Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][SEED] SeedCoin | New Road Map - page 9. (Read 184117 times)

sr. member
Activity: 255
Merit: 250
November 04, 2014, 10:01:50 PM
im a little confused... is the interest 269% daily? how much % is this coin for PoS?


I believe its currently 16%...

on a side note, anyone know of a correlation between the SEED drama and PINK radio silence?  Trading volume dropped significantly as did price once the issues with SEED got ugly
sr. member
Activity: 471
Merit: 500
November 04, 2014, 06:37:34 PM
im a little confused... is the interest 269% daily? how much % is this coin for PoS?
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
November 04, 2014, 11:20:32 AM
Can you pee on your own numb nuts? Wow!

1 satoshi would be what you would get if you try to unload tens of thousands of coins, let alone hundreds of thousands. Thats why the coin presently has ZERO real value, get it now numb nuts?

It isnt going to ever have any either ss 6 wallets own over 2/3s of total coins: any of them dumping even a small part of them = price ZERO. Hence why no one, including current holders, will ever buy it undrr yhese circumstances.

Now a widrr distribution thst can secure 100+ supporters, if dev active, no reason why it cant rank up to $50k in market cap or even more.

No publicity stunt, just obvious practicality... but you would need a brain to see the obvious numb nuts...

damn so you are that stupid. There arent a whole lot of coins that one could unload 10% of the total coins (hundreds of thousands) without crashing the price. You seriously just keep making yourself look more and more like an idiot.  btw I sold off 10k seed in the last day without crashing the price..... idiot

Also, aside from the number one wallet seed isnt distributed that differently than any random coin. Look at the richlist breakup of seedcoin
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/seed/#!rich

Now look at it on ltcd (only other coin I have even looked at)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ltcd/#!rich

Excluding the top wallet (who is talking about donating 300k coins). There isnt much difference. Go find a new coin to fud. Your window has closed and you made no impact at all. 
I'll ignore you for another week or two and see if you are still pathetic enough to be seen here. (I have a feeling most here have you ignored by now)
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
November 04, 2014, 10:50:35 AM
Can you pee on your own numb nuts? Wow!

1 satoshi would be what you would get if you try to unload tens of thousands of coins, let alone hundreds of thousands. Thats why the coin presently has ZERO real value, get it now numb nuts?

It isnt going to ever have any either ss 6 wallets own over 2/3s of total coins: any of them dumping even a small part of them = price ZERO. Hence why no one, including current holders, will ever buy it undrr yhese circumstances.

Now a widrr distribution thst can secure 100+ supporters, if dev active, no reason why it cant rank up to $50k in market cap or even more.

No publicity stunt, just obvious practicality... but you would need a brain to see the obvious numb nuts...
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
November 04, 2014, 04:05:14 AM
Ask someone a bit smarter than you, because you still dont seem to get what you wrote... wow.

In that case its one of two things.

1) You are a fucking idiot.

2) You are totally misunderstanding something (and are a fucking idiot).

Either way, as fun as its been Im done wasting my breath on you.  Back to ignore (must have been stoned and unblocked you or something).  Good luck getting 50% of the coins destroyed  Cheesy

There's no misunderstanding and, of course, from your perspective, the only other possible explanation would be that I am an idiot, which is so easily recognizable, right? That HAS TO be it.

Never mind the fact that, since the value of the coin presently is ZERO (actually 1 satoshi per seed, if the bid doesn't disappear as soon as there's any significant offer) and your memorable text implies the obvious, that burning 90% of the coins held in the top 10 wallets would actually increase the value of the remaining coins, you are, in fact, making the case for what I have proposed a long time ago which is condition sine qua non for the survival of this coin and to actually bring holders, big and small, some real value that they can trade out for real money, instead of the current and future ZERO. Get it now bright light? You were making the argument for the idea that you were supposedly opposing... numb nuts.



I had to unblock to read the wisdom...  Where are you getting 1 satoshi per seed?  Im seeing bids over 1600 satoshi. I made back the little bit I invested by selling 12% of my seed.  So yeah.... Fucking idiot.  you can be ignored for a while. Everything you shit out of your mouth is stupid and useless.

 As for me "making the case for what I have proposed a long time ago" it doesnt take a genius to see that if you destroy coins, the remaining coins will be worth more per coin. It doesnt bring any value as far as market cap other than as a publicity stunt though which is why its fucking stupid.

edit:  If you are taking the buy book btc volume, dividing it by total coins to get the "value" you are just re-affirming your stupidity.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
November 04, 2014, 02:30:46 AM
Cryptzo, good stuff man. Can't wait to hear more about this wallet BETA release. pm me your address I'll send you 50,000 SEED to put towards contests.

I've also talked to a bunch of people, and the general consensus with the elder tree/top wallet, is that it needs to be trimmed as it is far too large for new investors etc... Even with the seeds falling weekly.

So I think we are going to permanently dedicate 300,000 SEEDs as the elder tree. I will send them to you, and you can throw away the key.

Thoughts?
It's better to burn them than trust someone to throw away the key.

Just send them to this address: sXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVpr7nX

Once they go there they will never come back.
Can't burn them as they still need to stake in order to continue the weekly distribution. I think the permanent faucet aspect is too good to just burn. I mean, you can buy and start staking 1 Seed today, and by Sunday, you could have 30+ in your wallet.

Okay. I misunderstood what you meant by "throw away the key".

But if you guys want to get cryptographic, decentralized, and automated instead of non-cryptographic, centralized, and manual, I have an idea.

Create a burn address that is hardcoded into the wallet. Something like sXXXXXXXseedcoinfaucetXXXXXXTBEEoq. Then have the blockchain pick a new address randomly from all known to the chain and give seed to it proportional to the addresses's age in the block chain. The blockchain could distribute proportional to the amount in the faucet.

Since seed is pure PoS, the 0 transaction slot of each block is free for this new kind of coinbase.

It would be a first of a kind. Barabaras would call it a gimmick, but it would have the effect of spreading the wealth without relying on a script in someone's computer. Also, it would be completely voluntary.

If that went in, I'd throw a chunk of my holdings at it. By no means 90%, but a nontrivial amount.

"SeedCoin: World's First Decentralized Faucet"



Right on, these are the things I live for Smiley

We are for the most part only web devs, so it's awesome that you know how to get this concept into the wallets. I say we make this happen. Cryptzo, you down?


I'm down, but it will take some time as it's something I'd want to test heavily and it would require another hardfork (ugh I know.) so I'd want to have a long lead time before it became active. There's a few other fiddly bits to it but I'm sure I can figure it out.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
November 04, 2014, 02:03:43 AM
Anything undrr 90% if you are among the top 6 addresses is just trivial and yes, a pathetic non-effective gimmick. Butvyou are quite wrong otherwise: If current amount is didtributed in a fair way the allows for a community to exist and support the project, it is immaterial if there are 300k coins or 3 million. With proper distribution it would have some value while with current distribution it has none. And will nevrr have more than that: ZERO. You knoe it, regardless of your wishful thinking, and so does everyone else. Further realization will very soon become quite apparent.

Look, here's your collapse in logic. Any but the top address can't give away 90% without putting them below about the 20th address. No one will do that.


Thank you... Also, since the guys on top are the ones that had a thought out plan. I would bet that some of the top wallets would split their coins up between numerous wallets which would defeat the purpose.  Keep up the idea's though. The market is responding (unless some group is pumping, I havent been paying attention to the scene at all)
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
November 04, 2014, 01:15:28 AM
Anything undrr 90% if you are among the top 6 addresses is just trivial and yes, a pathetic non-effective gimmick. Butvyou are quite wrong otherwise: If current amount is didtributed in a fair way the allows for a community to exist and support the project, it is immaterial if there are 300k coins or 3 million. With proper distribution it would have some value while with current distribution it has none. And will nevrr have more than that: ZERO. You knoe it, regardless of your wishful thinking, and so does everyone else. Further realization will very soon become quite apparent.

Look, here's your collapse in logic. Any but the top address can't give away 90% without putting them below about the 20th address. No one will do that.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 502
November 03, 2014, 11:27:50 PM
Cryptzo, good stuff man. Can't wait to hear more about this wallet BETA release. pm me your address I'll send you 50,000 SEED to put towards contests.

I've also talked to a bunch of people, and the general consensus with the elder tree/top wallet, is that it needs to be trimmed as it is far too large for new investors etc... Even with the seeds falling weekly.

So I think we are going to permanently dedicate 300,000 SEEDs as the elder tree. I will send them to you, and you can throw away the key.

Thoughts?
It's better to burn them than trust someone to throw away the key.

Just send them to this address: sXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVpr7nX

Once they go there they will never come back.
Can't burn them as they still need to stake in order to continue the weekly distribution. I think the permanent faucet aspect is too good to just burn. I mean, you can buy and start staking 1 Seed today, and by Sunday, you could have 30+ in your wallet.

Okay. I misunderstood what you meant by "throw away the key".

But if you guys want to get cryptographic, decentralized, and automated instead of non-cryptographic, centralized, and manual, I have an idea.

Create a burn address that is hardcoded into the wallet. Something like sXXXXXXXseedcoinfaucetXXXXXXTBEEoq. Then have the blockchain pick a new address randomly from all known to the chain and give seed to it proportional to the addresses's age in the block chain. The blockchain could distribute proportional to the amount in the faucet.

Since seed is pure PoS, the 0 transaction slot of each block is free for this new kind of coinbase.

It would be a first of a kind. Barabaras would call it a gimmick, but it would have the effect of spreading the wealth without relying on a script in someone's computer. Also, it would be completely voluntary.

If that went in, I'd throw a chunk of my holdings at it. By no means 90%, but a nontrivial amount.

"SeedCoin: World's First Decentralized Faucet"



Right on, these are the things I live for Smiley

We are for the most part only web devs, so it's awesome that you know how to get this concept into the wallets. I say we make this happen. Cryptzo, you down?
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
November 03, 2014, 11:01:16 PM
Anything undrr 90% if you are among the top 6 addresses is just trivial and yes, a pathetic non-effective gimmick. Butvyou are quite wrong otherwise: If current amount is didtributed in a fair way the allows for a community to exist and support the project, it is immaterial if there are 300k coins or 3 million. With proper distribution it would have some value while with current distribution it has none. And will nevrr have more than that: ZERO. You knoe it, regardless of your wishful thinking, and so does everyone else. Further realization will very soon become quite apparent.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
November 03, 2014, 10:48:28 PM
Cryptzo, good stuff man. Can't wait to hear more about this wallet BETA release. pm me your address I'll send you 50,000 SEED to put towards contests.

I've also talked to a bunch of people, and the general consensus with the elder tree/top wallet, is that it needs to be trimmed as it is far too large for new investors etc... Even with the seeds falling weekly.

So I think we are going to permanently dedicate 300,000 SEEDs as the elder tree. I will send them to you, and you can throw away the key.

Thoughts?
It's better to burn them than trust someone to throw away the key.

Just send them to this address: sXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVpr7nX

Once they go there they will never come back.
Can't burn them as they still need to stake in order to continue the weekly distribution. I think the permanent faucet aspect is too good to just burn. I mean, you can buy and start staking 1 Seed today, and by Sunday, you could have 30+ in your wallet.

Okay. I misunderstood what you meant by "throw away the key".

But if you guys want to get cryptographic, decentralized, and automated instead of non-cryptographic, centralized, and manual, I have an idea.

Create a burn address that is hardcoded into the wallet. Something like sXXXXXXXseedcoinfaucetXXXXXXTBEEoq. Then have the blockchain pick a new address randomly from all known to the chain and give seed to it proportional to the addresses's age in the block chain. The blockchain could distribute proportional to the amount in the faucet.

Since seed is pure PoS, the 0 transaction slot of each block is free for this new kind of coinbase.

It would be a first of a kind. Barabaras would call it a gimmick, but it would have the effect of spreading the wealth without relying on a script in someone's computer. Also, it would be completely voluntary.

If that went in, I'd throw a chunk of my holdings at it. By no means 90%, but a nontrivial amount.

"SeedCoin: World's First Decentralized Faucet"
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 502
November 03, 2014, 06:21:33 PM
Cryptzo, good stuff man. Can't wait to hear more about this wallet BETA release. pm me your address I'll send you 50,000 SEED to put towards contests.

I've also talked to a bunch of people, and the general consensus with the elder tree/top wallet, is that it needs to be trimmed as it is far too large for new investors etc... Even with the seeds falling weekly.

So I think we are going to permanently dedicate 300,000 SEEDs as the elder tree. I will send them to you, and you can throw away the key.

Thoughts?


It's better to burn them than trust someone to throw away the key.

Just send them to this address: sXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVpr7nX

Once they go there they will never come back.


Can't burn them as they still need to stake in order to continue the weekly distribution. I think the permanent faucet aspect is too good to just burn. I mean, you can buy and start staking 1 Seed today, and by Sunday, you could have 30+ in your wallet.

legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
November 03, 2014, 03:59:53 PM
Ask someone a bit smarter than you, because you still dont seem to get what you wrote... wow.

In that case its one of two things.

1) You are a fucking idiot.

2) You are totally misunderstanding something (and are a fucking idiot).

Either way, as fun as its been Im done wasting my breath on you.  Back to ignore (must have been stoned and unblocked you or something).  Good luck getting 50% of the coins destroyed  Cheesy

There's no misunderstanding and, of course, from your perspective, the only other possible explanation would be that I am an idiot, which is so easily recognizable, right? That HAS TO be it.

Never mind the fact that, since the value of the coin presently is ZERO (actually 1 satoshi per seed, if the bid doesn't disappear as soon as there's any significant offer) and your memorable text implies the obvious, that burning 90% of the coins held in the top 10 wallets would actually increase the value of the remaining coins, you are, in fact, making the case for what I have proposed a long time ago which is condition sine qua non for the survival of this coin and to actually bring holders, big and small, some real value that they can trade out for real money, instead of the current and future ZERO. Get it now bright light? You were making the argument for the idea that you were supposedly opposing... numb nuts.

hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
November 03, 2014, 03:24:47 PM
Cryptzo, good stuff man. Can't wait to hear more about this wallet BETA release. pm me your address I'll send you 50,000 SEED to put towards contests.

I've also talked to a bunch of people, and the general consensus with the elder tree/top wallet, is that it needs to be trimmed as it is far too large for new investors etc... Even with the seeds falling weekly.

So I think we are going to permanently dedicate 300,000 SEEDs as the elder tree. I will send them to you, and you can throw away the key.

Thoughts?


It's better to burn them than trust someone to throw away the key.

Just send them to this address: sXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVpr7nX

Once they go there they will never come back.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
November 03, 2014, 02:26:46 PM
Ask someone a bit smarter than you, because you still dont seem to get what you wrote... wow.

In that case its one of two things.

1) You are a fucking idiot.

2) You are totally misunderstanding something (and are a fucking idiot).

Either way, as fun as its been Im done wasting my breath on you.  Back to ignore (must have been stoned and unblocked you or something).  Good luck getting 50% of the coins destroyed  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
November 03, 2014, 11:52:33 AM
Ask someone a bit smarter than you, because you still dont seem to get what you wrote... wow.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
November 03, 2014, 11:30:29 AM
Make that 650,000 instead, AND convince yhe other top ten to throw 90% of thrir stake and you will have something. Othrrwise it's just a meaningful but too small step in the right direction.

Will you ever see the light? I guess hope springs eternal.

Now it is the top ten? Last time it was the top 6 I believe.  You are seriously delusional if you think the top ten are going to throw away 90% of their coins. By even asking such an asinine request proves you are not the brightest...

I am not asking anyone anything; i am telling everyone the ONLY way this coin would ever have ANY value at all. Top 6 wallets would be a great follow up to the 300k. Top 10 would be much better. Top 20 almost perfection... goal being a market cap 6-10 times the (false) current one.
J
I am sharp enough to know that it wont happen though, hence this coin will never be worth anything.

That said it is fair to recognice what could potentially be a good start.

Now thinking with your greed will only only produce the same results than thinking with your ass...

You just want whatever coins you bought around the end of growth to be worth more... deny it till you're red in the face, it doesnt change anything.  Im all for others destroying their coins lol. But I try to think logically, which tells me no one will be throwing away 90% of their coins....  

Perhaps you should take a closer look at what you wrote, think it ovrr a bit, maybe discuss it with someone you consider smarter than you and then rephrase your post? Just a suggestion...

If you are referring to my "im all for people destroying their coins" your sarcasm detector sucks pretty bad. Or maybe it's just horrible English (which I hoping isnt your native tongue)
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
November 03, 2014, 11:09:53 AM
Make that 650,000 instead, AND convince yhe other top ten to throw 90% of thrir stake and you will have something. Othrrwise it's just a meaningful but too small step in the right direction.

Will you ever see the light? I guess hope springs eternal.

Now it is the top ten? Last time it was the top 6 I believe.  You are seriously delusional if you think the top ten are going to throw away 90% of their coins. By even asking such an asinine request proves you are not the brightest...

I am not asking anyone anything; i am telling everyone the ONLY way this coin would ever have ANY value at all. Top 6 wallets would be a great follow up to the 300k. Top 10 would be much better. Top 20 almost perfection... goal being a market cap 6-10 times the (false) current one.
J
I am sharp enough to know that it wont happen though, hence this coin will never be worth anything.

That said it is fair to recognice what could potentially be a good start.

Now thinking with your greed will only only produce the same results than thinking with your ass...

You just want whatever coins you bought around the end of growth to be worth more... deny it till you're red in the face, it doesnt change anything.  Im all for others destroying their coins lol. But I try to think logically, which tells me no one will be throwing away 90% of their coins....  

Perhaps you should take a closer look at what you wrote, think it ovrr a bit, maybe discuss it with someone you consider smarter than you and then rephrase your post? Just a suggestion...
sr. member
Activity: 255
Merit: 250
November 03, 2014, 10:54:54 AM
2 users addresses have been received, tiger5056 & dirtyboots77 will receive 500 seed each when i get the payment from cryptzo  Smiley

thanks yo!
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
November 03, 2014, 09:51:37 AM
2 users addresses have been received, tiger5056 & dirtyboots77 will receive 500 seed each when i get the payment from cryptzo  Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: