Topic: [ANN][Main] Bitcore- BTX - Datacarriersize up to 220 bytes - page 1026. (Read 729875 times)
Show how the settings sgminer for the suprnova
Here's another Pool:
https://btx.suprnova.cc
However - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already.
In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken.
https://btx.suprnova.cc
However - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already.
In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken.
my amd miner shows 12mh but only 4mh shown on pool
Quote
no, actually gtx1070=8Mh
suprnova show 50 for 4x1070 OC'dcoinspool show around 30
miner show 66Mh
but avrg btx/day almost the same on both.
How is the price going on cryptopia?
I am getting really bad hash rates for AMD rx 480 (around 100 khash/ss). My I7 CPU gives over 300 khash/s.
Is it really that slow?
My r9 280x has 4MhIs it really that slow?
What is your setting? If you don't mind sharing.
I am getting really bad hash rates for AMD rx 480 (around 100 khash/ss). My I7 CPU gives over 300 khash/s.
Is it really that slow?
My r9 280x has 4Mh Is it really that slow?
Any settings for AMD Sgminer ?
I am getting really bad hash rates for AMD rx 480 (around 100 khash/ss). My I7 CPU gives over 300 khash/s.
Is it really that slow?
Is it really that slow?
Here's another Pool:
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
Cuda error in func 'qubit_luffa512_cpu_init' at line 455 : invalid device symbol.
still getting this error from 2 days. and you say the only problem in ccminer is displaying correct hashrate?
Here's another Pool:
https://btx.suprnova.cc
However - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already.
In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken.
https://btx.suprnova.cc
However - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already.
In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken.
ah that's why con coinpool was showing all the time like 60% or that was just a bad estimate of the pool? for now my 1070 is at 16MH each one, is this correct?
Here's another Pool:
https://btx.suprnova.cc
However - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already.
In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken.
https://btx.suprnova.cc
However - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already.
In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken.
ah that's why con coinpool was showing all the time like 60% or that was just a bad estimate of the pool? for now my 1070 is at 16MH each one, is this correct?
Jon has just test the first payout.
http://claim.bitcore.cc/payout.php
Kind Regards Christian
P.S.
Thank you Jon for your hard work.
http://claim.bitcore.cc/payout.php
Kind Regards Christian
P.S.
Thank you Jon for your hard work.
List of Pools for Timetravel10
Singlepool Timetravel10
▌suprnova.cc l last check ▌passed (Webmaster: ocminer)
▌Coinspool.cu.cc l last check ▌passed (Webmaster: elbandi)
https://btx.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=gettingstarted
Singlepool Timetravel10
▌suprnova.cc l last check ▌passed (Webmaster: ocminer)
▌Coinspool.cu.cc l last check ▌passed (Webmaster: elbandi)
https://btx.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=gettingstarted
Code:
STRATUM: stratum+tcp://btx.suprnova.cc
PORT:3629
Username: Weblogin.Worker
Password: Worker Password
PORT:3629
Username: Weblogin.Worker
Password: Worker Password
Code:
Username: your wallet address Password: anything Algo: timetravel10
Example: minerd -a timetravel10 -o stratum+tcp://coinspool.cu.cc:3055 -u 1DKAo1HYr7zXLSvvgDvz9VMbCEQmSGLzvp -p t
URL (VarDiff between 0.0002 and 32) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3052
URL (VarDiff between 0.002 and 32) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3053
URL (VarDiff between 0.02 and 128) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3054
URL (VarDiff between 0.1 and 128) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3055
Example: minerd -a timetravel10 -o stratum+tcp://coinspool.cu.cc:3055 -u 1DKAo1HYr7zXLSvvgDvz9VMbCEQmSGLzvp -p t
URL (VarDiff between 0.0002 and 32) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3052
URL (VarDiff between 0.002 and 32) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3053
URL (VarDiff between 0.02 and 128) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3054
URL (VarDiff between 0.1 and 128) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3055
Mining Software BETA
sg miner is already out for ati ... but i cant connect to ocminer pool with it... to other pool yes
Any news about amd gpu miner?
Here's another Pool:
https://btx.suprnova.cc
However - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already.
In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken.
Thanks.https://btx.suprnova.cc
However - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already.
In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken.
Start mining there.
Here's another Pool:
https://btx.suprnova.cc
However - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already.
In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken.
https://btx.suprnova.cc
However - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos.
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already.
In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken.
There are already 4 coins on the balance of the pool, but not in the wallet.
I received the receipt address in my wallet, he was indicated in the miner.
Did I do it right?
I received the receipt address in my wallet, he was indicated in the miner.
Did I do it right?
Dont forget, its like bitcoin...u need 101 confirmations till maturating...
Greetz
Steve
There are already 4 coins on the balance of the pool, but not in the wallet.
I received the receipt address in my wallet, he was indicated in the miner.
Did I do it right?
I received the receipt address in my wallet, he was indicated in the miner.
Did I do it right?
Onemore byteball?I would like to join in
Note that Byteball and Bitcore are totally different projects. BB is based on a DAG structure, BTX uses PoW, just like bitcoin, but obviously with some great advantages like SegWit already activated and 20MB Blocksize.The only thing they have in common is the distribution via Airdrop to BTC holders.
Details on the dist. for Bitcore have yet to be announced. Please be patient.
Jump to: