Author

Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 601. (Read 3074310 times)

sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
move that crypto
that fucking carteling situation, still ruins the whole idea of delegates

But this is just a section in lisk forum where the delegates can imagine.
And most of them are very active community members since the beginning.


and whats then? they decided to vote on each other right from the begining. There is pretty little chances to a new comer to get involved
its clearly a cartel

this only works if they have enough lisk. the ark guys have a lot of lisk and will vote their own delegates. and i think there are some other with a huge amount of lisk.

and yes. i don't like the voting system neither.

It costs millions of $ initial investment to startup a competitive Bitcoin mining operation.

Ethereum mining is similar, with big investments in hardware, datacenter, electricity.

It is hard for new comers to get a delegate spot, that's just the nature of a capitalist system.

Imagine if they changed it to 2000 delegates, so everyone could run a delegate.  Then there would be very little incentive to collect Lisk, form groups of supporters, and add value to Lisk in order to get a delegate position.

yes thats capitalism. the rich get richer. and the richer become even richer.
and what is happening here and with other cryptos is that decentralation disappears.

It's happening everywhere, decentralisation doesn't mean everyone can or will be rich.
It's like first come, first served for example with Bitcoin (the early adopters/miners). You can't blame them only because they found (mined and bought) bitcoin before you or am I wrong?

your are not wrong according BTC. but why not to changes things that in future "the time of adoption" does not matter anymore?

If you come up with a good idea, like a blockchain app for example, then delegates, who are all different types of people from all over the world, might collectively invest more forged LSK than you would have forged by being a delegate.

Much more decentralized than old system where you would have to get approval from a bank or venture capitalist to finance a business plan.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
that fucking carteling situation, still ruins the whole idea of delegates

But this is just a section in lisk forum where the delegates can imagine.
And most of them are very active community members since the beginning.


and whats then? they decided to vote on each other right from the beginning. There is pretty little chances to a new comer to get involved
its clearly a cartel

If it's so, the elections' logic is wrong.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
that fucking carteling situation, still ruins the whole idea of delegates

But this is just a section in lisk forum where the delegates can imagine.
And most of them are very active community members since the beginning.


and whats then? they decided to vote on each other right from the begining. There is pretty little chances to a new comer to get involved
its clearly a cartel

this only works if they have enough lisk. the ark guys have a lot of lisk and will vote their own delegates. and i think there are some other with a huge amount of lisk.

and yes. i don't like the voting system neither.

It costs millions of $ initial investment to startup a competitive Bitcoin mining operation.

Ethereum mining is similar, with big investments in hardware, datacenter, electricity.

It is hard for new comers to get a delegate spot, that's just the nature of a capitalist system.

Imagine if they changed it to 2000 delegates, so everyone could run a delegate.  Then there would be very little incentive to collect Lisk, form groups of supporters, and add value to Lisk in order to get a delegate position.

yes thats capitalism. the rich get richer. and the richer become even richer.
and what is happening here and with other cryptos is that decentralation disappears.

It's happening everywhere, decentralisation doesn't mean everyone can or will be rich.
It's like first come, first served for example with Bitcoin (the early adopters/miners). You can't blame them only because they found (mined and bought) bitcoin before you or am I wrong?

your are not wrong according BTC. but why not to changes things that in future "the time of adoption" does not matter anymore?
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
that fucking carteling situation, still ruins the whole idea of delegates

But this is just a section in lisk forum where the delegates can imagine.
And most of them are very active community members since the beginning.


and whats then? they decided to vote on each other right from the begining. There is pretty little chances to a new comer to get involved
its clearly a cartel

this only works if they have enough lisk. the ark guys have a lot of lisk and will vote their own delegates. and i think there are some other with a huge amount of lisk.

and yes. i don't like the voting system neither.

It costs millions of $ initial investment to startup a competitive Bitcoin mining operation.

Ethereum mining is similar, with big investments in hardware, datacenter, electricity.

It is hard for new comers to get a delegate spot, that's just the nature of a capitalist system.

Imagine if they changed it to 2000 delegates, so everyone could run a delegate.  Then there would be very little incentive to collect Lisk, form groups of supporters, and add value to Lisk in order to get a delegate position.

yes thats capitalism. the rich get richer. and the richer become even richer.
and what is happening here and with other cryptos is that decentralation disappears.

It's happening everywhere, decentralisation doesn't mean everyone can or will be rich.
It's like first come, first served for example with Bitcoin (the early adopters/miners). You can't blame them only because they found (mined and bought) bitcoin before you or am I wrong?
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
that fucking carteling situation, still ruins the whole idea of delegates

But this is just a section in lisk forum where the delegates can imagine.
And most of them are very active community members since the beginning.


and whats then? they decided to vote on each other right from the begining. There is pretty little chances to a new comer to get involved
its clearly a cartel

this only works if they have enough lisk. the ark guys have a lot of lisk and will vote their own delegates. and i think there are some other with a huge amount of lisk.

and yes. i don't like the voting system neither.

It costs millions of $ initial investment to startup a competitive Bitcoin mining operation.

Ethereum mining is similar, with big investments in hardware, datacenter, electricity.

It is hard for new comers to get a delegate spot, that's just the nature of a capitalist system.

Imagine if they changed it to 2000 delegates, so everyone could run a delegate.  Then there would be very little incentive to collect Lisk, form groups of supporters, and add value to Lisk in order to get a delegate position.

yes thats capitalism. the rich get richer. and the richer become even richer.
and what is happening here and with other cryptos is that decentralation disappears.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 500
I've also updated my ⎋ DELEGATE PROPOSAL for ⎋ Community delegates contest!
Feel free to ask any questions and thanks for your votes!
Pay me lisk and i wil vote .
sr. member
Activity: 429
Merit: 252
I've also updated my ⎋ DELEGATE PROPOSAL for ⎋ Community delegates contest!
Feel free to ask any questions and thanks for your votes!
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
move that crypto
that fucking carteling situation, still ruins the whole idea of delegates

But this is just a section in lisk forum where the delegates can imagine.
And most of them are very active community members since the beginning.


and whats then? they decided to vote on each other right from the begining. There is pretty little chances to a new comer to get involved
its clearly a cartel

this only works if they have enough lisk. the ark guys have a lot of lisk and will vote their own delegates. and i think there are some other with a huge amount of lisk.

and yes. i don't like the voting system neither.

It costs millions of $ initial investment to startup a competitive Bitcoin mining operation.

Ethereum mining is similar, with big investments in hardware, datacenter, electricity.

It is hard for new comers to get a delegate spot, that's just the nature of a capitalist system.

Imagine if they changed it to 2000 delegates, so everyone could run a delegate.  Then there would be very little incentive to collect Lisk, form groups of supporters, and add value to Lisk in order to get a delegate position.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
that fucking carteling situation, still ruins the whole idea of delegates

But this is just a section in lisk forum where the delegates can imagine.
And most of them are very active community members since the beginning.


and whats then? they decided to vote on each other right from the begining. There is pretty little chances to a new comer to get involved
its clearly a cartel

this only works if they have enough lisk. the ark guys have a lot of lisk and will vote their own delegates. and i think there are some other with a huge amount of lisk.

and yes. i don't like the voting system neither.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 510
that fucking carteling situation, still ruins the whole idea of delegates

But this is just a section in lisk forum where the delegates can imagine.
And most of them are very active community members since the beginning.


and whats then? they decided to vote on each other right from the begining. There is pretty little chances to a new comer to get involved
its clearly a cartel

Logically, the community people who worked for and supported Lisk from the beginning with testing, GitHub, forum, chat et cetera have deserved this.

Nevertheless, even as a newcomer you have a chance. Write a good proposal and tell people why they should vote for you. It's worth a try
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
I don't post often over here but I've been very active in Lisk.chat and Lisk forums over the last months.

For those interested, I updated my delegate proposal for the contest.

It include all the links to my community services, guides, scripts, etc.

https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=143



Hey Gr33nDrag0n, I know you are very active on lisk chat Wink btw great proposal. Good luck for the contest!
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
I don't post often over here but I've been very active in Lisk.chat and Lisk forums over the last months.

For those interested, I updated my delegate proposal for the contest.

It include all the links to my community services, guides, scripts, etc.

https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=143


Gr33drag0n for president Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
that fucking carteling situation, still ruins the whole idea of delegates

But this is just a section in lisk forum where the delegates can imagine.
And most of them are very active community members since the beginning.


and whats then? they decided to vote on each other right from the begining. There is pretty little chances to a new comer to get involved
its clearly a cartel
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 508
i think the community fund is a fantastic idea, i will be donating towards it for future projects, keep the dream alive.
Agree, sounds interesting - will be good to see a community development fund roadmap alongside the main roadmap, would be great if the community gets a say in what gets prioritised in this fund - Like the sound of the main roadmap phases. Hopefully Lisk will go a long way in the future - its good to be able to pick some coins up at the current price.
indeed , it nice time to pick some cheap LSK
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
i think the community fund is a fantastic idea, i will be donating towards it for future projects, keep the dream alive.
Agree, sounds interesting - will be good to see a community development fund roadmap alongside the main roadmap, would be great if the community gets a say in what gets prioritised in this fund - Like the sound of the main roadmap phases. Hopefully Lisk will go a long way in the future - its good to be able to pick some coins up at the current price.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Good to see that this topic starting to wake up.  Wink
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
i think the community fund is a fantastic idea, i will be donating towards it for future projects, keep the dream alive.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
It's sad to see Lisk is now becoming shit coin and with no volume.

The calm before the storm
I can't stop buying
sr. member
Activity: 523
Merit: 250
The price waits some trigger now.


And the price goes some more high. The ark ICO will be success

Then, 6M lisk will be holding.


This will be happening or hell gate of dump will be opening?


From wan
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250

Update of my delegate proposal. Added the Community Fund.

    ~ 10 % from my rewards I want to donate for the Lisk Community Fund -> 15841793714384967784L

My proposal: https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=601

Poly#Crypto



A beautifully presented and ambitious proposal. You have my vote because you are a great Lisk supporter.

Thanks for your work for Lisk @Poly#Crypto

yes we definitely must look after the people that are really putting their time into Lisk. I'd like to say thanks also and i will also be sending my votes to Poly#crypto. great proposal!
Jump to: