[ANN][LTCU] LiteCoinUltra |5% PREMINE ONLY|COINMARKETCAP|CRYPTOPIA| JOIN NOW! - page 56.

BTC_TRADER

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

Hey Guys,

Which miner do you use for mining this coin? I know it is Scrypt, but when I look here: https://litecoin.info/Mining_software It's confusing and outdated. (I know this is the page for LTC but i figured it's the same software?

)

Can someone please point me in the right direction?

BTW, I'm having some slight issues with the graphic rendering of the wallet. I'm using a Microsoft SurfaceBook and the balance isn't rendered properly.....

http://i.imgur.com/w5O6dLs.jpg

r_victory

sr. member

Activity: 1955

Merit: 381

English<->Pt-BR - Professional Translations(90+)

Quote from: ruptan on August 01, 2017, 12:05:10 PM

Very nice Wallet. I am impressed. Thanks

Yes, the wallet have a great design, for me works fine and synchronization was quick. With these updates i'll try to mine now!!!

TheMiningPool.mine

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

ALL BOUNTY PAYMENTS FOR VOTING NOVA UP TO DATE UNTIL VOTE 228 NOW !

JUST A FEW MORE VOTES TO GO!

THANKS ALL

gr33k

full member

Activity: 181

Merit: 101

Quote from: TheMiningPool.mine on August 01, 2017, 12:16:21 PM

Quote from: gr33k on August 01, 2017, 11:42:41 AM

Quote from: TheMiningPool.mine on August 01, 2017, 11:40:42 AM

Quote from: gr33k on August 01, 2017, 11:08:03 AM

How about some compiled binaries for Windows with the fix please?
Also a copy and paste of a LiteCoinUltra.conf would be nice...

Compiling Wallet right now.
Btw last version is working fine too at the moment.

Will post new version in a few.

nothing special for the LiteCoinUltra.conf file

seednodes are hardcoded and working perfectly.

Thank you

Here it is!

WINDOWS WALLET VERSION 1.2
https://mega.nz/#!jh5xEZgI!4rEesOEOIy40hUXN9gIH1qxg6kQm6Gsw_DJ_S64JAyw

Works great! Thank you

Sync up immediately and received my mined coins!

TheMiningPool.mine

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

Quote from: gr33k on August 01, 2017, 11:42:41 AM

Quote from: TheMiningPool.mine on August 01, 2017, 11:40:42 AM

Quote from: gr33k on August 01, 2017, 11:08:03 AM

How about some compiled binaries for Windows with the fix please?
Also a copy and paste of a LiteCoinUltra.conf would be nice...

Compiling Wallet right now.
Btw last version is working fine too at the moment.

Will post new version in a few.

nothing special for the LiteCoinUltra.conf file

seednodes are hardcoded and working perfectly.

Thank you

Here it is!

WINDOWS WALLET VERSION 1.2
https://mega.nz/#!jh5xEZgI!4rEesOEOIy40hUXN9gIH1qxg6kQm6Gsw_DJ_S64JAyw

ruptan

sr. member

Activity: 491

Merit: 250

Very nice Wallet. I am impressed. Thanks

akuzn

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 16

Does the ICO have a "refer a friend/affiliate" style program?

belechau

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 100

.

gr33k

full member

Activity: 181

Merit: 101

Quote from: TheMiningPool.mine on August 01, 2017, 11:40:42 AM

Quote from: gr33k on August 01, 2017, 11:08:03 AM

How about some compiled binaries for Windows with the fix please?
Also a copy and paste of a LiteCoinUltra.conf would be nice...

Compiling Wallet right now.
Btw last version is working fine too at the moment.

Will post new version in a few.

nothing special for the LiteCoinUltra.conf file

seednodes are hardcoded and working perfectly.

Thank you

TheMiningPool.mine

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

Quote from: gr33k on August 01, 2017, 11:08:03 AM

How about some compiled binaries for Windows with the fix please?
Also a copy and paste of a LiteCoinUltra.conf would be nice...

Compiling Wallet right now.
Btw last version is working fine too at the moment.

Will post new version in a few.

nothing special for the LiteCoinUltra.conf file

seednodes are hardcoded and working perfectly.

vhns222

full member

Activity: 504

Merit: 105

WE are also in Nova just some more votes and we are there, only 26 votes and you can enjoy it in Nova be more active go and vote for LiteCoinUltra
go go go .

it s time for LiteCoinUltra.

gr33k

full member

Activity: 181

Merit: 101

Quote from: bumbacoin on August 01, 2017, 10:12:47 AM

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 08:48:15 AM

Quote from: lilaj4de on August 01, 2017, 07:51:43 AM

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 07:45:35 AM

LOL looking at the block explorer there is missing blocks in the recent transaction list, that only happens when there is a PoW or PoS Block with 0 Value.

Checkout block 830, it is not shown on the transaction list but it is there in the blockchain when searched, just like a bunch of other blocks....

http://miningpool2.thruhere.net:9013/block/7ce990752ceee434a499ede529fbadb2640154b0dc312fe49dc936c378800ab5

Running my eyes roughly through the source I can see that this one is FUBAR'd Cheesy

From what I understand in your commentary, does this project seem to be kind of obscure or suspicious?

Well the staking has been active from launch with 0 - 0.00010001 coins per PoS block so far & Block 200,000 is when the conventional 10% yearly rewards of staked balances will kick in.

This is just one big mess with superblocks that don't work properly either Roll Eyes

there's something weird with the source indeed,
it'll generally reject stake blocks (becuase zero reward) unless there's a fee involved,
but some are coming out with the extra 0.00000001 amount

when you sync from zero those teeny .00000001 will be rejected.

i've suggested a few changes which may help,
if they don't help then
worst case might be a hard fork to totally disable future staking or a new reward setup.

How about some compiled binaries for Windows with the fix please?
Also a copy and paste of a LiteCoinUltra.conf would be nice...

git pull origin will grab the main.cpp changes and recompile but not so easy on Windows...please release sooner than later Wink

TheMiningPool.mine

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

Quote from: bumbacoin on August 01, 2017, 10:12:47 AM

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 08:48:15 AM

Quote from: lilaj4de on August 01, 2017, 07:51:43 AM

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 07:45:35 AM

LOL looking at the block explorer there is missing blocks in the recent transaction list, that only happens when there is a PoW or PoS Block with 0 Value.

Checkout block 830, it is not shown on the transaction list but it is there in the blockchain when searched, just like a bunch of other blocks....

http://miningpool2.thruhere.net:9013/block/7ce990752ceee434a499ede529fbadb2640154b0dc312fe49dc936c378800ab5

Running my eyes roughly through the source I can see that this one is FUBAR'd Cheesy

From what I understand in your commentary, does this project seem to be kind of obscure or suspicious?

Well the staking has been active from launch with 0 - 0.00010001 coins per PoS block so far & Block 200,000 is when the conventional 10% yearly rewards of staked balances will kick in.

This is just one big mess with superblocks that don't work properly either Roll Eyes

there's something weird with the source indeed,
it'll generally reject stake blocks (becuase zero reward) unless there's a fee involved,
but some are coming out with the extra 0.00000001 amount

when you sync from zero those teeny .00000001 will be rejected.

i've suggested a few changes which may help,
if they don't help then
worst case might be a hard fork to totally disable future staking or a new reward setup.

Thanks BumbaCoin for your help!
Just updated sources in Git with your changes in main.cpp

Updating pool now
All other pools please update sources with new modfications made by bumbacoin .

https://github.com/TheCryptoServices/LiteCoinUltra

bumbacoin

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1036

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 08:48:15 AM

Quote from: lilaj4de on August 01, 2017, 07:51:43 AM

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 07:45:35 AM

LOL looking at the block explorer there is missing blocks in the recent transaction list, that only happens when there is a PoW or PoS Block with 0 Value.

Checkout block 830, it is not shown on the transaction list but it is there in the blockchain when searched, just like a bunch of other blocks....

http://miningpool2.thruhere.net:9013/block/7ce990752ceee434a499ede529fbadb2640154b0dc312fe49dc936c378800ab5

Running my eyes roughly through the source I can see that this one is FUBAR'd Cheesy

From what I understand in your commentary, does this project seem to be kind of obscure or suspicious?

Well the staking has been active from launch with 0 - 0.00010001 coins per PoS block so far & Block 200,000 is when the conventional 10% yearly rewards of staked balances will kick in.

This is just one big mess with superblocks that don't work properly either Roll Eyes

there's something weird with the source indeed,
it'll generally reject stake blocks (becuase zero reward) unless there's a fee involved,
but some are coming out with the extra 0.00000001 amount

when you sync from zero those teeny .00000001 will be rejected.

i've suggested a few changes which may help,
if they don't help then
worst case might be a hard fork to totally disable future staking or a new reward setup.

Deadjim

newbie

Activity: 79

Merit: 0

LTCU EXPLORER:

Code:

http://explorer.ltcu.hashpool.io

Quote

in development: need help with showing the net hashrate

LTCU POOL:

Code:

http://pool.hashpool.io/pool/LTCU/

Quote

mine through: stratum+tcp://mine.eu.hashpool.io:3333 -u -p

VARDIFF~128 <---> ~22000

Fees = 1.5%!
Payments every 15minutes!
Minimum Payment = 0.1 LTCU

DONATE:
BTC1XHashyYeuQmScn9dGQFUQLVxtZhiwWZJ
LTCU: LKjJvS6c55FWMpSMrpapKBHaFwMeF58Hj6

Rustyrio

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

VOTED LTCU Litecoinultra 220 / 250

Address`LKYR1vEPavigfd967vrLdqi7oeBKjsnuCt

thanks

Shews

full member

Activity: 177

Merit: 100

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 07:45:35 AM

LOL looking at the block explorer there is missing blocks in the recent transaction list, that only happens when there is a PoW or PoS Block with 0 Value.

Checkout block 830, it is not shown on the transaction list but it is there in the blockchain when searched, just like a bunch of other blocks....

http://miningpool2.thruhere.net:9013/block/7ce990752ceee434a499ede529fbadb2640154b0dc312fe49dc936c378800ab5

Running my eyes roughly through the source I can see that this one is FUBAR'd Cheesy

You released any coins to mine there Gizzard?

TheMiningPool.mine

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 08:48:15 AM

Quote from: lilaj4de on August 01, 2017, 07:51:43 AM

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 07:45:35 AM

LOL looking at the block explorer there is missing blocks in the recent transaction list, that only happens when there is a PoW or PoS Block with 0 Value.

Checkout block 830, it is not shown on the transaction list but it is there in the blockchain when searched, just like a bunch of other blocks....

http://miningpool2.thruhere.net:9013/block/7ce990752ceee434a499ede529fbadb2640154b0dc312fe49dc936c378800ab5

Running my eyes roughly through the source I can see that this one is FUBAR'd Cheesy

From what I understand in your commentary, does this project seem to be kind of obscure or suspicious?

Well the staking has been active from launch with 0 - 0.00010001 coins per PoS block so far & Block 200,000 is when the conventional 10% yearly rewards of staked balances will kick in.

This is just one big mess with superblocks that don't work properly either Roll Eyes

Well as I said many times, this is my first coin and it is probably far of being perfect...
That Pos low rewards are making wallet reject some blocks, I had to make a hotfix in the sources to let the wallet accept that PoS blocks.
Obviusly that is an error , becouse I wanted pos to start at block 200.000.
Btw I dont see anything obscure in that lol.

Its all good

No one is perfect , but that impefection makes no big difference (0.0001)
I'm still learning

Regards,
DEV

Gizzard

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: lilaj4de on August 01, 2017, 07:51:43 AM

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 07:45:35 AM

LOL looking at the block explorer there is missing blocks in the recent transaction list, that only happens when there is a PoW or PoS Block with 0 Value.

Checkout block 830, it is not shown on the transaction list but it is there in the blockchain when searched, just like a bunch of other blocks....

http://miningpool2.thruhere.net:9013/block/7ce990752ceee434a499ede529fbadb2640154b0dc312fe49dc936c378800ab5

Running my eyes roughly through the source I can see that this one is FUBAR'd Cheesy

From what I understand in your commentary, does this project seem to be kind of obscure or suspicious?

Well the staking has been active from launch with 0 - 0.00010001 coins per PoS block so far & Block 200,000 is when the conventional 10% yearly rewards of staked balances will kick in.

This is just one big mess with superblocks that don't work properly either Roll Eyes

lilaj4de

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 250

Quote from: Gizzard on August 01, 2017, 07:45:35 AM

LOL looking at the block explorer there is missing blocks in the recent transaction list, that only happens when there is a PoW or PoS Block with 0 Value.

Checkout block 830, it is not shown on the transaction list but it is there in the blockchain when searched, just like a bunch of other blocks....

http://miningpool2.thruhere.net:9013/block/7ce990752ceee434a499ede529fbadb2640154b0dc312fe49dc936c378800ab5

Running my eyes roughly through the source I can see that this one is FUBAR'd Cheesy

From what I understand in your commentary, does this project seem to be kind of obscure or suspicious?

Topic: [ANN][LTCU] LiteCoinUltra |5% PREMINE ONLY|COINMARKETCAP|CRYPTOPIA| JOIN NOW! - page 56. (Read 91213 times)