[ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet - page 256.

Quote from: evtrmm on May 22, 2014, 02:53:29 PM

wow this is getting off topic

dev please release wallet or some screenshots

How long do you need? A min, an hour, a day, a month? Why not prepare it before launch?

Dude, the current wallet has been prepared BEFORE launch, and is working properly.
These are things that the DEV has planned to change after launch.

he is asking for the wallet with anon feature.

i think the linux one.

richardn1987

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: richardn1987 on May 22, 2014, 02:51:43 PM

Quote from: richardn1987 on May 22, 2014, 02:51:43 PM

wow this is getting off topic

dev please release wallet or some screenshots

How long do you need? A min, an hour, a day, a month? Why not prepare it before launch?

Dude, the current wallet has been prepared BEFORE launch, and is working properly.
These are things that the DEV has planned to change after launch.

i know he planned it, but why? And how long still?

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

wow this is getting off topic

dev please release wallet or some screenshots

How long do you need? A min, an hour, a day, a month? Why not prepare it before launch?

Dude, the current wallet has been prepared BEFORE launch, and is working properly.
These are things that the DEV has planned to change after launch.

richardn1987

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: sussex on May 22, 2014, 02:47:18 PM

wow this is getting off topic

dev please release wallet or some screenshots

How long do you need? A min, an hour, a day, a month? Why not prepare it before launch?

Ezravdb

hero member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 506

Trphy.io

wow this is getting off topic

dev please release wallet or some screenshots

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Get a room! Roll Eyes

CONDOM free

sussex

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Get a room! Roll Eyes

maqa71

member

Activity: 80

Merit: 10

Quote from: SpringfieldM1A on May 22, 2014, 02:42:50 PM

Quote from: maqa71 on May 22, 2014, 02:39:18 PM

Quote from: SpringfieldM1A on May 22, 2014, 02:35:20 PM

Quote from: maqa71 on May 22, 2014, 02:39:18 PM

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "

Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging

(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) f
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { }
(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) finish
Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366
1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0]))
(gdb) where

Does this mean only a wallet or also fork Huh

there aint no fork in that man
thats debug log

Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment.
bitcoinrpc.cpp Huh

If thats beeing updated we need a fork.

I remember you from the Poloniex trollbox, all you did there was spread FUD regarding XC. It won't work in here.

Chill out dude, you prob. dont even know what fork means.
Simply question the dev can answer so we can be prepared.
Why the hate Grin

No hate, I think you are kinda cute actually Kiss

Group hug and XC to da Moooooooooon Grin

SpringfieldM1A

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 550

Quote from: SpringfieldM1A on May 22, 2014, 02:35:20 PM

Quote from: SpringfieldM1A on May 22, 2014, 02:35:20 PM

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "

Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging

(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) f
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { }
(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) finish
Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366
1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0]))
(gdb) where

Does this mean only a wallet or also fork Huh

there aint no fork in that man
thats debug log

Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment.
bitcoinrpc.cpp Huh

If thats beeing updated we need a fork.

I remember you from the Poloniex trollbox, all you did there was spread FUD regarding XC. It won't work in here.

Chill out dude, you prob. dont even know what fork means.
Simply question the dev can answer so we can be prepared.
Why the hate Grin

No hate, I think you are kinda cute actually Kiss

maqa71

member

Activity: 80

Merit: 10

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "

Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging

(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) f
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { }
(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) finish
Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366
1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0]))
(gdb) where

Does this mean only a wallet or also fork Huh

there aint no fork in that man
thats debug log

Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment.
bitcoinrpc.cpp Huh

If thats beeing updated we need a fork.

I remember you from the Poloniex trollbox, all you did there was spread FUD regarding XC. It won't work in here.

Chill out dude, you prob. dont even know what fork means.
Simply question the dev can answer so we can be prepared.
Why the hate Grin

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "

Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging

(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) f
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { }
(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) finish
Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366
1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0]))
(gdb) where

Does this mean only a wallet or also fork Huh

there aint no fork in that man
thats debug log

Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment.
bitcoinrpc.cpp Huh

If thats beeing updated we need a fork.

Ik zal je 1 ding zeggen, XC is zeker een goede koop, de developer heeft zo net gewoon bewezen dat ze wel degelijk met de wallet bezig zijn, het is een kwestie van tijd voordat de domme schapen in de trollbox dit ook door hebben.

SpringfieldM1A

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 550

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "

Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging

(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) f
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { }
(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) finish
Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366
1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0]))
(gdb) where

Does this mean only a wallet or also fork Huh

there aint no fork in that man
thats debug log

Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment.
bitcoinrpc.cpp Huh

If thats beeing updated we need a fork.

I remember you from the Poloniex trollbox, all you did there was spread FUD regarding XC. It won't work in here.

maqa71

member

Activity: 80

Merit: 10

Quote from: philipvdlinde on May 22, 2014, 02:31:08 PM

Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......

"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "

Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging

(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) f
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { }
(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) finish
Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270
CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366
1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0]))
(gdb) where

Does this mean only a wallet or also fork Huh

there aint no fork in that man
thats debug log

Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment.
bitcoinrpc.cpp Huh

If thats beeing updated we need a fork.

mojun7982

full member

Activity: 269

Merit: 100

The Standard Protocol - Solving Inflation

Dumping this coin is the dumbest move you can make, especially when you lose money while dumping. Anyways I support this coin 100% and I am hodling.

+1

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Dumping this coin is the dumbest move you can make, especially when you lose money while dumping. Anyways I support this coin 100% and I am hodling.

Ezravdb

hero member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 506

Trphy.io

Quote from: Quantumbud on May 22, 2014, 02:27:52 PM

I just wanted to extend my gratitude to all those who panic dumped a while ago,not only have you aided me in increasing my holdings but i now have more BTC to boot too.

To the Dev,ignore the window licking trollboxers and keep up the good work.

Yea sell at 18K buy at 11K haha

Quantumbud

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

I just wanted to extend my gratitude to all those who panic dumped a while ago,not only have you aided me in increasing my holdings but i now have more BTC to boot too.

To the Dev,ignore the window licking trollboxers and keep up the good work.

regmann

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100