The project does sound interesting, but with anonymous dev I'm afraid I''m out.
Shame, I was looking forward to this one.
You won't raise really big numbers anonymously. There's no way I'd invest a lot of btc without having some way to hold the lead dev accountable. I guess you will still raise a fair amount, but nowhere near what you could have done imo.
Shame, I was looking forward to this one.
You won't raise really big numbers anonymously. There's no way I'd invest a lot of btc without having some way to hold the lead dev accountable. I guess you will still raise a fair amount, but nowhere near what you could have done imo.
jl777 has nearly three years of reputation established, being anon is an advantage ... can't be closed down, so far less regulatory risk
It's a also a history of incomplete projects, building one ICO on top of another with promises of future functionality and utility at every step that have never been delivered.
I'm not saying this is just ICO milking, but anonymity is certainly not an advantage in this case imo. I can only speak from my own perspective, but I would have put a lot into a project like this, now at best I'd throw a bitcoin or two at it. I'm sure I'm not the only one.
