Spreading valuable information which helps you beating the market usually wouldn't get shared. And if it gets shared there might still be egoistic motives involved. If a bank labels an asset a buy, the bank isn't really interested in making you money. The bank is interested in making money for itself by either creating orchestrated herd behavior for a specific asset or by selling shit which they say is buy. I am curious to see how a platform like yours could work in the end (if at all). Our whole lives are about information tied to assets and most human beings don't feel like sharing the stuff that really makes you money.
The value you can earn in Pareto can be greater than the value you can earn from trying to trade on the information yourself.
In the Pareto Network the incentive models are aligned better.
Our white paper goes into more detail about who would use it, why they would use it over doing something else, and under what circumstances our network is a better way to make money, in the "case studies" section.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6MFoSQkT7U
I know there is a reason behind the choice of your name "pareto". But now here is the problem! You say that someone could earn more by sharing the info than by keeping it for himself. There is an economic model with the Greece letter called Alpha that has proven otherwise - surplus information gives individual advantage. You are looking to crack that model. Whatever your white paper tells, it has to prove that the old economic model based on alpha is wrong given the application of your economic model. Did you do that?
Maybe you can answer my question if you find the time. It is very possible that I am mistaken. I am not claiming I am right here so I would like to hear your input.
