Topic: [ANN][TIPS][0.43 REQUIRED HARDFORK UPDATE] FedoraCoin - Euphoria - Enlightenment - page 5. (Read 143078 times)

I'd stay away from any resemblance to fedora project & keep it simple.



or an alternative version, if you really want a hat.



EPwJ5L6faT2xe39AuhGSw3iCEBFLMtFKem

It's a new coin give it time. Do some research about the coin before investing obviously.

Version labels make it so that 1.0.4.3 is 0.43 Sorry about that, I'm not sure what the dev is up to.

Update my wallet but at the Fedora site they have 0.43 ?!

What is the highest price TIPS has got to??? Pondering whether to invest, no good at mining, all too complicated for me, and only have an old laptop anway.

Update your client, mine is at v1.0.4.3-unk-beta and working fine.

heya
anyone else have an issue with the windows wallet (v0.6.4.0-unk-beta)?
he dont want to sync with the network stacks at 2066 block, tryed to delete the blockchain and redownload it, he did it till 2066, then same old story,
any heads up ??

Great. Thank you for your effort.

You LOL, not me. How do you think i can hide what i don't want to show?
You can produce the same (to see BEL, not TIPS) error if you're lucky.

Your TIPS wallet must be closed.
1) start screen capture software;
2) start TIPS wallet;
3) very FAST click at icon "hat" at the taskbar;
4) if you clicked fast enough, then BEFORE block status/link icon painted YOU'LL SEE BEL, not TIPS.
So YOU fool, not me.
And CHECK sources if you don't believe. Handassed? Can't replace all texts in source? So if you are the one of devs of this coin - then i assured now for 100% that this coin is total crap. Because you don't know source, because you didn't know what to replace, because you saying that i'm talking shit about your crapcoin, but your coin is a crap.

PS: i'm working with photoshop everyday. This screenshot is a real screenshot. Not fake. Just cleared anything i don't want to be seen.
PPS: "All Balance: 123.456 BEL", hex 0x4EA168. Enough? Hex 0x50F3AE. Enough?

Are you sure that anyone, close to devs, or devs, didn't include trojan or something in future versions?
Are you sure that now there are no trojan?
I've checked compiled wallet, possibly (and only possibly) it's clean. For now there are no "alien" activity. But who knows? I checked at dedicated, clean virtual machine without any other wallets. Just watched for activity - filesystem/ports/etc. And monitor is running now. But i can't say if there are compiled trojan or not - if yes, then he can start anytime.
I didn't saying that this wallet has a trojan. No. But there is are probability more than zero. I've seen more than one trojans compiled with wallets. Bad feature request.

Hi,

Since not all users of this coin are as active as you are, may I ask for a feature in a future wallet version?

Please implement one of the following features:
1) an autoupdate feature which automatically keeps the QT updated without the user doing anything (or with the user just clicking an "update" button which only appears when new updates are available - but where the entire update process is done automatically)
2) a notification feature where the user can enter his eMail address into the wallet and the wallet sends him an eMail when a new version is available? That requires - of course - that the wallet has a way to check for updates. But since Microsoft/Apple/Adobe/andalltheothers can do it, so can you :-)
3) (for those who don't even run their QT all the time) a notification feature where the user can enter his eMail address into the wallet and the wallet sends that eMail address plus its own version information to a central server of yours which then sends out an eMail when a new software version is available. And which sends a warning eMail when a mantatory update has to be performed.

Naturally, as of today, the Cryptocurrency-community has been very active but with the price explosion of the Bitcoin last month, more and more "normal users" will enter the market.
They will not keep their wallet running all the time.
They will not check the forum all the time.
But they might spend hard cash on buying this coin at an exchange and then send it over to their wallet. As a community, we even need that kind of passive user - and we need their money buying this coin.
And when they find ways to spend or donate the coin, they will. And for that purpose they will open their wallets - but not in between.

Having said this, I personally prefer feature (3) because it has a few advantage over the other 2:

• It keeps even those "passive" users in the loop that do not run their wallet regularily.
• That way, if a really important change has to be made (e.g. a new blockchain), even those users won't lose their money because they get a notification. Think of the bad publicity when "normal users" start losing their money because they simply ignored their wallets for months only to find them not working anymore because weeks before, a new blockchain or equally invasive measure was introduced without them knowing.
• That feature can be extended for marketing purposes: add a checkmark "the makers of this coin are allowed to send me exciting news about this coin yaddayaddaya" - and voila you get yourself a free marketing database with tons of eMail addresses that you can use to keep engaging your users. Notify them of new shops where they can pay with this currency. Notify them of faucets. Notify them of exchanges that trade this coin. Notify them of the rise in value of that coin. And so on. Just keep engaging even the passive users - because to make a currency successful, you need every hand and every dollar you can get.

You guys and all the other professionals or those that have privacy concerns won't use that feature - and should never be required to do so. But the regular passive user will get that fuzzy feeling that he will be informed of important stuff without him spending much time checking bitcointalk or their wallets. And that will give him extra confidence when it comes to him spending the coin or buying the coin with his FIAT.

Just a few additional remarks:

• Naturally, the best possible combination would be (3) with (1) where the users gets a "move your ass and update your wallet or else..." eMail (friendly version, of course) - and then he opens the wallet and clicks on the "update" button and that's it for him.
  
• May be the required serverside portion (the thing that collects all version information and the eMail addresses and which also allows for sending out mass eMails to all users in that database) could be written in a generic way so that other virtual currencies can implement that feature, too?
• May be, future wallets should have a default setting that causes them to run in the background as a service whenever the computer starts. That way, even many passive users will contribute to the P2P network without them even knowing. But that was just a sideline remark and describes a completely different feature request. But then again, while you are at it... :-)

Don't know. What do you guys think about that feature request?
Does anyone second that request?
Does anyone have a better idea how to solve the above mentioned challenges that this new species of regular, passive users will introduce in the weeks and months to come?

Thanks
Matt
_{TIPS: EWXT5Tds3zWcmETwgNketJuMBpzc36QvYH}


P.S. Just a full disclosure: I have posted this same feature request to the thread of some other cryptocurrencies as well.

Wow lol try again, this time don't use Photoshop CS6 please.


You do know that difficulty rises don't you? Anyway what on Earth are you on about?


We don't have that error, and again DIFFICULTY RISES.

Another pump&dump to make instaprofit. Yes, shitcoin.
All coins, that was made after nn (for example ~100 forks) are scam and shit. More coins - more inflation. No more deflation that in bit/litecoin ideology. Each new coin adds an army of new coins that divides all market fiat. Soon will be one fork for one man in the world. I think there is enough of altcoins. Some of them must die, others who will survive can live. But everyday 1-2-5 new forks - it's a crazyness and idiotism.

According to your logic, dogecoin would've been even crazier no?

Dogecoin would've mined 200m coins in roughly the same amount of blocks. Not sure what the value of dogecoin was when it was added to Coinup, but the lowest I've seen before it was added to cryptsy was 0.00000032.

That would make that 64 BTC @ 0.00000032 for 200m coins.

DONE! 1003689294.5982

Hell I just wanted to mine a billion of something. http://fed.notnull.org/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks

20btc (@ 0.00000002) for just 4446 blocks. LOL.

999651584.59738 SO CLOSE!

Ok, here you are:


Quote: Block 0 - 99999: 0-5,000,000 FedoraCoin Reward. Random? Or what? 50% chance of 2.5mil. Not too much you think?
2.5mil * 0.00000002 (now at coinedup) = 0,05 btc. When diff was very low (at start) this is not too easy to mine so much btc's you think?
And yes, sorry - 500 billions total. This coin-making crazyness eats all brains.

Look at CENT. Error in pos-mining after end of pow-mining. I am sure that error is made not by mistake but specially.
With huge block rewards even 0.00000001 btc per coin is tooooo much.
So - new shitcoin here.

at 990,506,029.596!

first off.. wth are you talking about..? second.. wth are you talkin about?

We are about to crack the 1 billion mark!

TRANSACTION SUMMARY
938,137,869.49895   

Come join our pool, as we cross the billion threshold!
We are running around 250MH, PROP %0.5 Vardiff stratum!

http://fed.notnull.org/