[ANN][MULTI][VARDIFF] TradeMyBit MULTIALGO Profit Swap w/ Optional Auto-exchange - page 14.

bullus

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: Xenocyde on July 11, 2014, 04:21:09 AM

Quote from: bullus on July 11, 2014, 02:40:48 AM

I copied the 14.6 files into sgminer..using 14.4drivers

I haven't tried to mine Nist5 just yet, waiting for an autoswitch port or at least some profitable coins out there. So if I use that version I downloaded from you, I won't need a special bin file to get 10.9 MH/s with Nist5?

Nope, I didn't use a special bin (yet).

Xenocyde

sr. member

Activity: 265

Merit: 250

Quote from: bullus on July 11, 2014, 02:40:48 AM

I copied the 14.6 files into sgminer..using 14.4drivers

I haven't tried to mine Nist5 just yet, waiting for an autoswitch port or at least some profitable coins out there. So if I use that version I downloaded from you, I won't need a special bin file to get 10.9 MH/s with Nist5?

MeteoImpact

member

Activity: 97

Merit: 10

Shieldcoin just forked, and I feel like we're on the wrong fork.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-shld-shieldcoin-x15-pos-fair-launch-whitepaper-release-681570

bullus

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

I copied the 14.6 files into sgminer..using 14.4drivers

Xenocyde

sr. member

Activity: 265

Merit: 250

Quote from: bullus on July 10, 2014, 11:39:48 PM

Quote from: induktor on July 10, 2014, 09:43:47 PM

Quote from: bullus on July 10, 2014, 03:25:43 PM

Anyone test nist5 hashrates?

I get 10.9Mh/s with a 7950@1040/1500 , what are yours speed?

What are your settings for that hash rate?

question, is the kernel talkcoin-mod.cl better, or i need specifically nist5.cl ? (EDIT: in my miner nist5.cl gives invalid nonce error (sgminer 4.2.1))

EDIT: OK I figured it out, stock speeds with R9 280X I get 7.5MH per card, -w 128 -I 20 -g 4 -lookup-gap 2, tc 8192, kernel is talkcoin-mod.cl

Code:

	{
		"name" : "nist5",
		"algorithm" : "talkcoin-mod",
		"intensity" : "18",
                "hamsi-expand-big" : "1",
		"gpu-threads" : "2",
		"gpu-powertune" : "8",
                "gpu-fan" : "65-65",
		"worksize": "64"
	},

-----
"default-profile": "x11",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "4",
"failover-only" : true,
"shaders" : "1792",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"temp-cutoff" : "96",
"temp-overheat" : "94",
"temp-target" : "88",
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"shares" : "0",
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"no-restart" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"show-coindiff" : true,
"remove-disabled" : true,
"extranonce-subscription" : true
}

Code:

sgminer 4.2.2-254-gfdd4 - Started: [2014-07-11 05:41:56] - [0 days 00:11:01]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):43.77M (avg):40.73Mh/s | A:2  R:0  HW:0  WU:0.669/m
ST: 0  SS: 1  NB: 4  LW: 291  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to am02 nist5 multi (stratum) diff 0.087 as user xxx
Block: 27f6d7f6...  Diff:29  Started: [05:41:59]  Best share: 0.368
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0:  39.0C  65%    | 10.93M/10.96Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.223/m I:18

Thanks for config. Do you use special bin file for improved hashrates? If so, please provide that too

MeteoImpact

member

Activity: 97

Merit: 10

Any word on what TMB is going to calculate NIST5 hashrates as relative to scrypt? I ask because I run Nvidia cards and need to adjust my switching algorithm for the differing performance between what TMB estimates and what my cards actually get.

bullus

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: induktor on July 10, 2014, 09:43:47 PM

Quote from: bullus on July 10, 2014, 03:25:43 PM

Anyone test nist5 hashrates?

I get 10.9Mh/s with a 7950@1040/1500 , what are yours speed?

What are your settings for that hash rate?

question, is the kernel talkcoin-mod.cl better, or i need specifically nist5.cl ? (EDIT: in my miner nist5.cl gives invalid nonce error (sgminer 4.2.1))

EDIT: OK I figured it out, stock speeds with R9 280X I get 7.5MH per card, -w 128 -I 20 -g 4 -lookup-gap 2, tc 8192, kernel is talkcoin-mod.cl

Code:

	{
		"name" : "nist5",
		"algorithm" : "talkcoin-mod",
		"intensity" : "18",
                "hamsi-expand-big" : "1",
		"gpu-threads" : "2",
		"gpu-powertune" : "8",
                "gpu-fan" : "65-65",
		"worksize": "64"
	},

-----
"default-profile": "x11",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "4",
"failover-only" : true,
"shaders" : "1792",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"temp-cutoff" : "96",
"temp-overheat" : "94",
"temp-target" : "88",
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"shares" : "0",
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"no-restart" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"show-coindiff" : true,
"remove-disabled" : true,
"extranonce-subscription" : true
}

Code:

sgminer 4.2.2-254-gfdd4 - Started: [2014-07-11 05:41:56] - [0 days 00:11:01]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):43.77M (avg):40.73Mh/s | A:2  R:0  HW:0  WU:0.669/m
ST: 0  SS: 1  NB: 4  LW: 291  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to am02 nist5 multi (stratum) diff 0.087 as user xxx
Block: 27f6d7f6...  Diff:29  Started: [05:41:59]  Best share: 0.368
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0:  39.0C  65%    | 10.93M/10.96Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.223/m I:18

induktor

hero member

Activity: 710

Merit: 502

Quote from: bullus on July 10, 2014, 03:25:43 PM

Anyone test nist5 hashrates?

I get 10.9Mh/s with a 7950@1040/1500 , what are yours speed?

What are your settings for that hash rate?

question, is the kernel talkcoin-mod.cl better, or i need specifically nist5.cl ? (EDIT: in my miner nist5.cl gives invalid nonce error (sgminer 4.2.1))

EDIT: OK I figured it out, stock speeds with R9 280X I get 7.5MH per card, -w 128 -I 20 -g 4 -lookup-gap 2, tc 8192, kernel is talkcoin-mod.cl

bullus

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Anyone test nist5 hashrates?

I get 10.9Mh/s with a 7950@1040/1500 , what are yours speed?

boki15

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: dragonmike on July 10, 2014, 10:52:01 AM

I wonder if the card going sick and "gpu still showing activity suggesting a hard hang" phenomenon isn't linked with the switching. I.e. If one card doesn't switch (for whatever reason), it's stuck on the old algo hence not responding properly, leading to the mayhem experienced above.

I thought about this when I read old threads from similar problems... that were mostly happening when using more than one instance of cgminer.

Guess we can only wait for a better, stabler software to be released...

...or TMB to fine-tune its switcher?

I agree, you could be right. For me only 2 versions of ver5 are working, ver 4.2.1 has no issues, but it's a little bit slower. It's not worth to tune anything on TMB if the issue is coming from software. After new stable version TMB would probably need again to retune. It's only question of time, if ver 5 resolves this problem quick, there will be probably no need to tune TMB server. If not, then it's again qustion if TMB needs to reconfigure server and how long does it take. Here I agree again, we just need to wait for stable software, after that TMB will tune it's servers to be more stable, that's just my opinion.

dragonmike

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 556

I wonder if the card going sick and "gpu still showing activity suggesting a hard hang" phenomenon isn't linked with the switching. I.e. If one card doesn't switch (for whatever reason), it's stuck on the old algo hence not responding properly, leading to the mayhem experienced above.

I thought about this when I read old threads from similar problems... that were mostly happening when using more than one instance of cgminer.

Guess we can only wait for a better, stabler software to be released...

...or TMB to fine-tune its switcher?

RoyalSands

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: dragonmike on July 10, 2014, 09:03:03 AM

Quote from: Undland on July 10, 2014, 07:32:39 AM

More than 30 minutes i see this picture. Actually all of my worker is online. Accepted shares going every second.
P.S. What means Enable\Disable word in Monitoring column?

Same thing here. Sgminer is accepting shares and hashing away on the X11/X13/X15 switching ports but my reported hashrate on the website is zero at the moment, worker allegedly "offline".
Fishy.

P.S. it's supposed to send you an email if one of your worker goes offline (if you enable monitoring). The functionality doesn't currently work, however.

The reported hashrate is usually indicative of what was actually happening a few minutes back. There is a reporting delay.

dragonmike

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 556

Quote from: Undland on July 10, 2014, 07:32:39 AM

More than 30 minutes i see this picture. Actually all of my worker is online. Accepted shares going every second.
P.S. What means Enable\Disable word in Monitoring column?

Same thing here. Sgminer is accepting shares and hashing away on the X11/X13/X15 switching ports but my reported hashrate on the website is zero at the moment, worker allegedly "offline".
Fishy.

P.S. it's supposed to send you an email if one of your worker goes offline (if you enable monitoring). The functionality doesn't currently work, however.

boki15

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Guys, you all are using beta software with beta ports. If you expect stability and no disconnects, you should use something stable, even if it's less hash. For me first working V5 version was from 30.06, all other versions did not even start and if it started mining, exactly after 60 seconds sgminers quit.

You can get new miner from nicehash, version 2014-07-08. For me there is no difference in last 2 versions, both work flawless. There was only 1 thing I still do not understand. For some reason I needed to restart my pc when I tried last version. I was mining with 2014-06-30 version, quit with "Q", started version 2014-06-30. Miner did not start and it did not give me any popup or message. I restarted and everything started to work.

As everything is beta, error could be anywhere. I was solo mining, that's why I can say that the issue is probably on sgminer side, but you never know, there could be also some error in server configuration.

If it happens to someone in the night, just switch the miner for the night until the issue is resolved.

BTW: Who gave version 5 to the new miner? It's actually in version 4.2.2. It should be something with 5.x, it's confusing using 4.2.2 and calling it v5.

induktor

hero member

Activity: 710

Merit: 502

Quote from: judgecrypto on July 09, 2014, 09:35:51 PM

Hi,

This is Judge Crypto... the Judge Coin wallet forked at block 6000 to fix a PoS issue. Please update your wallet ASAP.

Thanks!

Judge Crypto

ouch!
thanks for the info

Undland

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1055

More than 30 minutes i see this picture. Actually all of my worker is online. Accepted shares going every second.
P.S. What means Enable\Disable word in Monitoring column?

MeteoImpact

member

Activity: 97

Merit: 10

Quote from: SpeedDemon13 on July 10, 2014, 04:33:40 AM

Is the pool/site down?

The website always seems to go down around 8:00 UTC, though the mining servers keep mining. Not sure if the mining servers are affected in any way by it, but I find it annoying that my API calls end up failing for half an hour or so every night and I get stuck mining blind.

SpeedDemon13

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Is the pool/site down?

judgecrypto

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Hi,

This is Judge Crypto... the Judge Coin wallet forked at block 6000 to fix a PoS issue. Please update your wallet ASAP.

Thanks!

Judge Crypto

QuadraQ

sr. member

Activity: 480

Merit: 250

Quote from: MeteoImpact on July 09, 2014, 03:53:23 PM

Is there any particular reason that DRK isn't on the X11 multiport? I realise that its difficulty is pretty high, but URO's has been higher lately and we seem to be doing fine with it.

Also, setting up the NIST5 port early for testing sounds like a great idea; I'd love to get my switcher configured sooner rather than later.

I would agree with this.

Topic: [ANN][MULTI][VARDIFF] TradeMyBit MULTIALGO Profit Swap w/ Optional Auto-exchange - page 14. (Read 153067 times)