Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 297. (Read 3074324 times)

Quote from: corsaro on April 27, 2017, 08:17:53 AM

I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...

Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...

Does it make sense?
If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this.

atreides
cc001
corsaro
dakk
goldeneye
gr33ndrag0n
hmachado
liskit
MrV
ntelo
Phoenix1969
polycrypto
redsn0w
sgdias
theredhawk
vrlc92
wannabe_rotebaron

...and some more.
Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48

It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk.
And of course you can also vote for pools.

Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve.

Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates.

This is not the point, rather a decentralized network.
And cooperation is the best thing can happen to a project.
If everyone just makes his own thing then there is no community and then there is no support.

If you have interest in the success of Lisk then you should vote for good delegates depending on groups.

Cooperation don't means i vote you, you vote me or "if you vote me, you have to vote also..." you can understand what i mean.....
this is the kind of groups that i don't like......

Cheers

Oh man sorry... You don't understand the reality and the facts.
Most GDT members and some later ARK members are doing great things for Lisk's since February last year.
And this group not only found for a vote swap. These members have also come together to exchange experiences, code, tips and tricks, suggestions and ideas. These people have done more for Lisk than all the pools and all the elite members together.

But okay, vote whoever you want.

andreafs

member

Activity: 97

Merit: 10

The winner is:

BTT user: logocreator

1000LSK

Surprise:
Since we are very happy about this contest we want also reward all the participants that have spend time to partecipating with 100LSK

So the next step in the few days will be collecting all the LSK address and start rewarding the guys!

more info on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ligs-need-a-logo-win-1000-lsk-1842233

Vote for Lisk Italian Group ;-)
https://liskitaliangroup.github.io/

fulig
corsaro
ondin
gregorst
anamix
dakk
liskit
splatters
redsn0w

Thank you Corsaro for pointing it!
Here is the link of the contest on BTT!

I would also take the opportunity to show the progress to Liskit pool

The project was paused cause team problems and now I'm working on the back-end by myself even if I'm only a front-end dev!

So please let me know what do you think guys and consider to vote liskit and our group for our community commitment

cesmak

legendary

Activity: 1057

Merit: 1009

Quote from: techbytes on April 27, 2017, 08:00:51 AM

I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...

Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...

Does it make sense?
If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this.

atreides
cc001
corsaro
dakk
goldeneye
gr33ndrag0n
hmachado
liskit
MrV
ntelo
Phoenix1969
polycrypto
redsn0w
sgdias
theredhawk
vrlc92
wannabe_rotebaron

...and some more.
Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48

It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk.
And of course you can also vote for pools.

Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve.

Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates.

This is not the point, rather a decentralized network.
And cooperation is the best thing can happen to a project.
If everyone just makes his own thing then there is no community and then there is no support.

If you have interest in the success of Lisk then you should vote for good delegates depending on groups.

Cooperation don't means i vote you, you vote me or "if you vote me, you have to vote also..." you can understand what i mean.....
this is the kind of groups that i don't like......

Cheers

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...

Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...

Does it make sense?
If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this.

atreides
cc001
corsaro
dakk
goldeneye
gr33ndrag0n
hmachado
liskit
MrV
ntelo
Phoenix1969
polycrypto
redsn0w
sgdias
theredhawk
vrlc92
wannabe_rotebaron

...and some more.
Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48

It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk.
And of course you can also vote for pools.

Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve.

Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates.

This is not the point, rather a decentralized network.
And cooperation is the best thing can happen to a project.
If everyone just makes his own thing then there is no community and then there is no support.

If you have interest in the success of Lisk then you should vote for good delegates depending on groups.

On another note, update your signature, ARK v1.2.0 is out... Grin

-tb-

Yes you are right.
My Sig looks good I think. But the current versions in there are not the best idea if the devs work too fast

corsaro

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

The winner is:

BTT user: logocreator

1000LSK

Surprise:
Since we are very happy about this contest we want also reward all the participants that have spend time to partecipating with 100LSK

So the next step in the few days will be collecting all the LSK address and start rewarding the guys!

more info on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ligs-need-a-logo-win-1000-lsk-1842233

Vote for Lisk Italian Group ;-)
https://liskitaliangroup.github.io/

fulig
corsaro
ondin
gregorst
anamix
dakk
liskit
splatters
redsn0w

techbytes

legendary

Activity: 1694

Merit: 1054

Point. Click. Blockchain

I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...

Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...

Does it make sense?
If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this.

atreides
cc001
corsaro
dakk
goldeneye
gr33ndrag0n
hmachado
liskit
MrV
ntelo
Phoenix1969
polycrypto
redsn0w
sgdias
theredhawk
vrlc92
wannabe_rotebaron

...and some more.
Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48

It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk.
And of course you can also vote for pools.

Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve.

Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates.

This is not the point, rather a decentralized network.
And cooperation is the best thing can happen to a project.
If everyone just makes his own thing then there is no community and then there is no support.

If you have interest in the success of Lisk then you should vote for good delegates depending on groups.

On another note, update your signature, ARK v1.2.0 is out... Grin

-tb-

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

Quote from: corsaro on April 27, 2017, 03:48:39 AM

I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...

Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...

Does it make sense?
If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this.

atreides
cc001
corsaro
dakk
goldeneye
gr33ndrag0n
hmachado
liskit
MrV
ntelo
Phoenix1969
polycrypto
redsn0w
sgdias
theredhawk
vrlc92
wannabe_rotebaron

...and some more.
Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48

It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk.
And of course you can also vote for pools.

Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve.

Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates.

This is not the point, rather a decentralized network.
And cooperation is the best thing can happen to a project.
If everyone just makes his own thing then there is no community and then there is no support.

If you have interest in the success of Lisk then you should vote for good delegates depending on groups.

techbytes

legendary

Activity: 1694

Merit: 1054

Point. Click. Blockchain

lisk pool list updated...

- added techbytes and popcornbag to standby pools
- added idealisk to standby pools
- added samuray to active pools
- added thrice.pi_prometheus to standby pools

complete list here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18502957

Delegate techbytes (#118) is now sharing 50% forged Lisk to voters. So vote for techbytes if you want to earn some Lisk.

https://lisk.cryptopools.com/

-tb-

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...

Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...

Does it make sense?
If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this.

atreides
cc001
corsaro
dakk
goldeneye
gr33ndrag0n
hmachado
liskit
MrV
ntelo
Phoenix1969
polycrypto
redsn0w
sgdias
theredhawk
vrlc92
wannabe_rotebaron

...and some more.
Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48

It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk.
And of course you can also vote for pools.

Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve.

Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates.

A group but its definition is formed by a lot of members (so users) so it's still decentralised by design

. Saying I don't vote for a delegate because he is member of a group (for me personally) it's non sense.

cesmak

legendary

Activity: 1057

Merit: 1009

I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...

Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...

Does it make sense?
If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this.

atreides
cc001
corsaro
dakk
goldeneye
gr33ndrag0n
hmachado
liskit
MrV
ntelo
Phoenix1969
polycrypto
redsn0w
sgdias
theredhawk
vrlc92
wannabe_rotebaron

...and some more.
Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48

It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk.
And of course you can also vote for pools.

Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve.

Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates.

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511