and from all the places... why this shitty exchange?
Topic: [ANN][MIN] Minerals - POS | Developing own anon solution | - page 389. (Read 742176 times)
Dev.... can you pls explain your double bitcointalk indentity?
and from all the places... why this shitty exchange?
and from all the places... why this shitty exchange?
He went grey because of Bitcoin?
Fuck Bitcoin then. he put on 50 years judging by his I.D.
Perhaps that's because all the ASIC increased Block Generation Speed and had an effect on his time / space continuum
Fuck Bitcoin then. he put on 50 years judging by his I.D.
Perhaps that's because all the ASIC increased Block Generation Speed and had an effect on his time / space continuum
He went grey coz all the shit that is happening here in the altcoin section. This is not what he intended.
We are all mining this coin to eventually swap it out for BTC - another coin where the identity of the dev is unknown 
The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast.
The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast.
so all the Satoshi Nakamoto stories aren't true?
It's still the wrong guy, allegedly
he isn't? coz here he's showing his ID which clearly states that he IS the inventor of bitcoin
We are all mining this coin to eventually swap it out for BTC - another coin where the identity of the dev is unknown
The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast.
The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast.
so all the Satoshi Nakamoto stories aren't true?
It's still the wrong guy, allegedly
We are all mining this coin to eventually swap it out for BTC - another coin where the identity of the dev is unknown
The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast.
The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast.
so all the Satoshi Nakamoto stories aren't true?
We are all mining this coin to eventually swap it out for BTC - another coin where the identity of the dev is unknown
The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast.
The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast.
Dev, care to explain this?
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/xddcoin-x13-algo-mine-now-no-ipolaunched.328863/#post-6995586
I don't care that you launch one, two or ten coins at once, but be honest about your identity >_>
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/xddcoin-x13-algo-mine-now-no-ipolaunched.328863/#post-6995586
I don't care that you launch one, two or ten coins at once, but be honest about your identity >_>
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features
isn't the price low enough for you fudders?
fudders are so greedy nowadays
most fudders have budget of 2 satoshi per coin, any coin
I would LOVE to by Minerals for 2 satoshi per coin
So untill the coin costs 1 satoshi FUD would be profitableLOL
FUD eh?
you must have patience of a saint
well, I don't
This is why I have to place my orders at ~330 and w8 for the weak souls to sell me their future profits
Why dev want bittrex added after POW end ?
Any premeditated ?
just let to small exchange added
Any premeditated ?
just let to small exchange added
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features
isn't the price low enough for you fudders?
fudders are so greedy nowadays
most fudders have budget of 2 satoshi per coin, any coin
I would LOVE to by Minerals for 2 satoshi per coin
So untill the coin costs 1 satoshi FUD would be profitable just clone coin, no innovations, no new features
isn't the price low enough for you fudders?
fudders are so greedy nowadays
most fudders have budget of 2 satoshi per coin, any coin
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features
isn't the price low enough for you fudders?
fudders are so greedy nowadays
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features
I feel like Minerals provide great innovation!
ASICs and multipools were raping and killing every coin. With minerals it is not possible. Wait for the bigger exchange and the price will skyrocket.
Actually, why am I telling you this? The more weak hands now - the lower price for me to buy Minerals
I hope that the wallet is very beautiful.
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features
Great.The coin looks awesome. 
I don't believe Pool.mn are scammers in any shape or form.
12000 minerals and counting here!
Bittrex after POW as Dev said.
The more FUD I see the easier it is for me to mine with my 50MHS
Bring it!
12000 minerals and counting here!
Bittrex after POW as Dev said.
The more FUD I see the easier it is for me to mine with my 50MHS
Bring it!
+1
The fact that coins are available for withdrawals and trade means that EACH miner is free to make their own choices.
Mine, or don't.
Withdraw, or leave in the pool.
Sell, or hold on C-Cex
Peace
Bitcointalk mirror: https://bitcointa.lk/threads/xddcoin-x13-algo-mine-now-no-ipolaunched.328863/#post-6995586
any comment from dev or supporter of this coin?
lol the dev caught red handed
what about pool.mn is it scammy?
I know a few pool operators who are also coin devs so I don't see what the big deal is. Regarding legitimacy of the pools, well Ive used that pool on a few occasion and never had any problems. But admittedly there is mixed feelings about that particular pool on these forums.
Actually I find it somewhat refreshing that a pool operator (if he is) take a stance against big hashers and mining farms.
Lets look at the fact though about the coin. launch was very smooth, there seems to be nice distribution, no forks, confirmation that there is a wallet, there is a block explorer, coins are transferable and tradable on an exchange, and finally there are no multi-pools dumping!
or the opposite. pool.mn literally centralized this coin to be the only ones controlling it.
if you can propose an alternative way instead of this, would be welcome, but for now this is the only solution against farm centralization
funny, to fight centralization you need centralization...
Guys, please enlighten us what the issue is about pool.mn? Has pool.mn done something in the past that we have to be concerned about? What is the significance if the dev team is related to pool.mn?
Everything about minerals coin so far has been smooth and there is nothing really to complain about at this point. Yes the POW portion is closed, but the answer will always lie somewhere in-between centralised and decentralized, open and closed source. Exactly where in-between something needs to be depends on the risks one want to mitigate for a coin and the controls needed to be implemented to mitigate the risks.
So the alarmists about pool.mn please tell us why you are concerned and why I should rather move my resources elsewhere, although I have not had any issues with minerals coin so far?
Everything about minerals coin so far has been smooth and there is nothing really to complain about at this point. Yes the POW portion is closed, but the answer will always lie somewhere in-between centralised and decentralized, open and closed source. Exactly where in-between something needs to be depends on the risks one want to mitigate for a coin and the controls needed to be implemented to mitigate the risks.
So the alarmists about pool.mn please tell us why you are concerned and why I should rather move my resources elsewhere, although I have not had any issues with minerals coin so far?
For me it is better that we know who the developer, only I do not like that the developer has not confirmed this fact above, when someone asked him about it directly.
Jump to: