[ANN][TAC] TalkCoin - page 120. | Bitcointalksearch.org

binkshurts

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: corsaro on June 16, 2014, 11:40:43 AM

Quote from: binkshurts on June 16, 2014, 11:33:05 AM

Quote from: corsaro on June 16, 2014, 08:30:19 AM

Quote from: djm34 on June 16, 2014, 06:36:09 AM

Can someone check if this one compiles on linux (it is a direct fork of sph-sgminer where I have uploaded my changes)
https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod

OK, compiled successfully on ubuntu 12.04 64 bit.

and working fine with HD7970 at doubled hashrate with old drivers Wink

git clone https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod
cd sph-sgminer_x11mod
autoreconf -i
CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native" ./configure
make

Am i missing a step? I tried to set this up on debian but it seems like im missing files.. like the kernels/sgminer... do i need to import from other files?

did you follow exactly these steps ?

git clone https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod
cd sph-sgminer_x11mod
autoreconf -i
CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native" ./configure
make

I compiled it on ubuntu

Ok it looks like i might've fat fingered something but i got it installed with 14.6beta drivers.

However, this compiled version is giving me less hashrate than the original one.. i get about 5mhs on 290x's while the older version i get about 7-8mhs...
hmm

AizenSou

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

Back to 5k sat already. Angry

Who are you dumpers? Where is my 3k sat TAC??
Damn I should give up. Buy support is just too good.

corsaro

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: binkshurts on June 16, 2014, 11:33:05 AM

Quote from: corsaro on June 16, 2014, 08:30:19 AM

Quote from: djm34 on June 16, 2014, 06:36:09 AM

Can someone check if this one compiles on linux (it is a direct fork of sph-sgminer where I have uploaded my changes)
https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod

OK, compiled successfully on ubuntu 12.04 64 bit.

and working fine with HD7970 at doubled hashrate with old drivers Wink

git clone https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod
cd sph-sgminer_x11mod
autoreconf -i
CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native" ./configure
make

Am i missing a step? I tried to set this up on debian but it seems like im missing files.. like the kernels/sgminer... do i need to import from other files?

did you follow exactly these steps ?

git clone https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod
cd sph-sgminer_x11mod
autoreconf -i
CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native" ./configure
make

I compiled it on ubuntu

binkshurts

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: corsaro on June 16, 2014, 08:30:19 AM

Quote from: djm34 on June 16, 2014, 06:36:09 AM

Can someone check if this one compiles on linux (it is a direct fork of sph-sgminer where I have uploaded my changes)
https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod

OK, compiled successfully on ubuntu 12.04 64 bit.

and working fine with HD7970 at doubled hashrate with old drivers Wink

git clone https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod
cd sph-sgminer_x11mod
autoreconf -i
CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native" ./configure
make

Am i missing a step? I tried to set this up on debian but it seems like im missing files.. like the kernels/sgminer... do i need to import from other files?

corsaro

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: djm34 on June 16, 2014, 10:17:32 AM

Quote from: corsaro on June 16, 2014, 10:10:39 AM

Quote from: karimdr2 on June 16, 2014, 09:38:08 AM

Quote from: Ignition75 on June 16, 2014, 08:52:50 AM

Quote from: corsaro on June 16, 2014, 08:36:32 AM

Quote from: AizenSou on June 16, 2014, 08:14:36 AM

Quote from: corsaro on June 16, 2014, 08:01:23 AM

yes, R9-290 and R9-290X are more difficult to be set.
I am testing with --thread-concurrency 8192 and --gpu-memclock 1250 directly inside sgminer.conf and it seems more stable then before... more tests will come out in the following hours...
I'll keep you informed

thread-concurrency doesn't affect much NIST5-performance (check the source code) I would not touch it. Play with thread-concurrency only bring you 1% more in my experience.
Important is delete all the *.bin file in sgminer-nist5 and set proper clock, intensity.

anyway, now I am running fine sph-sgminer_nist5 on my windows machines with R9-290 and R9-290X at double hashrate...

the secret is to set --thread-concurrency 8192 and gpu memclock at lowest possible value (--gpu-memclock 1250 or --gpu-memclock 1300)

on some R9-290 lowest gpu-memclock is 1250 and on other R9-290X it is 1300

I'm running memclock at 650 on all rigs, no difference in speed and saves a little power...

At 650 your gpu run at the stock clock ! You can check it on Sgminer console !

none of my R9-290 goes under 1300 Mhz as memclock. I can set 1300 as minimum. A couple of them can be set at 1250

there is some sort of a bug with msi afterburner /amd drivers
(kill msi) then restart it should give the possibility to change the clock (or you have to restart the computer)

Yes, it was msi afterbarner Wink

Ignition75

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

www.dashpay.io

Quote from: hammerbrain on June 16, 2014, 10:54:59 AM

Can someone post an idiots guide and links to the latest working upgrade....can't seem to get this running on any of my machines.....sux.

I have the old lib-4 but it just crashes the drivers....any help would be appreciated.

What's the issue mate? You got the 14.6 Beta drivers working OK?

Email me at [email protected] and I'll send you a working lib-4 file...

tiddy

sr. member

Activity: 271

Merit: 250

it is not only coin that have the anon talking,so u know

hammerbrain

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: Ignition75 on June 16, 2014, 10:44:06 AM

Quote from: djm34 on June 16, 2014, 10:17:32 AM

Quote from: corsaro on June 16, 2014, 10:10:39 AM

Quote from: karimdr2 on June 16, 2014, 09:38:08 AM

Quote from: Ignition75 on June 16, 2014, 08:52:50 AM

Quote from: corsaro on June 16, 2014, 08:36:32 AM

Quote from: AizenSou on June 16, 2014, 08:14:36 AM

Quote from: corsaro on June 16, 2014, 08:01:23 AM

yes, R9-290 and R9-290X are more difficult to be set.
I am testing with --thread-concurrency 8192 and --gpu-memclock 1250 directly inside sgminer.conf and it seems more stable then before... more tests will come out in the following hours...
I'll keep you informed

thread-concurrency doesn't affect much NIST5-performance (check the source code) I would not touch it. Play with thread-concurrency only bring you 1% more in my experience.
Important is delete all the *.bin file in sgminer-nist5 and set proper clock, intensity.

anyway, now I am running fine sph-sgminer_nist5 on my windows machines with R9-290 and R9-290X at double hashrate...

the secret is to set --thread-concurrency 8192 and gpu memclock at lowest possible value (--gpu-memclock 1250 or --gpu-memclock 1300)

on some R9-290 lowest gpu-memclock is 1250 and on other R9-290X it is 1300

I'm running memclock at 650 on all rigs, no difference in speed and saves a little power...

At 650 your gpu run at the stock clock ! You can check it on Sgminer console !

none of my R9-290 goes under 1300 Mhz as memclock. I can set 1300 as minimum. A couple of them can be set at 1250

there is some sort of a bug with msi afterburner /amd drivers
(kill msi) then restart it should give the possibility to change the clock (or you have to restart the computer)

Mate, great work with the miner, appreciate it a lot.

On the 270's, I got Memclock 750, Engine 1271, Intensity 21 and each card is giving me 8.69 Mh/s
On the 280's, I got Memclock 775, Engine 1120, Intensity 20 and each card is giving me 12.2 Mh/s
On the 290's, I got Memclock 675, Engine 1075, Intensity 19 and each card is giving me 14.8 Mh/s

Farm is sitting on just under 1.5 Gh/s...

I'll send you a reward for your efforts in the morning... Not gonna goto the warehouse tonight, Germany/Portugal is about to start Grin