There is too few mining power to get the donation really working (I know MIDAS it's fault and the checkup) and NH is killing our mining pool.
If you combine these "stories" my conclusion is that we need more then NH haspower to get the coin really going and leave NH as it is.
The outcome for the miners goes down yes but what are we mining if the coins intentions can't be upheld ?
I can provide more hashpower, but nerved it down because of the complaints earlier on and this makes me confused.
So MIDAS calculates a formula to determine the difficulty based on the average hashrate. With NH linked we get differential averages.
Why is it bad for the miners ? As the coin needs a certain hashrate to survive you need 24/7 miners, which NH aint doing, MIDAS reacts and the difficulties go up and down and yes they do, I can see that in my transaction log for payouts and that's just random and my hashrating is for a week the same.
I checked NH out and they don't have a farm linked to this coin as their "minersoftware" doesn't support HODL. They give the option to buy hashrate which can be pointed here if you choose the HODL algo. And it's so low that you can ignore it... 13KH combined hashpower EU + USA server which are around 70 miners.
So somebody is paying NH to mine here. In a way the discussion which was held, comes down to you are not allowed to buy cloud hash or have a good system to be able to mine here? Is it me but isn't the problem situated in the bad hardware ppl are using ?
So please explain why I nerfed my hashrate down ?
How much NH hash were you using before and how much are you using now? Do you know how much BTC it was costing you to mine 1 ROI coin using NH? I just checked the network rate at 130,000 hash so mining should be easy. I turned off my 30 miners here so people could mine more coins easier...