Author

Topic: [ANN][MIN] Minerals - POS | Developing own anon solution | - page 385. (Read 742186 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
One more drawback i can see is with this method is that a cheat dev can easily divert the hash to mine another coin of his choice and than shut the shop and run away.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
I like the idea of fair POW, don't know why trolls say it's not crypto, perhaps they should read more... Let see how this end next week (or how it start the PoS). Don't let us down dev!!! Smiley Just a few point for those who don't want to read all pages:

Good:
 * Fair distribution, limited to 50Mhs per account
 * Low market manipulation, as nobody should hold most of the coins
 * No premine/instamine (dev owns %100 of pools, and charges %1 for that, sound fair, they mounted the servers and if you mine in another pool you are paying as well)

Bad (or at least some concern points):
 * Dev can make a fork at any time without limitation
 * Don't have a public wallet (needed to provide fair distribution)
 * Only one exchange during PoW (as an option to keep your coins in another place, that is pointless since dev can make whatever he wants, if you trust him its the same)
You hit the nail on the head. I think if we can get this on bittrex the interest will stay strong for this coin. Where is [email protected] when we need him! lol
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
I like the idea of fair POW, don't know why trolls say it's not crypto, perhaps they should read more... Let see how this end next week (or how it start the PoS). Don't let us down dev!!! Smiley Just a few point for those who don't want to read all pages:

Good:
 * Fair distribution, limited to 50Mhs per account
 * Low market manipulation, as nobody should hold most of the coins
 * No premine/instamine (dev owns %100 of pools, and charges %1 for that, sound fair, they mounted the servers and if you mine in another pool you are paying as well)

Bad (or at least some concern points):
 * Dev can make a fork at any time without limitation
 * Don't have a public wallet (needed to provide fair distribution)
 * Only one exchange during PoW (as an option to keep your coins in another place, that is pointless since dev can make whatever he wants, if you trust him its the same)
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
This is a very interesting debate. I for one, like the concept of limited m/h mining. Puts mining back on an even playing field for all. The downfall is no exchanges till after pow, which is ok, but hinders the immediate value of the coin, and for some miners a quick return is needed or a portion of for electric bills, financing of equipment etc. IF dedicated pool and so on would agree to the stipulations of the 50 m/h limit then give them the code. We're at block 8515 at the moment, so it will be a long haul until we reach the pos phase. So this coin probably will not see it worth until then, which does suck. Maybe it the price to pay for the concept.? I do wish Bittrex and the devs would come to a quick resolution however, I'm not sure about all that crap binaryclock was referring to and the secret society BS? he kinda spoke out of both sides of his mouth I feel. But lets face it the only ones making any money off of mining is the pool operators, the exchanges and the coin devs, and usually the miners doing all the work, get what's left over after that. I'm all for what's in the miners best interest not the pool operators. We shall see with this coin if its going to do anything for fairness for the miners..... so far yes but is being hindered with no exchanges involved,,, come on bittrex!!!
  
EDIT: If it doesn't find away on to another exchange(s) and the price keeps falling I will be forced to move on to another shit coin and try to make a quick buck,,,, so something needs to give ASAP! without exposure a coin will rot

+1 i agree with you. We need to take the concept and see how the fairness of the concept can be implemented / used in other coins while making things more transparent.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
This is a very interesting debate. I for one, like the concept of limited m/h mining. Puts mining back on an even playing field for all. The downfall is no exchanges till after pow, which is ok, but hinders the immediate value of the coin, and for some miners a quick return is needed or a portion of for electric bills, financing of equipment etc. IF dedicated pool and so on would agree to the stipulations of the 50 m/h limit then give them the code. We're at block 8515 at the moment, so it will be a long haul until we reach the pos phase. So this coin probably will not see it worth until then, which does suck. Maybe it the price to pay for the concept.? I do wish Bittrex and the devs would come to a quick resolution however, I'm not sure about all that crap binaryclock was referring to and the secret society BS? he kinda spoke out of both sides of his mouth I feel. But lets face it the only ones making any money off of mining is the pool operators, the exchanges and the coin devs, and usually the miners doing all the work, get what's left over after that. I'm all for what's in the miners best interest not the pool operators. We shall see with this coin if its going to do anything for fairness for the miners..... so far yes but is being hindered with no exchanges involved,,, come on bittrex!!!
  
EDIT: If it doesn't find away on to another exchange(s) and the price keeps falling I will be forced to move on to another shit coin and try to make a quick buck,,,, so something needs to give ASAP! without exposure a coin will rot
sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 250
I am here for the goodness of Crypto.  I have been here much longer than anyone and have tried to form a society that is good to move forward.  Privatization of crypto will not been tolerated.  You may or may not know there is a society of over 150 people, pool owners, exchanges, leaders in crypto that all VETO'd your coin - it is just not me.  People will not stand for stuff like this - the scams are already too bad and developers are trying to gain more and more control.  It won't happen. 

You seem like a nice guy and for that I feel bad that it worked out like this for you.  Your idea was probably good on paper but you probably never considered the backlash from the engineering community that created these walelts and crypto in general.  Sure miners will mine anything under the sun - they have no idea of the implications.  But the people who created crypto are looking out for them.  Private sources are not accepted, under any circumstance - that is not crypto anymore.. it is paypal or whatever.  We don't want paypals.  People want to be able to control their wallets and review source codes.  We want public ledgers and pools and exchanges, not backroom bargins and developer 100% control.


Privacy is temporary and as soon as the POW stage ends there will be no more privacy. Think about Minerals as being 100% POS where distribution is being achieved by mining and not some random allocation.
Btw, two darlings of crypto - NXT and DRK are/were private. If people are concerned about privacy we should really start with them where millions of dollars have been invested.

I agree with minerals dev. the idea of getting premine for dev from pool fee and cutting off the middleman (other pools) is a good move.
claiming to speak as the representative of merely 150 people does not necessarily means that you representing the goodness of crypto.

I think we safely can say he represent a small group of people that used to make a lot of money the way distribution were done in the past, but won't do it if other ways becomes the norm. He represent the goodness of their pockets, not the goodness of crypto. Just like any other mafia, he's prepared to take it very far to defend his business and it's up to us, the crypto community, to stop it before that sort of people gain too much control.

+1  Grin

Vested interests always shout loudest  Wink
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
price 0.00000331 scramble Lips sealed
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
I am here for the goodness of Crypto.  I have been here much longer than anyone and have tried to form a society that is good to move forward.  Privatization of crypto will not been tolerated.  You may or may not know there is a society of over 150 people, pool owners, exchanges, leaders in crypto that all VETO'd your coin - it is just not me.  People will not stand for stuff like this - the scams are already too bad and developers are trying to gain more and more control.  It won't happen. 

You seem like a nice guy and for that I feel bad that it worked out like this for you.  Your idea was probably good on paper but you probably never considered the backlash from the engineering community that created these walelts and crypto in general.  Sure miners will mine anything under the sun - they have no idea of the implications.  But the people who created crypto are looking out for them.  Private sources are not accepted, under any circumstance - that is not crypto anymore.. it is paypal or whatever.  We don't want paypals.  People want to be able to control their wallets and review source codes.  We want public ledgers and pools and exchanges, not backroom bargins and developer 100% control.


Privacy is temporary and as soon as the POW stage ends there will be no more privacy. Think about Minerals as being 100% POS where distribution is being achieved by mining and not some random allocation.
Btw, two darlings of crypto - NXT and DRK are/were private. If people are concerned about privacy we should really start with them where millions of dollars have been invested.

I agree with minerals dev. the idea of getting premine for dev from pool fee and cutting off the middleman (other pools) is a good move.
claiming to speak as the representative of merely 150 people does not necessarily means that you representing the goodness of crypto.

I think we safely can say he represent a small group of people that used to make a lot of money the way distribution were done in the past, but won't do it if other ways becomes the norm. He represent the goodness of their pockets, not the goodness of crypto. Just like any other mafia, he's prepared to take it very far to defend his business and it's up to us, the crypto community, to stop it before that sort of people gain too much control.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Code:
[2:14am]   do you plan on adding minerals?
[2:15am] psorano: as of right now, we dnt plan on it
[2:15am] minerals is an interesting concept but it violates our principle of open source wallets
[2:15am] they were willing to give us the source but i think the community needs to read and review the code
[2:16am] we're willing to reconsider based on feedback from the community.
[2:16am] *dumps bag on ccex*
[2:17am] but imagine if someone decides to bash the mineral thread, no one will be able to independantly verify one way or the other.
[2:19am] the other reason were not willing to launch it yet is that all of the pools are under their control. they can 51% attack us at any time
[2:19am] i have no evidence that why would. the mineral coins have been very transparent with us up to this point. but its a definite worry

The dev already stated that Bittrex would not do anything until after POW is over.


This coin probably is a scam  Roll Eyes

Beware , like Honorcoin

this twat is a fud poster ignore him


Bittrex Bill is very smart.  In fact, Mintpal and Poloniex say the same.  Bill is beating around the bush being political here,  where in fact, the real reason is the privatization of Cryptocurrency which Bittrex, Poloniex, Mintpal, and other smart exchanges DO NOT AGREE WITH.

Do not make crypto private, you will fail.

I don't understand why are you personally so against this idea. I truly hope that future coins will think about implementing something similar. Pools, like yours, have too much influence and power over crypto and that can't be good. ASICs are another problem. Privacy is temporary and only during the POW stage, moreover source code was given to some people. As the POW stage approaches its end the source and wallets will be released. I think that comparison to Microsoft's secrecy is just not fair.

ps Part of Darkcoin code is private but you support it, why?

btw do you guys remember when was NXT code released? I think at the beginning of this year, something like 2 months after their IPO.

I am here for the goodness of Crypto.  I have been here much longer than anyone and have tried to form a society that is good to move forward.  Privatization of crypto will not been tolerated.  You may or may not know there is a society of over 150 people, pool owners, exchanges, leaders in crypto that all VETO'd your coin - it is just not me.  People will not stand for stuff like this - the scams are already too bad and developers are trying to gain more and more control.  It won't happen. 

You seem like a nice guy and for that I feel bad that it worked out like this for you.  Your idea was probably good on paper but you probably never considered the backlash from the engineering community that created these walelts and crypto in general.  Sure miners will mine anything under the sun - they have no idea of the implications.  But the people who created crypto are looking out for them.  Private sources are not accepted, under any circumstance - that is not crypto anymore.. it is paypal or whatever.  We don't want paypals.  People want to be able to control their wallets and review source codes.  We want public ledgers and pools and exchanges, not backroom bargins and developer 100% control.


Privacy is temporary and as soon as the POW stage ends there will be no more privacy. Think about Minerals as being 100% POS where distribution is being achieved by mining and not some random allocation.
Btw, two darlings of crypto - NXT and DRK are/were private. If people are concerned about privacy we should really start with them where millions of dollars have been invested.

I agree with minerals dev. the idea of getting premine for dev from pool fee and cutting off the middleman (other pools) is a good move.
claiming to speak as the representative of merely 150 people does not necessarily means that you representing the goodness of crypto.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028
#mitandopelomundo
Code:
[2:14am]   do you plan on adding minerals?
[2:15am] psorano: as of right now, we dnt plan on it
[2:15am] minerals is an interesting concept but it violates our principle of open source wallets
[2:15am] they were willing to give us the source but i think the community needs to read and review the code
[2:16am] we're willing to reconsider based on feedback from the community.
[2:16am] *dumps bag on ccex*
[2:17am] but imagine if someone decides to bash the mineral thread, no one will be able to independantly verify one way or the other.
[2:19am] the other reason were not willing to launch it yet is that all of the pools are under their control. they can 51% attack us at any time
[2:19am] i have no evidence that why would. the mineral coins have been very transparent with us up to this point. but its a definite worry

The dev already stated that Bittrex would not do anything until after POW is over.


This coin probably is a scam  Roll Eyes

Beware , like Honorcoin

this twat is a fud poster ignore him


Bittrex Bill is very smart.  In fact, Mintpal and Poloniex say the same.  Bill is beating around the bush being political here,  where in fact, the real reason is the privatization of Cryptocurrency which Bittrex, Poloniex, Mintpal, and other smart exchanges DO NOT AGREE WITH.

Do not make crypto private, you will fail.

I don't understand why are you personally so against this idea. I truly hope that future coins will think about implementing something similar. Pools, like yours, have too much influence and power over crypto and that can't be good. ASICs are another problem. Privacy is temporary and only during the POW stage, moreover source code was given to some people. As the POW stage approaches its end the source and wallets will be released. I think that comparison to Microsoft's secrecy is just not fair.

ps Part of Darkcoin code is private but you support it, why?

btw do you guys remember when was NXT code released? I think at the beginning of this year, something like 2 months after their IPO.

I am here for the goodness of Crypto.  I have been here much longer than anyone and have tried to form a society that is good to move forward.  Privatization of crypto will not been tolerated.  You may or may not know there is a society of over 150 people, pool owners, exchanges, leaders in crypto that all VETO'd your coin - it is just not me.  People will not stand for stuff like this - the scams are already too bad and developers are trying to gain more and more control.  It won't happen.  

You seem like a nice guy and for that I feel bad that it worked out like this for you.  Your idea was probably good on paper but you probably never considered the backlash from the engineering community that created these walelts and crypto in general.  Sure miners will mine anything under the sun - they have no idea of the implications.  But the people who created crypto are looking out for them.  Private sources are not accepted, under any circumstance - that is not crypto anymore.. it is paypal or whatever.  We don't want paypals.  People want to be able to control their wallets and review source codes.  We want public ledgers and pools and exchanges, not backroom bargins and developer 100% control.




LOL, what a bunch of bullshit.

You don't want privatization of crypto yet you talk about this secret society made out of elitists? Get real. If anything of what you're saying is true than you're obviously trying monopolize the market. Fucking sick TBH.

And please, give me a break, don't talk about the "people" like you're trying to protect them/us or some other shit. The way you act, write and express w/e resembles the lowest form of politics - egocentric thinking at its purest.
Sure miners will mine anything under the sun - they have no idea of the implications.
Are you real? and you implementing all those shit coins do know? You haven't got a fuck clue. You're just cashing them all out.

We want public ledgers and pools and exchanges, not backroom bargins
Says the guy in his so called hidden society.
And who the fuck is we.

+1000
binaryclock is sad because dedicatedpool with yours bigfarms cannot mine minerals lol
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Code:
[2:14am]   do you plan on adding minerals?
[2:15am] psorano: as of right now, we dnt plan on it
[2:15am] minerals is an interesting concept but it violates our principle of open source wallets
[2:15am] they were willing to give us the source but i think the community needs to read and review the code
[2:16am] we're willing to reconsider based on feedback from the community.
[2:16am] *dumps bag on ccex*
[2:17am] but imagine if someone decides to bash the mineral thread, no one will be able to independantly verify one way or the other.
[2:19am] the other reason were not willing to launch it yet is that all of the pools are under their control. they can 51% attack us at any time
[2:19am] i have no evidence that why would. the mineral coins have been very transparent with us up to this point. but its a definite worry

The dev already stated that Bittrex would not do anything until after POW is over.


This coin probably is a scam  Roll Eyes

Beware , like Honorcoin

this twat is a fud poster ignore him


Bittrex Bill is very smart.  In fact, Mintpal and Poloniex say the same.  Bill is beating around the bush being political here,  where in fact, the real reason is the privatization of Cryptocurrency which Bittrex, Poloniex, Mintpal, and other smart exchanges DO NOT AGREE WITH.

Do not make crypto private, you will fail.

I don't understand why are you personally so against this idea. I truly hope that future coins will think about implementing something similar. Pools, like yours, have too much influence and power over crypto and that can't be good. ASICs are another problem. Privacy is temporary and only during the POW stage, moreover source code was given to some people. As the POW stage approaches its end the source and wallets will be released. I think that comparison to Microsoft's secrecy is just not fair.

ps Part of Darkcoin code is private but you support it, why?

btw do you guys remember when was NXT code released? I think at the beginning of this year, something like 2 months after their IPO.

I am here for the goodness of Crypto.  I have been here much longer than anyone and have tried to form a society that is good to move forward.  Privatization of crypto will not been tolerated.  You may or may not know there is a society of over 150 people, pool owners, exchanges, leaders in crypto that all VETO'd your coin - it is just not me.  People will not stand for stuff like this - the scams are already too bad and developers are trying to gain more and more control.  It won't happen.  

You seem like a nice guy and for that I feel bad that it worked out like this for you.  Your idea was probably good on paper but you probably never considered the backlash from the engineering community that created these walelts and crypto in general.  Sure miners will mine anything under the sun - they have no idea of the implications.  But the people who created crypto are looking out for them.  Private sources are not accepted, under any circumstance - that is not crypto anymore.. it is paypal or whatever.  We don't want paypals.  People want to be able to control their wallets and review source codes.  We want public ledgers and pools and exchanges, not backroom bargins and developer 100% control.




LOL, what a bunch of bullshit.

You don't want privatization of crypto yet you talk about this secret society made out of elitists? Get real. If anything of what you're saying is true than you're obviously trying monopolize the market. Fucking sick TBH.

And please, give me a break, don't talk about the "people" like you're trying to protect them/us or some other shit. The way you act, write and express w/e resembles the lowest form of politics - egocentric thinking at its purest.
Sure miners will mine anything under the sun - they have no idea of the implications.
Are you real? and you implementing all those shit coins do know? You haven't got a fuck clue. You're just cashing them all out.

We want public ledgers and pools and exchanges, not backroom bargins
Says the guy in his so called hidden society.
And who the fuck is we.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013
The coin is just trading at the rate on par with mining it. The price will remain in limbo until POW ends and the wallets and everything is opened up. Once the code has been scrutinised and if everything checks out, it will be business as usual. If everything checks out there will at least not be a top heavy rich list of the mega miner/dumpers. (Hopefully). A big IF everything checks out and turns out to be legit and above board that is.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
Code:
[2:14am]   do you plan on adding minerals?
[2:15am] psorano: as of right now, we dnt plan on it
[2:15am] minerals is an interesting concept but it violates our principle of open source wallets
[2:15am] they were willing to give us the source but i think the community needs to read and review the code
[2:16am] we're willing to reconsider based on feedback from the community.
[2:16am] *dumps bag on ccex*
[2:17am] but imagine if someone decides to bash the mineral thread, no one will be able to independantly verify one way or the other.
[2:19am] the other reason were not willing to launch it yet is that all of the pools are under their control. they can 51% attack us at any time
[2:19am] i have no evidence that why would. the mineral coins have been very transparent with us up to this point. but its a definite worry

The dev already stated that Bittrex would not do anything until after POW is over.


This coin probably is a scam  Roll Eyes

Beware , like Honorcoin

this twat is a fud poster ignore him


Bittrex Bill is very smart.  In fact, Mintpal and Poloniex say the same.  Bill is beating around the bush being political here,  where in fact, the real reason is the privatization of Cryptocurrency which Bittrex, Poloniex, Mintpal, and other smart exchanges DO NOT AGREE WITH.

Do not make crypto private, you will fail.

I don't understand why are you personally so against this idea. I truly hope that future coins will think about implementing something similar. Pools, like yours, have too much influence and power over crypto and that can't be good. ASICs are another problem. Privacy is temporary and only during the POW stage, moreover source code was given to some people. As the POW stage approaches its end the source and wallets will be released. I think that comparison to Microsoft's secrecy is just not fair.

ps Part of Darkcoin code is private but you support it, why?

btw do you guys remember when was NXT code released? I think at the beginning of this year, something like 2 months after their IPO.

I am here for the goodness of Crypto.  I have been here much longer than anyone and have tried to form a society that is good to move forward.  Privatization of crypto will not been tolerated.  You may or may not know there is a society of over 150 people, pool owners, exchanges, leaders in crypto that all VETO'd your coin - it is just not me.  People will not stand for stuff like this - the scams are already too bad and developers are trying to gain more and more control.  It won't happen. 

You seem like a nice guy and for that I feel bad that it worked out like this for you.  Your idea was probably good on paper but you probably never considered the backlash from the engineering community that created these walelts and crypto in general.  Sure miners will mine anything under the sun - they have no idea of the implications.  But the people who created crypto are looking out for them.  Private sources are not accepted, under any circumstance - that is not crypto anymore.. it is paypal or whatever.  We don't want paypals.  People want to be able to control their wallets and review source codes.  We want public ledgers and pools and exchanges, not backroom bargins and developer 100% control.


Privacy is temporary and as soon as the POW stage ends there will be no more privacy. Think about Minerals as being 100% POS where distribution is being achieved by mining and not some random allocation.
Btw, two darlings of crypto - NXT and DRK are/were private. If people are concerned about privacy we should really start with them where millions of dollars have been invested.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Code:
[2:14am]   do you plan on adding minerals?
[2:15am] psorano: as of right now, we dnt plan on it
[2:15am] minerals is an interesting concept but it violates our principle of open source wallets
[2:15am] they were willing to give us the source but i think the community needs to read and review the code
[2:16am] we're willing to reconsider based on feedback from the community.
[2:16am] *dumps bag on ccex*
[2:17am] but imagine if someone decides to bash the mineral thread, no one will be able to independantly verify one way or the other.
[2:19am] the other reason were not willing to launch it yet is that all of the pools are under their control. they can 51% attack us at any time
[2:19am] i have no evidence that why would. the mineral coins have been very transparent with us up to this point. but its a definite worry

The dev already stated that Bittrex would not do anything until after POW is over.


This coin probably is a scam  Roll Eyes

Beware , like Honorcoin

this twat is a fud poster ignore him


Bittrex Bill is very smart.  In fact, Mintpal and Poloniex say the same.  Bill is beating around the bush being political here,  where in fact, the real reason is the privatization of Cryptocurrency which Bittrex, Poloniex, Mintpal, and other smart exchanges DO NOT AGREE WITH.

Do not make crypto private, you will fail.

I don't understand why are you personally so against this idea. I truly hope that future coins will think about implementing something similar. Pools, like yours, have too much influence and power over crypto and that can't be good. ASICs are another problem. Privacy is temporary and only during the POW stage, moreover source code was given to some people. As the POW stage approaches its end the source and wallets will be released. I think that comparison to Microsoft's secrecy is just not fair.

ps Part of Darkcoin code is private but you support it, why?

btw do you guys remember when was NXT code released? I think at the beginning of this year, something like 2 months after their IPO.

I am here for the goodness of Crypto.  I have been here much longer than anyone and have tried to form a society that is good to move forward.  Privatization of crypto will not been tolerated.  You may or may not know there is a society of over 150 people, pool owners, exchanges, leaders in crypto that all VETO'd your coin - it is just not me.  People will not stand for stuff like this - the scams are already too bad and developers are trying to gain more and more control.  It won't happen. 

You seem like a nice guy and for that I feel bad that it worked out like this for you.  Your idea was probably good on paper but you probably never considered the backlash from the engineering community that created these walelts and crypto in general.  Sure miners will mine anything under the sun - they have no idea of the implications.  But the people who created crypto are looking out for them.  Private sources are not accepted, under any circumstance - that is not crypto anymore.. it is paypal or whatever.  We don't want paypals.  People want to be able to control their wallets and review source codes.  We want public ledgers and pools and exchanges, not backroom bargins and developer 100% control.



hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 531
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features Undecided

I feel like Minerals provide great innovation!
ASICs and multipools were raping and killing every coin. With minerals it is not possible. Wait for the bigger exchange and the price will skyrocket.
Actually, why am I telling you this? The more weak hands now - the lower price for me to buy Minerals  Grin

No ASICs and multipools not mean this coin become valuable.
If the DEV team have no plan for the next step..It will dead after POW

have you seen the crap coins released recently(the lineup after boostcoin i mean), they become valuable without offering anything new, just useless promises

this coin isn't certainly worse than those

couldn't agree more. I have no idea why people buy all the shitcoins that are listed on bittrex every day. Obviously I am not a professional trader and I may not see the big picture here, but all that I see is 99% coins has nothing new and die in few weeks. Not the case with Minerals here

Probably, but not sure.

I think a massive dump come when pow end and when a bigger exchange list this one.
Lot of people wait to sell this one, and with one weeks of mining, big amount will dump.
Hope i'm false.

what dump you are talking about, the coin is already in a dump state, 300 lol

The dump of those who hold and waiting for a bigger exchange in hope to make better profit
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
Code:
[2:14am]   do you plan on adding minerals?
[2:15am] psorano: as of right now, we dnt plan on it
[2:15am] minerals is an interesting concept but it violates our principle of open source wallets
[2:15am] they were willing to give us the source but i think the community needs to read and review the code
[2:16am] we're willing to reconsider based on feedback from the community.
[2:16am] *dumps bag on ccex*
[2:17am] but imagine if someone decides to bash the mineral thread, no one will be able to independantly verify one way or the other.
[2:19am] the other reason were not willing to launch it yet is that all of the pools are under their control. they can 51% attack us at any time
[2:19am] i have no evidence that why would. the mineral coins have been very transparent with us up to this point. but its a definite worry

The dev already stated that Bittrex would not do anything until after POW is over.


This coin probably is a scam  Roll Eyes

Beware , like Honorcoin

this twat is a fud poster ignore him


Bittrex Bill is very smart.  In fact, Mintpal and Poloniex say the same.  Bill is beating around the bush being political here,  where in fact, the real reason is the privatization of Cryptocurrency which Bittrex, Poloniex, Mintpal, and other smart exchanges DO NOT AGREE WITH.

Do not make crypto private, you will fail.

I don't understand why are you personally so against this idea. I truly hope that future coins will think about implementing something similar. Pools, like yours, have too much influence and power over crypto and that can't be good. ASICs are another problem. Privacy is temporary and only during the POW stage, moreover source code was given to some people. As the POW stage approaches its end the source and wallets will be released. I think that comparison to Microsoft's secrecy is just not fair.

ps Part of Darkcoin code is private but you support it, why?

btw do you guys remember when was NXT code released? I think at the beginning of this year, something like 2 months after their IPO.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Code:
[2:14am]   do you plan on adding minerals?
[2:15am] psorano: as of right now, we dnt plan on it
[2:15am] minerals is an interesting concept but it violates our principle of open source wallets
[2:15am] they were willing to give us the source but i think the community needs to read and review the code
[2:16am] we're willing to reconsider based on feedback from the community.
[2:16am] *dumps bag on ccex*
[2:17am] but imagine if someone decides to bash the mineral thread, no one will be able to independantly verify one way or the other.
[2:19am] the other reason were not willing to launch it yet is that all of the pools are under their control. they can 51% attack us at any time
[2:19am] i have no evidence that why would. the mineral coins have been very transparent with us up to this point. but its a definite worry

The dev already stated that Bittrex would not do anything until after POW is over.


This coin probably is a scam  Roll Eyes

Beware , like Honorcoin

this twat is a fud poster ignore him


Bittrex Bill is very smart.  In fact, Mintpal and Poloniex say the same.  Bill is beating around the bush being political here,  where in fact, the real reason is the privatization of Cryptocurrency which Bittrex, Poloniex, Mintpal, and other smart exchanges DO NOT AGREE WITH.

Do not make crypto private, you will fail.


full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 250
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Jump to: