Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][POOL][PROFIT-SHIFT] Coinshift.com, the first profit-shifting multipool - page 7. (Read 28702 times)

newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Hi-
Why is my unexchanged balance going down but my exchange balance is flat lining?   It rings true in the numbers that are also shown on my stats page as well.

http://i.imgur.com/ikoQaBl.jpg
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
I send you PM and tried to contact you via twitter:

Quote
Hey.
I used the following address at your pool:
http://coinshift.com/account/1Nb8p8GgzRrj9bZNzx21BGVxSW2BZXLXws/

It's from bitcoin.de my favourite exchange.
Now i would like to use another address from my personal wallet.

I stopped mining at that address, because i got 0.00092154 confimed BTC and 0.00039559 unconfirmed BTC.

I thought it would confirm, so that i reach the minimum payment amount, but nothing happens.

Still the same since more than 24 hours.

Could you please take a look at it?

best regards
Beulemann
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
What's your address? I'll take a look. If you could post a screenshot of your rig hashrate that would be helpful too.
Website is 2301.8 Kh/s with a rejected of 54.8 Kh/s.

Everything looks OK to me -- perhaps when you checked the site you were on the lower end of the variance. When I checked your hashrate was reported as >2900Kh: http://cl.ly/Uh37

The site currently reports the hashrate as calculated over the last 20 minutes. There is going to be some variance there, which is why you see the graph oscillate between 2300 and 3000. Maybe we need to increase that so it gives you a better picture of your actual hashrate. The problem there is that we don't want it to take a long time for new users to see their hashrate ramp up. There is definitely a way to make it work for both, so we'll work on it.

To double check I calculated your hashrate over the last hour:
Code:
mysql> select 65536*sum(difficulty)/(60*60)/1000000 as mh  from shares where username="1Q697sCKUo1pp3GXGxPbJN6GJPJz97R1LE" and time > date_sub(now(), interval 60 minute);
+--------------------+
| mh                 |
+--------------------+
| 2.7589199644444444 |
+--------------------+
1 row in set (0.35 sec)
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Pointed 3.6MH/s your way to see how your pool works out for me.  If it's good over the next 24H, will point the rest of my hash power over.  I like the idea of the pool, it makes sense.
trc
full member
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
Now BTC / DAY ?
We're at .00498 right now which is good considering we're above Wafflepool and CleverMining (as of this very moment). I expect we'll get a bit above .005 today.

Your reasoning for not mining LTC when below LTC profitability is sound but those others don't have a clue even when they have the power to mine it. I hope you reach enough hash rate soon. I'd like to suggest that you make the preparations to do what others can't, when the time comes.
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
Now BTC / DAY ?
We're at .00498 right now which is good considering we're above Wafflepool and CleverMining (as of this very moment). I expect we'll get a bit above .005 today.
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
How much longer are we going to sit with this unexchanged balance?

The AUR is finally mature so it will exchange today.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
Whatever you are doing now you're doing it wrong profitability is below ltc and has been so for more than 24  hours.
Yep, fair enough. We've been very disappointed with the performance over the last day. We trimmed out some poor performing coins last night and things are much better today. We'll keep you posted.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
How much longer are we going to sit with this unexchanged balance?
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
WU:2723.8/m  WUE:98.3%


Damn!

Thats a good WUE!

We had some luck with that eh?  Grin  If only it was always like that.
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
What's your address? I'll take a look. If you could post a screenshot of your rig hashrate that would be helpful too.

Nowhere to upload an image to at the moment but a screen copy as of 12:33pm, PST.  I did drop the Intensity down to 18 from 20 and that has seemed to matchup with the site a little better (as well as produce far fewer rejected).  

 cgminer version 3.7.2 - Started: [2014-03-27 00:01:32] - [0 days 07:31:33]
 Pool management GPU management Settings Display options Quit        
 (5s):2.753M (avg):2.772Mh/s | A:1165248  R:51456  HW:0  WU:2723.8/m  WUE:98.3%
 ST: 1  SS: 0  NB: 869  LW: 10746  GF: 1  RF: 0
 Connected to us-west.coinshift.com diff 1.02K with stratum as user 1Q697sCKUo1pp3GXGxPbJN6GJPJz97R1LE
 Coinshift  Diff: 5.42K  Started: [07:32:03]  Best share: 3.12M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GPU 0:  69.0C 2923RPM | 457.4K/461.9Kh/s | R:5.5% HW:0 WU: 449.8/m I:18
 GPU 1:  73.0C 4325RPM | 458.8K/462.1Kh/s | R:2.1% HW:0 WU: 431.7/m I:18
 GPU 2:  72.0C 2990RPM | 457.9K/462.1Kh/s | R:6.0% HW:0 WU: 442.5/m I:18
 GPU 3:  70.0C 2800RPM | 458.7K/462.1Kh/s | R:3.8% HW:0 WU: 432.2/m I:18
 GPU 4:  61.0C 2865RPM | 458.2K/462.1Kh/s | R:2.9% HW:0 WU: 497.9/m I:18
 GPU 5:  51.0C 2902RPM | 457.9K/462.2Kh/s | R:5.0% HW:0 WU: 469.8/m I:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [07:28:22] Accepted 0316666f Diff 21.2K/1024 GPU 4 at Coinshift
 [07:28:41] Accepted 3ac657e9 Diff 1.11K/1024 GPU 3 at Coinshift
 [07:28:57] Accepted 136579d4 Diff 3.38K/1024 GPU 1 at Coinshift
 [07:29:21] Accepted 252e909b Diff 1.76K/1024 GPU 3 at Coinshift
 [07:30:46] Accepted 0451cf3d Diff 15.2K/1024 GPU 3 at Coinshift
 [07:30:59] Accepted 1a6606db Diff 2.48K/1024 GPU 3 at Coinshift
 [07:31:02] Accepted 1b67253d Diff 2.39K/1024 GPU 4 at Coinshift
 [07:31:02] Accepted 3793b251 Diff 1.18K/1024 GPU 4 at Coinshift
 [07:31:08] Accepted 1b74023b Diff 2.39K/1024 GPU 0 at Coinshift
 [07:31:10] Accepted 16fce4ca Diff 2.85K/1024 GPU 5 at Coinshift
 [07:31:12] Accepted 15f39765 Diff 2.98K/1024 GPU 5 at Coinshift
 [07:31:25] Accepted 254595ba Diff 1.76K/1024 GPU 5 at Coinshift
 [07:31:43] Accepted 01f7101f Diff 33.4K/1024 GPU 4 at Coinshift
 [07:31:47] Accepted 2a1d6620 Diff 1.56K/1024 GPU 0 at Coinshift
 [07:32:15] Accepted 0652f0da Diff 10.4K/1024 GPU 2 at Coinshift
 [07:32:18] Accepted 3b800ef8 Diff 1.1K/1024 GPU 4 at Coinshift
 [07:32:44] Accepted 1579bf53 Diff 3.05K/1024 GPU 2 at Coinshift

