Topic: [ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet - page 259. (Read 268507 times)
May 22, 2014, 03:00:08 PM
dont worry about them DEV, i believe in you
May 22, 2014, 02:59:55 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
May 22, 2014, 02:59:14 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
Evidence is more helpful than words.
May 22, 2014, 02:59:05 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
i would rather be TRANSPARENT.
few hours ago, you said you will release a linux wallet as you promised.
then tell us now if you will release it or not.
don't keep us wait here in vain.
May 22, 2014, 02:58:49 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
Ok. That's some bullshit. Fully transparent would mean you have actually released ANY info WHATSOEVER on how you are implementing anonymous features. And yes, 3
people with an interest and experience in crypto NOT being on BCT is strange. And no, degrees mean jack shit when it comes to coding skill. AND where are the "community members"
that you said helped on the testnet?
May 22, 2014, 02:57:47 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
Thanks dev. We would rather you be fully transparent. Thanks for your work. I am holding!
May 22, 2014, 02:55:23 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
May 22, 2014, 02:54:19 PM
Can anyone back up atcsecure's claims?
Who else is on the dev team?
Who else is on the dev team?
be patient. either scam or legit, we will know sooon enough.
for the record, its either going to work or we will continue to code until does.. or I run out of money
Who else is on "the team" that you have referenced? Have they chimed in on this thread?
there are now 3 other programmers and they are not on this forum
You have 3 guys coding crypto and none are on BCT....
I'm being fully transparent in REAL-TIME about whats going, that is the best I can do.. yes I hand selected the developers and so what if they are NOT On BCT? 1 of them has a PHD and just doesn't spend his time on forums....
we have made huge progress, however we have reached another hurdle/issue that requires more coding and testing
May 22, 2014, 02:52:08 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
May 22, 2014, 02:51:20 PM
Can anyone back up atcsecure's claims?
Who else is on the dev team?
Who else is on the dev team?
be patient. either scam or legit, we will know sooon enough.
for the record, its either going to work or we will continue to code until it does.. or I run out of money or resources
but the linux wallet is working right?
we will see it now right?
linux wallet works, anon code needs more work
Could you please release a more detailed statement (with estimated timelines)? Yesterday, you said that the anon code was successfully tested working on testnet. Thanks in advance
Yes, the dev's statements have been, at best, ambiguous and the ones over the last hour has caused problems for the markets - not great and has affected the coin's reputation.
May 22, 2014, 02:50:20 PM
Can anyone back up atcsecure's claims?
Who else is on the dev team?
Who else is on the dev team?
be patient. either scam or legit, we will know sooon enough.
for the record, its either going to work or we will continue to code until it does.. or I run out of money or resources
but the linux wallet is working right?
we will see it now right?
linux wallet works, anon code needs more work
Could you please release a more detailed statement (with estimated timelines)? Yesterday, you said that the anon code was successfully tested working on testnet. Thanks in advance
ppl here are waiting for the linux wallet.
if it did work, let them scrutinize it.
May 22, 2014, 02:49:56 PM
For this tech you really need some mathematicians and cryptographers to create the algorithms that your programmers implement.
Is this the case here XC developers? Or are you going to create anon by hacking together some code? Please tell me your main release will be a white paper on your breakthrough?
Is this the case here XC developers? Or are you going to create anon by hacking together some code? Please tell me your main release will be a white paper on your breakthrough?
There is no whitepaper only dev's words..
May 22, 2014, 02:48:39 PM
Can anyone back up atcsecure's claims?
Who else is on the dev team?
Who else is on the dev team?
be patient. either scam or legit, we will know sooon enough.
for the record, its either going to work or we will continue to code until it does.. or I run out of money or resources
but the linux wallet is working right?
we will see it now right?
linux wallet works, anon code needs more work
Could you please release a more detailed statement (with estimated timelines)? Yesterday, you said that the anon code was successfully tested working on testnet. Thanks in advance
May 22, 2014, 02:43:51 PM
For this tech you really need some mathematicians and cryptographers to create the algorithms that your programmers implement.
Is this the case here XC developers? Or are you going to create anon by hacking together some code? Please tell me your main release will be a white paper on your breakthrough?
Is this the case here XC developers? Or are you going to create anon by hacking together some code? Please tell me your main release will be a white paper on your breakthrough?
May 22, 2014, 02:42:42 PM
Can anyone back up atcsecure's claims?
Who else is on the dev team?
Who else is on the dev team?
be patient. either scam or legit, we will know sooon enough.
for the record, its either going to work or we will continue to code until does.. or I run out of money
Who else is on "the team" that you have referenced? Have they chimed in on this thread?
there are now 3 other programmers and they are not on this forum
What kind of crypto programmers are not on bitcointalk?
May 22, 2014, 02:41:07 PM
Not sure if this will happen, but if XC actually has a new way of doing anon without the flawed masternode idea, then it'll become a worthy coin for sure.
Good luck, I look forward to reading the code and possibly whitepaper if one is released.
Good luck, I look forward to reading the code and possibly whitepaper if one is released.
What exactly is flawed about DRK's masternode idea? I have not been following it closely. Thanks in advance
Darkcoin's MasterNode has two issues that work in tandem to be a cause for concern; the nodes can be targeted for DDOS and it's possible for a bad actor to be a node.
If the good nodes are attacked the flow of traffic will increase towards bad actors.
What needs to be researched is the cost of the attack and what outcome do you want? For example attacking X amount of MasterNode with intent to devalue DarkCoin by showing it's weakness is easier than using that attack to unveil transactions.
Remember there are always different reasons why someone would attack DarkCoin. I'd imagine early attacks being proof of concept to warn people away from the technology.
Even the creator of CoinJoin (DarkCoin's fundamental tech) has said that the technology in Monero is superior in everyway, he doesn't understand why DarkCoin is where it is.
Take that for what it's worth.
May 22, 2014, 02:38:14 PM
Can anyone back up atcsecure's claims?
Who else is on the dev team?
Who else is on the dev team?
be patient. either scam or legit, we will know sooon enough.
for the record, its either going to work or we will continue to code until it does.. or I run out of money or resources
but the linux wallet is working right?
we will see it now right?
linux wallet works, anon code needs more work
linux wallet with anon feature right?
then unleash it!
May 22, 2014, 02:37:44 PM
Can anyone back up atcsecure's claims?
Who else is on the dev team?
Who else is on the dev team?
be patient. either scam or legit, we will know sooon enough.
for the record, its either going to work or we will continue to code until it does.. or I run out of money or resources
but the linux wallet is working right?
we will see it now right?
linux wallet works, anon code needs more work
more work meas couple of hours or days ?
May 22, 2014, 02:35:24 PM
Can anyone back up atcsecure's claims?
Who else is on the dev team?
Who else is on the dev team?
be patient. either scam or legit, we will know sooon enough.
for the record, its either going to work or we will continue to code until it does.. or I run out of money or resources
but the linux wallet is working right?
we will see it now right?
linux wallet works, anon code needs more work
May 22, 2014, 02:32:18 PM
Devs posts are up-setting the market, not great 
Jump to: