[ANN]Launched ::: AMBER Coin ::: X11 PoW/PoS - page 7.

marada

sr. member

Activity: 442

Merit: 250

Quote from: Amph on August 17, 2014, 10:55:21 AM

binary only isn't good at all, small miners must wait for pool owners(also bad distribution not everyone can compile, on windows is problematic too), and big pool can instamine the shit out of this crap

binary and qt together are mandatory for any coin

and instamining is relative, a big hash(renting hash) can "instamine" at diff 10 for example...

It is not really unfair people get something for what they can do rather than for how much do they have!

I don't know how could it prevent small miners, unless you are talking about the size of their brains.

No vendor-related binaries are mandatory. Only the sources are mandatory (unless you make a closed source coin).

The same no AMD or NVIDIA miner is mandatory, it is only expected by miners using this kind of stuff.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: marada on August 17, 2014, 10:37:40 AM

Quote from: Amph on August 17, 2014, 10:24:36 AM

Quote from: marada on August 17, 2014, 10:19:03 AM

Quote from: Amph on August 17, 2014, 10:03:05 AM

Quote from: btcshare on August 17, 2014, 09:59:05 AM

with -6 trust ,You're kidding? Huh

it's not like that without the neg trust he become suddently trustable, with that newbie account he have....

It seems to be just because CanaryInTheMine condescended to look up here, demand releasing the sources BEFORE the launch and when it did not happen posted his negative comment.

The only what is really amazing is why just this time? I have seen hundreds of coin launches and the wallet was never released before the launch.
Moreover it was a common practise not to release sources even an hour after the launch, just on pools demands. Binaries only (what is really bad, I can not mine in such cases).

This dev released the sources... and has got that!

It is very much unfair unless he do the same with all others devs who didn't release the sources before launch (90%+ of launches here).

it might be because he have free time now, and because of all the recent scam, in any case this is a bad launch with only the source and no compiled qt

I don't think the launch is bad because of not releasing binary wallet! I think this is much better than binaries only.
Well, it may prevent some morons from early mining and give an extra reward for those who can build it fast themselves!

I think the reason behind this really "special treatment" could be another coin being in his interest, maybe launched nearby...

binary only isn't good at all, small miners must wait for pool owners(also bad distribution not everyone can compile, on windows is problematic too), and big pool can instamine the shit out of this crap

binary and qt together are mandatory for any coin

and instamining is relative, a big hash(renting hash) can "instamine" at diff 10 for example...

MadGhost

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!

launch is good but that is not the only thing that decides the coins future.

marada

sr. member

Activity: 442

Merit: 250

Quote from: Amph on August 17, 2014, 10:24:36 AM

Quote from: marada on August 17, 2014, 10:19:03 AM

Quote from: Amph on August 17, 2014, 10:03:05 AM

Quote from: btcshare on August 17, 2014, 09:59:05 AM

with -6 trust ,You're kidding? Huh

it's not like that without the neg trust he become suddently trustable, with that newbie account he have....

It seems to be just because CanaryInTheMine condescended to look up here, demand releasing the sources BEFORE the launch and when it did not happen posted his negative comment.

The only what is really amazing is why just this time? I have seen hundreds of coin launches and the wallet was never released before the launch.
Moreover it was a common practise not to release sources even an hour after the launch, just on pools demands. Binaries only (what is really bad, I can not mine in such cases).

This dev released the sources... and has got that!

It is very much unfair unless he do the same with all others devs who didn't release the sources before launch (90%+ of launches here).

it might be because he have free time now, and because of all the recent scam, in any case this is a bad launch with only the source and no compiled qt

I don't think the launch is bad because of not releasing binary wallet! I think this is much better than binaries only.
Well, it may prevent some morons from early mining and give an extra reward for those who can build it fast themselves!

I think the reason behind this really "special treatment" could be another coin being in his interest, maybe launched nearby...

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: marada on August 17, 2014, 10:19:03 AM

Quote from: Amph on August 17, 2014, 10:03:05 AM

Quote from: btcshare on August 17, 2014, 09:59:05 AM

with -6 trust ,You're kidding? Huh

it's not like that without the neg trust he become suddently trustable, with that newbie account he have....

It seems to be just because CanaryInTheMine condescended to look up here, demand releasing the sources BEFORE the launch and when it did not happen posted his negative comment.

The only what is really amazing is why just this time? I have seen hundreds of coin launches and the wallet was never released before the launch.
Moreover it was a common practise not to release sources even an hour after the launch, just on pools demands. Binaries only (what is really bad, I can not mine in such cases).

This dev released the sources... and has got that!

It is very much unfair unless he do the same with all others devs who didn't release the sources before launch (90%+ of launches here).

it might be because he have free time now, and because of all the recent scam, in any case this is a bad lauch with only the source and no compiled qt

marada

sr. member

Activity: 442

Merit: 250

Quote from: Amph on August 17, 2014, 10:03:05 AM

Quote from: btcshare on August 17, 2014, 09:59:05 AM

with -6 trust ,You're kidding? Huh

it's not like that without the neg trust he become suddently trustable, with that newbie account he have....

It seems to be just because CanaryInTheMine condescended to look up here, demand releasing the sources BEFORE the launch and when it did not happen posted his negative comment.

The only what is really amazing is why just this time? I have seen hundreds of coin launches and the wallet was never released before the launch.
Moreover it was a common practise not to release sources even an hour after the launch, just on pools demands. Binaries only (what is really bad, I can not mine in such cases).

This dev released the sources... and has got that!

It is very much unfair unless he do the same with all others devs who didn't release the sources before launch (90%+ of launches here).

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: btcshare on August 17, 2014, 09:59:05 AM

with -6 trust ,You're kidding? Huh

it's not like that without the neg trust he become suddently trustable, with that newbie account he have....

marada

sr. member

Activity: 442

Merit: 250

There is first pool for this coin.
See OP.

btcshare

member

Activity: 65

Merit: 10

with -6 trust ,You're kidding? Huh

CryptoHypno

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 101

Sometimes Your Coins Just Hypnotize Me!

Quote from: amber_gold on August 17, 2014, 09:52:35 AM

I'd like to summarize the facts about the code and launch.

Yes, there is no binary wallet at launch, but everyone can build it from the sources. This is a bit geeky coin, maybe not for everyone. If anybody is scared that the code wasn't reviewed - he can launch it in a virtual machine, won't hurt anybody.

I have released the code before the launch (to test it on another machines) but someone started premining before the official launch, so I had to modify and upload again (this is the anti-Croatian-patch, because this guy's IP is from Zagreb, Croatia).

Nearly all the devs release the code or binaries at the launchtime. It very often happens that binaries are released before the sources, but I appreciate the idea of open source. You earn coins not just with your hardware but also with your skills.
That's why there's a bounty for those who have skills and will build the binaries for the rest of community.

The issue is that your "bounty" is worthless. 50 coins? How about offering 50,000 coins. Even then you'd have trouble finding someone with enough interest to help you.

amber_gold

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

I'd like to summarize the facts about the code and launch.

Yes, there is no binary wallet at launch, but everyone can build it from the sources. This is a bit geeky coin, maybe not for everyone. If anybody is scared that the code wasn't reviewed - he can launch it in a virtual machine, won't hurt anybody.

I have released the code before the launch (to test it on another machines) but someone started premining before the official launch, so I had to modify and upload again (this is the anti-Croatian-patch, because this guy's IP is from Zagreb, Croatia).

Nearly all the devs release the code or binaries at the launchtime. It very often happens that binaries are released before the sources, but I appreciate the idea of open source. You earn coins not just with your hardware but also with your skills.
That's why there's a bounty for those who have skills and will build the binaries for the rest of community.

kevin486

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: amber_gold on August 17, 2014, 09:41:44 AM

There is a bounty for Mac OS X and Windows wallet binary. Who would like to compile them for the community can earn 50 AMBER per each.

Really a joke... Never see a new coin lunch like this.

CanaryInTheMine

donator

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1060

between a rock and a block!

Quote from: gjhiggins on August 17, 2014, 09:34:26 AM

Quote from: CanaryInTheMine on August 17, 2014, 09:14:28 AM

Code should be reviewed by community before launch. Otherwise, don't release on bitcointalk forums.

To which “community” do you refer? And could you give a few more details about the review process you're insisting upon?

(Just because you paid several BTC for your Hero account doesn't entitle you to throw your weight around unilaterally.)

Cheers

Graham

You can find a lot of good info in Meta, like how you don't buy Hero accounts:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/forum-rankspositionsbadges-what-do-those-shiny-coins-under-my-name-mean-178608

CryptoHypno

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 101

Sometimes Your Coins Just Hypnotize Me!

Quote from: amber_gold on August 17, 2014, 09:41:44 AM

There is a bounty for Mac OS X and Windows wallet binary. Who would like to compile them for the community can earn 50 AMBER per each.

Wow, a whole 50 amber???

amber_gold

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

There is a bounty for Mac OS X and Windows wallet binary. Who would like to compile them for the community can earn 50 AMBER per each.

Zerotenine

member

Activity: 114

Merit: 10

Quote from: CanaryInTheMine on August 17, 2014, 09:14:28 AM

Quote from: ZacharyComstock on August 17, 2014, 09:04:13 AM

Quote from: CanaryInTheMine on August 17, 2014, 08:52:39 AM

Release source code first.

You seem to misunderstand how coin launches work. If developers release source it will mean a launch. Unless you are willing to review the source code by yourself in private

Quote

OP with negative rating , worst launch .

Since CanaryInTheMine has found altcoin section all launches going to have negative rating devs (or at least ones that CanaryInTheMine will spot on his free time)

No really... Where's github link with commit history etc?

Uploading code at "release" is bull defecation. Newbie accounts?

Code should be reviewed by community before launch. Otherwise, don't release on bitcointalk forums.
Setup your own coin's forum.

Good said!Too many scum coins are around,and lot of noobs loosing their money and getting debt because of these scumers...

ZacharyComstock

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 102

Quote from: gjhiggins on August 17, 2014, 09:34:26 AM

Quote from: CanaryInTheMine on August 17, 2014, 09:14:28 AM

Code should be reviewed by community before launch. Otherwise, don't release on bitcointalk forums.

To which “community” do you refer? And could you give a few more details about the review process you're insisting upon?

(Just because you paid several BTC for your Hero account doesn't entitle you to throw your weight around unilaterally.)

Cheers

Graham

Unfortunately CanaryInTheMine seem to have faint understanding of what is going on here

gjhiggins

legendary

Activity: 2254

Merit: 1290

Quote from: CanaryInTheMine on August 17, 2014, 09:14:28 AM

Code should be reviewed by community before launch. Otherwise, don't release on bitcointalk forums.

To which “community” do you refer? And could you give a few more details about the review process you're insisting upon?

(Just because you paid several BTC for your Hero account doesn't entitle you to throw your weight around unilaterally.)

Cheers

Graham

CanaryInTheMine

donator

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1060

between a rock and a block!

Quote from: amber_gold on August 17, 2014, 09:16:45 AM

The trust rating was intended for trade. I haven't made any trade.
It seems someone abuses this as I have got all the negatives just after launching the coin!

It was.... from my Trust summary:

Quote

User Date Risked BTC amount
CanaryInTheMine 2014-08-17 0.00000000

@marada:
Yes, the number of coins includes all the coins possible, POW and POS. It is quite common that devs claim the POW coin amount as total, but I want to be fair. There will be 1000*100+49000*50=2550000 coins n PoW period. The rest will be in the PoW/PoS period.

A big glory to those who are solo-mining! You are tough cookies, guys!

Have you gotten familiar with Trust yet?
Read here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/marketplace-trust-211858

kevin486

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

So you don't even have an executable windows exe wallet, and you called it as a launch?

Kidding me, nude?

Topic: [ANN]Launched ::: AMBER Coin ::: X11 PoW/PoS - page 7. (Read 26771 times)