Phzi - Pool hashrate as of this moment is 3091.675 Mh/s.  Website is 2301.8 Kh/s with a rejected of 54.8 Kh/s.
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
Been running cgminer and my avg hashing rate is 2.833Mh/s but combined accepted/rejected hashrate per your site seems to be hovering between 2350 and 2500Mh/s.  I'm fairly new to mining but having tried out Middlecoin, Cleverming and WafflePool for a couple days each, they all virtually nailed it.  Any suggestions as to why I'm coming in below and/or what to do about it?

What's your address? I'll take a look. If you could post a screenshot of your rig hashrate that would be helpful too.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Been running cgminer and my avg hashing rate is 2.833Mh/s but combined accepted/rejected hashrate per your site seems to be hovering between 2350 and 2500Mh/s.  I'm fairly new to mining but having tried out Middlecoin, Cleverming and WafflePool for a couple days each, they all virtually nailed it.  Any suggestions as to why I'm coming in below and/or what to do about it?
Compare pool reported hashrate to WU, not hashrate.  See if that matches more closely.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Been running cgminer and my avg hashing rate is 2.833Mh/s but combined accepted/rejected hashrate per your site seems to be hovering between 2350 and 2500Mh/s.  I'm fairly new to mining but having tried out Middlecoin, Cleverming and WafflePool for a couple days each, they all virtually nailed it.  Any suggestions as to why I'm coming in below and/or what to do about it?
sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 250
Whatever you are doing now you're doing it wrong profitability is below ltc and has been so for more than 24  hours.
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
@coinshift
For example, now that i am writing this post, pool is dedicated 96.5% on AUR and 0.73% on DOGE and remains on others.
Since pool has 2.5GHash, 0.73% will be about 18Mhash. It is obvious that 18Mhash cant find any DOGE block. So i think the pool algorithm should consider coin's difficulty into it's dedication's amount too (i like to call it hashrate efficiency).
It is wiser that pool assign those 18Mhash to RDD or GDC since it can be more efficient on those coins difficulty [OR] assign enough hashrate to DOGE side.

What do you think?

That's a common question. Since finding a block is an independent random chance, you shouldn't slice up the hashrate and try to look at pieces independently across small time periods (in this case, the instantaneous DOGE hashrate). Statistically there is no benefit to maintaining some "minimum" instantaneous hashrate on a single coin.

We do manage the pool's "hashrate efficiency", but it matters only in aggregate across all the coins we're mining and across a longer time period. In other words, you should look at the weighted average of the coin difficulties, not any one coin. For example, imagine we had 2000 altcoins, all with the same difficulty as DOGE. We then allocate 0.05% to each. If you look at an individual coin you would think the probability of finding a block would be quite low. However, in aggregate, we'll actually find blocks quite often -- this is because the risk/reward ratio for each unit of hashrate is profitable.

Another way to think about it is thinking of it over a longer timescale. Instantaneously at some points it was .73% DOGE and others it was 80% DOGE, but over the course of the day it averaged out to 700MH/sec.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Last night, I tried to get on this pool and it kept coming up dead on sgminer.  I'll double check my settings but was there an issue last night?  I tried the backup and the regular address. 
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
@coinshift

I've a question:

For example, now that i am writing this post, pool is dedicated 96.5% on AUR and 0.73% on DOGE and remains on others.
Since pool has 2.5GHash, 0.73% will be about 18Mhash. It is obvious that 18Mhash cant find any DOGE block. So i think the pool algorithm should consider coin's difficulty into it's dedication's amount too (i like to call it hashrate efficiency).
It is wiser that pool assign those 18Mhash to RDD or GDC since it can be more efficient on those coins difficulty [OR] assign enough hashrate to DOGE side.

What do you think?

There's an echo in here.. echo in here..
Pages:
Jump to: