Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANNOUNCE] SolidCoin - new and improved block chain. Secure from pools - page 24. (Read 85528 times)

sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
Please explain why he's wrong coinhunter.

Sure, since the difficulty can only raise in three bands 2%, 6% and 10%, and decrease to whatever level is necessary (upto 4x) where is he getting this 20% figure from?

If we are at target hash rate it will maintain that level within 2%. The other thing to consider is the target hash rate is more like "the maximum" wanted, it's different to BTC where 10 minutes is "Desired". "3 minutes" isn't necessarily desired in SolidCoin, it's the maximum.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015
Don't know if this issue has been already brought up, but as I understand it, there is a problem with SolidCoin retarget algorithm that will manifest itself when the difficulty reaches the hashrate. Since it considers only the last 240 blocks when retargeting (correct me if I'm wrong), there will be huge fluctuations in the difficulty level. I ran some quick simulations, and you can expect the difficulty level to regularly fluctuate between +-20% where it "should" be, and more than that in some rarer cases. So every once in a while, you'll have situations, where the "real" difficulty according to the "real" hashrate should be 10000, but SolidCoin target is actually 12000 and drops to 8000 with one retarget (33% drop), and all this while the hashrate is static.

LOL, you better rerun your tests again. Could we please get a clue in here.

Please explain why he's wrong coinhunter.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
Don't know if this issue has been already brought up, but as I understand it, there is a problem with SolidCoin retarget algorithm that will manifest itself when the difficulty reaches the hashrate. Since it considers only the last 240 blocks when retargeting (correct me if I'm wrong), there will be huge fluctuations in the difficulty level. I ran some quick simulations, and you can expect the difficulty level to regularly fluctuate between +-20% where it "should" be, and more than that in some rarer cases. So every once in a while, you'll have situations, where the "real" difficulty according to the "real" hashrate should be 10000, but SolidCoin target is actually 12000 and drops to 8000 with one retarget (33% drop), and all this while the hashrate is static.

LOL, you better rerun your tests again. Could we please get a clue in here.
donator
Activity: 1654
Merit: 1351
Creator of Litecoin. Cryptocurrency enthusiast.

Seriously though, back this claim up:

It's bullshit is it? Considering we can number the guys who mined the first million Bitcoins on a single hand how is it bullshit when SolidCoin has over 10000 individual owners of coin already?

Your victims investors deserve to know how you came up with that "10000 solidcoin owners" number.

Couldn't one get some idea by counting the number of different accounts or IP addresses on the exchange? It wouldn't be exact but it would give a ballpark figure.

There's really know way to know. You can count the number of miners on all the pools or the number of accounts on the exchange. That will just give you an estimate. For example, I've mined solidcoins and sold all of them for bitcoins for a small profit. But I wouldn't call myself an owner of solidcoins since I don't own any anymore.

And I can't imagine how he can claim that he can count the number of miners of the first million bitcoins on a single hand.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100

Seriously though, back this claim up:

It's bullshit is it? Considering we can number the guys who mined the first million Bitcoins on a single hand how is it bullshit when SolidCoin has over 10000 individual owners of coin already?

Your victims investors deserve to know how you came up with that "10000 solidcoin owners" number.

Couldn't one get some idea by counting the number of different accounts or IP addresses on the exchange? It wouldn't be exact but it would give a ballpark figure.
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
Don't know if this issue has been already brought up, but as I understand it, there is a problem with SolidCoin retarget algorithm that will manifest itself when the difficulty reaches the hashrate. Since it considers only the last 240 blocks when retargeting (correct me if I'm wrong), there will be huge fluctuations in the difficulty level. I ran some quick simulations, and you can expect the difficulty level to regularly fluctuate between +-20% where it "should" be, and more than that in some rarer cases. So every once in a while, you'll have situations, where the "real" difficulty according to the "real" hashrate should be 10000, but SolidCoin target is actually 12000 and drops to 8000 with one retarget (33% drop), and all this while the hashrate is static.

It's certainly not a showstopper, but hardly what I would call optimal, and something to consider if you are planning on copying retargetting from SolidCoin for your own project.

If I were to design a retargetting algo, I would find the first block that has a timestamp a certain amount of time in the past (say 2 weeks), see how many blocks were generated in that time, and adjust accordingly and often. Not the other way around as it's done in all current chains.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 251
And before long you'll have that nice fast network all to yourself.

Chris buddy, even though you seem to be a rather bitter and annoyed person,  good luck with whatever you're doing. Just wanted to make sure I get this in quote for later in case you edit.

Here, I'll sign it for you:

Code:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

And before long you'll have that nice fast network all to yourself.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=eEiI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Seriously though, back this claim up:

It's bullshit is it? Considering we can number the guys who mined the first million Bitcoins on a single hand how is it bullshit when SolidCoin has over 10000 individual owners of coin already?

Your victims investors deserve to know how you came up with that "10000 solidcoin owners" number.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
What would happen on Bitcoin if that happened? Say it dropped to a dollar tomorrow and stayed there for a month. How long would it take for transactions to go through then?

It would likely would take about 3-6 months to reset, and until then people would be jumping from BTC to SolidCoin or perhaps nothing at all (being disillusioned with the whole p2p currency thing).
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I like Bitcoin, Monero and BCash
LOL, yeah except did you notice we can survive a drop in half of hashrate and the network is still 3 times faster than Bitcoins? What other chain can do that? None.
I'm not sure losing half the hashrate is something you should brag about.

I actually think that is something to brag about.

We all knew that the miners would move away, that was a given, but the fact that it's still going (unlike i0coin) is testament to the intelligent choices made in the design.
sr. member
Activity: 383
Merit: 250
Sounds like Chris Acheson has some money invested in Bitcoin. I personally do not care if Solidcoin replaces Bitcoin. I do like the fact that if the exchange rate drops way down and miners drop like flies because they cannot pay their electricity bills, that it resets the difficulty much quicker. What would happen on Bitcoin if that happened? Say it dropped to a dollar tomorrow and stayed there for a month. How long would it take for transactions to go through then?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
And before long you'll have that nice fast network all to yourself.

Chris buddy, even though you seem to be a rather bitter and annoyed person,  good luck with whatever you're doing. Just wanted to make sure I get this in quote for later in case you edit.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 251
...are all irrelevant to Bitcoin.  Only the more frequent difficulty retargeting actually defends SolidCoin from anything, and it's an attack that Bitcoin isn't even vulnerable to.  In order to get Bitcoin stuck in the same difficulty trap that Namecoin and Ixcoin are currently in, you'd have to destroy miners' faith in the future value of the currency in a very short amount of time.  If you can pull that off, Bitcoin would be pretty much dead anyway, so whatever.

Just wow, if you read this back and don't understand the hilarity of what you're saying then ..... Smiley

"Bitcoin isn't even vulnerable to that" - "But if you can pull that off it will die"

Haha. Wow.

It's glaringly obvious that you're running on pure rhetoric.  You either aren't bothering to think through what I'm saying, or don't care.  I know you're desperate to stop SolidCoin from sinking, but letting it show is a bad idea.

No matter how often you retarget difficulty, the magnitude of such an attack would kill any blockchain-based currency.  Getting stuck with high difficulty and a low hashrate is an afterthought.

Bullshit.  Bitcoin was publicly announced when the blockchain was started.  It took two years to reach a price of $1.  There was ample time to buy/mine plenty of bitcoins if you thought it was going to take off.  Most people (myself included) didn't think it would and didn't bother.  If SolidCoin were to ever take off, it'll be the same situation.

It's bullshit is it? Considering we can number the guys who mined the first million Bitcoins on a single hand how is it bullshit when SolidCoin has over 10000 individual owners of coin already?

You're just making shit up now.  Care to provide citations for those claims?

From the price and hashrate charts, it looks more like people are jumping overboard.

LOL, yeah except did you notice we can survive a drop in half of hashrate and the network is still 3 times faster than Bitcoins? What other chain can do that? None.

And before long you'll have that nice fast network all to yourself.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
It's bullshit is it? Considering we can number the guys who mined the first million Bitcoins on a single hand how is it bullshit when SolidCoin has over 10000 individual owners of coin already?
I like some of the changes in SC, but at least tell the truth. Lying just doesn't help the cause. You have no idea who owns the first million Bitcoins.

LOL, yeah except did you notice we can survive a drop in half of hashrate and the network is still 3 times faster than Bitcoins? What other chain can do that? None.
I'm not sure losing half the hashrate is something you should brag about.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
...are all irrelevant to Bitcoin.  Only the more frequent difficulty retargeting actually defends SolidCoin from anything, and it's an attack that Bitcoin isn't even vulnerable to.  In order to get Bitcoin stuck in the same difficulty trap that Namecoin and Ixcoin are currently in, you'd have to destroy miners' faith in the future value of the currency in a very short amount of time.  If you can pull that off, Bitcoin would be pretty much dead anyway, so whatever.

Just wow, if you read this back and don't understand the hilarity of what you're saying then ..... Smiley

"Bitcoin isn't even vulnerable to that" - "But if you can pull that off it will die"

Haha. Wow.

The scenario where SolidCoin price starts to rise and rise , encouraging more and more miners away from Bitcoin is a likely one, and it will destroy the Bitcoin network as it has no defense against such things. Unlike SolidCoin.

Bitcoin owners could wake up in 3 days and find that their confirmations are now taking 12 hours, nearly every site supporting them is taking 3 days to confirm any transfers they make. If you do not see how very vulnerable Bitcoin is then you are not worth continuing a debate with, as it is obvious to anyone with a passing understanding of the protocol.

Bullshit.  Bitcoin was publicly announced when the blockchain was started.  It took two years to reach a price of $1.  There was ample time to buy/mine plenty of bitcoins if you thought it was going to take off.  Most people (myself included) didn't think it would and didn't bother.  If SolidCoin were to ever take off, it'll be the same situation.

It's bullshit is it? Considering we can number the guys who mined the first million Bitcoins on a single hand how is it bullshit when SolidCoin has over 10000 individual owners of coin already?

Just because Bitcoin was available publicly doesn't mean much at all, it takes time for a concept such as a "p2p currency" to become well known. I suspect SolidCoin wil also be deemed unfair to "X" once it has global acceptance, simply because we didn't get millions of people making that first coin. "They only got over 10000".  So I can categorically say SolidCoin's existence is more fair than Bitcoins. Whether it's "fair" from the majority of the worlds viewpoint we will wait and see.

From the price and hashrate charts, it looks more like people are jumping overboard.

LOL, yeah except did you notice we can survive a drop in half of hashrate and the network is still 3 times faster than Bitcoins? What other chain can do that? None.
hero member
Activity: 589
Merit: 500
If time it takes to mine 240 blocks exceeds 12 hours then the difficulty will drop.

Got it?

I think so, and the difficulty adjustment is just lag against the increase of miners. It took such a long time to balance the change of miner power in the present year 2011. So 2%, 6% and the limited 10% increase of difficulty has nothing, just a meaningless parameter arbitrarily chosen. CoinHunter, could you please explain why limited 10% is chosen? Is there any theory behind it?
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 251
You are wrong. The developers aren't going to change some core things in Bitcoin, I already discussed this with some of them prior to making SolidCoin. The consensus from them was it was never going to change, and there was no purpose to it.

Maybe you should have taken the peer review seriously.

Quote
You sound like them, are you one?

Nope.

Quote
What these "developers" don't understand however is that people that use Bitcoin, actually want fast confirmations. They want a fast network. This is why SolidCoin is successful, it's fast and always will be. My other protocol changes are intelligently designed to protect SolidCoin from a variety of attacks that Bitcoin cannot.  This isn't subjective, it's something that Bitcoin doesn't do that SC does. Your argument that "it's easy to make those changes" is irrelevant because no one before me made those changes and Bitcoin is still vulnerable to them regardless of your banter.

3 minute blocks are the only thing that SolidCoin has going for it.  Your other protocol changes:

  • Difficulty retargets more often
  • Difficulty increases limited to +10% per retarget
  • Block reward changed from 50 to 32
  • (Again, anything else?  Seriously, if I missing anything, I'd like to hear specifics from you, instead of hand-waving)

...are all irrelevant to Bitcoin.  Only the more frequent difficulty retargeting actually defends SolidCoin from anything, and it's an attack that Bitcoin isn't even vulnerable to.  In order to get Bitcoin stuck in the same difficulty trap that Namecoin and Ixcoin are currently in, you'd have to destroy miners' faith in the future value of the currency in a very short amount of time.  If you can pull that off, Bitcoin would be pretty much dead anyway, so whatever.

Quote
If Bitcoin was to adopt them it's going to be a major PITA getting people to accept it.

And it would be a major PITA to get any significant number of people to switch over to SolidCoin too.

Quote
On top of the protocol improvements SolidCoin's start has been many times more fair than Bitcoins.

Bullshit.  Bitcoin was publicly announced when the blockchain was started.  It took two years to reach a price of $1.  There was ample time to buy/mine plenty of bitcoins if you thought it was going to take off.  Most people (myself included) didn't think it would and didn't bother.  If SolidCoin were to ever take off, it'll be the same situation.

Quote
and see why people are jumping aboard.

From the price and hashrate charts, it looks more like people are jumping overboard.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015
If time it takes to mine 240 blocks exceeds 12 hours then the difficulty will drop.

Got it?
No not yet, trying really hard to though lol.

Is there anywhere we can get stats on the SC network with projected difficultys?
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
If time it takes to mine 240 blocks exceeds 12 hours then the difficulty will drop.

Got it?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
If it's increasing, it's because it hasn't risen to the "proper" level yet.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015
how long does it take for the difficulty to drop?or does it ever drop? it seems like it just keeps on increasing
Wondering the same exact thing?

"Twice daily difficulty retargets" ?
Pages:
Jump to: