Topic: [ANN][MAMM] MammothCoin | TRUSTLESS WALLET UPDATED! V.3.1 (Mandatory) - page 30. (Read 181584 times)
August 12, 2014, 11:46:16 AM
I would love to be part of this historical movement. I don't know nothing about coding or anything technical if you think i can be helpful for this project this will be honor for me to be one of the historians who tested this first of all.
August 12, 2014, 11:19:03 AM
I published
http://www.reddit.com/r/MAMMOTHCOIN/comments/2dcg4h/mammothcoin_we_need_to_find_5_volunteers_test/
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/2dcfnu/mammothcoin_we_need_to_find_5_volunteers_test/
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2dcdy1/mammothcoin_we_need_to_find_5_volunteers_test/
retwitt https://twitter.com/intent/retweet?tweet_id=499226889752707073
http://www.reddit.com/r/MAMMOTHCOIN/comments/2dcg4h/mammothcoin_we_need_to_find_5_volunteers_test/
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/2dcfnu/mammothcoin_we_need_to_find_5_volunteers_test/
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2dcdy1/mammothcoin_we_need_to_find_5_volunteers_test/
retwitt https://twitter.com/intent/retweet?tweet_id=499226889752707073
August 12, 2014, 10:13:55 AM
I need 4 more people to join tests tomorrow Aug 13 at 6 AM GMT
August 12, 2014, 07:33:51 AM
it be better if you get some reputable members to test it. if you have to pay them, you should it would add credibility to the system, id recommend contacting xc dev and offering something
I accept reputable members but XC dev is not reputable one because he does not know what is multisig and true trustless system and keep cheating his community with absurd things. Sorry if am rude but these are the facts laying in front of me. Someone else who is not XC dev can join tests for sure. I won't lose my time to teach amateurs what is trust-less system look like!! Please follow their threads and take screencaps they will like to cheat with our concepts their community soon.
really wow that statement is pretty strong. im no coder so i can't say who is wrong who is right but making that statement shows you must be pretty confident in your system.
il try find some reputable dev's who are willing to test it.
second thing is it ok if post what we discussed in forum. would you change your mind if community would agree
No doubt, very strong words. But if he's right, something I could never determine, he's got every right to say it. . . Trickery all over the place in cryptoland.
August 12, 2014, 04:22:57 AM
it be better if you get some reputable members to test it. if you have to pay them, you should it would add credibility to the system, id recommend contacting xc dev and offering something
I accept reputable members but XC dev is not reputable one because he does not know what is multisig and true trustless system and keep cheating his community with absurd things. Sorry if am rude but these are the facts laying in front of me. Someone else who is not XC dev can join tests for sure. I won't lose my time to teach amateurs what is trust-less system look like!! Please follow their threads and take screencaps they will like to cheat with our concepts their community soon.
really wow that statement is pretty strong. im no coder so i can't say who is wrong who is right but making that statement shows you must be pretty confident in your system.
il try find some reputable dev's who are willing to test it.
second thing is it ok if post what we discussed in forum. would you change your mind if community would agree
If you like go for it. We no need to attack on them. Because this will hurt many unnecessarily. Most will keep believe because they already enough involved.
I need tomorrow some testers, please join them. You can be one of first tester of the historical movement!
August 12, 2014, 04:13:26 AM
I need still 5 member at 13 Aug 6 AM GMT for tests, please send PM or post here if interested. We will test our new decentralized QT transfers.
August 12, 2014, 03:18:37 AM
been following this coin. 1.1btc buys total, not attractive enough for me to buy here. will we see 100sats
August 12, 2014, 02:57:58 AM
it be better if you get some reputable members to test it. if you have to pay them, you should it would add credibility to the system, id recommend contacting xc dev and offering something
I accept reputable members but XC dev is not reputable one because he does not know what is multisig and true trustless system and keep cheating his community with absurd things. Sorry if am rude but these are the facts laying in front of me. Someone else who is not XC dev can join tests for sure. I won't lose my time to teach amateurs what is trust-less system look like!! Please follow their threads and take screencaps they will like to cheat with our concepts their community soon.
really wow that statement is pretty strong. im no coder so i can't say who is wrong who is right but making that statement shows you must be pretty confident in your system.
il try find some reputable dev's who are willing to test it.
second thing is it ok if post what we discussed in forum. would you change your mind if community would agree
August 12, 2014, 02:55:41 AM
we need to find 5 volunteers test with me, truly decentralized crypto currency, Aug 13 at 6 AM GMT
Post if you interested or PM me please.
Post if you interested or PM me please.
August 12, 2014, 02:51:09 AM
it be better if you get some reputable members to test it. if you have to pay them, you should it would add credibility to the system, id recommend contacting xc dev and offering something
I accept reputable members but XC dev is not reputable one because he does not know what is multisig and true trustless system and keep cheating his community with absurd things. Sorry if am rude but these are the facts laying in front of me. Someone else who is not XC dev can join tests for sure. I won't lose my time to teach amateurs what is trust-less system look like!! Please follow their threads and take screencaps they will like to cheat with our concepts their community soon.
August 12, 2014, 02:49:03 AM
MammothCoin will be first one who has this technology (see below) before any other currency.
time to sit and think for those not like the technology we bring about!
time to sit and think for those not like the technology we bring about!
This is helpful thankyou. I'm thinking the best way to explain the difference here then will be through the escrow aspect. No other coin is treating it that way yet from my understanding. There are however other coins offering a mixing that occurs across a network of equal nodes.
Would you be willing to make a similar pledge to an animal rights group? That would very quickly dispel the criticism and there is little risk to your personal wealth at this point. I've only pledged my donations starting at basically a %5000 percent growth. If/when that happens, any of us interested in the long term prospect of this project should be more than happy to donate some of our new found value. This is how its worked for many coins. Seeing as there is no premine and anyone holding coins, including devs, obtained them on equal ground, its up to the community to make the charitable aspect work. Promises are good. We need lots of promises from many coin holders besides myself. Dev pledges are of course the most respected though. . .
August 12, 2014, 02:48:23 AM
it be better if you get some reputable members to test it. if you have to pay them, you should it would add credibility to the system, id recommend contacting xc dev and offering something
August 12, 2014, 02:45:29 AM
who is the guarantor
you should check the original post, and read the part 1 of the whitepaper, it's all explained.
below is the original post
Here is the 2nd part of the whitepaper, which gives a high level in-depth view of the trustless algorithm we use. Please refer to the part 1 if you need to understand some terms. Part 1 is here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8272890
==
The following diagram shows a high level description of the trustless system algorithm. It shows the “normal” case where everything goes as expected.
The next diagram shows the case where, after step 6, the Sender is not satisfied with the Mixer’s txid. This could happen if the Sender cannot verify Mixer’s transaction, or Mixer did not send enough funds to the destination. In which case Sender asks Guarantor to do the arbitration. The new scenario are marked in brown lines and explained in the diagram.
There are other possible scenarios, that we will describe in the next parts, where we will show details of the algorithm and steps. But from the above two cases you see why multisig is tightly linked with trustless system and how it creates a bonding among all parties where they have to follow the anonymous transfer rules.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8272890
==
The following diagram shows a high level description of the trustless system algorithm. It shows the “normal” case where everything goes as expected.
The next diagram shows the case where, after step 6, the Sender is not satisfied with the Mixer’s txid. This could happen if the Sender cannot verify Mixer’s transaction, or Mixer did not send enough funds to the destination. In which case Sender asks Guarantor to do the arbitration. The new scenario are marked in brown lines and explained in the diagram.
There are other possible scenarios, that we will describe in the next parts, where we will show details of the algorithm and steps. But from the above two cases you see why multisig is tightly linked with trustless system and how it creates a bonding among all parties where they have to follow the anonymous transfer rules.
August 12, 2014, 02:45:18 AM
who is the guarantor
Please visit https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8297017read the past explanations.
August 11, 2014, 10:38:30 PM
MammothCoin will be first one who has this technology (see below) before any other currency.
http://s27.postimg.org/byvawll37/trustless2.png
http://s16.postimg.org/87330fkf9/trustless2b.png
time to sit and think for those not like the technology we bring about!
http://s27.postimg.org/byvawll37/trustless2.png
http://s16.postimg.org/87330fkf9/trustless2b.png
time to sit and think for those not like the technology we bring about!
you should reedit the OP #1, add this picture to OP #1. look clock, key,super,their OP is cool.
August 11, 2014, 10:06:35 PM
can't believe MAMM traded so low
August 11, 2014, 07:41:52 PM
POW finished a while ago. Only 25M coins in total. Looks like it is now less easy to pick up volume.
August 11, 2014, 06:17:49 PM
If the launch and initial mining were fair, the devs don't have a step up on anyone. I'd say the only 'evidence' of them trying to take advantage of their position would be a big buying effort right before a tech update. . . And even if they did do that, it would be evidence that they believe in what they're doing.
if i was dev and my tech is groundbreaking why wouldn't i take advantage and make some money. id buy 1btc and watch it fly. at the end of the day its because of dev we have the tech why would anyone have a problem with dev making money as long the tech is legit. would you have a problem?
Definitely not. They'd be stupid not to, and they deserve the reward if they actually innovate.
would you prefer a different name for the coin
Yes, Mammoth really focuses it on species preservation. No doubt thats a good cause, but it doesn't really make sense with the coin's technicals. In my opinion 'Mammoth' coin would be something tied to a charity from inception. . . I think the name should be something that says Decentralized, Anonymous and Secure. . . How about DAS coin. or in German, 'the coin'? haha, yea maybe not.
August 11, 2014, 05:23:58 PM
If the launch and initial mining were fair, the devs don't have a step up on anyone. I'd say the only 'evidence' of them trying to take advantage of their position would be a big buying effort right before a tech update. . . And even if they did do that, it would be evidence that they believe in what they're doing.
if i was dev and my tech is groundbreaking why wouldn't i take advantage and make some money. id buy 1btc and watch it fly. at the end of the day its because of dev we have the tech why would anyone have a problem with dev making money as long the tech is legit. would you have a problem?
Definitely not. They'd be stupid not to, and they deserve the reward if they actually innovate.
would you prefer a different name for the coin
August 11, 2014, 05:20:36 PM
If the launch and initial mining were fair, the devs don't have a step up on anyone. I'd say the only 'evidence' of them trying to take advantage of their position would be a big buying effort right before a tech update. . . And even if they did do that, it would be evidence that they believe in what they're doing.
if i was dev and my tech is groundbreaking why wouldn't i take advantage and make some money. id buy 1btc and watch it fly. at the end of the day its because of dev we have the tech why would anyone have a problem with dev making money as long the tech is legit. would you have a problem?
Definitely not. They'd be stupid not to, and they deserve the reward if they actually innovate.
Jump to: