SERIOUSLY PEOPLE STOP FREAKING OUT AND ATTACKING THE DEV. He is just a regular dude working on something that has NOT BEEN DONE BEFORE. Yes, he did say it would be finished today but shit fucking happens.. Get over it, grow some patience, and maybe a set of balls and a brain while your at it people. Get the fuck over yourselves people
Topic: [ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet - page 258. (Read 268553 times)
May 22, 2014, 02:09:21 PM
May 22, 2014, 02:09:07 PM
If he had been wanting to dump coins he would have released a wallet working or not and dumped into the hype. Programming is tedious and hard ot put a timeline to. Anyone that does not like the approach doesn't have to be here. I prefer a solid working wallet to one with problems. This is not cut and paste and devs from somewhere besides these boards is probably a good idea. Less chance of code and ideas leaking to other people. I plan on sticking around for a while.
Keep after it dev!
Keep after it dev!
May 22, 2014, 02:08:26 PM
u think he should release something that doesn't work properly, something he has to withdraw, or something that works good and he doesn't....
then why did he launch the coin? just curious
May 22, 2014, 02:08:18 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
DEV could give a shit about the current coin price. Nor any marketing. He did not even promote this coin, and has been here from the beginning giving updates on both successes and setbacks.
You people that want to make a quick buck are the ones causing issues. At this point, Altsecure wants to be transparent and not famous. maybe you all need to take a look back through this thread and realize what is really going on. You could go jump on a coin that was over hyped and under developed.
What we do know at this point, the coin has a working wallet that properly stakes. (WOW - much success right Whitecoin?) And the developer has been here pretty much nonstop giving us updates on everything.
If I were him, I would keep updating and stay away from answering any questions until the wallet is released.
May 22, 2014, 02:08:08 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
No, I think he shouldn't have used the word "successfully" - it implies that the code works, which he also said had happened on testnet.
Are you a big bagholder?
Well done!! Bravo!!!!
May 22, 2014, 02:08:04 PM
The poloniex trollbox has flocked to this thread.
May 22, 2014, 02:07:49 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
Evidence is more helpful than words.
Do not forget dev has a team~ 3 Programmers
publish the whitepaper to review the features, it's really hard to cheat the detail
May 22, 2014, 02:06:24 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
No, I think he shouldn't have used the word "successfully" - it implies that the code works, which he also said had happened on testnet.
Are you a big bagholder?
May 22, 2014, 02:05:50 PM
this drama is fully p&D game!
dev you created FUD and disdain the coin.
even you succeed, you lost your reputation.
dev you created FUD and disdain the coin.
even you succeed, you lost your reputation.
How did the dev create FUD? He stated from the onset that the timelines he gave are "estimates." As we should all be aware of. The Dev is just reporting to us his minor setbacks. This is called "transparency" and is a good thing. I don't see any FUD but yours.
May 22, 2014, 02:05:12 PM
this drama is fully p&D game!
dev you created FUD and disdain the coin.
even you succeed, you lost your reputation.
how? because he would rather release a working product then a product that doesn't DRK DOESN't work no one is complaning about that, bunch of bitches this btc community is. dev you created FUD and disdain the coin.
even you succeed, you lost your reputation.
May 22, 2014, 02:04:46 PM
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging
(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) f
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=
270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { }
(gdb) where
#0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=
#1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434
#2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361
#3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160
#4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185
(gdb) finish
Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=
CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366
1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0]))
(gdb) where
May 22, 2014, 02:04:37 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
No, I think he shouldn't have used the word "successfully" - it implies that the code works, which he also said had happened on testnet.
Are you a big bagholder?
May 22, 2014, 02:04:10 PM
Yea. I am a dev on Cinni. And we posted deadlines for many projects thus far but almost all have met minor delays and set backs. But in the end, we delivered as promised. These type of things are normal.
May 22, 2014, 02:03:52 PM
+1 I can't wait for the wallet to be released, but let the guy do his magic. Im excited but sure won't be conned out of my XC by dumpers. Hold tight!
May 22, 2014, 02:03:23 PM
this drama is fully p&D game!
dev you created FUD and disdain the coin.
even you succeed, you lost your reputation.
dev you created FUD and disdain the coin.
even you succeed, you lost your reputation.
May 22, 2014, 02:02:41 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
May 22, 2014, 02:02:01 PM
Guys have some patient.. or GTFO!! So easy!
May 22, 2014, 02:01:35 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
I'd prefer statements like "It's done when it's done." This would prevent such pumps like we just had.
I mean when these guys you hired are experienced programmers they should know that there are always issues in the end. I'm out for the moment.
May 22, 2014, 02:01:25 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
i would rather be TRANSPARENT.
few hours ago, you said you will release a linux wallet as you promised.
then tell us now if you will release it or not.
don't keep us wait here in vain.
there is a process in s/w development, and when we hit the issue today, we have to trace through the code to find the bug, how can I release a wallet with a bug in it?
May 22, 2014, 02:01:22 PM
DEV YOU ARE SPREADING FUDs.
damage done! you have to do something now!
damage done! you have to do something now!
there is NO FUD
Fact 1. Working linux w/ anon code
Fact 2. Anon Code needs more work to meet criteria
would you rather me be silent or FULLY TRANSPARENT?
Evidence is more helpful than words.
Jump to: