Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][PoW/PoS/MN][GPU ONLY]Project SONO - New listing vote for new projects! - page 26. (Read 229410 times)

member
Activity: 246
Merit: 10
AHQ3sd23QnVDzo8DqEQnhbJyYJhUSuwbmU
I hope June 1 we will see SonoX
As Hamukione said, SonoX is coming. I hope that SonoX can stay on the original objectives, which aim at to build up new exchange that can change the whole crypto exchange ecosystem. Currently, the ecosytem has been abundant with lots of greedy, scam, low-quality, bad-support exchanges. All of those stuffs have created bad experiences on potential investors, who would like to join the ecosystem in the near future.
I agree. Lately, there had been lots of new exchanges popping up then turning to a scam one month later. I hope SonoX would turn into one of more reliant exchange when it finally launches.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 14
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
I hope June 1 we will see SonoX
As Hamukione said, SonoX is coming. I hope that SonoX can stay on the original objectives, which aim at to build up new exchange that can change the whole crypto exchange ecosystem. Currently, the ecosytem has been abundant with lots of greedy, scam, low-quality, bad-support exchanges. All of those stuffs have created bad experiences on potential investors, who would like to join the ecosystem in the near future.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
I hope June 1 we will see SonoX
member
Activity: 132
Merit: 12
My dream is to be a self-made billionaire
At the moment, SONO has been really undervalued.
I think sono undervalued too.

SONO current signature campaign is only relevant for someone who really would like to support the project. In addition, signature payments are something like bonus for their supports to keep the SONO project become more popular in both the forum and the crypto ecosystem.
Quote
But instead of using 5$ worth of signature, i prefer buying 1000 coin from Exchange for 700$ and setting my own masternode.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
5 * 0.13= 0.65 (0.00064889 BTC)  - 50 * 0.13= 6.5 (0.00005989 BTC) ~ 5.6 $
$5.6 for each participant at member rank with maximum 50 posts per week.
Honestly, this is one of the most perfect payment rates I have ever seen in the bitcointalk forum.
Thanks for such amazing campaign, gunka.
Best wishes for SONO project.

I'll say this..

We had some airdrops that allowed users to get some coins for free.
1 month after all the airdrops were complete, 4500$ worth of SONO were in all of their accounts.
The price is set like this because we are undervalued.

If you don't think this project will make it and climb back up, then leave it.
This is just an option to get a few coins while posting.

If we were to pay our users at the current price and with the goal of competing against big companies with lots of money, then we would burn our distribution fund in less then 3 weeks.
That would be a waste no doubt.

I think sono undervalued too.

But instead of using 5$ worth of signature, i prefer buying 1000 coin from Exchange for 700$ and setting my own masternode.

And i will probably get more $ from some other signature that i paid for 1000 sono.

member
Activity: 462
Merit: 14
Moreover, I strongly believe that someday in the year of 2018, SONO will surpass $5, which might be a next start for the project after one of the most gloomy period during its lifespan.
Today, SONO has stayed at around $0.8, so its need five-fold rises to hit the target.
Let's support SONO and help it grow gradually, everyone.
The price is set like this because we are undervalued.
member
Activity: 462
Merit: 14
Yeah, you make a point, Hamukione. This is something like a bonus per post for someone who really believe in SONO and would like to support the project through their posts. If someone think that the campaign is mainly for daily earnings, they should leave.
This is just an option to get a few coins while posting.

Another plus point for you. The marketing funds of SONO project should be used as most efficiently as possible.
Quote
If we were to pay our users at the current price and with the goal of competing against big companies with lots of money, then we would burn our distribution fund in less then 3 weeks.
That would be a waste no doubt.
hero member
Activity: 1202
Merit: 507
Pinch.Network Guaranteed Airdrop
5 * 0.13= 0.65 (0.00064889 BTC)  - 50 * 0.13= 6.5 (0.00005989 BTC) ~ 5.6 $
$5.6 for each participant at member rank with maximum 50 posts per week.
Honestly, this is one of the most perfect payment rates I have ever seen in the bitcointalk forum.
Thanks for such amazing campaign, gunka.
Best wishes for SONO project.

I'll say this..

We had some airdrops that allowed users to get some coins for free.
1 month after all the airdrops were complete, 4500$ worth of SONO were in all of their accounts.
The price is set like this because we are undervalued.

If you don't think this project will make it and climb back up, then leave it.
This is just an option to get a few coins while posting.

If we were to pay our users at the current price and with the goal of competing against big companies with lots of money, then we would burn our distribution fund in less then 3 weeks.
That would be a waste no doubt.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 14
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
5 * 0.13= 0.65 (0.00064889 BTC)  - 50 * 0.13= 6.5 (0.00005989 BTC) ~ 5.6 $
$5.6 for each participant at member rank with maximum 50 posts per week.
Honestly, this is one of the most perfect payment rates I have ever seen in the bitcointalk forum.
Thanks for such amazing campaign, gunka.
Best wishes for SONO project.
member
Activity: 246
Merit: 10
AHQ3sd23QnVDzo8DqEQnhbJyYJhUSuwbmU
It's only the first week for the signature campaign. As for me, let's just see first how the per posts payment would fare before changing the rules. I know it might encourage spamming but the aim here is to promote the project more so the more the posts, the more the exposure.
You can follow the status here  https://sonohub.ru/user.html?u=1196258
Thank you for the link. Didn't know there would be a way to check one's status at the signature campaign. Great feature.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 101
The current price is too low for bounty hunters and other members. For me , I don't even bother to participate in this kind of this project. Its realy waste of time and money.
Money ? What money?
Do you think that getting $5 for the fact that you have a signed signature is not enough?
For you it looks like this:
5 * 0.13= 0.65 (0.00064889 BTC)  - 50 * 0.13= 6.5 (0.00005989 BTC) ~ 5.6 $
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 100
The current price is too low for bounty hunters and other members. For me , I don't even bother to participate in this kind of this project. Its realy waste of time and money.
member
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
Open and Transparent Science Powered By Blockchain
Ya I would echo sentiment above that it would be wise to raise the reward to increase participation. Just my 2 cents.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 101
It's only the first week for the signature campaign. As for me, let's just see first how the per posts payment would fare before changing the rules. I know it might encourage spamming but the aim here is to promote the project more so the more the posts, the more the exposure.
You can follow the status here  https://sonohub.ru/user.html?u=1196258
member
Activity: 246
Merit: 10
AHQ3sd23QnVDzo8DqEQnhbJyYJhUSuwbmU
It's only the first week for the signature campaign. As for me, let's just see first how the per posts payment would fare before changing the rules. I know it might encourage spamming but the aim here is to promote the project more so the more the posts, the more the exposure.
sr. member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 282
tBTC - https://dapp.tbtc.network/
Our official signature campaign is now live!
More details can be found here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-project-sono-signature-campaigntwitter-campaign-2105784

i think you need to re-evaluate the rules because it could create a spam.
(which i believe it has been created)
because as we can see many people who did those spam thing lately to increase it and at the same time to meet the maximum requirement.
why do not you put it this way for example ?
1.15 Minimum and 25 Maximum every week
2.Exact number for every rank like 4 [email protected] or something like that

sent you an example about this,and for me it can be considered as a spam
full member
Activity: 480
Merit: 106
Our official signature campaign is now live!
More details can be found here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-project-sono-signature-campaigntwitter-campaign-2105784
At current low price of SONO, I think payment rates per week, not per post will be more appropriate strategy, Hamukione.
Something like 5 Sono for Junior member, 10 Sono for member, 15 for Full member, 20 for Senior member, and 30 for Hero/ Ledgendary.
Just my suggestion, so simply ignore it if you don't agree.
I also think a point based system with the fixed amount of SONO per week is more appropriate.
Jr. Member per post will have 0.5 points, min 5 posts to get the reward, max 50 posts. Member is the same but they have 1 points per post. Full Member is 1.3 points and so go on for higher rank but point base instead flat out SONO per post like the old signature.

No cap on the maximum number of participants because of each week there are only fixed amount of SONO give out as a reward.
For example, 1000 SONO / total number of points = rate of SONO per 1 point. More people jump in then the rate will be lower. Team don't have to worry that the fund for signature campaign burn out.
hero member
Activity: 1202
Merit: 507
Pinch.Network Guaranteed Airdrop
member
Activity: 462
Merit: 14
Sadly, only Yobit know detail amount of SONO (altcom) lost back when the chain split.
But I think most of the people have coin stuck at Yobit already sold to get BTC cause that was the only way to get out.
So right now, the current SONO's circulating supply does have a good percent SONO lost in the limbo. My wild guess would be around 5-10% of circulating supply.
Yobit is probably a scam exchange, which has very bad supports for both traders, projects that used their services.
Anyway, SONO team have fixed network issues several months ago, but the Yobit exchange ignore ask from SONO team to fix wallet issues in the exchange.
Personally, Yobit should do this by themselves without any addittional fees. They have to be responsible for all of their services delivered to customers.
full member
Activity: 480
Merit: 106
Do we know the exact amount of sono's (or altcommunitycoin's) lost in yobits wallet?

Also are you dropping them from the circulating supply or you are counting them too?
Sadly, only Yobit know detail amount of SONO (altcom) lost back when the chain split.
But I think most of the people have coin stuck at Yobit already sold to get BTC cause that was the only way to get out.
So right now, the current SONO's circulating supply does have a good percent SONO lost in the limbo. My wild guess would be around 5-10% of circulating supply.
Pages:
Jump to: