Liberty Coin. I asked a genuine question. You spend so much energy and time defending the haters and trolls, yet won't post any info regarding the progress of your coin, or at least communication in a positive way.
Please spend just 2 minutes advising how your coder friend is progressing if at all.
Topic: [ANN][LIBERTYCOIN][XLB] v1.0.3.0 | X11 | 100% POS | No IPO | No Premine | - page 51. (Read 359881 times)
May 29, 2014, 11:25:51 PM
May 29, 2014, 11:24:00 PM
Who cares how many coins have the developers? Even if 99%. The value of the coins is not in the holders!
Seriously?*IF* - I have no idea - *IF* they hold 99% of the coins it makes them worthless.
Currency is oil in the engine.
No oil, the engine freezes solid and the car goes nowhere, it stops.
Without liquidity and free movement of a currency, it is worthless.
If the currency supply is limitted, the price *should* go up, but only once it is in circulation.
It's not called currency by accident. It is a direct refence to the current of a river, with lakes (banks), pools (accounts), waterfalls (market drops), slow meandering loops (low interest rates) and fast flowing shallow sections (everybody wants more).
Holding 99% of the coins and depriving the market of circulation means it becomes worthless - a stagnant pond with no inlet or outlet.
It's at 1500 now, from 1800 earlier.
The coin was not premined, the network reached 80gh/s in pow phase and the algorith is X11, not Scrypt, so we would need thousands of GPU's to 'instamine' it. Saying Libertycoin was instamined is nonsense.
My personal info isn't secret. I can give it to you if you ask, and it's even published in the main thread, so as you can see I have nothing to hide.
Sure...
As I said I don't have anything to hide.
Iconic Expert was the only one who lied about anon been ready, and he's no longer involved in this coin, so I suggest you blame him.
I didn't understand, sorry, please explain again. :/
Sure, what do you need?
We need to see the dev team is really doing sth
May 29, 2014, 11:23:28 PM
Who cares how many coins have the developers? Even if 99%. The value of the coins is not in the holders!
Seriously?*IF* - I have no idea - *IF* they hold 99% of the coins it makes them worthless.
Currency is oil in the engine.
No oil, the engine freezes solid and the car goes nowhere, it stops.
Without liquidity and free movement of a currency, it is worthless.
If the currency supply is limitted, the price *should* go up, but only once it is in circulation.
It's not called currency by accident. It is a direct refence to the current of a river, with lakes (banks), pools (accounts), waterfalls (market drops), slow meandering loops (low interest rates) and fast flowing shallow sections (everybody wants more).
Holding 99% of the coins and depriving the market of circulation means it becomes worthless - a stagnant pond with no inlet or outlet.
It's at 1500 now, from 1800 earlier.
The coin was not premined, the network reached 80gh/s in pow phase and the algorith is X11, not Scrypt, so we would need thousands of GPU's to 'instamine' it. Saying Libertycoin was instamined is nonsense.
My personal info isn't secret. I can give it to you if you ask, and it's even published in the main thread, so as you can see I have nothing to hide.
Sure...
As I said I don't have anything to hide.
Iconic Expert was the only one who lied about anon been ready, and he's no longer involved in this coin, so I suggest you blame him.
I didn't understand, sorry, please explain again. :/
Sure, what do you need?
May 29, 2014, 11:22:40 PM
dont feed them, a few posts ago he was threatening you. Just ignore the trolls and focus on serious questions
May 29, 2014, 11:20:49 PM
Who cares how many coins have the developers? Even if 99%. The value of the coins is not in the holders!
Seriously?*IF* - I have no idea - *IF* they hold 99% of the coins it makes them worthless.
Currency is oil in the engine.
No oil, the engine freezes solid and the car goes nowhere, it stops.
Without liquidity and free movement of a currency, it is worthless.
If the currency supply is limitted, the price *should* go up, but only once it is in circulation.
It's not called currency by accident. It is a direct refence to the current of a river, with lakes (banks), pools (accounts), waterfalls (market drops), slow meandering loops (low interest rates) and fast flowing shallow sections (everybody wants more).
Holding 99% of the coins and depriving the market of circulation means it becomes worthless - a stagnant pond with no inlet or outlet.
It's at 1500 now, from 1800 earlier.
The coin was not premined, the network reached 80gh/s in pow phase and the algorith is X11, not Scrypt, so we would need thousands of GPU's to 'instamine' it. Saying Libertycoin was instamined is nonsense.
My personal info isn't secret. I can give it to you if you ask, and it's even published in the main thread, so as you can see I have nothing to hide.
Sure...
As I said I don't have anything to hide.
Iconic Expert was the only one who lied about anon been ready, and he's no longer involved in this coin, so I suggest you blame him.
I didn't understand, sorry, please explain again. :/
Sure, what do you need?
May 29, 2014, 11:17:49 PM
Who cares how many coins have the developers? Even if 99%. The value of the coins is not in the holders!
Seriously?*IF* - I have no idea - *IF* they hold 99% of the coins it makes them worthless.
Currency is oil in the engine.
No oil, the engine freezes solid and the car goes nowhere, it stops.
Without liquidity and free movement of a currency, it is worthless.
If the currency supply is limitted, the price *should* go up, but only once it is in circulation.
It's not called currency by accident. It is a direct refence to the current of a river, with lakes (banks), pools (accounts), waterfalls (market drops), slow meandering loops (low interest rates) and fast flowing shallow sections (everybody wants more).
Holding 99% of the coins and depriving the market of circulation means it becomes worthless - a stagnant pond with no inlet or outlet.
It's at 1500 now, from 1800 earlier.
The coin was not premined, the network reached 80gh/s in pow phase and the algorith is X11, not Scrypt, so we would need thousands of GPU's to 'instamine' it. Saying Libertycoin was instamined is nonsense.
My personal info isn't secret. I can give it to you if you ask, and it's even published in the main thread, so as you can see I have nothing to hide.
Sure...
As I said I don't have anything to hide.
Iconic Expert was the only one who lied about anon been ready, and he's no longer involved in this coin, so I suggest you blame him.
I didn't understand, sorry, please explain again. :/
May 29, 2014, 11:16:59 PM
Who cares how many coins have the developers? Even if 99%. The value of the coins is not in the holders!
Seriously?*IF* - I have no idea - *IF* they hold 99% of the coins it makes them worthless.
Currency is oil in the engine.
No oil, the engine freezes solid and the car goes nowhere, it stops.
Without liquidity and free movement of a currency, it is worthless.
If the currency supply is limitted, the price *should* go up, but only once it is in circulation.
It's not called currency by accident. It is a direct refence to the current of a river, with lakes (banks), pools (accounts), waterfalls (market drops), slow meandering loops (low interest rates) and fast flowing shallow sections (everybody wants more).
Holding 99% of the coins and depriving the market of circulation means it becomes worthless - a stagnant pond with no inlet or outlet.
It's at 1500 now, from 1800 earlier.
The coin was not premined, the network reached 80gh/s in pow phase and the algorith is X11, not Scrypt, so we would need thousands of GPU's to 'instamine' it. Saying Libertycoin was instamined is nonsense.
My personal info isn't secret. I can give it to you if you ask, and it's even published in the main thread, so as you can see I have nothing to hide.
Sure...
As I said I don't have anything to hide.
Iconic Expert was the only one who lied about anon been ready, and he's no longer involved in this coin, so I suggest you blame him.
I didn't understand, sorry, please explain again. :/
We have never given an specific date. The only one who did that was Iconic Expert, and he's no longer involved in this coins. I suggest you blame him.
May 29, 2014, 11:15:09 PM
Who cares how many coins have the developers? Even if 99%. The value of the coins is not in the holders!
Seriously?*IF* - I have no idea - *IF* they hold 99% of the coins it makes them worthless.
Currency is oil in the engine.
No oil, the engine freezes solid and the car goes nowhere, it stops.
Without liquidity and free movement of a currency, it is worthless.
If the currency supply is limitted, the price *should* go up, but only once it is in circulation.
It's not called currency by accident. It is a direct refence to the current of a river, with lakes (banks), pools (accounts), waterfalls (market drops), slow meandering loops (low interest rates) and fast flowing shallow sections (everybody wants more).
Holding 99% of the coins and depriving the market of circulation means it becomes worthless - a stagnant pond with no inlet or outlet.
It's at 1500 now, from 1800 earlier.
The coin was not premined, the network reached 80gh/s in pow phase and the algorith is X11, not Scrypt, so we would need thousands of GPU's to 'instamine' it. Saying Libertycoin was instamined is nonsense.
My personal info isn't secret. I can give it to you if you ask, and it's even published in the main thread, so as you can see I have nothing to hide.
Sure...
As I said I don't have anything to hide.
Iconic Expert was the only one who lied about anon been ready, and he's no longer involved in this coin, so I suggest you blame him.
I didn't understand, sorry, please explain again. :/
May 29, 2014, 11:13:44 PM
To all haters just sell all your coins in the exchange then move to other coins. You save yourself time and somebody will get cheap coins.
+1
May 29, 2014, 11:12:41 PM
I had posted the screenshots shown that it is fake the cooperation of the DEV and the Chinese IT company.
and I doubted that whether they are in the development of anonymity wallet and the day June 1st they mentioned in their earlier posts.
They deleted most of my posts.
and I doubted that whether they are in the development of anonymity wallet and the day June 1st they mentioned in their earlier posts.
They deleted most of my posts.
Yes, it's totally false. We are no longer working with a Chinese company, because we cannot trust Polzki, so we are developing it by our own.
It's hard work to do the development, hope for your success.
me, shut up from now.
Thanks
May 29, 2014, 11:12:23 PM
I had posted the screenshots shown that it is fake the cooperation of the DEV and the Chinese IT company.
and I doubted that whether they are in the development of anonymity wallet and the day June 1st they mentioned in their earlier posts.
They deleted most of my posts.
and I doubted that whether they are in the development of anonymity wallet and the day June 1st they mentioned in their earlier posts.
They deleted most of my posts.
The Dev was not the one who said they were going to contact the Chinese, it was another member of the community. He turned out to be lying about who he knew. You can't blame the Dev of Libertycoin for trying to reach out to all possible avenues to implement anon. It is still being figured out. This is basically an alpha test. So give them some time and let them do their thing. The more they have to answer people every 5 minutes, the less time they are developing things. Let the Dev dev! YAY!
btw, obvious alt acct is obvious
May 29, 2014, 11:12:06 PM
I had posted the screenshots shown that it is fake the cooperation of the DEV and the Chinese IT company.
and I doubted that whether they are in the development of anonymity wallet and the day June 1st they mentioned in their earlier posts.
They deleted most of my posts.
and I doubted that whether they are in the development of anonymity wallet and the day June 1st they mentioned in their earlier posts.
They deleted most of my posts.
Yes, it's totally false. We are no longer working with a Chinese company, because we cannot trust Polzki, so we are developing it by our own.
It's hard work to do the development, hope for your success.
me, shut up from now.
May 29, 2014, 11:10:44 PM
Who cares how many coins have the developers? Even if 99%. The value of the coins is not in the holders!
Seriously?*IF* - I have no idea - *IF* they hold 99% of the coins it makes them worthless.
Currency is oil in the engine.
No oil, the engine freezes solid and the car goes nowhere, it stops.
Without liquidity and free movement of a currency, it is worthless.
If the currency supply is limitted, the price *should* go up, but only once it is in circulation.
It's not called currency by accident. It is a direct refence to the current of a river, with lakes (banks), pools (accounts), waterfalls (market drops), slow meandering loops (low interest rates) and fast flowing shallow sections (everybody wants more).
Holding 99% of the coins and depriving the market of circulation means it becomes worthless - a stagnant pond with no inlet or outlet.
It's at 1500 now, from 1800 earlier.
The coin was not premined, the network reached 80gh/s in pow phase and the algorith is X11, not Scrypt, so we would need thousands of GPU's to 'instamine' it. Saying Libertycoin was instamined is nonsense.
My personal info isn't secret. I can give it to you if you ask, and it's even published in the main thread, so as you can see I have nothing to hide.
Sure...
As I said I don't have anything to hide.
Iconic Expert was the only one who lied about anon been ready, and he's no longer involved in this coin, so I suggest you blame him.
I didn't understand, sorry, please explain again. :/
May 29, 2014, 11:08:54 PM
Who cares how many coins have the developers? Even if 99%. The value of the coins is not in the holders!
Seriously?*IF* - I have no idea - *IF* they hold 99% of the coins it makes them worthless.
Currency is oil in the engine.
No oil, the engine freezes solid and the car goes nowhere, it stops.
Without liquidity and free movement of a currency, it is worthless.
If the currency supply is limitted, the price *should* go up, but only once it is in circulation.
It's not called currency by accident. It is a direct refence to the current of a river, with lakes (banks), pools (accounts), waterfalls (market drops), slow meandering loops (low interest rates) and fast flowing shallow sections (everybody wants more).
Holding 99% of the coins and depriving the market of circulation means it becomes worthless - a stagnant pond with no inlet or outlet.
It's at 1500 now, from 1800 earlier.
The coin was not premined, the network reached 80gh/s in pow phase and the algorith is X11, not Scrypt, so we would need thousands of GPU's to 'instamine' it. Saying Libertycoin was instamined is nonsense.
My personal info isn't secret. I can give it to you if you ask, and it's even published in the main thread, so as you can see I have nothing to hide.
Sure...
As I said I don't have anything to hide.
Iconic Expert was the only one who lied about anon been ready, and he's no longer involved in this coin, so I suggest you blame him.
May 29, 2014, 11:07:30 PM
To all haters just sell all your coins in the exchange then move to other coins. You save yourself time and somebody will get cheap coins.
May 29, 2014, 11:06:22 PM
I had posted the screenshots shown that it is fake the cooperation of the DEV and the Chinese IT company.
and I doubted that whether they are in the development of anonymity wallet and the day June 1st they mentioned in their earlier posts.
They deleted most of my posts.
and I doubted that whether they are in the development of anonymity wallet and the day June 1st they mentioned in their earlier posts.
They deleted most of my posts.
Yes, it's totally false. We are no longer working with a Chinese company, because we cannot trust Polzki, so we are developing it by our own.
May 29, 2014, 11:04:30 PM
I had posted the screenshots shown that it is fake the cooperation of the DEV and the Chinese IT company.
and I doubted that whether they are in the development of anonymity wallet and the day June 1st they mentioned in their earlier posts.
They deleted most of my posts.
and I doubted that whether they are in the development of anonymity wallet and the day June 1st they mentioned in their earlier posts.
They deleted most of my posts.
May 29, 2014, 11:01:38 PM
Leberty Coin.... A LOT of damage has been done. The big thing the community is looking for is the Anon. You say no dates, as you don't want to make false promises. I get that. BUT.... we all would like something a bit more specific as to who this friend of gib is, and a time frame. Just to say "no dates" only adds ammunition for the haters.
Please give more details to keep the faith of the guys left.
Please give more details to keep the faith of the guys left.
May 29, 2014, 10:59:44 PM
"Shortly after however, a message was posted on the BitcoinTalk forums , allegedly by someone who hacked the original LIbertyCoin BitcoinTalk account, and told everyone IconicExpert was no longer part of XLB because of his previous BlackCoin shenanigans.
For those of you unaware, IconicExpert had organised a BlackCoin event and collected roughly $13,000 in donations to get the event funded. However, the event never took place, and people didn’t get their money back either (yet?)."
http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/2014/5/28/libertycoin-prices-slashed-after-internal-finger-pointing-and-controversy?utm_content=bufferc40e4&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
For those of you unaware, IconicExpert had organised a BlackCoin event and collected roughly $13,000 in donations to get the event funded. However, the event never took place, and people didn’t get their money back either (yet?)."
http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/2014/5/28/libertycoin-prices-slashed-after-internal-finger-pointing-and-controversy?utm_content=bufferc40e4&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
May 29, 2014, 10:56:03 PM
Who cares how many coins have the developers? Even if 99%. The value of the coins is not in the holders!
Seriously?*IF* - I have no idea - *IF* they hold 99% of the coins it makes them worthless.
Currency is oil in the engine.
No oil, the engine freezes solid and the car goes nowhere, it stops.
Without liquidity and free movement of a currency, it is worthless.
If the currency supply is limitted, the price *should* go up, but only once it is in circulation.
It's not called currency by accident. It is a direct refence to the current of a river, with lakes (banks), pools (accounts), waterfalls (market drops), slow meandering loops (low interest rates) and fast flowing shallow sections (everybody wants more).
Holding 99% of the coins and depriving the market of circulation means it becomes worthless - a stagnant pond with no inlet or outlet.
It's at 1500 now, from 1800 earlier.
The coin was not premined, the network reached 80gh/s in pow phase and the algorith is X11, not Scrypt, so we would need thousands of GPU's to 'instamine' it. Saying Libertycoin was instamined is nonsense.
My personal info isn't secret. I can give it to you if you ask, and it's even published in the main thread, so as you can see I have nothing to hide.
Sure...
As I said I don't have anything to hide.
Iconic Expert was the only one who lied about anon been ready, and he's no longer involved in this coin, so I suggest you blame him.
Jump to: