[ANN][Pool][Profit-Switch][Optional Auto-Exchange per Coin][Vardiff] ~ Hashcows - page 152.

jedimstr

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: GoldBit89 on November 16, 2013, 06:59:02 PM

Quote from: jedimstr on November 16, 2013, 09:43:51 AM

Quote from: GoldBit89 on November 16, 2013, 07:26:23 AM

anyone using Cuda miner instead of cgminer for hashcows?

if so what starting command line are you using?

this is what im trying to use but keeps just saying

HTTP request failed: Failed connect to 127.0.0.32; No
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 15 seconds

cudaminer.exe" -d 0 -i 1 -l auto
-o stratum+tcp://stratum01.hashco.ws:8888 -O ****.1:****

is that double quote after cudaminer.exe part of your copy/paste or just a typo, because it looks like cudaminer isn't taking any of your parameters at all?

here is rest of it:

"C:\Users\******\Desktop\guiminer-scrypt_win32_binaries_v0.04\cudaminer\cudaminer.exe"

im now wondering if i should put a "/" after :8888 like this :8888/

You may also want to relocate your miner folder. Windows has a habit of mucking up Administrative privileges for executables with Desktop in the path, though that doesn't seem to be your issue here.

GoldBit89

hero member

Activity: 526

Merit: 500

Its all about the Gold

Quote from: jedimstr on November 16, 2013, 09:43:51 AM

Quote from: GoldBit89 on November 16, 2013, 07:26:23 AM

anyone using Cuda miner instead of cgminer for hashcows?

if so what starting command line are you using?

this is what im trying to use but keeps just saying

HTTP request failed: Failed connect to 127.0.0.32; No
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 15 seconds

cudaminer.exe" -d 0 -i 1 -l auto
-o stratum+tcp://stratum01.hashco.ws:8888 -O ****.1:****

is that double quote after cudaminer.exe part of your copy/paste or just a typo, because it looks like cudaminer isn't taking any of your parameters at all?

here is rest of it:

"C:\Users\******\Desktop\guiminer-scrypt_win32_binaries_v0.04\cudaminer\cudaminer.exe"

im now wondering if i should put a "/" after :8888 like this :8888/

jedimstr

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: GoldBit89 on November 16, 2013, 07:26:23 AM

anyone using Cuda miner instead of cgminer for hashcows?

if so what starting command line are you using?

this is what im trying to use but keeps just saying

HTTP request failed: Failed connect to 127.0.0.1:9332; No
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 15 seconds

cudaminer.exe" -d 0 -i 1 -l auto
-o stratum+tcp://stratum01.hashco.ws:8888 -O ****.1:****

is that double quote after cudaminer.exe part of your copy/paste or just a typo, because it looks like cudaminer isn't taking any of your parameters at all?

GoldBit89

hero member

Activity: 526

Merit: 500

Its all about the Gold

anyone using Cuda miner instead of cgminer for hashcows?

if so what starting command line are you using?

this is what im trying to use but keeps just saying

HTTP request failed: Failed connect to 127.0.0.1:9332; No
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 15 seconds

cudaminer.exe" -d 0 -i 1 -l auto
-o stratum+tcp://stratum01.hashco.ws:8888 -O ****.1:****

nwfella

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1000

Well hello there!

Currently have 3 workers that cgminer is saying shares are being accepted for. However, my worker stats is showing each of them as currently inactive?!

Any ideas?

Prelude

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Thirtybird on November 15, 2013, 04:19:23 PM

Quote from: Prelude on November 15, 2013, 10:35:25 AM

I know that each coin has their own share difficulty configurations, but would it be possible to lower the max from 1000? On fast coins like WDC (current round) my fastest rigs often don't even have time to submit a share, and when they do have time it's only from 1~3 GPUs out of 6. Makes me feel like I'm burning electricity for nothing. Perhaps until (if?) ASICs come out for scrypt, a worker's overall speed/difficulty calculation should be limited to the fastest GPU available, roughly 800KH/s. My 4.5MH/s rigs get hit the hardest since they are being treated as one single 4.5MH/s number cruncher instead of the 6x 740~800KH/s number crunchers that they really are.

run 6 instances of cgminer for the time being if you think you're getting penalized by unnaturally high vardiff. If all the cards take the same settings, it's amazingly simple to create a batch file and use a variable from the command line to choose a specific device when firing it off.

Eh, I suppose I could do that but it would be a huge pain in the ass considering my CGWatcher and CGRemote setup I have going on.

Thirtybird

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 500

Quote from: Prelude on November 15, 2013, 10:35:25 AM

I know that each coin has their own share difficulty configurations, but would it be possible to lower the max from 1000? On fast coins like WDC (current round) my fastest rigs often don't even have time to submit a share, and when they do have time it's only from 1~3 GPUs out of 6. Makes me feel like I'm burning electricity for nothing. Perhaps until (if?) ASICs come out for scrypt, a worker's overall speed/difficulty calculation should be limited to the fastest GPU available, roughly 800KH/s. My 4.5MH/s rigs get hit the hardest since they are being treated as one single 4.5MH/s number cruncher instead of the 6x 740~800KH/s number crunchers that they really are.

run 6 instances of cgminer for the time being if you think you're getting penalized by unnaturally high vardiff. If all the cards take the same settings, it's amazingly simple to create a batch file and use a variable from the command line to choose a specific device when firing it off.

Prelude

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1000

I know that each coin has their own share difficulty configurations, but would it be possible to lower the max from 1000? On fast coins like WDC (current round) my fastest rigs often don't even have time to submit a share, and when they do have time it's only from 1~3 GPUs out of 6. Makes me feel like I'm burning electricity for nothing. Perhaps until (if?) ASICs come out for scrypt, a worker's overall speed/difficulty calculation should be limited to the fastest GPU available, roughly 800KH/s. My 4.5MH/s rigs get hit the hardest since they are being treated as one single 4.5MH/s number cruncher instead of the 6x 740~800KH/s number crunchers that they really are.

nearmiss

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: sal002 on November 15, 2013, 09:35:59 AM

Quote from: goofy73 on November 15, 2013, 06:54:21 AM

guys you should take difficulty from the coin client (getmininginfo command in console, think you know it) Otherwise sites like coinchoose, coinwarz etc shows wrong value or show it with big delay.. And why you don`t mine MNC?!

Do I show the wrong value? I get it from the getmininginfo. My delay is five minutes, though, so maybe that is what you mean.

Could be, hashco.ws is also delayed a couple minutes in updating the site, but is using live values for all its calculations behind the scenes.

sal002

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

Quote from: goofy73 on November 15, 2013, 06:54:21 AM

guys you should take difficulty from the coin client (getmininginfo command in console, think you know it) Otherwise sites like coinchoose, coinwarz etc shows wrong value or show it with big delay.. And why you don`t mine MNC?!

Do I show the wrong value? I get it from the getmininginfo. My delay is five minutes, though, so maybe that is what you mean.

nearmiss

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: goofy73 on November 15, 2013, 06:54:21 AM

guys you should take difficulty from the coin client (getmininginfo command in console, think you know it) Otherwise sites like coinchoose, coinwarz etc shows wrong value or show it with big delay.. And why you don`t mine MNC?!

I assume your referring to the site itself. Of course we take difficulty from the coin client. We don't use coinchoose/coinwarz or any other similar site for anything. MNC was in the rotation for quite some time, but it had some issues recently with forks. I've been trying to track down a legitimate new client/src and ensure we are on the correct chain before re-enabling. Hopefully this will be done today.

goofy73

member

Activity: 65

Merit: 10

guys you should take difficulty from the coin client (getmininginfo command in console, think you know it) Otherwise sites like coinchoose, coinwarz etc shows wrong value or show it with big delay.. And why you don`t mine MNC?!

dolby

full member

Activity: 136

Merit: 100

What should I do in order to keep reject ratio lower? I'm constantly getting Rejected after Stratum from pool 0 detected new block on my faster rig.

My reject ratio in cgminer 3.30 is 4.3% after 24h on my faster rig 2462 kh/s
......................................and only 0.4% after 24h on my slowest rig 2128 kh/s

some advice please
thx

Thirtybird

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 500

Quote from: hotwired007 on November 13, 2013, 06:19:25 PM

Quote from: Thirtybird on November 12, 2013, 04:34:03 PM

As hashcows has vardiff, I used multiple instances of cgminer - 1 for each card in the system. This allowed me to tune each card individually (7850 & 5870 & 5770) and for each one to have its optimal difficulty.

What thread concurrency (t/c) are you using for your 5870? - i'm running 6144 atm but i'm conviced it can do better (850 clock - getting about 400)

my 7950 is running at t/c atm 21712 but only getting a very low hashrate

8192 for my 5870 w/1GB

Code:

cgminer --scrypt --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 -I 15 --thread-concurrency 8192 -o stratum+tcp://stratum01.hashco.ws:8888 -u username.worker -p password

this gets me ~375 kh/sec with stock clock of 850/1200 so I think you're spot on with your config. I had to balance mine with using the machine, so I tend to run a lower intensity on that card as it's my everyday workstation.

aTriz

hero member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 683

Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big

Quote from: jedimstr on November 13, 2013, 07:21:38 PM

COW DOWN COW DOWN!!!

Who's gone Cow Tipping? Huh

Fixed up, sorry about that guys...

Cows had to poo!

jedimstr

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

COW DOWN COW DOWN!!!

Who's gone Cow Tipping? Huh

GBattaglia

hero member

Activity: 735

Merit: 501

Quote from: willittobe on November 13, 2013, 07:19:13 PM

Hmm, seems like the cows are out to pasture at the moment? Went down maybe 10 minutes ago...

Indeed. Something is off. Can't connect my miners to the pool; just hangs at 'Starting CgMiner'

willittobe

full member

Activity: 141

Merit: 100

Hmm, seems like the cows are out to pasture at the moment? Went down maybe 10 minutes ago...

hotwired007

hero member

Activity: 585

Merit: 500

Quote from: Thirtybird on November 12, 2013, 04:34:03 PM

As hashcows has vardiff, I used multiple instances of cgminer - 1 for each card in the system. This allowed me to tune each card individually (7850 & 5870 & 5770) and for each one to have its optimal difficulty.

What thread concurrency (t/c) are you using for your 5870? - i'm running 6144 atm but i'm conviced it can do better (850 clock - getting about 400)

my 7950 is running at t/c atm 21712 but only getting a very low hashrate

Thirtybird

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 500

Quote from: hotwired007 on November 12, 2013, 11:10:19 AM

Quote from: Taxidermista on October 25, 2013, 07:07:37 AM

Quote from: hotwired007 on October 25, 2013, 05:20:12 AM

Quote from: Taxidermista on October 25, 2013, 05:12:52 AM

Quote from: GBattaglia on October 24, 2013, 09:07:56 PM

Quote from: Taxidermista on October 24, 2013, 09:19:13 AM

0.007 BTC per MH and day... this profit barely covers a 0.10 USD/kwh rate. I keep my rigs working because they heat my house nicely, but this is the only reason now.

How is your efficiency on your mining Rigs? I generally have 500 Watts per MH of hashing power, which translates to roughly $4/day in power at 11/kwh electricity rates.

Same results, about 0.5 kw per MH. That's 5 cents per hour per MH/s, so 1.20 $/day for every MH/s.

What HW are you guys running? i'm still running 5 series GPUs and my rig eats 650w for 1Mh/s (5870/5850/5770/5770).

I have a weird mix of 5xxx and 7xxx.

I have now got a 7950 added (7950/5870/5850) whats the best config? i have: -g 1 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 8000 -I 15,18,18 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --temp-target 70

edit - i'm getting a lot of HW errors with the 7950 (i think this is the thread-concurrency being wrong though)

As hashcows has vardiff, I used multiple instances of cgminer - 1 for each card in the system. This allowed me to tune each card individually (7850 & 5870 & 5770) and for each one to have its optimal difficulty.

Topic: [ANN][Pool][Profit-Switch][Optional Auto-Exchange per Coin][Vardiff] ~ Hashcows - page 152. (Read 347329 times)