Topic: [ANN][PRESALE] Pareto Network - The P2P Financial Content & Information Marketplace - page 102. (Read 64375 times)
November 22, 2017, 06:05:05 PM
Are there any assumptions, what will be the price of the tokens of this project?
November 22, 2017, 05:59:06 PM
Tell me please
why this forum is needed for this project
why this forum is needed for this project
At a minimum, each user will be able to earn with the information that he puts on the Internet. Everyone will be able to influence the course of the crypto currency
it is necessary to think of something better
I'm not sure there could be anything better. For me it looks like an espionage network that gives you data in exchange for ... Just like that, it provides free of charge data
November 22, 2017, 05:52:47 PM
Tell me please
why this forum is needed for this project
why this forum is needed for this project
At a minimum, each user will be able to earn with the information that he puts on the Internet. Everyone will be able to influence the course of the crypto currency
Social networks do not allow you to monetize your knowledge and assumptions
November 22, 2017, 05:51:10 PM
Tell me please
why this forum is needed for this project
why this forum is needed for this project
At a minimum, each user will be able to earn with the information that he puts on the Internet. Everyone will be able to influence the course of the crypto currency
it is necessary to think of something better
November 22, 2017, 05:48:12 PM
Tell me please
why this forum is needed for this project
why this forum is needed for this project
At a minimum, each user will be able to earn with the information that he puts on the Internet. Everyone will be able to influence the course of the crypto currency
November 22, 2017, 05:47:36 PM
Suppose the project was successful and was launched. Users publish information. How will the moderation take place?
I believe that this will be some kind of electronic algorithm that will analyze the reliability. It will be too expensive to attract people here.
You think? It seems to me that algorithms are not yet able to determine the usefulness of content, especially its quality
I agree. The idea of the rating looks more reliable and interesting. Quality can not be determined.
You can determine some technical issues - the number of errors in the article, the quality of the video itself
November 22, 2017, 05:42:48 PM
Tell me please
why this forum is needed for this project
why this forum is needed for this project
At a minimum, each user will be able to earn with the information that he puts on the Internet. Everyone will be able to influence the course of the crypto currency
November 22, 2017, 05:39:41 PM
Tell me please
why this forum is needed for this project
why this forum is needed for this project
November 22, 2017, 05:37:25 PM
Suppose the project was successful and was launched. Users publish information. How will the moderation take place?
I believe that this will be some kind of electronic algorithm that will analyze the reliability. It will be too expensive to attract people here.
You think? It seems to me that algorithms are not yet able to determine the usefulness of content, especially its quality
I agree. The idea of the rating looks more reliable and interesting. Quality can not be determined.
November 22, 2017, 05:31:44 PM
Suppose the project was successful and was launched. Users publish information. How will the moderation take place?
I believe that this will be some kind of electronic algorithm that will analyze the reliability. It will be too expensive to attract people here.
You think? It seems to me that algorithms are not yet able to determine the usefulness of content, especially its quality
November 22, 2017, 05:25:29 PM
By the way, will the payment differ depending on the quality of the content?
I think that in this respect, developers should work as well as with the bounty. That is, video is one amount, an analytical article is another amount.
But how will the quality of the content be determined? I mean, will the same number of tokens be given for good and for a bad article?
Quality of content is determined by how much other people rewarded it. If the content is valuable then people will reward it after the fact (increases rank), because this allows them to get the more content sooner (increased rank = content faster).
This is understandable, the usual rating system. When exactly will the reward take place? Is there a certain period?
November 22, 2017, 05:19:16 PM
I think the project will be quite successful. The idea is interesting and necessary, in fact, it is much more necessary than hundreds of already existing exchanges
Exchanges are needed, but such a project will also play a role. At a minimum, you can get money for constantly being in a social network)
November 22, 2017, 05:10:18 PM
I think the project will be quite successful. The idea is interesting and necessary, in fact, it is much more necessary than hundreds of already existing exchanges
November 22, 2017, 05:07:34 PM
Suppose the project was successful and was launched. Users publish information. How will the moderation take place?
I believe that this will be some kind of electronic algorithm that will analyze the reliability. It will be too expensive to attract people here.
November 22, 2017, 05:02:16 PM
Suppose the project was successful and was launched. Users publish information. How will the moderation take place?
November 22, 2017, 04:57:49 PM
In these times information is always money. The idea is not bad but apparently I did not get a lot of interest in the contract address and I looked at only 50 eth looked. So the investment they have received is very low, maybe later, but they will not be able to get enough to go to the market or to invest in the project.
Do you think the project is unlikely to raise enough funds? Of course, for such a money platform of good quality will not workThis is not an indicator, the project is still able to collect the right amount of funds. In the end, it concept is very interesting
Of course! The concept is interesting and the marketing component is very good. It seems to me that the project may lack a few publications on major portals. It would help a lot
November 22, 2017, 04:47:45 PM
In these times information is always money. The idea is not bad but apparently I did not get a lot of interest in the contract address and I looked at only 50 eth looked. So the investment they have received is very low, maybe later, but they will not be able to get enough to go to the market or to invest in the project.
Do you think the project is unlikely to raise enough funds? Of course, for such a money platform of good quality will not workThis is not an indicator, the project is still able to collect the right amount of funds. In the end, it concept is very interesting
November 22, 2017, 04:38:46 PM
In these times information is always money. The idea is not bad but apparently I did not get a lot of interest in the contract address and I looked at only 50 eth looked. So the investment they have received is very low, maybe later, but they will not be able to get enough to go to the market or to invest in the project.
Do you think the project is unlikely to raise enough funds? Of course, for such a money platform of good quality will not work 
November 22, 2017, 01:14:36 AM
Spreading valuable information which helps you beating the market usually wouldn't get shared. And if it gets shared there might still be egoistic motives involved. If a bank labels an asset a buy, the bank isn't really interested in making you money. The bank is interested in making money for itself by either creating orchestrated herd behavior for a specific asset or by selling shit which they say is buy. I am curious to see how a platform like yours could work in the end (if at all). Our whole lives are about information tied to assets and most human beings don't feel like sharing the stuff that really makes you money.
The value you can earn in Pareto can be greater than the value you can earn from trying to trade on the information yourself.
In the Pareto Network the incentive models are aligned better.
Our white paper goes into more detail about who would use it, why they would use it over doing something else, and under what circumstances our network is a better way to make money, in the "case studies" section.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6MFoSQkT7U
I know there is a reason behind the choice of your name "pareto". But now here is the problem! You say that someone could earn more by sharing the info than by keeping it for himself. There is an economic model with the Greece letter called Alpha that has proven otherwise - surplus information gives individual advantage. You are looking to crack that model. Whatever your white paper tells, it has to prove that the old economic model based on alpha is wrong given the application of your economic model. Did you do that?
November 21, 2017, 07:13:44 PM
Jump to: