Wow, this thread sure smells like FUD lately.
Lets see here, who am I gonna trust when it comes to deciding whether or not something is okay. The dev whose name and background I know, or the person hiding behind a screen name claiming that everything is in trouble.
Let me think...
Nice use of logical fallacy, it would make sense I guess if you ignored all the evidence and example code I provided.
Has your code worked yet? Please stop talking how much you can hack, and go do it!
Clearly the Dev says risks are mitigated, you say they aren't.
Go prove your point, thats the only thing I can say.
If your words can be as dangerous as your actions, go show us.
IMO your all words and no action, clearly you had to re-write your scrypt cause it didn't work.
Now, when your successful, please come back and share your concerns.
Until then the dev has gave you every response to why it won't work. Yet you claim it works.. But, yet, you cannot get it to work, you say the dev lied to you instead of believing the fail safe mechanisms they put in place.
Put your scrypt in action, if it wins, you can donate the money back and work with dev to fix it, I am sure you would be loaded with money from VRC community if you actually help and cut the FUD.
