[ANN][MIN] Minerals - POS | Developing own anon solution | - page 410.

Zorro23hu

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: PWDDCZ on June 13, 2014, 02:07:48 AM

Quote from: hamba on June 13, 2014, 02:02:43 AM

Quote from: Zulandio on June 13, 2014, 01:55:49 AM

I do think it's silly to stop multiple workers on a pool. But I don't really feel sorry for anyone that lost hash because of it. I have DRK for a fail over if you don't have a failover pool or two that's your fault even if it was just a DDoS you would still have lost hash. Protect yourself.

The pool wasn't dead, it was rejecting shares from deleted workers. How do you configure failover to help you in that situation?

Good question!

Maybe this "--disable-rejecting"? In the documentation wrote as "Automatically disable pools that continually reject shares"

seyond

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: megadestruct61 on June 13, 2014, 02:08:18 AM

Quote from: guessren on June 13, 2014, 01:57:37 AM

WARNING! This too much like a cheating coin 'wecoin' . Maybe devs using these hashs to dig other X11 coin。 And then miners will get noting。

Well I can be fairly sure that isn't happening. The difficulty is not changing wildly and does not correspond to any other x11 coin I know to mine so it would appear as tho we are mining a new coin. Does feel weird to keep this many coins on the pool tho I must say...

look at the difficulty the same as which coin?

seyond

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: Tony luo on June 13, 2014, 01:52:37 AM

[MIN] Minerals. Launched!

You may contact Bittrex to add MIN-BTC market! Twitter: @BittrexExchange , Ticket. Thanks!

How do you think about it ?
first ,all the coins are in control of the dev. how we could exchange the coin?
second ,i don't really trust the power of the dev if they ask us to contact the exchange market ?
i think the the dev's economic power is a basic of a new coin.

if you want to be added to bittrex, you need a community.

bittrex also want to see we have a big community. so the more requests they receive from us, the more probability we have to be added bittrex

guessren

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: harihebat on June 13, 2014, 02:02:12 AM

Quote from: guessren on June 13, 2014, 01:57:37 AM

WARNING! This too much like a cheating coin 'wecoin' . Maybe devs using these hashs to dig other X11 coin。 And then miners will get noting。

maybe but i hope not..... i'm fan warcraft and starcraft

In 'wecoin' project ,I lost 0.2BTC ,and 10MLTC_hash*5days. and then I get nothing. I just want to say,'Everyone don't waste too much of your hash.'

megadestruct61

sr. member

Activity: 334

Merit: 250

Quote from: guessren on June 13, 2014, 01:57:37 AM

WARNING! This too much like a cheating coin 'wecoin' . Maybe devs using these hashs to dig other X11 coin。 And then miners will get noting。

Well I can be fairly sure that isn't happening. The difficulty is not changing wildly and does not correspond to any other x11 coin I know to mine so it would appear as tho we are mining a new coin. Does feel weird to keep this many coins on the pool tho I must say...

PWDDCZ

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: hamba on June 13, 2014, 02:02:43 AM

Quote from: Zulandio on June 13, 2014, 01:55:49 AM

I do think it's silly to stop multiple workers on a pool. But I don't really feel sorry for anyone that lost hash because of it. I have DRK for a fail over if you don't have a failover pool or two that's your fault even if it was just a DDoS you would still have lost hash. Protect yourself.

The pool wasn't dead, it was rejecting shares from deleted workers. How do you configure failover to help you in that situation?

Good question!

huynhthuan99

full member

Activity: 144

Merit: 100

hot coin..very good

hamba

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Quote from: Zulandio on June 13, 2014, 01:55:49 AM

I do think it's silly to stop multiple workers on a pool. But I don't really feel sorry for anyone that lost hash because of it. I have DRK for a fail over if you don't have a failover pool or two that's your fault even if it was just a DDoS you would still have lost hash. Protect yourself.

The pool wasn't dead, it was rejecting shares from deleted workers. How do you configure failover to help you in that situation?

harihebat

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: guessren on June 13, 2014, 01:57:37 AM

WARNING! This too much like a cheating coin 'wecoin' . Maybe devs using these hashs to dig other X11 coin。 And then miners will get noting。

maybe but i hope not..... i'm fan warcraft and starcraft

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

newbie fudders are hilarious

PWDDCZ

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

I am very curious about why any1 can speak italian or arabian that's OK CUZ it's so common. But if you say chinese in this thread occasionlly,you will be labelled dog ! What a fuck superiority some1 shows!

guessren

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

WARNING! This too much like a cheating coin 'wecoin' . Maybe devs using these hashs to dig other X11 coin。 And then miners will get noting。

Zulandio

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

I do think it's silly to stop multiple workers on a pool. But I don't really feel sorry for anyone that lost hash because of it. I have DRK for a fail over if you don't have a failover pool or two that's your fault even if it was just a DDoS you would still have lost hash. Protect yourself.

Tony luo

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

[MIN] Minerals. Launched!

You may contact Bittrex to add MIN-BTC market! Twitter: @BittrexExchange , Ticket. Thanks!

How do you think about it ?
first ,all the coins are in control of the dev. how we could exchange the coin?
second ,i don't really trust the power of the dev if they ask us to contact the exchange market ?
i think the the dev's economic power is a basic of a new coin.

hamba

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Quote from: Klarisskin on June 13, 2014, 01:33:49 AM

I had 3 backup pools in failover, but fail-over didn't trigger because pool 0 was alive, it was just rejecting each and every share from my workers 2, 3 and 4.

Same here. If the pool had shown up as dead it wouldn't be such an issue.

Although the devs also stated that any changes will be announced well ahead and one hour is not well ahead. He says he did it because the community demanded it, but what about the part of the community that was sleeping? They couldn't demand it to left it as is until they wake up. Some compensation to the damaged parties should be made. The dev will have 1% of the coin anyway, so it shouldn't be the problem.

It's nice to see that the dev cares, but you can't haste unannounced solutions to problems because they generate more problems and one hour ahead can hardly be called announcement.

Imagine Facebook now announces it will be deleting all accounts with more than 5 photo albums in one hour... That wouldn't be so cool.

Zorro23hu

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: Klarisskin on June 13, 2014, 01:33:49 AM

Quote from: Zorro23hu on June 13, 2014, 01:32:19 AM

Everytime should be configured a or many backup pool with other coin to avoid this situation, e.g. Darkcoin...

I had 3 backup pools in failover, but fail-over didn't trigger because pool 0 was alive, it was just rejecting each and every share from my workers 2, 3 and 4.

Youre right, it's a different story. I haven't any idea to avoid this situation atm.

atchoum6760

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1063

Hi !

I have a problem with my new config.
I have 2 R9 270 x you can see please.
thx

jc12345

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1013

Quote from: seyond on June 13, 2014, 12:47:37 AM

cloak burncoin cinni cry

all of these coin is controled by chinese

do you understand? silly guys.

do you think all of you(poor dogs) can pump the market？

I agree guys, leave the silly nationality arguments, that is for the children. The Chinese play a very important part in crypto and the economy of the world. Lets all get along together nicely.

Klarisskin

full member

Activity: 138

Merit: 100

Quote from: Zorro23hu on June 13, 2014, 01:32:19 AM

Everytime should be configured a or many backup pool with other coin to avoid this situation, e.g. Darkcoin...

I had 3 backup pools in failover, but fail-over didn't trigger because pool 0 was alive, it was just rejecting each and every share from my workers 2, 3 and 4.

Zorro23hu

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Everytime should be configured one or many backup pool with other coin to avoid this (or other) situation, e.g. Darkcoin... My configuration/starting bat file has 5-6 different coin pool address.

Topic: [ANN][MIN] Minerals - POS | Developing own anon solution | - page 410. (Read 742186 times)