Hi, guys. Installing DAPPs in testnet web-wallet is not works? Or I do something wrong?
I login, click "DAPP store", click "Lisk Guestbook", click install, input the password for current account and get error: "Incorrect master password".
Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 1934. (Read 3074324 times)
March 28, 2016, 10:45:44 AM
March 28, 2016, 10:44:08 AM
Ooohh ! Cryptsy.com update...
March 28, 2016, 10:37:47 AM
Presumably the block forger maintains the active delegate list?
What mechanism changes the active delegate list?
The approval. Every round (~17 minutes) Lisk checks the approval rates and re-arranges all delegates automatically.
What mechanism changes the active delegate list?
The approval. Every round (~17 minutes) Lisk checks the approval rates and re-arranges all delegates automatically.
Thanks for the answers again. Just a word of advice: To flourish, Lisk will need to appeal to more than a crypto/developer support base. It will need also to appeal to lay people from people in the investment and commercial worlds like myself. I'm asking these questions as I don't know what "Lisk" means?
March 28, 2016, 10:34:32 AM
...
If you think that giving plenty of money will motivate people to secure the network, you are already screwed. How could you seriously think that this is not a centralized system?
...
If you think that giving plenty of money will motivate people to secure the network, you are already screwed. How could you seriously think that this is not a centralized system?
...
It's works in Eth, Dash, etc. Why isn't work in Lisk? Money is a great motivator. The main question how is it works in details. I don't like the current system. I think it less secure then Dash masternodes or Eth POW or delegates with 1 money 1 vote 1 delegate.
And Crypti doesn't have same revenue and what? The big part of nodes was installed one person.
March 28, 2016, 10:33:07 AM
You can now validate your passphrases on the ICO website. We will post a more detailed guide later this evening.
Please be 100% sure you insert the exact same passphrase as the ICO website gave you!
We also made a few other changes. They will be mentioned in the guide later.
March 28, 2016, 10:31:34 AM
Anyone have a guess on when we can actually hold the LISK we bought? Instead of having it sit on someone else's server?
11th April .. and there is not any server :/ the dev team should still create the genesis block !
March 28, 2016, 10:30:21 AM
Honestly guys, this delegate idea is the worst thing I have ever seen on this forum. If you think that giving plenty of money will motivate people to secure the network, you are already screwed. How could you seriously think that this is not a centralized system? God, I really thought that the Lisk concept was good at the beginning (I took part of the ICO) but now I see myself dump this already dead coin during the first bump.
Since this is your first post on this forum, I'm taking your word for it
I just created my account to post this. Not posting 10 times a day does not mean you are not part of the altcoin ecosystem, anyway I am not here to justify the validity of my opinion (basing yours on the number of posts is at least less valid though). Still, I though Lisk had a great potential but now with this shitty idea, I give it less less than 2 years to disappear.
hey look it's a talking shit head! eats with his ass and shits out his mouth! wow!
mmm debating with 12yo wankers is one of the reasons I never had to create an account... my bad for having done it anyway
March 28, 2016, 10:25:49 AM
Anyone have a guess on when we can actually hold the LISK we bought? Instead of having it sit on someone else's server?
Dude, we fucking answer this question like every single page. Anyone have a guess when idiots like you will read a few pages back instead of asking this very question every single page?
March 28, 2016, 10:24:18 AM
Anyone have a guess on when we can actually hold the LISK we bought? Instead of having it sit on someone else's server?
March 28, 2016, 10:21:42 AM
Honestly guys, this delegate idea is the worst thing I have ever seen on this forum. If you think that giving plenty of money will motivate people to secure the network, you are already screwed. How could you seriously think that this is not a centralized system? God, I really thought that the Lisk concept was good at the beginning (I took part of the ICO) but now I see myself dump this already dead coin during the first bump.
Since this is your first post on this forum, I'm taking your word for it
I just created my account to post this. Not posting 10 times a day does not mean you are not part of the altcoin ecosystem, anyway I am not here to justify the validity of my opinion (basing yours on the number of posts is at least less valid though). Still, I though Lisk had a great potential but now with this shitty idea, I give it less less than 2 years to disappear.
March 28, 2016, 10:15:35 AM
Honestly guys, this delegate idea is the worst thing I have ever seen on this forum. If you think that giving plenty of money will motivate people to secure the network, you are already screwed. How could you seriously think that this is not a centralized system? God, I really thought that the Lisk concept was good at the beginning (I took part of the ICO) but now I see myself dump this already dead coin during the first bump.
Since this is your first post on this forum, I'm taking your word for it
March 28, 2016, 10:14:41 AM
Honestly guys, this delegate idea is the worst thing I have ever seen on this forum. If you think that giving plenty of money will motivate people to secure the network, you are already screwed. How could you seriously think that this is not a centralized system? God, I really thought that the Lisk concept was good at the beginning (I took part of the ICO) but now I see myself dump this already dead coin during the first bump.
March 28, 2016, 10:14:32 AM
I'm curently finalizing the testnet node security.
Do you want the node to be accesible from TOR ?
I ask because on some of my servers I use dynamic autoban of TOR exit nodes to prevent DDOS by TOR.
I think that active delegate node won't be using TOR, it would be too slow, so I don't see a problem with active delegate blocking those IP. Do you ?
Do you want the node to be accesible from TOR ?
I ask because on some of my servers I use dynamic autoban of TOR exit nodes to prevent DDOS by TOR.
I think that active delegate node won't be using TOR, it would be too slow, so I don't see a problem with active delegate blocking those IP. Do you ?
March 28, 2016, 10:11:50 AM
Wonder if this will take off.
March 28, 2016, 10:09:47 AM
Hypothetically.. if I own 2 million lisk. And I create 33 separate accounts with nodes off 1 computer. Then vote for my nodes.. then I am going to secure all of them with the weight of my vote. I'm not a pessimist but I doubt even 60% of people in the ICO will vote.
If I am right and this can happen.. it almost definitely will happen because of greed. But it doesn't help secure the network. Please revise your plans on delegates and come up with a better formula. I said it before about having a calculation involved when it comes to voting.
If I am right and this can happen.. it almost definitely will happen because of greed. But it doesn't help secure the network. Please revise your plans on delegates and come up with a better formula. I said it before about having a calculation involved when it comes to voting.
March 28, 2016, 10:00:46 AM
So if your uptime is 1% and your approval is greater than delegate 101 then you remain an active delegate? If so what is the point of uptime?
Yes. The uptime is just a reference how good a delegate's node is performing. So if you see a node is performing really bad, you simply remove your votes from the delegate. So it isn't amongst the top 101.
Presumably the block forger maintains the active delegate list?
What mechanism changes the active delegate list?
The approval. Every round (~17 minutes) Lisk checks the approval rates and re-arranges all delegates automatically.
Yes. The uptime is just a reference how good a delegate's node is performing. So if you see a node is performing really bad, you simply remove your votes from the delegate. So it isn't amongst the top 101.
Presumably the block forger maintains the active delegate list?
What mechanism changes the active delegate list?
The approval. Every round (~17 minutes) Lisk checks the approval rates and re-arranges all delegates automatically.
March 28, 2016, 09:56:41 AM
As a non-technical LISK ICO holder I am struggling to understand the voting process. I've read most of these posts and Section B in the handbook and it's not entirely clear. In this thread I see a lot of confusion and questions. Part of the confusion is that the term "vote" is overloaded - seems to define both a measure of support and the act of giving support to a max of 33 delegates. Hence a "vote" can refer to both 0.00000001 Lisk and 1 Lisk.
It would be good if Section B was expanded to further explain
1) the process when a Lisk holder makes a vote (i.e. spends 1 Lisk) and how their holding affects the delegate approvals.
If a user makes a vote (spends 1 LISK) all the delegates he voted for receive the number of votes equally to the voters amount of LISK. E.g. if you own 1M LISK he will at the beginning get about 1% approval.
2) when do approvals change and when does the list of active delegates change
Every round they change, so about every 17 minutes.
3) when and how uptime changes the active delegate rankings
AFAIK the uptime is also updated every 17 minutes. However, the uptime is independent of the delegate rank. Only the amount the approval matters.
In the meantime could someone kindly answer the following: There are two LISK holders: HolderA (10 Lisk) and HolderB (200 Lisk) and 200 Delegates: Delegate1 ... Delegate200.
1) Presumably if HolderA votes for only Delegate1 then Delegate1 gets 1,000,000,000 votes, however, if HolderA votes for Delegate1 and Delegate2 then they both only get 500,000,000 votes?
Right now both receive 1,000,000,000 votes.
2) Presumably a holder can vote more than once a delegate round including withdrawing votes?
The vote always only has the power of your current LISK balance. You can't vote several times for 1 delegate, unless you remove your vote from him before.
3) Where are the approvals stored? In the blockchain?
Yes.
4) Presumably the block forger maintains the active delegate list?
What do you mean?
It would be good if Section B was expanded to further explain
1) the process when a Lisk holder makes a vote (i.e. spends 1 Lisk) and how their holding affects the delegate approvals.
If a user makes a vote (spends 1 LISK) all the delegates he voted for receive the number of votes equally to the voters amount of LISK. E.g. if you own 1M LISK he will at the beginning get about 1% approval.
2) when do approvals change and when does the list of active delegates change
Every round they change, so about every 17 minutes.
3) when and how uptime changes the active delegate rankings
AFAIK the uptime is also updated every 17 minutes. However, the uptime is independent of the delegate rank. Only the amount the approval matters.
In the meantime could someone kindly answer the following: There are two LISK holders: HolderA (10 Lisk) and HolderB (200 Lisk) and 200 Delegates: Delegate1 ... Delegate200.
1) Presumably if HolderA votes for only Delegate1 then Delegate1 gets 1,000,000,000 votes, however, if HolderA votes for Delegate1 and Delegate2 then they both only get 500,000,000 votes?
Right now both receive 1,000,000,000 votes.
2) Presumably a holder can vote more than once a delegate round including withdrawing votes?
The vote always only has the power of your current LISK balance. You can't vote several times for 1 delegate, unless you remove your vote from him before.
3) Where are the approvals stored? In the blockchain?
Yes.
4) Presumably the block forger maintains the active delegate list?
What do you mean?
Thanks for the answers - just some further clarification:
"3) when and how uptime changes the active delegate rankings
AFAIK the uptime is also updated every 17 minutes. However, the uptime is independent of the delegate rank. Only the amount the approval matters."
So if your uptime is 1% and your approval is greater than delegate 101 then you remain an active delegate? If so what is the point of uptime?
"4) Presumably the block forger maintains the active delegate list?
What do you mean?"
What mechanism changes the active delegate list?
March 28, 2016, 09:48:54 AM
Wrong. The amount raised is for Lisk development and not Crypti...
It is.
But I'm sure a new influx of developers will start using the Lisk codebase to update Crypti to the same levels.
Probably they're already buying up XCR, why else did the price rise op from 1300 Satoshi's to what it is now?
Well, considering the REALLY low volume i think the price flutuation doesnt mean anything at all.
Its moving like 10 btc/day, 1 random guy alone could make the price go up or down and wouldnt even need to put much effort into it.
March 28, 2016, 09:37:34 AM
Crypti and Lisk can coexist and collaborate which is a good thing imo!
After the ICO the Lisk-team holds about 80% of the total supply of Crypti if I remember it correctly. So, I would say Crypti is done because it's centralized now.
March 28, 2016, 09:35:27 AM
Crypti and Lisk can coexist and collaborate which is a good thing imo!
Jump to: