I would have to agree with this & thank you as well, to many new coin ANN's are started with bad code or viruses. As someone who likes to test them all, it's very helpful to have someone to review the code for what most aren't able to find. Honest coins even paid bounties to have their code reviewed, showing trust & that it's safe to use. Yes, I understand that Bittrex has security knowledge & even they have a tough time with some of it till it's too late. I'm referring to the stuff that is easy to spot & saving the few people before the ANN is deleted, or they invest & mine it to find out hours/days/weeks down the road.[/center]
Since the source code has been published, everybody can view it. That's why I've published the sources, not the binaries only. What's the problem? The problem is a bounty for reviewing?
I've build the wallet without any problems/errors on my Ubuntu, and now I have a problem. What settings for 7950? I've mined scrypt and qubit on my GPU before, I've never tried X11. May I use the same sph-sgminer I use to mine qubit? Is it worth trying solo-mining (low diff)?
The one who wants to use it, should have some skills, too 
). So there is no reason to mark him as a scammer preemptively. Anybody with a half of a brain may see that this is a new account and one should treat everything that dev releases with caution. But marking him as a scammer is just bullshit.