Topic: [ANN][NIM] - Nimiq - The Browser Based Blockchain - page 32. (Read 131277 times)
From the anti-FUD video, "+50% market capitalization" as though it was a worthy achievement. Not that hard when your coin almost worth zero and dropped 99% from ICO value.
I didn't look for the project for a while. I saw the nimiq shit show video. You got famous Coinfanatic with your statement: "Team nimiq work only for about 2 days a month". Congrats bro for exposing the scam. It is more obvious that they are not working, just smoking pot in their 1.1 million dollar villa 
nimiq proved by investors to be a scam. nimiq was reported as a scam on deadcoins.com
https://i.imgur.com/zadcELJ.png
https://i.imgur.com/mI23qCc.png
https://i.imgur.com/QVGzR79.png
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3277
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3307
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3268
project is going to toilet... looks bad. i stop digging this coin.
https://i.imgur.com/zadcELJ.png
https://i.imgur.com/mI23qCc.png
https://i.imgur.com/QVGzR79.png
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3277
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3307
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3268
project is going to toilet... looks bad. i stop digging this coin.
Haha. This is soo cool. It is no surprise for me that deadcoins.com included nimiq as a scam coin. ICO investors (including me) lost 98.8% of their investment due to nimiq scam coin. Long journey short. Maybe it is time to refund the ICO investors or at least partially ( 50% ). The scam is going down and people started to realize the scam behind nimiq. The only people that are happy with scamiq are just 5-10 people who own over 90% of current global hash rate and they are dumping all newly created coins.
Nimiq is a good project, I believe in the development team of Nimiq: Phillipp, Marvin, Richy, Pascal, Elon Chin ...
Therefore, the trash who deliberately spread FUD here did not harm this project, and did not make me worry at all.
The trash that I want to mention here are: nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, Scamiq2, matthewgpu, Robin.Nimiq
*The dog barks, the group still goes*
Therefore, the trash who deliberately spread FUD here did not harm this project, and did not make me worry at all.
The trash that I want to mention here are: nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, Scamiq2, matthewgpu, Robin.Nimiq
*The dog barks, the group still goes*
this is really bad. you are kidding about us no? instead of answering to these legit questions posted by others you just made a parody short movie telling us that we are fudders and you work so hard. this is exactly the definition of shitshow. why didn't you stop post video with sushi, surfing ??
Nimiq answer FUDDERS
Giving them the attention they deserve
What is this all about?
Nimiq is the first browser blockchain.
That means apps based on Nimiq can run directly in the browser of the user, locally, without the need of a server-side application.
Since its launch, this have been an informative/discussion thread for Nimiq-related topics.
In January these group of users were created with the sole purpose of spreading FUD in this thread:
nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, Scamiq2, matthewgpu
As you might have noticed they always use unnecessarily aggressive language, huge red bold fonts and empty claims instead of serious questions.
Team Nimiq have answered here their non-factual claims. Also held a live Reddit AMA session recently where all questions were answered.
There is also a blog post with a summary of the AMA.
Nimiq welcome all newcomers, invite them to ask questions, and would like to apologize for these users behavior and any inconvenience they might cause.
Giving them the attention they deserve
What is this all about?
Nimiq is the first browser blockchain.
That means apps based on Nimiq can run directly in the browser of the user, locally, without the need of a server-side application.
Since its launch, this have been an informative/discussion thread for Nimiq-related topics.
In January these group of users were created with the sole purpose of spreading FUD in this thread:
nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, Scamiq2, matthewgpu
As you might have noticed they always use unnecessarily aggressive language, huge red bold fonts and empty claims instead of serious questions.
Team Nimiq have answered here their non-factual claims. Also held a live Reddit AMA session recently where all questions were answered.
There is also a blog post with a summary of the AMA.
Nimiq welcome all newcomers, invite them to ask questions, and would like to apologize for these users behavior and any inconvenience they might cause.
nimiq proved by investors to be a scam. nimiq was reported as a scam on deadcoins.com
https://i.imgur.com/zadcELJ.png
https://i.imgur.com/mI23qCc.png
https://i.imgur.com/QVGzR79.png
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3277
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3307
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3268
project is going to toilet... looks bad. i stop digging this coin.
https://i.imgur.com/zadcELJ.png
https://i.imgur.com/mI23qCc.png
https://i.imgur.com/QVGzR79.png
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3277
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3307
https://deadcoins.com/entry/3268
project is going to toilet... looks bad. i stop digging this coin.
Your news is already one week old. Can you share any working project that came out of the community funding project? Reality is that nothing came out of the community funding. Developers already stopped working. Nothing came out of WEG Bank. There is also no product or service developed by WEG Bank with TokenPay ( ICO project that scammed thousands of ppl ). You know only to ban miners.
New Blog Post: Third Community Funding Meeting
The key goal of the Nimiq Community Project Funding initiative is to increase our connection with and to further support the community. Team Nimiq see this as key to the future success of the Nimiq ecosystem.
Learn about the 3rd meeting in this blog post.
About Fudders
Nimiq is the first browser blockchain.
That means apps based on Nimiq can run directly in the browser of the user, locally, without the need of a server-side application.
Since its launch, this have been an informative/discussion thread.
In January these group of users were created with the sole purpose of spreading FUD in this thread:
nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, Scamiq2, matthewgpu
As you might have noticed they always use unnecessarily aggressive language, huge red bold fonts and empty claims instead of serious questions.
Team Nimiq have answered here their non-factual claims. Also held a live Reddit AMA session recently where all questions were answered.
There is also a blog post with a summary of the AMA.
Nimiq welcome all newcomers, invite them to ask questions, and would like to apologize for these users behavior and any inconvenience they might cause.
Nimiq is the first browser blockchain.
That means apps based on Nimiq can run directly in the browser of the user, locally, without the need of a server-side application.
Since its launch, this have been an informative/discussion thread.
In January these group of users were created with the sole purpose of spreading FUD in this thread:
nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, Scamiq2, matthewgpu
As you might have noticed they always use unnecessarily aggressive language, huge red bold fonts and empty claims instead of serious questions.
Team Nimiq have answered here their non-factual claims. Also held a live Reddit AMA session recently where all questions were answered.
There is also a blog post with a summary of the AMA.
Nimiq welcome all newcomers, invite them to ask questions, and would like to apologize for these users behavior and any inconvenience they might cause.
I am very disappointed. I am one of these miners who got tricked acquiring mining equipment namely 20 xeon servers at the beginning and many GPU rigs. I got literally fucked by team nimiq buying the xeon servers as sushi pool released the gpu miner and my xeon went just totally unprofitable and now I am just looking to sell my xeon servers.
Now, I get fucked again by team nimiq as they decided to switch to Proof of Stake in order to remove all miners from the equation of mining. They are really interested only for their own pockets and they don't care about the people who invested heavily into mining equipment or ICO. A user proved them on discord that Albatross can work also on Proof of Work, but their sole intention is to screw all miners in nimiq switching completely to Proof of Stake (not even hybrid or something like that).
I am utterly disappointed and now, I am finished with all this crap. I already stopped mining this trash and I will never ever mine or recommend to anybody this trash coin that is switching to complete POS. I am pissed off that they are money hungry and they don't understand basic economics and the values that miners bring to the nimiq project by simply mining and consuming electricity and computation power. Just remember my words: Proof of Work brings value to the coin. If you switch to POS, with block rewards like now, you will get hyperinflation in your trash coin as there is literally no cost of mining POS blocks.
Now, I get fucked again by team nimiq as they decided to switch to Proof of Stake in order to remove all miners from the equation of mining. They are really interested only for their own pockets and they don't care about the people who invested heavily into mining equipment or ICO. A user proved them on discord that Albatross can work also on Proof of Work, but their sole intention is to screw all miners in nimiq switching completely to Proof of Stake (not even hybrid or something like that).
I am utterly disappointed and now, I am finished with all this crap. I already stopped mining this trash and I will never ever mine or recommend to anybody this trash coin that is switching to complete POS. I am pissed off that they are money hungry and they don't understand basic economics and the values that miners bring to the nimiq project by simply mining and consuming electricity and computation power. Just remember my words: Proof of Work brings value to the coin. If you switch to POS, with block rewards like now, you will get hyperinflation in your trash coin as there is literally no cost of mining POS blocks.
Facts proven so far:
1. Philipp von Styp Rekowsky is a drug addict (cannabis or cocaine).
2. Robin Linus is a drug addict.
3. Marvin Wissfeld (aka "normana") is probably a drug addict, too.
4. Nimiq creates fake trading volume with bots ($200000 fake volume per day)
5. Nimiq manipulates the market price with ICO money ( $50000 fake buy orders every month )
6. Team is not working but creates only noise to deceive investors. Github profile shows no activity since weeks.
7. Nimiq uses fake identities (such as "normana") to pretend there is community support for their scam.
8. Partnership with Agora Trade is a joke because they never had a single customer.
9. Partnership with WEG bank is a joke because they're almost bankrupt.
The project is being very disappointing. Not only for ICO investors, but also for miners. Initially, it was supposed to be only CPU minable only with Argon2d. Then we found out that GPU mining is more efficient and my hardware got obsolete in an instant. Now, I am surprised that they want to get rid of all Proof of Work and replace it with Proof of Stake.
Very disappointing mining this coin. You don't know what to expect from the project anymore. Even the discussions of vested accounts of mining POS is bad. Just saying...
Very disappointing mining this coin. You don't know what to expect from the project anymore. Even the discussions of vested accounts of mining POS is bad. Just saying...
Have you read the original whitepaper? https://medium.com/nimiq-network/nimiq-a-peer-to-peer-payment-protocol-native-to-the-web-ffd324bb084
Nowhere does it say it's CPU only. They mention Argon2d and ETHash as candidates, both are CPU and GPU minable. Regarding PoS, they wrote:
Quote
We would strongly prefer to switch to a Proof-of-Stake Algorithm in the long run to get to a more energy-efficient Blockchain system.
If you are saying it is "supposed to be only CPU minable", then you have a vision different from the Nimiq Team vision as announced in their very early days.
That is a fucking medium article, not a white paper. IMHO
The project was promoted as a Browser minable coin using CPU only. This is what their marketing promoted. Now they want to screw all miners to implement pos.
The project is being very disappointing. Not only for ICO investors, but also for miners. Initially, it was supposed to be only CPU minable only with Argon2d. Then we found out that GPU mining is more efficient and my hardware got obsolete in an instant. Now, I am surprised that they want to get rid of all Proof of Work and replace it with Proof of Stake.
Very disappointing mining this coin. You don't know what to expect from the project anymore. Even the discussions of vested accounts of mining POS is bad. Just saying...
Very disappointing mining this coin. You don't know what to expect from the project anymore. Even the discussions of vested accounts of mining POS is bad. Just saying...
Have you read the original whitepaper? https://medium.com/nimiq-network/nimiq-a-peer-to-peer-payment-protocol-native-to-the-web-ffd324bb084
Nowhere does it say it's CPU only. They mention Argon2d and ETHash as candidates, both are CPU and GPU minable. Regarding PoS, they wrote:
Quote
We would strongly prefer to switch to a Proof-of-Stake Algorithm in the long run to get to a more energy-efficient Blockchain system.
If you are saying it is "supposed to be only CPU minable", then you have a vision different from the Nimiq Team vision as announced in their very early days.
The project is being very disappointing. Not only for ICO investors, but also for miners. Initially, it was supposed to be only CPU minable only with Argon2d. Then we found out that GPU mining is more efficient and my hardware got obsolete in an instant. Now, I am surprised that they want to get rid of all Proof of Work and replace it with Proof of Stake.
Very disappointing mining this coin. You don't know what to expect from the project anymore. Even the discussions of vested accounts of mining POS is bad. Just saying...
Very disappointing mining this coin. You don't know what to expect from the project anymore. Even the discussions of vested accounts of mining POS is bad. Just saying...
THEY WILL MINE POS WITH VESTED ACCOUNTS (WORTH 1.5 BILLION NIMIQS) AFTER THEY WILL SWITCH TO 100% POS.
SCAM SCAM SCAM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THEY WILL MINE OVER 80% OF COINS BY THEMSELVES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SCAM SCAM SCAM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THEY WILL MINE OVER 80% OF COINS BY THEMSELVES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This has been confirmed by some members (namely Marvin and Glenn on Discord ) that the scamiq team will mine with vested accounts worth almost 1.5 billion coins (30% of existing coins right now).
Mind sharing when Marvin and Glenn confirmed that on Discord (screenshot or it didn't happen)? Last time I checked, Glenn wasn't a team member...
Marvin just wrote on Discord:
Quote
in case you missed it, the answer if the vesting accounts can participate in staking is already in the Albatross paper: "Staking: When nodes want to become validators, they must send a staking transaction. [...]The result of the staking transaction is to transfer the desired amount of tokens from the node’s account to a special lock account and adding his validating key to an on-chain registryof potential validators." Vested funds cannot be transferred, so they also can't be transferred to the lock account for staking.
Which is complete opposite of what you just claimed.
THEY WILL MINE POS WITH VESTED ACCOUNTS (WORTH 1.5 BILLION NIMIQS) AFTER THEY WILL SWITCH TO 100% POS.
SCAM SCAM SCAM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THEY WILL MINE OVER 80% OF COINS BY THEMSELVES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This has been confirmed by some members (namely Marvin and Glenn on Discord ) that the scamiq team will mine with vested accounts worth almost 1.5 billion coins (30% of existing coins right now).
WARNING!!! vj1977 is a dangerous suckpuppet of normana.
WARNING!!! Normana is a dangerous suckpuppet.
Please clear up your mind! Is vj1977 my sockpuppet account or am I his sockpuppet account. Or both? Is it a sockpuppet chain or a circle?51% attack on Byzantium is actually 34%. So in Albatros it's actually not 51%, but 34%, because the security assumption is that at most one third (of selected block producers) is Byzantine.
Haven't heard that, can you provide a proof that 51% is 34%?There is no 51% attack, that's just a stupid saying from PoW chains. What usually is meant by 51% attack is double-spend attack or selfish mining attacks.
For those attacks, attackers on PoW chains need about 51% of mining power (well, you can do with less than 51%, but then you need luck). As far as I understood, PBFT needs 67% for double-spend, no? And selfish mining is not an issue in Albatross as there is no mining at all.
From what I understood, the thing you can do with 34% in PBFT is to halt the protocol. This attack will cause your 34% stake to become worth nothing and can be resolved by all other stakers through a collaborative fork. So the effect is limited and you don't earn anything from it (= no incentive to perform), definitely not comparable to a 51% attack on PoW chains.
stupid marvin suckpuppet
Quote
SoerenLast Wednesday at 11:58 AM
In Albatros it's actually not 51%, but 34%, because the security assumption is that at most one third (of selected block producers) is Byzantine.
abatros is vulnerable to 33% to get hacked for good. Once you get 33.3% you hacked the entire system. Stupid liar with secret agenda to push proof of stake in order to scam everybody else including miners.
PROOF: https://i.imgur.com/r9AKyLU.png
Very good finding that their new proposed model to switching to Proof of stake is 33%+1 vulnerable and not 50%+1 anymore. It is also alarming that they consider to remove the entire reward distribution for the simple fact that POS doesn't consume anymore resources.
yes yes. abastros is proof of stake and vulnerable to 33%+1. project is dangerous for nimiq and they also mentioned in their document that rewards should be removed from miners because pos is not burning electricity and fees are enough for miners. i don't understand why would they post such things....
Nimiq is the only blockchain created and designed specifically for mainstream adoption.
Stupid Marvin suckpuppet.
Warning to newcomers:
Please note that andrewjaxx, coinfanatic, john.btc, matthewgpu, nimiqshitcoin, robin.nimiq, sasha.new, Scamiq, Scamiq2, wentian.cn, and yuluxugi32132 are all recently created accounts (confirmed on their profile) by a few followers of an unknown homemade project and think by attacking Nimiq, it would somehow magically make theirs less shitty. Their sole purpose is a coordinated childish attack to FUD and spam this thread in huge red fonts, as you can see for yourself.
To learn more, stay up-to-date with the project progress, and engage with the awesome Nimiq community and team, please join the many official channels found on nimiq.com.
Discord https://discordapp.com/invite/cMHemg8
Telegram https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEJW-ozFwo7Er9jpHw
Community https://nimiq.community/
Reddit Reddit
Blog https://medium.com/nimiq-network
Twitter https://twitter.com/nimiq
*** the dogs are still barking, but the caravan goes on ***
THEY WILL MINE POS WITH VESTED ACCOUNTS (WORTH 1.5 BILLION NIMIQS) AFTER THEY WILL SWITCH TO 100% POS.
SCAM SCAM SCAM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THEY WILL MINE OVER 80% OF COINS BY THEMSELVES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This has been confirmed by some members (namely Marvin and Glenn on Discord ) that the scamiq team will mine with vested accounts worth almost 1.5 billion coins (30% of existing coins right now).
WARNING!!! vj1977 is a dangerous suckpuppet of normana.
WARNING!!! Normana is a dangerous suckpuppet.
Please clear up your mind! Is vj1977 my sockpuppet account or am I his sockpuppet account. Or both? Is it a sockpuppet chain or a circle?51% attack on Byzantium is actually 34%. So in Albatros it's actually not 51%, but 34%, because the security assumption is that at most one third (of selected block producers) is Byzantine.
Haven't heard that, can you provide a proof that 51% is 34%?There is no 51% attack, that's just a stupid saying from PoW chains. What usually is meant by 51% attack is double-spend attack or selfish mining attacks.
For those attacks, attackers on PoW chains need about 51% of mining power (well, you can do with less than 51%, but then you need luck). As far as I understood, PBFT needs 67% for double-spend, no? And selfish mining is not an issue in Albatross as there is no mining at all.
From what I understood, the thing you can do with 34% in PBFT is to halt the protocol. This attack will cause your 34% stake to become worth nothing and can be resolved by all other stakers through a collaborative fork. So the effect is limited and you don't earn anything from it (= no incentive to perform), definitely not comparable to a 51% attack on PoW chains.
stupid marvin suckpuppet
Quote
SoerenLast Wednesday at 11:58 AM
In Albatros it's actually not 51%, but 34%, because the security assumption is that at most one third (of selected block producers) is Byzantine.
abatros is vulnerable to 33% to get hacked for good. Once you get 33.3% you hacked the entire system. Stupid liar with secret agenda to push proof of stake in order to scam everybody else including miners.
PROOF: https://i.imgur.com/r9AKyLU.png
Very good finding that their new proposed model to switching to Proof of stake is 33%+1 vulnerable and not 50%+1 anymore. It is also alarming that they consider to remove the entire reward distribution for the simple fact that POS doesn't consume anymore resources.
Jump to: