Topic: [ANN][X11][PoS only] NinjaCoin - Ninja Launch - Hard fork 1.2.2 - page 16. (Read 69071 times)
new wallet is up and running, looks good John
I think i have found, it's working on linux. It was the market tab that take info from bittrex. Since it's disable or seomthing like this, it produce error. Give me a couple of minutes the time i upload all this.
Edit:
-source on github is updated
-linux wallet is updated
-windows wallet is updated
Edit:
-source on github is updated
-linux wallet is updated
-windows wallet is updated
Windows wallet is working.
Can i withdraw coins from Bittrex?
E: NO! I cant.. :/ Let see what gonna do Bittrex now.. and when..(?)
Apparently you can, unless they're stuck in an order which was live before they took the market offline. (Attempting to cancel a live order in the offline market yields an error message that says MARKET_OFFLINE.)
I think i have found, it's working on linux. It was the market tab that take info from bittrex. Since it's disable or seomthing like this, it produce error. Give me a couple of minutes the time i upload all this.
Edit:
-source on github is updated
-linux wallet is updated
-windows wallet is updated
Edit:
-source on github is updated
-linux wallet is updated
-windows wallet is updated
Windows wallet is working.
Can i withdraw coins from Bittrex?
https://bittrex.com/Status
It say they are on block +16000 and the good fork is around 14500. You should wait until they update the wallet.
This pool is in the good fork(for the moment) and display the current block:
http://p2poolcoin.com:12500
Every other pools are on the wrong fork and should update or close to give a chance on the good chain to become longer that the bad chain.
I think i have found, it's working on linux. It was the market tab that take info from bittrex. Since it's disable or seomthing like this, it produce error. Give me a couple of minutes the time i upload all this.
Edit:
-source on github is updated
-linux wallet is updated
-windows wallet is updated
Edit:
-source on github is updated
-linux wallet is updated
-windows wallet is updated
Windows wallet is working.
Can i withdraw coins from Bittrex?
E: NO! I cant.. :/ Let see what gonna do Bittrex now.. and when..(?)
wallet V1.2.1 work fine
# Ninjacoin - Guys how is this going? TM Kengren it too, as well as the opportunity to stand up? I was very worried because there are still inside 50BT
What did i miss!? why is this coin off of Bittrex
I think i have found, it's working on linux. It was the market tab that take info from bittrex. Since it's disable or seomthing like this, it produce error. Give me a couple of minutes the time i upload all this.
Edit:
-source on github is updated
-linux wallet is updated
-windows wallet is updated
Edit:
-source on github is updated
-linux wallet is updated
-windows wallet is updated
I had my wallet open without any problem and with many re-open since the new fork.
But i just have close it and have the same error...
But i just have close it and have the same error...
Get the wallet working, reach out to allcoins to list it and lets get back on track. Chances are polo and mint aren't going to touch this coin with a ten foot pole after what happen today.
I had my wallet open without any problem and with many re-open since the new fork.
But i just have close it and have the same error...
But i just have close it and have the same error...
K let us know when you got it please.
I do respect the effort and the honesty of taking the responsibility for the problem, it's not your fault that people tried/did sell the bad coins. all you can do now is try to make it right and hope people understand.
not work
I had my wallet open without any problem and with many re-open since the new fork.
But i just have close it and have the same error...
But i just have close it and have the same error...
Dedicatedpool does not agree with rolling back. Bittrex should not be forced to lose BTC on this matter. Dedicatedpool has stayed on the old wallet, and Bittrex will as well.
This was not Bittrex's fault. Shit happens unfortunately, but you can't except them to take the hit on this.
If Bittrex stays on the old wallet, how are you guys going to sell your NJA?
If i have roll back the chain it's because there was a very small error but with huge problems on PoS. It's not that it was not working but it worked too well.This was not Bittrex's fault. Shit happens unfortunately, but you can't except them to take the hit on this.
If Bittrex stays on the old wallet, how are you guys going to sell your NJA?
Millions or billions of coins were created in no time with staking. It's just not possible to stay on the old wallet.
The rollback was very short, maybe 3 hours ago to get in a sane blockchain with correct staking reward.
For a 3 hours problem, i think it's better to roll back a little. No other choice.
I would totally agree with you John if people hadn't sold their obviously fawlty coins to bittrex it would have been an easy fix to just roll it back, everyones wallets would have been corrected and problem solved without anyone getting hurt. but because some (seems to be quite a few) knowingly sold their coins on bittrex there is now a shwack load of people who spent real btc's for those coins and it's their wallets that will be hurt if it's done now.
besides price this is the other reason it's retarded to push a coin on bittrex before it's been checked/tested... if we had waited till after pow had ended to list on bittrex then we wouldn't be in this mess and the people that wanted to knowingly sell their bad coins wouldn't have had the help of the exchange, we would have been able to fix the issue and have everything top notch before it hit the markets... so there would have been no fud to work through and no people out money cause of a lack of testing.
It's "just" a bad story with bittrex on a faulty chain. I don't blame them, it's my fault, a stupid 6 char length missing in the maths reward.
But on the other side, if we go on another exchange with the good fork, this coin can continue to live without any problem.
People who have sell the bad coins on bittrex have make some profit AFTER block 14000. All the miners/buyers that were holding a lot of NJA still have them on the good fork.
If we don't move on another exchange, everyone will loose much more that if we let this coin die.
We have the choice to be bagholder of a dead coin because of some BTC that were "stolen" or we can jump on the good fork and let it continue his road on poloniex, mintpal, bter... so many exchanges...
Edit: the p2pool seems to move the good folk well.
CANT USE A P2P IF THE F*CKING WALLET DOESNT WORK!
FIX IT ALREADY!
Windows wallet v1.2.0 is the same , It everytime stopes responding and closes...
same problem, as the others users 
Windows wallet v1.2.0 is the same , It everytime stopes responding and closes...
Dedicatedpool does not agree with rolling back. Bittrex should not be forced to lose BTC on this matter. Dedicatedpool has stayed on the old wallet, and Bittrex will as well.
This was not Bittrex's fault. Shit happens unfortunately, but you can't except them to take the hit on this.
If Bittrex stays on the old wallet, how are you guys going to sell your NJA?
If i have roll back the chain it's because there was a very small error but with huge problems on PoS. It's not that it was not working but it worked too well.This was not Bittrex's fault. Shit happens unfortunately, but you can't except them to take the hit on this.
If Bittrex stays on the old wallet, how are you guys going to sell your NJA?
Millions or billions of coins were created in no time with staking. It's just not possible to stay on the old wallet.
The rollback was very short, maybe 3 hours ago to get in a sane blockchain with correct staking reward.
For a 3 hours problem, i think it's better to roll back a little. No other choice.
I would totally agree with you John if people hadn't sold their obviously fawlty coins to bittrex it would have been an easy fix to just roll it back, everyones wallets would have been corrected and problem solved without anyone getting hurt. but because some (seems to be quite a few) knowingly sold their coins on bittrex there is now a shwack load of people who spent real btc's for those coins and it's their wallets that will be hurt if it's done now.
besides price this is the other reason it's retarded to push a coin on bittrex before it's been checked/tested... if we had waited till after pow had ended to list on bittrex then we wouldn't be in this mess and the people that wanted to knowingly sell their bad coins wouldn't have had the help of the exchange, we would have been able to fix the issue and have everything top notch before it hit the markets... so there would have been no fud to work through and no people out money cause of a lack of testing.
It's "just" a bad story with bittrex on a faulty chain. I don't blame them, it's my fault, a stupid 6 char length missing in the maths reward.
But on the other side, if we go on another exchange with the good fork, this coin can continue to live without any problem.
People who have sell the bad coins on bittrex have make some profit AFTER block 14000. All the miners/buyers that were holding a lot of NJA still have them on the good fork.
If we don't move on another exchange, everyone will loose much more that if we let this coin die.
We have the choice to be bagholder of a dead coin because of some BTC that were "stolen" or we can jump on the good fork and let it continue his road on poloniex, mintpal, bter... so many exchanges...
Could be a good option ... IF wallets were functioning lol New Linux QT seg faults with core dump so it doesn't even open anymore. Have tested on Arch-Linux and Debian with same result
Dedicatedpool does not agree with rolling back. Bittrex should not be forced to lose BTC on this matter. Dedicatedpool has stayed on the old wallet, and Bittrex will as well.
This was not Bittrex's fault. Shit happens unfortunately, but you can't except them to take the hit on this.
If Bittrex stays on the old wallet, how are you guys going to sell your NJA?
If i have roll back the chain it's because there was a very small error but with huge problems on PoS. It's not that it was not working but it worked too well.This was not Bittrex's fault. Shit happens unfortunately, but you can't except them to take the hit on this.
If Bittrex stays on the old wallet, how are you guys going to sell your NJA?
Millions or billions of coins were created in no time with staking. It's just not possible to stay on the old wallet.
The rollback was very short, maybe 3 hours ago to get in a sane blockchain with correct staking reward.
For a 3 hours problem, i think it's better to roll back a little. No other choice.
I would totally agree with you John if people hadn't sold their obviously fawlty coins to bittrex it would have been an easy fix to just roll it back, everyones wallets would have been corrected and problem solved without anyone getting hurt. but because some (seems to be quite a few) knowingly sold their coins on bittrex there is now a shwack load of people who spent real btc's for those coins and it's their wallets that will be hurt if it's done now.
besides price this is the other reason it's retarded to push a coin on bittrex before it's been checked/tested... if we had waited till after pow had ended to list on bittrex then we wouldn't be in this mess and the people that wanted to knowingly sell their bad coins wouldn't have had the help of the exchange, we would have been able to fix the issue and have everything top notch before it hit the markets... so there would have been no fud to work through and no people out money cause of a lack of testing.
It's "just" a bad story with bittrex on a faulty chain. I don't blame them, it's my fault, a stupid 6 char length missing in the maths reward.
But on the other side, if we go on another exchange with the good fork, this coin can continue to live without any problem.
People who have sell the bad coins on bittrex have make some profit AFTER block 14000. All the miners/buyers that were holding a lot of NJA still have them on the good fork.
If we don't move on another exchange, everyone will loose much more that if we let this coin die.
We have the choice to be bagholder of a dead coin because of some BTC that were "stolen" or we can jump on the good fork and let it continue his road on poloniex, mintpal, bter... so many exchanges...
Edit: the p2pool seems to move the good folk well.
Dedicatedpool does not agree with rolling back. Bittrex should not be forced to lose BTC on this matter. Dedicatedpool has stayed on the old wallet, and Bittrex will as well.
This was not Bittrex's fault. Shit happens unfortunately, but you can't except them to take the hit on this.
If Bittrex stays on the old wallet, how are you guys going to sell your NJA?
If i have roll back the chain it's because there was a very small error but with huge problems on PoS. It's not that it was not working but it worked too well.This was not Bittrex's fault. Shit happens unfortunately, but you can't except them to take the hit on this.
If Bittrex stays on the old wallet, how are you guys going to sell your NJA?
Millions or billions of coins were created in no time with staking. It's just not possible to stay on the old wallet.
The rollback was very short, maybe 3 hours ago to get in a sane blockchain with correct staking reward.
For a 3 hours problem, i think it's better to roll back a little. No other choice.
I would totally agree with you John if people hadn't sold their obviously fawlty coins to bittrex it would have been an easy fix to just roll it back, everyones wallets would have been corrected and problem solved without anyone getting hurt. but because some (seems to be quite a few) knowingly sold their coins on bittrex there is now a shwack load of people who spent real btc's for those coins and it's their wallets that will be hurt if it's done now.
besides price this is the other reason it's retarded to push a coin on bittrex before it's been checked/tested... if we had waited till after pow had ended to list on bittrex then we wouldn't be in this mess and the people that wanted to knowingly sell their bad coins wouldn't have had the help of the exchange, we would have been able to fix the issue and have everything top notch before it hit the markets... so there would have been no fud to work through and no people out money cause of a lack of testing.
EDIT: do we know appox how many bad coins were sold in the market?
Resolve the problem of WALLET!!!!!!!!!
Jump to: