Well admin has been very helpful however I still think payments are off. For the time being I'll go to another pool.
I'll be checking back on this thread to see the other opinions.
Topic: [ANN][LTC][Pool][PPLNS] WeMineLTC.com | 0% FEES! | Stratum | DDoS Protection |!! - page 23. (Read 74351 times)
April 15, 2013, 07:46:28 PM
April 15, 2013, 07:34:51 PM
I have 4 7950s and I pull ~640 kh out of each card with these settings.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
Goodnight sweet video cards
They never go above 75 C on the core and 85-90 C on the VRM's so I am not worried at all. I just wish these cards had better RAM for overclocking since I know I could squeeze a little more out of each if I could hit 1700-1800 mhz on the memory.
April 15, 2013, 07:27:15 PM
This might have been addressed before, but I'm not going to look through all the pages... Can someone please tell me how to set up Reaper to run on wemineltc.com?
I tried setting the config file to say:
host us.wemineltc.com port 80 and host eu.wemineltc.com port 3333 and host wemineltc.com port 8332
etc.
All would give me "unable to connect to server"
I tried setting the config file to say:
host us.wemineltc.com port 80 and host eu.wemineltc.com port 3333 and host wemineltc.com port 8332
etc.
All would give me "unable to connect to server"
April 15, 2013, 07:18:20 PM
I have 4 7950s and I pull ~640 kh out of each card with these settings.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
Goodnight sweet video cards
They never go above 75 C on the core and 85-90 C on the VRM's so I am not worried at all. I just wish these cards had better RAM for overclocking since I know I could squeeze a little more out of each if I could hit 1700-1800 mhz on the memory.
April 15, 2013, 07:16:39 PM
I have 4 7950s and I pull ~640 kh out of each card with these settings.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
Goodnight sweet video cards
April 15, 2013, 07:14:59 PM
Something is still off with the payouts it seems.
Here's my math for one of my miners:
Hashrate: 750 KH/s
According to the allchains.info calculator, that should give me around 2.3 LTC/day.
My round estimate on wemineltc was about .11. With an average round time of just over an hour, .11 ltc/rnd * 20.5 rnds/day = 2.26 ltc/day.
So the round estimate seems accurate. However, over the past 5 rounds, I only got .032 max. .032 * 20.5 = .656 ltc/day. With PPLNS, as I understand it, each round should payout roughly the same, the variance comes with time between payouts.
So it seems the round estimate is accurate, but the payouts are not. Did you not update the payout system to account for the switch from 64 difficulty to 128? Or could it be because some of my mining was on the us stratum server earlier in the day when it was still on vardiff and those shares were not weighted correctly?
As a comparison, I mined with the same setup on give-me-ltc.com yesterday and earlier today. Same hashrate, round payouts were roughly .022. However, they have a high pool rate, so average round time was about 15 minutes. That's 96 rounds/day so .022 ltc/rnd * 96 rnds/day = 2.11 ltc/day.
I still appreciate the effort, but until I understand why I wasn't getting the appropriate payouts, I'll be at give-me-ltc.
Here's my math for one of my miners:
Hashrate: 750 KH/s
According to the allchains.info calculator, that should give me around 2.3 LTC/day.
My round estimate on wemineltc was about .11. With an average round time of just over an hour, .11 ltc/rnd * 20.5 rnds/day = 2.26 ltc/day.
So the round estimate seems accurate. However, over the past 5 rounds, I only got .032 max. .032 * 20.5 = .656 ltc/day. With PPLNS, as I understand it, each round should payout roughly the same, the variance comes with time between payouts.
So it seems the round estimate is accurate, but the payouts are not. Did you not update the payout system to account for the switch from 64 difficulty to 128? Or could it be because some of my mining was on the us stratum server earlier in the day when it was still on vardiff and those shares were not weighted correctly?
As a comparison, I mined with the same setup on give-me-ltc.com yesterday and earlier today. Same hashrate, round payouts were roughly .022. However, they have a high pool rate, so average round time was about 15 minutes. That's 96 rounds/day so .022 ltc/rnd * 96 rnds/day = 2.11 ltc/day.
I still appreciate the effort, but until I understand why I wasn't getting the appropriate payouts, I'll be at give-me-ltc.
Or could it be because some of my mining was on the us stratum server earlier in the day when it was still on vardiff and those shares were not weighted correctly?. That. We fucked up earlier today, with the USA server and VARDIFF
I urge you to try us now and compare April 15, 2013, 07:13:23 PM
I have 4 7950s and I pull ~640 kh out of each card with these settings.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1625 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256
That said my pay per round is about half of what the estimated actually is, its like only ~1400 kh are actually making it through to the server. Any idea why I am only earning around half of what any calculator is suggesting?
April 15, 2013, 07:04:04 PM
Quote
Your numbers are way off. First of all you mine in the wrong pool (on screenshot
) and secondly, the 0.58 ratio is for thr 7970s not the 7950s. You should be getting no less than 600 Khses PER card with 7950s.Increase memory and put core in the 950~1000 Mhz zone. Try also this cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u yourUsername -p YourPassword --thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256
and let me knwo how it works for you
I was mining with the other pool before when this one was down
This is with "cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p pass --shaders 1792 --gpu-engine 900 --gpu-memclock 1450 --gpu-fan 100 --thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256"
April 15, 2013, 07:01:42 PM
Something is still off with the payouts it seems.
Here's my math for one of my miners:
Hashrate: 750 KH/s
According to the allchains.info calculator, that should give me around 2.3 LTC/day.
My round estimate on wemineltc was about .11. With an average round time of just over an hour, .11 ltc/rnd * 20.5 rnds/day = 2.26 ltc/day.
So the round estimate seems accurate. However, over the past 5 rounds, I only got .032 max. .032 * 20.5 = .656 ltc/day. With PPLNS, as I understand it, each round should payout roughly the same, the variance comes with time between payouts.
So it seems the round estimate is accurate, but the payouts are not. Did you not update the payout system to account for the switch from 64 difficulty to 128? Or could it be because some of my mining was on the us stratum server earlier in the day when it was still on vardiff and those shares were not weighted correctly?
As a comparison, I mined with the same setup on give-me-ltc.com yesterday and earlier today. Same hashrate, round payouts were roughly .022. However, they have a high pool rate, so average round time was about 15 minutes. That's 96 rounds/day so .022 ltc/rnd * 96 rnds/day = 2.11 ltc/day.
I still appreciate the effort, but until I understand why I wasn't getting the appropriate payouts, I'll be at give-me-ltc.
Here's my math for one of my miners:
Hashrate: 750 KH/s
According to the allchains.info calculator, that should give me around 2.3 LTC/day.
My round estimate on wemineltc was about .11. With an average round time of just over an hour, .11 ltc/rnd * 20.5 rnds/day = 2.26 ltc/day.
So the round estimate seems accurate. However, over the past 5 rounds, I only got .032 max. .032 * 20.5 = .656 ltc/day. With PPLNS, as I understand it, each round should payout roughly the same, the variance comes with time between payouts.
So it seems the round estimate is accurate, but the payouts are not. Did you not update the payout system to account for the switch from 64 difficulty to 128? Or could it be because some of my mining was on the us stratum server earlier in the day when it was still on vardiff and those shares were not weighted correctly?
As a comparison, I mined with the same setup on give-me-ltc.com yesterday and earlier today. Same hashrate, round payouts were roughly .022. However, they have a high pool rate, so average round time was about 15 minutes. That's 96 rounds/day so .022 ltc/rnd * 96 rnds/day = 2.11 ltc/day.
I still appreciate the effort, but until I understand why I wasn't getting the appropriate payouts, I'll be at give-me-ltc.
April 15, 2013, 06:53:43 PM
500 per card is 1500, atm you are pulling like 1128 !! (check the WU, thats the Workers Utility)
April 15, 2013, 06:49:44 PM
I'm trying to use as a dedicated miner, 3 7950s, for some reason it just wont reply with accepted at any point.
i finally got my workers going, there has been alot of problems, but now its atleast stable. Have 3 7950's running, 2 of them @ stock speed (core@840 and memory@1450 to get 0,58 ratio), and 1 down-clocked to get lower temps (core@580, memory@1000). Still waiting for my pcie-risers.
Im getting about 240Kh/s per card with I=13, and about 490Kh/s at I=20. I hade about 75% HW's before, then i changed --thread-concurrency = 22528 and I=20 and after that less than 1% HW's. Why?
This is my bat file:
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 20 --worksize 128 -g 1 --gpu-engine 580,840,840 --gpu-memclock 1000,1450,1450 --thread-concurrency 22528 --gpu-fan 100
Will start to overclock to get better numbers as soon i get my new case in order. Is 490Kh/s @ stock OK for a 7950? This is a screenshot and the code from the .bat.
Your numbers are way off. First of all you mine in the wrong pool (on screenshot
) and secondly, the 0.58 ratio is for thr 7970s not the 7950s. You should be getting no less than 600 Khses PER card with 7950s.Increase memory and put core in the 950~1000 Mhz zone. Try also this cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u yourUsername -p YourPassword --thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256
and let me knwo how it works for you
I was only getting about 500 per card with this :/ I'm a complete novice with cgminer I have to mess around with it a bit i think.
Thanks again though
April 15, 2013, 06:47:10 PM
using reaper:
overclock core clock 1025
mem clock 1480
pwr limit +20 (for now)
voltage slightly under clocked I believe at 1100
litecoin.conf
worksize 256
vectors 1
aggression 18
threads_per_gpu 1
sharethreads 32
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 22976
temps are holding from 70 to 75 with 75 to 90 percent fans
overclock core clock 1025
mem clock 1480
pwr limit +20 (for now)
voltage slightly under clocked I believe at 1100
litecoin.conf
worksize 256
vectors 1
aggression 18
threads_per_gpu 1
sharethreads 32
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 22976
temps are holding from 70 to 75 with 75 to 90 percent fans
April 15, 2013, 06:45:08 PM
I'm trying to use as a dedicated miner, 3 7950s, for some reason it just wont reply with accepted at any point.
i finally got my workers going, there has been alot of problems, but now its atleast stable. Have 3 7950's running, 2 of them @ stock speed (core@840 and memory@1450 to get 0,58 ratio), and 1 down-clocked to get lower temps (core@580, memory@1000). Still waiting for my pcie-risers.
Im getting about 240Kh/s per card with I=13, and about 490Kh/s at I=20. I hade about 75% HW's before, then i changed --thread-concurrency = 22528 and I=20 and after that less than 1% HW's. Why?
This is my bat file:
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 20 --worksize 128 -g 1 --gpu-engine 580,840,840 --gpu-memclock 1000,1450,1450 --thread-concurrency 22528 --gpu-fan 100
Will start to overclock to get better numbers as soon i get my new case in order. Is 490Kh/s @ stock OK for a 7950? This is a screenshot and the code from the .bat.
Your numbers are way off. First of all you mine in the wrong pool (on screenshot
) and secondly, the 0.58 ratio is for thr 7970s not the 7950s. You should be getting no less than 600 Khses PER card with 7950s.Increase memory and put core in the 950~1000 Mhz zone. Try also this cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u yourUsername -p YourPassword --thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256
and let me knwo how it works for you
April 15, 2013, 06:43:50 PM
I'm trying to use as a dedicated miner, 3 7950s, for some reason it just wont reply with accepted at any point.
i finally got my workers going, there has been alot of problems, but now its atleast stable. Have 3 7950's running, 2 of them @ stock speed (core@840 and memory@1450 to get 0,58 ratio), and 1 down-clocked to get lower temps (core@580, memory@1000). Still waiting for my pcie-risers.
Im getting about 240Kh/s per card with I=13, and about 490Kh/s at I=20. I hade about 75% HW's before, then i changed --thread-concurrency = 22528 and I=20 and after that less than 1% HW's. Why?
This is my bat file:
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 20 --worksize 128 -g 1 --gpu-engine 580,840,840 --gpu-memclock 1000,1450,1450 --thread-concurrency 22528 --gpu-fan 100
Will start to overclock to get better numbers as soon i get my new case in order. Is 490Kh/s @ stock OK for a 7950? This is a screenshot and the code from the .bat.
Please send me some links and your settings!
April 15, 2013, 06:39:04 PM
I'm trying to use as a dedicated miner, 3 7950s, for some reason it just wont reply with accepted at any point.
i finally got my workers going, there has been alot of problems, but now its atleast stable. Have 3 7950's running, 2 of them @ stock speed (core@840 and memory@1450 to get 0,58 ratio), and 1 down-clocked to get lower temps (core@580, memory@1000). Still waiting for my pcie-risers.
Im getting about 240Kh/s per card with I=13, and about 490Kh/s at I=20. I hade about 75% HW's before, then i changed --thread-concurrency = 22528 and I=20 and after that less than 1% HW's. Why?
This is my bat file:
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 20 --worksize 128 -g 1 --gpu-engine 580,840,840 --gpu-memclock 1000,1450,1450 --thread-concurrency 22528 --gpu-fan 100
Will start to overclock to get better numbers as soon i get my new case in order. Is 490Kh/s @ stock OK for a 7950? This is a screenshot and the code from the .bat.
April 15, 2013, 06:35:33 PM
I'm trying to use as a dedicated miner, 3 7950s, for some reason it just wont reply with accepted at any point.
i finally got my workers going, there has been alot of problems, but now its atleast stable. Have 3 7950's running, 2 of them @ stock speed (core@840 and memory@1450 to get 0,58 ratio), and 1 down-clocked to get lower temps (core@580, memory@1000). Still waiting for my pcie-risers.
Im getting about 240Kh/s per card with I=13, and about 490Kh/s at I=20. I hade about 75% HW's before, then i changed --thread-concurrency = 22528 and I=20 and after that less than 1% HW's. Why?
This is my bat file:
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.wemineltc.com:3333 -u user -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 20 --worksize 128 -g 1 --gpu-engine 580,840,840 --gpu-memclock 1000,1450,1450 --thread-concurrency 22528 --gpu-fan 100
Will start to overclock to get better numbers as soon i get my new case in order. Is 490Kh/s @ stock OK for a 7950? This is a screenshot and the code from the .bat.
April 15, 2013, 06:31:32 PM
gotcha yes excited to get this running. ive been using notroll up til now :/ my confusion is to why the settings on the ltc hardware comparison page are so drastically off.....
-I 20 --thread-concurrency 24768 --worksize 256 Win7, 13.3 beta drivers (Currently running avg : 1.2 Mh/s with 2x).
yes excited to get this running. ive been using notroll up til now :/ my confusion is to why the settings on the ltc hardware comparison page are so drastically off..... -I 20 --thread-concurrency 24768 --worksize 256 Win7, 13.3 beta drivers (Currently running avg : 1.2 Mh/s with 2x).
Well LTC is not so easy as BTC for mining. It takes lot of(painful) testing, and thats why we are here - we've been through this with trial and error and we try to help our users as much as possible
Build a pool- anyone can build a pool!! Important thing is to build a community And to answer to your question, why they are so drastically off....
BECAUSE IT CAN!!
Thats the magic of the internet afterall... ^__^Happy mining!!
April 15, 2013, 06:27:19 PM
gotcha yes excited to get this running. ive been using notroll up til now :/ my confusion is to why the settings on the ltc hardware comparison page are so drastically off.....
-I 20 --thread-concurrency 24768 --worksize 256 Win7, 13.3 beta drivers (Currently running avg : 1.2 Mh/s with 2x).
yes excited to get this running. ive been using notroll up til now :/ my confusion is to why the settings on the ltc hardware comparison page are so drastically off..... -I 20 --thread-concurrency 24768 --worksize 256 Win7, 13.3 beta drivers (Currently running avg : 1.2 Mh/s with 2x).
April 15, 2013, 06:23:37 PM
on the level?
He means that we are awesome
Im glad it worked for you
Dont worry what site reports at the moment, it takes average prices per 10 minutes of your hash power. In around 20~30 mins you should see the correct number. You dont get paid based on Hash power but based on shares submitted ! So dont worry April 15, 2013, 06:19:50 PM
on the level?
Jump to: