Moving forward, the new alert will read differently, and will only state the facts. The new alert will read "Yobit is open for NYC deposits and trading, but you can not withdraw NYC from Yobit."Takes the GUARDIAN & PIONEER to get the infiltraitors to do their job and POST FACTS. Now that you "decided" to do it, how about removing "Altmarkets" from Community site exchange list. How about removing all of the bogus "Mr 51%" entries from explorer.nycoin.info Top 100. And how about stop being envious little BITCHES and trying to hold down / disrupt THE EARLIEST FREE & LIGHTNING FAST CRYPTO IN EXISTENCE.
P.S. Everyone will learn the real story behind NYC. They will ALL find
https://newyorkcoin.net/history.html 
Whoa guys, he capitalized "bitches", he must be getting mad at me. Stick a fork in him folks, he's done.
You didn't get me to do anything, I, along with our contact at CMC agreed that it would be best to update the alert, instead of doing what you fiercely advocated for and highly recommended doing, which was editing the alert to be misleading and ambiguous or removing the alert entirely. Quit downplaying the fact that you can't even reach out to CMC for executive changes, you're no guardian or pioneer, you're more like the crazy uncle who always gets caught lying and maintains a creepy aura.
Funny that you refer to this as my "job" when it actually looks like you are trying to cover up the fact that the "GUARDIAN & PIONEER" has lost all control of NewYorkCoin to a decentralized group of volunteers who don't consider this a "job" but instead a passion. You can surely find the envious little bitch by looking in the mirror, he's the one there with the tan cargo shorts.
The website is maintained by a different team member, but you wouldn't know that because you aren't part of the team. He has long been notified about many updates and will get to them when he has time, not everybody builds drag and drop websites on Wix like you pal.
As far as the Mr. 51% tags go, those were placed on those wallets by devs, also not my department, but you wouldn't know that because you aren't part of the team. The tags were placed on those wallet addresses for the sole purpose of tracking the funds used during the 51% attack, those addresses are verified to have been used for double spending purposes, but you wouldn't know that because you aren't a part of the team. We used those tags in tandem with security measures to alert us when funds moved from those tagged wallets, that's how we stopped the attacker dead in his tracks when he tried to dump them on Graviex, but you wouldn't know that because... you get the point.
The recovered funds from the attack are still in the sole possession of Graviex, where they will remain until they are all paid out to developers for completing the dev bounties listed on the Git, and any future dev bounties until the funds run dry. At no point will anyone on the team control those funds, they are to be sent directly from Graviex to the wallet address of the developer(s) who complete the bounties.
Says volumes about you that you have a problem with the way those addresses are labelled. The only reason someone would want those wallets to not be tagged is if they were associated with those wallets. Those are not bogus tags, they are a product of simple research and verification. Way to expose yourself. Again, stick a fork in him folks, he's done.
