Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins - page 74. (Read 57735 times)

newbie
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
What are the values for the fees on ZERG  pool right now ?

define('"'"'YAAMP_FEES_MINING'"'"', 0.5);
define('"'"'YAAMP_FEES_EXCHANGE'"'"', 2);
define('"'"'YAAMP_FEES_RENTING'"'"', 2);
define('"'"'YAAMP_TXFEE_RENTING_WD'"'"', 0.002);

It is written 0% but we must know if there are other hidden fees.

Can you let us know please ?

Thank you.

Can you answer ? Is the pool owner there, to answer ?
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Of course, I understand, forks, spoons, etc., but why the balance changed? This is what has already been confirmed, sent to the stock exchange, sold and returned back, in the form of BTC coin, or does this pool work differently and how could this happen?

It is not synchronous process, but rather async. Coins are sent in batches, also sold in different chunks. Exchange time is just average time to get it all sorted.


i remember you were writing something about balancing between nicehash power and other users. I am not sure how it works, but just today I witnessed the following:

So I was mining UFO-neoscrypt with my 6 MH of power. And this block was going for like almost 2 hrs. 118 minutes. I was having 58% of shares and hoping for the nice fat portion of shares, but here comes someone with 100 MHs, mines for 6 minutes, grabs 80% of this block and 98% of next four and switches to another coin, leaving me to wait for another two hours.
Was that autoswitching algo? maybe. Was that profitable for the autoswitch-connected guy? I hope so. Do I want to follow your request "please guys, follow options 2 and 3, mine exact coin" after such case? Definitely not.

Life sucks and it's unfair, yes, i know. Just wanted to vent off a bit.
sr. member
Activity: 338
Merit: 250
Hello:

Are payments in LTC better or the same as in BTC? How is the payment made? First change the coins to BTC and then to LTC? Are they switched to LTC directly?

Which method has the least fees and expenses for the miner? Payments in BTC or in LTC?

Thank you.


PD: I also want to ask, is the benefit made by SniffDog with the TimeTravel algorithm correct? Because the profits are not being paid.



Anyone knows?

There are severe problems at cryptopia. Number of coins LUX, MAC, HSR disabled for autotrade mining. Some coins will be traded on different exchanges meanwhile

That's right on top of Zergpool website

Now all we need to do is find an exchange or wait for cryptopia to fix their end.....

But of course.... we know the timetravel wallet works great cause the exchanges can withdrawl from new wallet... just no deposits yet
newbie
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
What are the values for the fees on ZERG  pool right now ?

define('"'"'YAAMP_FEES_MINING'"'"', 0.5);
define('"'"'YAAMP_FEES_EXCHANGE'"'"', 2);
define('"'"'YAAMP_FEES_RENTING'"'"', 2);
define('"'"'YAAMP_TXFEE_RENTING_WD'"'"', 0.002);

It is written 0% but we must know if there are other hidden fees.

Can you let us know please ?

Thank you.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Hello:

Are payments in LTC better or the same as in BTC? How is the payment made? First change the coins to BTC and then to LTC? Are they switched to LTC directly?

Which method has the least fees and expenses for the miner? Payments in BTC or in LTC?

Thank you.


PD: I also want to ask, is the benefit made by SniffDog with the TimeTravel algorithm correct? Because the profits are not being paid.



Anyone knows?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
net hash and pool hash were almost the same pretty easy to understand why the profits were good Wink

We've been conditioned to be suspicious when profitability is higher than usual.

Just check the explorer of the coin and the block on the pool,it's pretty easy tbh
newbie
Activity: 150
Merit: 0
Uff ... no amd supported  Embarrassed
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1002
Quote
BTC payouts are made automatically every 8 hours for all balances above 0.01, or 0.001 on Sunday.

You must pay all balances above 0.0005 first this sunday, and then change the rules.

Agreed and there should be a Grace period before it goes into effect especially since the pool been down

We have introduced 0.5% fee and raised payment threshold to recover from attacks. Those will be returned to previous values once we are back on track.

I am sorry for inconvienience, and can promise that all will be payed as before. Take an example with Nicehash, it took 3 months for them to start paying. We lost 1 BTC, but for small pool it is quite a lot.

Nicehash are scamers. You want to be like them?

Will there be a payout today with a threshold of 0.0005 BTC as well?
Sorry, but I am waiting for that, as it's still explained in the main page of the pool.
I know, that there have been some issues during the week, but I am a bit confused, that the payout rules changes, before the payout has been done.

Please confirm, that the 0.0005 BTC threshold will be executed today. that would be very nice. Smiley
BTW I like Zergpool very much and hope, that pinpins keeps up doing the very good job!

Regards


Thank you for support. We aim to payout >0.005BTC first. However all other balances are stored and will be payed.
You are exactly right we had a problems, but slowly recovering.


I'm waiting third week. I know you don't want to answer, but when will you pay the old balances above 0.0005 BTC?
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
net hash and pool hash were almost the same pretty easy to understand why the profits were good Wink

We've been conditioned to be suspicious when profitability is higher than usual.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
net hash and pool hash were almost the same pretty easy to understand why the profits were good Wink
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
Well something must have changed, because as soon as I removed the multiplier, the value for timetravel is now reasonable.

As I said before, it was between 3-4x the profitability of the next profitable algo when I first posted about it.
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
Hello,

We have been on correct wallet since 2 days ago. Dev has also confirmed we are on right chain. You can also check blocks on zerg and block explorers on internet.


{
  "version": 140300,
  "protocolversion": 70016,
  "walletversion": 130000,
  "blocks": 469976,
  "difficulty": 215.4704477151884,
  "testnet": false,
  "keypoololdest": 1519236468,
  "keypoolsize": 100,
  "paytxfee": 0.00000000,
  "relayfee": 0.00100000,
  "errors": ""
}


So the multiplier needs to be adjusted?  Should it be multiplied by 100?
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Hello:

Are payments in LTC better or the same as in BTC? How is the payment made? First change the coins to BTC and then to LTC? Are they switched to LTC directly?

Which method has the least fees and expenses for the miner? Payments in BTC or in LTC?

Thank you.


PD: I also want to ask, is the benefit made by SniffDog with the TimeTravel algorithm correct? Because the profits are not being paid.
member
Activity: 1027
Merit: 19
Hello,

We have been on correct wallet since 2 days ago. Dev has also confirmed we are on right chain. You can also check blocks on zerg and block explorers on internet.


{
  "version": 140300,
  "protocolversion": 70016,
  "walletversion": 130000,
  "blocks": 469976,
  "difficulty": 215.4704477151884,
  "testnet": false,
  "keypoololdest": 1519236468,
  "keypoolsize": 100,
  "paytxfee": 0.00000000,
  "relayfee": 0.00100000,
  "errors": ""
}
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
Something up with Timetravel?  I know there's no exchange, but that doesn't explain why it's considered the most profitable algo to mine by almost 3 fold the next highest.

Wrong side of split chain again?

Been happening a lot...

Update: Confirmed.
https://twitter.com/Machinecoin/status/965381439440203777

Pinpins, please get us on the right track.  Thanks.

Groundhog day feelings, lost more hours mining other split chain

 The other pools responded rather quickly.  As of now, zergpool is the only one still have machinecoin enabled and on the wrong chain.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Something up with Timetravel?  I know there's no exchange, but that doesn't explain why it's considered the most profitable algo to mine by almost 3 fold the next highest.

Wrong side of split chain again?

Been happening a lot...

Update: Confirmed.
https://twitter.com/Machinecoin/status/965381439440203777

Pinpins, please get us on the right track.  Thanks.

Groundhog day feelings, lost more hours mining other split chain
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
Something up with Timetravel?  I know there's no exchange, but that doesn't explain why it's considered the most profitable algo to mine by almost 3 fold the next highest.

Wrong side of split chain again?

Been happening a lot...

Update: Confirmed.
https://twitter.com/Machinecoin/status/965381439440203777

Pinpins, please get us on the right track.  Thanks.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Let's be objective here.

zpool has 2% fee, 180+ coins, running for 2 years
hashrefinery has 1.25% fee, 50+ coins, running for 0.5 year
ahashpool has 1% fee, 70+ coins, running for 0.5 year

Yet, pinpins is new to running a pool, says he is a 1 person team, decides to charge 0% fee, and add 160+ coins.

If you have 160+ coins in zergpool, you better make sure you are in contact with 160+ dev teams and git repos and monitor 160+ coins on a daily basis to prevent chain splits and forks, and handle upgrades in a timely manner.  Don't you think this is too aggressively to the point of recklessness?  And you think a new pool admin is able to handle 160+ coins better than hashrefinery, better than ahash, to the point as good as crackfoo who's been doing it for zpool for 2 years?  I'm just pointing out the numbers.  Maybe pinpins is super human, who knows!



You may be correct. pinpins is super human. I never have problems getting paid. My hash and payments are consistent.

http://zerg.zergpool.com/?address=1FQsbVSVJqfF6e84iymdLPqsL1HM5ibURw

Only time anything changes is when I fuck with shit. I did quit using the sniffdog. I'm very happy with pinpins and zergpool. You guys that keep trolling should move on and go somewhere else, plenty of other pools out there. Come back in a few months and try again...

newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Let's be objective here.

zpool has 2% fee, 180+ coins, running for 2 years
hashrefinery has 1.25% fee, 50+ coins, running for 0.5 year
ahashpool has 1% fee, 70+ coins, running for 0.5 year

Yet, pinpins is new to running a pool, says he is a 1 person team, decides to charge 0% fee, and add 160+ coins.

If you have 160+ coins in zergpool, you better make sure you are in contact with 160+ dev teams and git repos and monitor 160+ coins on a daily basis to prevent chain splits and forks, and handle upgrades in a timely manner.  Don't you think this is too aggressively to the point of recklessness?  And you think a new pool admin is able to handle 160+ coins better than hashrefinery, better than ahash, to the point as good as crackfoo who's been doing it for zpool for 2 years?  I'm just pointing out the numbers.  Maybe pinpins is super human, who knows!

member
Activity: 1027
Merit: 19
Pinpins.

I really want to support your pool (don't mind the fee) but things like this (see screenshot) really worries me.



Wallet: 1E38chNM4ZnXqu5kKimQdUjSGu2otmgmzS

I have mined in other YIMP fork pools (ahashpool, zpool, hashrefinery, etc) and never seen anything like this.

Could you please explain what happened to balance ??



Hello,

But lets be honest to ourselves, you have level of hashrate and slowly getting you balance up, then all of sudden there is a hype, won't you assume something went wrong? Your earnings were returned to level of actual - genuine blocks.
Have a look at your graphs, it goes slowly up and then there is rapid growth.
Pages:
Jump to: