Isn't there a way to fix that without reusing an address?
Huh? The problem only exists when reusing the address. My workflow depends on that, and changing the workflow is a lot of work. At any rate, this issue is a bug and should be fixed.
Topic: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin - page 67. (Read 594476 times)
June 11, 2013, 05:07:24 AM
Huh? The problem only exists when reusing the address. My workflow depends on that, and changing the workflow is a lot of work. At any rate, this issue is a bug and should be fixed.
June 11, 2013, 05:01:24 AM
Isn't there a way to fix that without reusing an address?
June 11, 2013, 04:54:06 AM
Why wouldn't they recommend that?
Because reusing addresses hurts everyone's privacy... it's true to some extent, but it is always a problem when human behavior is the thing being hacked on instead of code.
June 11, 2013, 04:47:33 AM
Why wouldn't they recommend that?
June 11, 2013, 04:43:10 AM
Bounty #2:
Based on snailbrain's latest namecoin-qt I have the following problem:
- manually create and submit a tx to send full balance of addr1
-> part to addr2
-> part back to addr1 (think change back to sending address)
- The transaction is sent correctly but the wallet is updated only for the debit of addr1 and credit of addr2. For some reason the credit of addr1 is ignored, even when the the tx is included in a block
- restarting namecoind with -rescan gets that balance back
I need the above to work as in bitcoin, i.e. when sending to the address the output belongs to, both debit and credit to that address get processed by the wallet.
I have 1 BTC up for grabs for that fix, and I'll also try to fix it myself time permitting.
Yesterday I asked for pointers on #bitcoin-dev and instead of tech advice I got a "you shouldn't do that"... oh well.
Based on snailbrain's latest namecoin-qt I have the following problem:
- manually create and submit a tx to send full balance of addr1
-> part to addr2
-> part back to addr1 (think change back to sending address)
- The transaction is sent correctly but the wallet is updated only for the debit of addr1 and credit of addr2. For some reason the credit of addr1 is ignored, even when the the tx is included in a block
- restarting namecoind with -rescan gets that balance back
I need the above to work as in bitcoin, i.e. when sending to the address the output belongs to, both debit and credit to that address get processed by the wallet.
I have 1 BTC up for grabs for that fix, and I'll also try to fix it myself time permitting.
Yesterday I asked for pointers on #bitcoin-dev and instead of tech advice I got a "you shouldn't do that"... oh well.
June 11, 2013, 04:37:09 AM
Hey, good news, got a link for those?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Saw it on reddit
http://www.reddit.com/r/Namecoin/comments/1g2tcs/the_bit_extensions_are_now_live_for_chrome_and/
http://namecoin.com
June 11, 2013, 04:28:50 AM
Browser plugins available now for chrome and firefox.
I think this is a real milestone.
I think this is a real milestone.
Hey, good news, got a link for those?
Thanks.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
June 11, 2013, 03:52:08 AM
Looking for someone to come represent NameCoin at the Bitcoin EU conference (http://theconference.eu) on a panel of alternative currencies. Anyone available to come to Amsterdam September 27-29 and sit on the panel with Charles Lee (coblee) and others?
June 11, 2013, 03:34:00 AM
Time to petition opendns too. Who does the plugin query?
June 11, 2013, 03:30:25 AM
Browser plugins available now for chrome and firefox.
I think this is a real milestone.
I think this is a real milestone.
June 10, 2013, 04:56:25 PM
Namecoin has tons of untapped potential. I'm really happy this is still being actively worked on. Thank you!
June 10, 2013, 04:10:20 PM
Very excited.
June 10, 2013, 11:50:54 AM
<3 MzkyUxTvvQzzBaBwxGeGSosSmUF1Ctk34i
much appreciated
Bounty paid, tx c9dd9f1074b40c049ebc53c804377e1200201792dd6473a002a0059712eff98d
nelisky : so I just wanted to check that you're satisfied that your requirements have been fulfilled and tested for the namecoin-qt client, extra functions, open source, no hidden code, etc? If so I've agreed to put 500 nmc for namecoin-qt client code to get in to this state which I will happily pay.
Also I have another 250nmc for this namecoin-qt to get merged back into official namecoin/namecoin github repository and another 250 nmc for it to rebased on top of the v0.8.2 bitcoin-namecoin compatability (i.e. leveldb, etc) mods that khal is currently working on.
Thanks for all your work so far snailbrain, this is excellent
i wish i could take the credit..
unfortunately the main credit goes to vinced, khal, and all you guys (virtual-master, moa, nelisky, phelix and many others)... AND the coder of Namecoin-qt who has done an excellent job so far, he is very knowledgeable and has worked day and night to get this right (and there is much more to come)
You can give me credit for a Jump Start <3 ---- and I will continue with the dev in collaboration with the community to make sure we continue to support NMC into the foreseeable future.
I cannot understand why Namecoin is not the most talked about crypto of ALL..
I'm sure that those people that have given NMC a miss will be disappointed in the future
I don't know about everyone else.. but I'm excited.
June 10, 2013, 11:17:51 AM
<3 MzkyUxTvvQzzBaBwxGeGSosSmUF1Ctk34i
much appreciated
Bounty paid, tx c9dd9f1074b40c049ebc53c804377e1200201792dd6473a002a0059712eff98d
Received.. brilliant.. thanks
June 10, 2013, 07:37:36 AM
nelisky : so I just wanted to check that you're satisfied that your requirements have been fulfilled and tested for the namecoin-qt client, extra functions, open source, no hidden code, etc? If so I've agreed to put 500 nmc for namecoin-qt client code to get in to this state which I will happily pay.
Also I have another 250nmc for this namecoin-qt to get merged back into official namecoin/namecoin github repository and another 250 nmc for it to rebased on top of the v0.8.2 bitcoin-namecoin compatability (i.e. leveldb, etc) mods that khal is currently working on.
Thanks for all your work so far snailbrain, this is excellent
I'm still not 100% sure there's nothing broken, but all the commands implemented work as advertised and I couldn't find any obvious "hidden code". This is no guarantee however, and before I get this into a production environment I'll do a full code review for my own benefit.
June 10, 2013, 07:16:49 AM
<3 MzkyUxTvvQzzBaBwxGeGSosSmUF1Ctk34i
much appreciated
Bounty paid, tx c9dd9f1074b40c049ebc53c804377e1200201792dd6473a002a0059712eff98d
nelisky : so I just wanted to check that you're satisfied that your requirements have been fulfilled and tested for the namecoin-qt client, extra functions, open source, no hidden code, etc? If so I've agreed to put 500 nmc for namecoin-qt client code to get in to this state which I will happily pay.
Also I have another 250nmc for this namecoin-qt to get merged back into official namecoin/namecoin github repository and another 250 nmc for it to rebased on top of the v0.8.2 bitcoin-namecoin compatability (i.e. leveldb, etc) mods that khal is currently working on.
Thanks for all your work so far snailbrain, this is excellent
June 10, 2013, 06:32:16 AM
<3 MzkyUxTvvQzzBaBwxGeGSosSmUF1Ctk34i
much appreciated
Bounty paid, tx c9dd9f1074b40c049ebc53c804377e1200201792dd6473a002a0059712eff98d
June 09, 2013, 07:49:17 PM
Been testing snailbrain version with all the RPC commands added. So far everything is working pretty well, there's just one small issue which I'm not sure relates to snailbrain's updates or not, but is kind of problematic for me.
Regardless, I'm calling the 1000 NMC bounty I offered as fulfilled. Can you provide an address for sending it, snailbrain?
Now, the problem I'm having is (using addresses imported without private key, not sure if that's relevant) when sending a transaction that has the same address in inputs and outputs, for example returning change to the sending address. When I do that the sending address is empty as far as the daemon is concerned even though the transaction is properly formed. The only way to see the unspent output again is by rescanning.
Addr1 10 NMC
-> Addr2 9 NMC
-> Addr1 1 NMC
Addr2 has 9 NMC, Addr1 is empty until I restart with -rescan
Addr1 10 NMC
-> Addr2 9 NMC
-> Addr3 1 NMC
Addr1 is empty, Addr2 has 9 NMC, Addr3 has 1 NMC as expected.
Regardless, I'm calling the 1000 NMC bounty I offered as fulfilled. Can you provide an address for sending it, snailbrain?
Now, the problem I'm having is (using addresses imported without private key, not sure if that's relevant) when sending a transaction that has the same address in inputs and outputs, for example returning change to the sending address. When I do that the sending address is empty as far as the daemon is concerned even though the transaction is properly formed. The only way to see the unspent output again is by rescanning.
Addr1 10 NMC
-> Addr2 9 NMC
-> Addr1 1 NMC
Addr2 has 9 NMC, Addr1 is empty until I restart with -rescan
Addr1 10 NMC
-> Addr2 9 NMC
-> Addr3 1 NMC
Addr1 is empty, Addr2 has 9 NMC, Addr3 has 1 NMC as expected.
looking into this.. doesn't seem related to changes we have done.. but still checking..
edit: removed some stuff for now
<3 MzkyUxTvvQzzBaBwxGeGSosSmUF1Ctk34i
much appreciated
Hopefully Khal can add to proper repo to get the rest of bounty to fulfil moa's bounty too xXx (or can wait for next update)
The dev has been working extremely hard
Snailbrain could you help out bytecoin? We have a bounty.
the coder is very busy atm .. concentrating on NMC above all.. but you can send a link in PM
June 09, 2013, 07:34:31 PM
Snailbrain could you help out bytecoin? We have a bounty.
June 09, 2013, 04:09:40 PM
Been testing snailbrain version with all the RPC commands added. So far everything is working pretty well, there's just one small issue which I'm not sure relates to snailbrain's updates or not, but is kind of problematic for me.
Regardless, I'm calling the 1000 NMC bounty I offered as fulfilled. Can you provide an address for sending it, snailbrain?
Now, the problem I'm having is (using addresses imported without private key, not sure if that's relevant) when sending a transaction that has the same address in inputs and outputs, for example returning change to the sending address. When I do that the sending address is empty as far as the daemon is concerned even though the transaction is properly formed. The only way to see the unspent output again is by rescanning.
Addr1 10 NMC
-> Addr2 9 NMC
-> Addr1 1 NMC
Addr2 has 9 NMC, Addr1 is empty until I restart with -rescan
Addr1 10 NMC
-> Addr2 9 NMC
-> Addr3 1 NMC
Addr1 is empty, Addr2 has 9 NMC, Addr3 has 1 NMC as expected.
Regardless, I'm calling the 1000 NMC bounty I offered as fulfilled. Can you provide an address for sending it, snailbrain?
Now, the problem I'm having is (using addresses imported without private key, not sure if that's relevant) when sending a transaction that has the same address in inputs and outputs, for example returning change to the sending address. When I do that the sending address is empty as far as the daemon is concerned even though the transaction is properly formed. The only way to see the unspent output again is by rescanning.
Addr1 10 NMC
-> Addr2 9 NMC
-> Addr1 1 NMC
Addr2 has 9 NMC, Addr1 is empty until I restart with -rescan
Addr1 10 NMC
-> Addr2 9 NMC
-> Addr3 1 NMC
Addr1 is empty, Addr2 has 9 NMC, Addr3 has 1 NMC as expected.
Jump to: