Topic: [ANN][SPACE] 🚀 SpaceCoin 🚀 - Scrypt PoW/PoS - 12K Given Away On Twitter!!! - page 12. (Read 53846 times)

Have you considered burning ECASH?

He thinks he owns proof of burn and any coin that comes out is copying his. Yet he as well as every other coin, including mine is a copy of bitcoin. He is attacking my coin and will continue to attack any new Proof of burn coin that comes out. I on the other hand am looking forward to more proof of burn coins. The more the better because there is a lot of dead coins out there and Digital Credits can not possibly rescue all the bag holders by ourselves. At the end of the day all his FUD is speculation and completely unproven. Will Digital credits succeed, who knows, I don't know that and neither dose he. The fact is we both have a different approach to our burns, He is going after active coins, I'm going after dead coins. I'm using an automated burn process and he is using a manual one. He claims his way is better. I don't see how attacking coins under active development meets the propose of Proof of burn. How he thinks I copied his terrible idea is beyond me. Digital Credits was designed to rescue holders of dead coins, not attack ones that are tring to make it work. We were also designed to have a life beyond our burn fund. We have PoW and PoS at a 1% inflation rate. Once his burn fund runs up what is it's purpose? Nothing, it will die like the coins he claims to be targeting.  

The goal of the DigitalCredits project is to increase the number of SpaceCoin nodes and stake lots of coins.  The block explorer they made also requires its own node, in case you weren't aware.  Exchanges also require their own nodes to run their wallets, in case you weren't aware.

So what DigitalCredits is doing is bringing a dead coin back to life, by your own definition.  It increases the number of altcoins.  Why is he claiming to decrease the number of altcoins, when he's doing the exact opposite of that (and doing the opposite of everything else he says)?  






Actually he did promise to burn the same coins BARR burns.  He broke that promise too.  






Not true.  Actually you were fudding BARR 24/7 in C-Cex chat because you didn't think I would notice.  You told everyone who would listen that BARR is worthless, that DGCS was already far more valuable than BARR, and that everyone who invested in BARR was an idiot who would lose all their money.

When I responded to you in C-Cex chat, it was only to answer your lies about BARR.  I simply responded with the facts, and you had a public meltdown.  You asked for DGCS to be delisted from C-Cex, and you told all DGCS holders to withdraw their coins.

I posted screencaps of those chats in your topic, and then you locked the topic and started a new one.  Remember now?

Remember how you said you were going to war against BARR, and how you would "destroy my pussy faggot bitch ass on December 1st" or something like that?  

How is that working out, so far?  You still haven't burned any coins, nobody is buying Spacecoin, and you have a marketcap of 2 BTC?  Well, actually about 90% of that figure is the coins still in the Yobit faucet which aren't really in circulation yet, so the marketcap is more like 0.2 BTC.  I don't feel very destroyed.  

somehow i totally agree with you, and there are even other proof of burn coins and who knows if barr_ufficial knows about them and does the same thing....

BARR_Official, you have been trying to FUD Digital Credits since we first came out and your attempts have failed. But good luck with that. You currently burning a coin under active development which by the way is shady. The DEV of said coin don't even like you. I don't understand what your problem is with me or why you keep attacking me. But if that what makes your dick hard, keep trying. At the end of the day we will still be here. Good luck with your NXT asset!  

1. my definition of dead coin is based on one thing:no nodes, i don't care about block explorers, exchange and other things.
2. on the world of crypto even in 12 second something big can happen and they noticed it the hard way, they aren't copying anybody othervise they would burn the coins you go behind

What is your definition of a dead coin?  No volume, no block explorer, no development, no community, nobody cares about the coin?  

Spacecoin had no block explorer.  Digital Credits put up a block explorer to bring the coin back to life, supposedly so they could kill it and make it dead again, supposedly to get rid of coins that were already dead.  And when the burn is over and they take down the block explorer, then Spacecoin will be right back where it started.  



We do not work with bit1 or use his lists.  We made our own lists for BARR, checking every coin on Coinmarketcap and also some coins that weren't on Coinmarketcap.  We checked all block explorers and reviewed every Bitcointalk ANN for over 600 coins.  It took a lot of time, effort, and work, and it has paid off in BARR's results which have demolished people's predictions of what we would accomplish.




Digital Credits, on the other hand, picked 3 coins to burn - and then found out at the last minute that 2 of them wouldn't work.  He wanted to copy BARR, but he didn't put in the necessary thought or effort into doing a proper job.  And it shows.  

Digital Credits has never burned any altcoins, he asks you to send your coins to an exchange and trust them instead of burning the coins yourself, and he's already sent out 6 million DGCS from his premined "burn fund".  The millions of DGCS at Yobit and BTCPoolExchange cannot be tracked on a block explorer, so there is no way to see who is getting those coins.

Only 200,000 DGCS have been mined with PoW, but 200,000,000 were premined.  That's a 76-year supply for exchanging burned altcoins, according to the dcredits official website.  Why so many?  How will those coins be handled?  Are they already being sold on multiple exchanges?  There's no way to know, because there is no transparency.

The dcredits website and ANN said that intristin won't have control of the premined funds;  
it said that only 2.6 million DGCS will be issued per year for burned altcoins;
it said that those coins will never move except in exchange for burned altcoins and will never be used for giveaways;
and it said that we can check the block explorer to make sure the funds aren't being stolen.

That's the only transparency and accountability Digital Credits offered to the public, and all of those promises have already been broken.  

intristin sends millions of DGCS whenever he wants, without announcing it first on any of his several Bitcointalk topics.  He made a fake forum on his own website, "had a vote" to break his promises, 2 "new" users "voted" to take 1 million premined coins from the "burn fund", and then intristin has never posted again on that fake forum, since over 2 weeks ago, ever since he had the "vote".  He sent 1 million DGCS to Yobit "for a faucet that pays 5 DGCS per hour" and he sent 5 million DGCS to BTCPoolExchange "for burned altcoins".  

He wants other people to buy DGCS, but he sits apparently doing nothing while DGCS has a daily volume of .01btc.  But he spent money to have someone code his wallet, he spent money to get listed on exchanges, he spent money for a website, and he spent money for block explorers.  Why is he spending money on everything except buying his own DGCS coins?  Maybe he's planning to sell more than he buys, because he doesn't seem to think DGCS is worth buying.  He's not even one of the top miners, so he's not bothering to mine much either.  Why should he mine a few hundred, when he has 194 Million left to spend however he wants?  





BARR has burned $20,000 worth of altcoins since last month, with all transactions publicly available on decentralized blockchains.  All distribution of BARR is transparent, available to everyone on the NXT blockchain, and every transaction from our burnfund includes a message with the txid of the altcoins burned to earn that BARR.  It's airtight, with no unanswered questions.  

We have spent thousands of dollars of our personal money to keep our promises, support the price of BARR and of the altcoins we're burning, and give hundreds of people the chance to get their money back from these altcoins.  

So you can ignore us if you want, but we're running a legitimate project and getting things done.  

BARR has burned 33% of all Fractalcoins, 36% of all Keycoins, 48% of all Sapience coins, 36% of Lyrabar, and 41% of Anarchists Prime.  These are coins that people actually want, that they pay money for, that they could have sold for BTC, that have now been burned in exchange for BARR.  





We have a real system, and it works.  We don't just tell people, "Buy 200 SelfieCoins for 1 satoshi each, then exchange them for 1 DGCS which is worth 100 satoshis, losing half your money as soon as you start, oh wait SelfieCoin is broken never mind."







"Just buy 4 Spacecoins for 100 satoshis each, then trade them for 1 DGCS at a total cost of 400 satoshis per DGCS, and then if you're lucky you can sell your 1 DGCS for 150 satoshis."

Ya that is a good possibility but I mean all the signs were there like there was good steady buying of large chunks of SPACE from like 800 sats to 1500 sats like steady buying large chunks lol But I guess that's just the way the cookie crumbles lol

My guess is that when the price started to drop he just panicked and bailed. But who knows.

That is true but I mean it was clear as day that all the Dev needed to do was string everyone along a little bit longer and this coin easy would have hit 5k at least and then he could have cashed out a lot more lol That's all I'm saying is sure there is Greed but it doesn't take a genius to figure out how to do this game and honestly if the Dev would have just kept talking and showing upcoming things to come for SPACE then it wouldn't have been anything for this coin to reach a price triple its ATH for sure but that's alright some people just are too greedy and would rather have their chump change instead of actually try to create a coin that could possibly have some sort of future and then really cash in on it lol Cheers

Greed makes people stupid! 

Well that is too bad cause if that Dev was any amount of smart he would have waited till SPACE hit 5k a coin which is was easily on it's way to hitting with the steam and momentum that it had off the hop and then dumped all his coins lol He clearly didn't think that one through too much and ended up making very little off that scam lol So I'm at least hoping he's one of those 5 coins a day Devs at least so at least I could see some reasoning behind taking a small pay day off SPACE when it easily could have been triple or quadruple what he took from it lol Just saying...........

The DEV dumped his coins shortly before he disappeared. And he dumped them shortly after the peak of it's price. I can't prove he intended it to be a scam from day one, but the fact that he dumped without announcing it and disappeared without any goodbye leads me to belive it was a scam from day 1. I could be wrong, but... The order of events raises a red flag with me. We see this time and time again with these coins where the Dev just up and vanishes without a trace.

What I still don't get is how people keep saying that SPACE pumped and dumped? I was with SPACE from the very beginning and I didn't see anything except the coin started getting some steam and was in a good position to maybe pump and go high but then the Dev just quit writing and everything just kind of slowly fizzled out lol That's all I've seen so far from SPACE cause it only peaked at what? 1250 sats a coin or 1500 sats?

Buy the dips, sell the rips, people warning of just another pump and dump cycle did seem to get quickly drowned out by moon on 0.02 btc volume. Volatility is nowhere near as high as people think it is on shorter time scales.

I disagree, targeting coins under active development will only make the target coin more valuable as you reduce the supply. I think it's smarter to go after dead coins, but that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. So we will agree to disagree here. And most of the people buying up space right now are staking it as I have advised them to do. The true burn of Space wont happen until the last day. The pool, the block explorer, and nodes will offline and the coin will be delisted from Yobit when the burn ends. We will have to wait until then to see if our burn of Space is successful or a failure.  

instead i suggest you ignore barr_ufficial, is telling the same things his friend bit1 does and this last have a list of dead coins only on the paper because doesn't run real checks

Well then I suggest that we find someone to take over this coin and try to bring it back to life then That's all I can really suggest lol

If a coin is already dead, we don't need any help getting rid of it.  It's already gone.  That's why the only way to achieve any real change is to burn active coins that need help in going away.

The price of Spacecoin is still pretty much the same, and there's only .02btc volume.  So nobody is burning them, and it's pretty much already dead.  

Staking is still generating 32 coins at a time, so when this "burn" is over there will actually be more Spacecoins in circulation instead of less.  But there will still be no volume, so it will still be just as dead.

Awesome Great work