Topic: [ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet - page 252. (Read 268507 times)
May 22, 2014, 11:12:48 PM
For those looking for more technical details, the linux wallet is able to accept the anon transaction and get the hash back for that transaction.. but we still have some bugs to work out to validate that transaction... once that is done we will have a working linux wallet...
May 22, 2014, 11:11:51 PM
Okay. I just got off teamview with actsecure. The anon feature linux wallet is 100% legit. He demoed it to me, I saw it first hand through teamview. He also showed me the minor bug he needs to work through before he can release the wallet. And he expects it to be completed in the next day or two.
Guys, this is legit. And actsecure knows what he is doing. It's just my word, but as a dev of Cinni I am staking my reputation that he is not lying about an anon wallet.
Guys, this is legit. And actsecure knows what he is doing. It's just my word, but as a dev of Cinni I am staking my reputation that he is not lying about an anon wallet.
May 22, 2014, 10:39:22 PM
please some one capable of verification do this.
i am grateful to dev, but i am not in a good condition to do it.
thanks
i am grateful to dev, but i am not in a good condition to do it.
thanks
battbot is a dev for Cinni, will be interesting to see his feedback.
great!
May 22, 2014, 10:36:54 PM
please some one capable of verification do this.
i am grateful to dev, but i am not in a good condition to do it.
thanks
i am grateful to dev, but i am not in a good condition to do it.
thanks
battbot is a dev for Cinni, will be interesting to see his feedback.
May 22, 2014, 10:35:50 PM
please some one capable of verification do this.
i am grateful to dev, but i am not in a good condition to do it.
thanks
i am grateful to dev, but i am not in a good condition to do it.
thanks
May 22, 2014, 10:28:43 PM
okay I'm ready for the teamviewer, to demo current status... based on the current rate of progress we are looking at another day or two
PM me if you want the teamviewer info
PM me if you want the teamviewer info
Great! Sent a PM!
May 22, 2014, 10:25:29 PM
atcsecure will be more worried than us because he put a lot of time and money, I believe
sorry. i don't think he is worried about it!
May 22, 2014, 10:22:51 PM
atcsecure will be more worried than us because he put a lot of time and money, I believe
sorry. i don't think he is worried about it!
May 22, 2014, 10:21:08 PM
okay I'm ready for the teamviewer, to demo current status... based on the current rate of progress we are looking at another day or two
PM me if you want the teamviewer info
PM me if you want the teamviewer info
Great! ...and now hashrate will spike
May 22, 2014, 10:20:13 PM
okay I'm ready for the teamviewer, to demo current status... based on the current rate of progress we are looking at another day or two
PM me if you want the teamviewer info
PM me if you want the teamviewer info
May 22, 2014, 10:18:47 PM
I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.
it will take over the momentum form DRK.
but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.
Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.
That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.
It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity
Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!
this is hilarious, few words from dev, of course as vague as possible except the "promise", turn the trend up and down.
this is totally bad for a legit dev.
if dev want to update ppl, he should give out some evidence.
If he talks too much, some others will doubt he is not working hard. I personally keep all my minded coins and wait.
i do think he is talking too much without any evidence!
Thinks about the dev's id: atcsecure. And he is a Sr.member. This makes me believe he is a specialist in security. I have faith in him.
what if it is deception? and he dump the coin instamined after launch.
oh. the premined coin is just a tool to misguide us
He registered on March 26, 2013. This should be really a huge conspiracy if you are true.
May 22, 2014, 10:15:17 PM
atcsecure will be more worried than us because he put a lot of time and money, I believe
sorry. i don't think he is worried about it!
May 22, 2014, 10:11:12 PM
I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.
it will take over the momentum form DRK.
but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.
Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.
That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.
It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity
Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!
this is hilarious, few words from dev, of course as vague as possible except the "promise", turn the trend up and down.
this is totally bad for a legit dev.
if dev want to update ppl, he should give out some evidence.
If he talks too much, some others will doubt he is not working hard. I personally keep all my minded coins and wait.
i do think he is talking too much without any evidence!
Thinks about the dev's id: atcsecure. And he is a Sr.member. This makes me believe he is a specialist in security. I have faith in him.
May 22, 2014, 10:11:04 PM
i can't help calling this dev a liar.
prove me wrong!
prove me wrong!
May 22, 2014, 10:09:23 PM
I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.
it will take over the momentum form DRK.
but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.
Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.
That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.
It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity
Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!
this is hilarious, few words from dev, of course as vague as possible except the "promise", turn the trend up and down.
this is totally bad for a legit dev.
if dev want to update ppl, he should give out some evidence.
If he talks too much, some others will doubt he is not working hard. I personally keep all my minded coins and wait.
i do think he is talking too much without any evidence!
Thinks about the dev's id: atcsecure. And he is a Sr.member. This makes me believe he is a specialist in security. I have faith in him.
what if it is deception? and he dump the coin instamined after launch.
oh. the premined coin is just a tool to misguide us
May 22, 2014, 10:03:03 PM
I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.
it will take over the momentum form DRK.
but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.
Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.
That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.
It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity
Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!
this is hilarious, few words from dev, of course as vague as possible except the "promise", turn the trend up and down.
this is totally bad for a legit dev.
if dev want to update ppl, he should give out some evidence.
If he talks too much, some others will doubt he is not working hard. I personally keep all my minded coins and wait.
i do think he is talking too much without any evidence!
Thinks about the dev's id: atcsecure. And he is a Sr.member. This makes me believe he is a specialist in security. I have faith in him.
May 22, 2014, 09:58:08 PM
I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.
it will take over the momentum form DRK.
but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.
Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.
That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.
It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity
Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!
this is hilarious, few words from dev, of course as vague as possible except the "promise", turn the trend up and down.
this is totally bad for a legit dev.
if dev want to update ppl, he should give out some evidence.
If he talks too much, some others will doubt he is not working hard. I personally keep all my minded coins and wait.
i do think he is talking too much without any evidence!
May 22, 2014, 09:55:54 PM
I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.
it will take over the momentum form DRK.
but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.
Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.
That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.
It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity
Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!
this is hilarious, few words from dev, of course as vague as possible except the "promise", turn the trend up and down.
this is totally bad for a legit dev.
if dev want to update ppl, he should give out some evidence.
If he talks too much, some others will doubt he is not working hard. I personally keep all my minded coins and wait.
May 22, 2014, 09:45:49 PM
I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.
it will take over the momentum form DRK.
but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.
Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.
That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.
It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity
Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!
this is hilarious, few words from dev, of course as vague as possible except the "promise", turn the trend up and down.
this is totally bad for a legit dev.
if dev want to update ppl, he should give out some evidence.
May 22, 2014, 09:35:21 PM
I wonder how it would effect dark if XC trumped them by releasing an anon wallet first.
it will take over the momentum form DRK.
but who knows when the dev is going to release the linux one.
Possibly, but having the dev give his real name would defiantly be a major boost.
That said, I can understand why he/she wouldn't want to. After all anonymity is what we are after for the wallet so we should respect their right to it as well.
It does seem counter-intuitive for the dev to release his personal info when the push is anonymity
Assuming that he can pull it off, and I seriously doubt he's not working hard toward exactly that, his reputation in this forum should be enough to instill confidence in this coin. I'm just sorry that I ddin't mine more when it was slow and uncertain. I had my day 1 mined coins sitting on bittrex at the 'safe' price of 0.0001 and forgot about them. Kicking myself. Haha!
Jump to: