Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][TX]TRANSFER - BITTREX - MULTIPOOL - ANDROID - POW/POS,TOR, MN, Stealth - page 30. (Read 119960 times)

sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Let's make a new altcoin environment.
Can someone tell me what ports you can use with making a master node?  And is there a way I can check to see if there open?
you can check if port is open here http://www.canyouseeme.org/
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 500
Can someone tell me what ports you can use with making a master node?  And is there a way I can check to see if there open?
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
  i translated it  to  chinese ,please check ,thank you !
hero member
Activity: 491
Merit: 500
@Transfer Dev

1. I noticed the code review went well. Is transfer a clone of something? Or is it original code?
Edit: "(except it is fork from BTC and NVC)"

2. Who are the devs? Do they have profile's here?

3. Will there be a linux client?

4. I noticed that to make a masternode, the wallet says: "You must send exactly 100 000 TX to the collateral address." Is the 100 000 TX just stuck there forever? Or can someone who owns a masternode use the TX from the collateral address?

Hi

Welcome.

1. Code itself is original. But we forked few codebases too. (BTC, NVC, SLING, CRAVE)

2. They are also members on this forum. We will consider revealing more info.
I wanted to make POD. But those services are not available anymore. If you find some available, let me know. I will verify myself.

3. Good question. You are the first who is asking. We will compile linux wallet if there will be more interest.

4. You can use those coins when ever you want. (if you own them)  

Thanks for your responses. I hope for a Linux Client, considering part of your goal is "Our main goal is availability on all possible devices and using all kinds of Internet services."
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
@Transfer Dev

1. I noticed the code review went well. Is transfer a clone of something? Or is it original code?
Edit: "(except it is fork from BTC and NVC)"

2. Who are the devs? Do they have profile's here?

3. Will there be a linux client?

4. I noticed that to make a masternode, the wallet says: "You must send exactly 100 000 TX to the collateral address." Is the 100 000 TX just stuck there forever? Or can someone who owns a masternode use the TX from the collateral address?

Hi

Welcome.

1. Code itself is original. But we forked few codebases too. (BTC, NVC, SLING, CRAVE)

2. They are also members on this forum. We will consider revealing more info.
I wanted to make POD. But those services are not available anymore. If you find some available, let me know. I will verify myself.

3. Good question. You are the first who is asking. We will compile linux wallet if there will be more interest.

4. You can use those coins when ever you want. (if you own them)  
sr. member
Activity: 358
Merit: 251
How many Masternodes?

Current maximum is 47 (47 * 100 000 = 4 700 000 TX).
At this moment there are 9 master nodes active.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1160
How many Masternodes?
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
is it only possible to get the msgpupkey from the address i want to write to?

You can use console:

validateaddress

You will get result something like this....

"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "TxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxG",
"ismine" : true,
"isscript" : false,
"pubkey" : "0xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxd",
"iscompressed" : true,
"account" : "test"
legendary
Activity: 957
Merit: 1006
is it only possible to get the msgpupkey from the address i want to write to?
member
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
Will not be investing.

That's your problem, buddy!  Wink

Development is still in progress.

One more dev is on the team now.
In wallet trading will be done in 24 hours. We will also add in wallet block explorer to this package.
Online wallet will be up in less than 72 hours.

We also found a way how to create a virtual prepaid Mastercard for anonymous purposes.
We will add this service soon. (Anonymous virtual Mastercard)

Stay tuned

You are the greatest Dev ever!
Now all watch it climbing to the TOP of Coinmarketcap!  Cool



I like it too. Safe investment in here.

Transfer is on the 207th place.
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/transfercoin/#charts
Still a lot of room to grow. Cool
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
Development is still in progress.

One more dev is on the team now.
In wallet trading will be done in 24 hours. We will also add in wallet block explorer to this package.
Online wallet will be up in less than 72 hours.

We also found a way how to create a virtual prepaid Mastercard for anonymous purposes.
We will add this service soon. (Anonymous virtual Mastercard)

Stay tuned

Nice progress.
Here, development happen much more quickly than elsewhere.
hero member
Activity: 843
Merit: 1004
Will not be investing.

That's your problem, buddy!  Wink

Development is still in progress.

One more dev is on the team now.
In wallet trading will be done in 24 hours. We will also add in wallet block explorer to this package.
Online wallet will be up in less than 72 hours.

We also found a way how to create a virtual prepaid Mastercard for anonymous purposes.
We will add this service soon. (Anonymous virtual Mastercard)

Stay tuned

You are the greatest Dev ever!
Now all watch Trasfercoin climbing to the TOP of Coinmarketcap!  Cool

full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
Buying every coin on the sell side from Bittrex wouldn't even give a person enough for 3 masternodes. To have any chance of this being taken seriously you'll have to drop the ridiculous 100 000 TX masternode requirement to begin with. Of course you probably won't. That's not what ponzis are about is it?

Isn't it more beneficial to have more masternodes?

I disagree, you need to keep the masternode requirement higher so that your average Joe doesn't try messing around with transactions as a bad actor. If you have 1 btc investment then you're a lot less likely to become a bad actor. You don't want several dozen masternodes but you also don't just want a hand full. It's a balancing act. This coin has everything that a coin needs for transparency so just bite the bullet and drive the market price up if you really want to become a masternode. This is no pump and dump.

Dash current number of masternodes: 2992
Tx current maximum possible masternodes: 47

Give me a break.

I would agree that 100,000 is a high amount. Granted there seems to be a lot of people watching this project but it's not that popular yet.

There were 8 masternodes when I checked this morning, two of which had the same I.P.

If you got in early then you'll make some dosh, if not then 100k is probably going to put people off

I think it would be reasonable to make it 5x or 10x "Tx current maximum possible masternodes: 47", at least 470 masternodes, so a requirement of 20 000 TX or 10 000 TX. What does the dev think?

Thanks for asking

We had 3 reasons why the requirement for MN is 100 000 TX.

1. We will achieve the greatest possible diversity of IP´s.
Two and more running MN on the same IP Does not fulfill the function of true decentralization.

2. When the MN option is too expensive, rest of coins will stake and make the chain more secure.
Chain needs more stakers than masternodes.

3. Building a MN makes stable income for holder. (Maximum amount of MN is limited)

Your reasoning with point number 1 is so flawed I can't believe you actually believe it yourself. But thanks for your response, you have made it clear for me what the intent here is. Will not be investing.
sr. member
Activity: 383
Merit: 250
Development is still in progress.

One more dev is on the team now.
In wallet trading will be done in 24 hours. We will also add in wallet block explorer to this package.
Online wallet will be up in less than 72 hours.

We also found a way how to create a virtual prepaid Mastercard for anonymous purposes.
We will add this service soon. (Anonymous virtual Mastercard)

Stay tuned

I like the sounds of the Virtual Anonymous Mastercard, that's a game changer  Grin
hero member
Activity: 491
Merit: 500
@Transfer Dev

1. I noticed the code review went well. Is transfer a clone of something? Or is it original code?
Edit: "(except it is fork from BTC and NVC)"

2. Who are the devs? Do they have profile's here?

3. Will there be a linux client?

4. I noticed that to make a masternode, the wallet says: "You must send exactly 100 000 TX to the collateral address." Is the 100 000 TX just stuck there forever? Or can someone who owns a masternode use the TX from the collateral address?
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Let's make a new altcoin environment.
Development is still in progress.

One more dev is on the team now.
In wallet trading will be done in 24 hours. We will also add in wallet block explorer to this package.
Online wallet will be up in less than 72 hours.

We also found a way how to create a virtual prepaid Mastercard for anonymous purposes.
We will add this service soon. (Anonymous virtual Mastercard)

Stay tuned

good job, keep up the good work
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Development is still in progress.

One more dev is on the team now.
In wallet trading will be done in 24 hours. We will also add in wallet block explorer to this package.
Online wallet will be up in less than 72 hours.

We also found a way how to create a virtual prepaid Mastercard for anonymous purposes.
We will add this service soon. (Anonymous virtual Mastercard)

Stay tuned
sr. member
Activity: 383
Merit: 250
Buying every coin on the sell side from Bittrex wouldn't even give a person enough for 3 masternodes. To have any chance of this being taken seriously you'll have to drop the ridiculous 100 000 TX masternode requirement to begin with. Of course you probably won't. That's not what ponzis are about is it?

Isn't it more beneficial to have more masternodes?

I disagree, you need to keep the masternode requirement higher so that your average Joe doesn't try messing around with transactions as a bad actor. If you have 1 btc investment then you're a lot less likely to become a bad actor. You don't want several dozen masternodes but you also don't just want a hand full. It's a balancing act. This coin has everything that a coin needs for transparency so just bite the bullet and drive the market price up if you really want to become a masternode. This is no pump and dump.

Dash current number of masternodes: 2992
Tx current maximum possible masternodes: 47

Give me a break.

I would agree that 100,000 is a high amount. Granted there seems to be a lot of people watching this project but it's not that popular yet.

There were 8 masternodes when I checked this morning, two of which had the same I.P.

If you got in early then you'll make some dosh, if not then 100k is probably going to put people off

I think it would be reasonable to make it 5x or 10x "Tx current maximum possible masternodes: 47", at least 470 masternodes, so a requirement of 20 000 TX or 10 000 TX. What does the dev think?

Thanks for asking

We had 3 reasons why the requirement for MN is 100 000 TX.

1. We will achieve the greatest possible diversity of IP´s.
Two and more running MN on the same IP Does not fulfill the function of true decentralization.

2. When the MN option is too expensive, rest of coins will stake and make the chain more secure.
Chain needs more stakers than masternodes.

3. Building a MN makes stable income for holder. (Maximum amount of MN is limited)

Very good points...So in other words, since buying 10,000 TX is unaffordable right now, just keep buying smaller amounts of TX and hold and keep staking. The more stakers, the more secure the network and then this will help you get closer to 100,000 TX so that you can setup a masternode. This creates a good self regulating dynamic between masternode and POS.....I agree that nobody really knows about this coin yet.
sr. member
Activity: 383
Merit: 250
Buying every coin on the sell side from Bittrex wouldn't even give a person enough for 3 masternodes. To have any chance of this being taken seriously you'll have to drop the ridiculous 100 000 TX masternode requirement to begin with. Of course you probably won't. That's not what ponzis are about is it?

Isn't it more beneficial to have more masternodes?

I disagree, you need to keep the masternode requirement higher so that your average Joe doesn't try messing around with transactions as a bad actor. If you have 1 btc investment then you're a lot less likely to become a bad actor. You don't want several dozen masternodes but you also don't just want a hand full. It's a balancing act. This coin has everything that a coin needs for transparency so just bite the bullet and drive the market price up if you really want to become a masternode. This is no pump and dump.

Dash current number of masternodes: 2992
Tx current maximum possible masternodes: 47

Give me a break.

Good point, yeah I agree that dev should look at lowering the TX required for masternode but the question is how low?
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Buying every coin on the sell side from Bittrex wouldn't even give a person enough for 3 masternodes. To have any chance of this being taken seriously you'll have to drop the ridiculous 100 000 TX masternode requirement to begin with. Of course you probably won't. That's not what ponzis are about is it?

Isn't it more beneficial to have more masternodes?

I disagree, you need to keep the masternode requirement higher so that your average Joe doesn't try messing around with transactions as a bad actor. If you have 1 btc investment then you're a lot less likely to become a bad actor. You don't want several dozen masternodes but you also don't just want a hand full. It's a balancing act. This coin has everything that a coin needs for transparency so just bite the bullet and drive the market price up if you really want to become a masternode. This is no pump and dump.

Dash current number of masternodes: 2992
Tx current maximum possible masternodes: 47

Give me a break.

I would agree that 100,000 is a high amount. Granted there seems to be a lot of people watching this project but it's not that popular yet.

There were 8 masternodes when I checked this morning, two of which had the same I.P.

If you got in early then you'll make some dosh, if not then 100k is probably going to put people off

I think it would be reasonable to make it 5x or 10x "Tx current maximum possible masternodes: 47", at least 470 masternodes, so a requirement of 20 000 TX or 10 000 TX. What does the dev think?

Thanks for asking

We had 3 reasons why the requirement for MN is 100 000 TX.

1. We will achieve the greatest possible diversity of IP´s.
Two and more running MN on the same IP Does not fulfill the function of true decentralization.

2. When the MN option is too expensive, rest of coins will stake and make the chain more secure.
Chain needs more stakers than masternodes.

3. Building a MN makes stable income for holder. (Maximum amount of MN is limited)
Pages:
Jump to: