Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][UPDATE! FORK][Exchange] HyperCoin- Windows, OSX & *Nix GUI Client Included - page 11. (Read 34988 times)

full member
Activity: 159
Merit: 100
This seems like an OK coin:

1. Very small premine (only 128k TOTAL are in circulation right now)
3. Low orphan/reject rates at difficulty of 0.11170942
4. Low block reward (25). No random blocks.  No huge early blocks.
5. 40 seconds is a good time between blocks.  Long enough to be secure but fast enough to facilitate quick transactions
8. Source on github instead of megafileshare

These are my favorite points. Fuck it, I'm in.
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Ive been mining on the original listed ports?

Have they been working? Because they were what was working for me

yeah its working fine. Only been mining about an hour and a bit and have 100 coins.
legendary
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
This seems like an OK coin:

1. Very small premine (only 128k TOTAL are in circulation right now)

2. Windows client, with correct port opened, made 65 connections

3. Low orphan/reject rates at difficulty of 0.11170942

4. Low block reward (25). No random blocks.  No huge early blocks.

5. 40 seconds is a good time between blocks.  Long enough to be secure but fast enough to facilitate quick transactions

6. Working windows client and working linux code at launch

7. Cool name and icon

8. Source on github instead of megafileshare

I don't agree.  Number 6 on your list is correct, but with one caveat.  The instructions for mining the coin which instruct all miners which ports are used were incorrect.  Only those of us that noticed the windows client using a different port were able to mine.  These kind of mistakes with the pre-mine don't make this a very good launch IMO.
I understand after looking at the netstat this the wallet that it is using 17453 and 17452. It was an honest mistake. But I still mined no problem solo.

Hey, no problem. We all make mistakes Smiley

HYC: HEpuWAAA7zHfHXvdUjCPi8WjZEX82jihMt
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Ive been mining on the original listed ports?

Have they been working? Because they were what was working for me
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Network approaching 150 mh/s.  difficulty has increased to .44683767

Quick start for this coin

Very much so!
hero member
Activity: 1395
Merit: 505
Network approaching 150 mh/s.  difficulty has increased to .44683767

Quick start for this coin
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Ive been mining on the original listed ports?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Setting up for solo mining:
Create a hypercoin.conf file in %Appdata%/Roaming/hypercoin/
rpcuser=username
rpcpassword=password
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rcpallowip=192.168.1.*
rpcport=7452
port=7453
daemon=1
server=1
gen=0
addnode=82.211.31.244

Wait a sec... aren't the ports WRONG in the original post?! I see the wallet client using 17453 not 7453. If that's the case wouldn't it make sense to make rpcport=17452?

(offline for a couple of hours but I'll be back later)

yep, got connections now)

Can we change rpcport to 17453?

Check original post I updated it for you guys Smiley
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Setting up for solo mining:
Create a hypercoin.conf file in %Appdata%/Roaming/hypercoin/
rpcuser=username
rpcpassword=password
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rcpallowip=192.168.1.*
rpcport=7452
port=7453
daemon=1
server=1
gen=0
addnode=82.211.31.244

Wait a sec... aren't the ports WRONG in the original post?! I see the wallet client using 17453 not 7453. If that's the case wouldn't it make sense to make rpcport=17452?

(offline for a couple of hours but I'll be back later)

yep, got connections now)

Can we change rpcport to 17453?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
This seems like an OK coin:

1. Very small premine (only 128k TOTAL are in circulation right now)

2. Windows client, with correct port opened, made 65 connections

3. Low orphan/reject rates at difficulty of 0.11170942

4. Low block reward (25). No random blocks.  No huge early blocks.

5. 40 seconds is a good time between blocks.  Long enough to be secure but fast enough to facilitate quick transactions

6. Working windows client and working linux code at launch

7. Cool name and icon

8. Source on github instead of megafileshare

I don't agree.  Number 6 on your list is correct, but with one caveat.  The instructions for mining the coin which instruct all miners which ports are used were incorrect.  Only those of us that noticed the windows client using a different port were able to mine.  These kind of mistakes with the pre-mine don't make this a very good launch IMO.

The ports are correct. I mined with those ports no problem. I understand after looking at the netstat this the wallet that it is using 17453 and 17452. It was an honest mistake. But I still mined no problem solo.
hero member
Activity: 1395
Merit: 505
True but I consider that trivial - anyone smart enough to forward a port on their router is going to know how to run the getpeerinfo command (or check the source...)
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
This seems like an OK coin:

1. Very small premine (only 128k TOTAL are in circulation right now)

2. Windows client, with correct port opened, made 65 connections

3. Low orphan/reject rates at difficulty of 0.11170942

4. Low block reward (25). No random blocks.  No huge early blocks.

5. 40 seconds is a good time between blocks.  Long enough to be secure but fast enough to facilitate quick transactions

6. Working windows client and working linux code at launch

7. Cool name and icon

8. Source on github instead of megafileshare

I don't agree.  Number 6 on your list is correct, but with one caveat.  The instructions for mining the coin which instruct all miners which ports are used were incorrect.  Only those of us that noticed the windows client using a different port were able to mine.  These kind of mistakes with the pre-mine don't make this a very good launch IMO.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501
Pool up and running @ http://hyc.scryptmining.com

Let me know how it goes.  2% fee, stratum only, Proportional per share payouts.

Cool no idea how to run a proxy for cudaminer

O well I guess I pass on this coin anyways
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
This seems like an OK coin:

1. Very small premine (only 128k TOTAL are in circulation right now)

2. Windows client, with correct port opened, made 65 connections

3. Low orphan/reject rates at difficulty of 0.11170942

4. Low block reward (25). No random blocks.  No huge early blocks.

5. 40 seconds is a good time between blocks.  Long enough to be secure but fast enough to facilitate quick transactions

6. Working windows client and working linux code at launch

7. Cool name and icon

8. Source on github instead of megafileshare

Couldn't have said it better myself! Thanks for the support brother. Also I noticed, out of all the Spamcoins that have came out in the past week, this coin (even though I don't consider it a spamcoin) seems to have less hate-directed comments towards it (except ofc hydroponica) Thank you everybody for the support!
hero member
Activity: 1395
Merit: 505
This seems like an OK coin:

1. Very small premine (only 128k TOTAL are in circulation right now)

2. Windows client, with correct port opened, made 65 connections

3. Low orphan/reject rates at difficulty of 0.11170942

4. Low block reward (25). No random blocks.  No huge early blocks.

5. 40 seconds is a good time between blocks.  Long enough to be secure but fast enough to facilitate quick transactions

6. Working windows client and working linux code at launch

7. Cool name and icon

8. Source on github instead of megafileshare
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
500 HYC mined, 33 transactions.  Very low orphan/reject rate right now.  Using Windows Client

Awesome Cheesy:D
hero member
Activity: 1395
Merit: 505
500 HYC mined, 33 transactions.  Very low orphan/reject rate right now.  Using Windows Client
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Pool up and running @ http://hyc.scryptmining.com

Let me know how it goes.  2% fee, stratum only, Proportional per share payouts.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501
Anyone else notice, that noone is buying this coin?

You seriously have nothing better to do than waste your time trying to flame this coin?

If its not this one its another one.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Anyone else notice, that noone is buying this coin?

You seriously have nothing better to do than waste your time trying to flame this coin?
Pages:
Jump to: