[ANN][XCN] Cryptonite | 1st mini-blockchain coin | M7 PoW | No Premine - page 180.

bitfreak!

legendary

Activity: 1536

Merit: 1000

electronic [r]evolution

Quote from: syyyn on July 28, 2014, 01:23:22 AM

Dev spent 10's of thousands of dollars starting this coin? Hahahaha more BS.

Many members here will remember that I had a 28 BTC bounty for anyone capable of developing the mini-blockchain scheme:

[CLOSED] $20,000 Mini-Blockchain Implementation

Admittedly BTC was worth much more at that point in time, and I didn't spend 28 BTC on development, but it was more than 20 BTC. And so far I've only been able to mine 2 blocks myself. So I'm sorry if Windows users feel some how robbed, but there were no guarantees when you decided to use this coin and we have a big obvious red warning plastered on the website which explains how experimental this coin is.

catia

full member

Activity: 288

Merit: 105

Quote from: jly77 on July 28, 2014, 01:31:36 AM

Can the old wallet be used?

Yeah just run the new exe. No delete/upgrade or anything required.

jly77

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: catia on July 28, 2014, 01:25:36 AM

Quote from: prix on July 28, 2014, 01:09:15 AM

Quote from: catia on July 28, 2014, 12:47:10 AM

Quote from: prix on July 28, 2014, 12:02:43 AM

I can't get a transaction from block 1 by the hash.
Can anybody check it?
What's wrong?

Couple things. It was printing the wrong txid, a what you really want to use it getrawtransaction txid 1
This is fixed in github and binaries are building.

Ok. Please, notify when the build will be available.

New binaries http://gpile.it/mbc/ 800/801 vintage

Can the old wallet be used?

WilderX

hero member

Activity: 597

Merit: 504

Quote from: WilderX on July 28, 2014, 12:35:40 AM

Quote from: bitfreak! on July 27, 2014, 11:59:31 PM

Ok we should have working Windows binaries now.

cryptonited-qt:
http://gpile.it/mbc/win64_cryptonite-qt_14072723.exe

cryptonited:
http://gpile.it/mbc/win64_cryptonited_14072723.exe

EDIT: you will probably need to delete the cryptonite folder inside of ~/AppData/Raoming/

Well dev seems to be working so far I did not re-download the dll's tho? No matter?

Still have to say the shit that went down with this launch is not cool.

OK have to take that back all my wallets just went back to 0 balance! STILL NOT WORKING. And I remove the data in roaming folder.

catia

full member

Activity: 288

Merit: 105

Quote from: prix on July 28, 2014, 01:09:15 AM

Quote from: catia on July 28, 2014, 12:47:10 AM

Quote from: prix on July 28, 2014, 12:02:43 AM

I can't get a transaction from block 1 by the hash.
Can anybody check it?
What's wrong?

Couple things. It was printing the wrong txid, a what you really want to use it getrawtransaction txid 1
This is fixed in github and binaries are building.

Ok. Please, notify when the build will be available.

New binaries http://gpile.it/mbc/ 800/801 vintage

syyyn

full member

Activity: 212

Merit: 100

Dev spent 10's of thousands of dollars starting this coin? Hahahaha more BS.

jasemoney

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1008

Forget-about-it

oh my god you guys didnt get coins for 25 minutes of work, complain more!

CrazyLeoW

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

XC

stupid dev, refund our POWER! shit!

dreampursuing

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

This is totally a mistake dissussion thread. Please make it right and relaunch !~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CrazyLeoW

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

XC

Quote from: jly77 on July 28, 2014, 01:15:10 AM

Quote from: catia on July 28, 2014, 01:11:18 AM

The windows chain is not viable. The difficulty adjustment had no effect, so all those coins were mined with minimum difficulty. Part of the problem is people thinking they lost some huge amount of coin when in fact those coins represent 1/1000 or less the work of coins done on the working chain.

So even if you have 200k XCN on that fork, it's probably not even a single blocks worth of work on the other chain. So moral of the story is that it's not practical to move the network to the windows chain and it's also not sane as the total work done in that chain is marginal at best. It seems to be a case of, well I lost mine, so everybody should lose theirs. One of these chains is correct, and the other is decidedly not. It sucks that you mined a weird chain, and I apologize for writing that code. But I am not the distributor of whatever justice you seek and am not going to tell people that the valid proof of works that they found don't count anymore because your miner was broke.

All of this was caused by a single uninitialized variable, and presumably some compiler difference caused this to not be a critical error on linux.

For those of you that think we don't want to restart to keep coins. Let me give you the lowdown. Between bitfreak and I, we have a total of 4 blocks. I'm pretty sure that in any kind of relaunch the results will be the same simply because we are pushing out the code and pushing go at the same time.

Don't waste your time to write these bullshits. Tell us how to get windows wallet work!

Dev, I wanna fuck your grandma!!! fuck off!!! shit!!!

uvt9

sr. member

Activity: 300

Merit: 250

Quote from: jly77 on July 28, 2014, 01:15:10 AM

Don't waste your time to write these bullshits. Tell us how to get windows wallet work!

it's working already, i got synced without needs of adding nodes or conf file. just download wallet plus dll file and wait.

jly77

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: catia on July 28, 2014, 01:11:18 AM

The windows chain is not viable. The difficulty adjustment had no effect, so all those coins were mined with minimum difficulty. Part of the problem is people thinking they lost some huge amount of coin when in fact those coins represent 1/1000 or less the work of coins done on the working chain.

So even if you have 200k XCN on that fork, it's probably not even a single blocks worth of work on the other chain. So moral of the story is that it's not practical to move the network to the windows chain and it's also not sane as the total work done in that chain is marginal at best. It seems to be a case of, well I lost mine, so everybody should lose theirs. One of these chains is correct, and the other is decidedly not. It sucks that you mined a weird chain, and I apologize for writing that code. But I am not the distributor of whatever justice you seek and am not going to tell people that the valid proof of works that they found don't count anymore because your miner was broke.

All of this was caused by a single uninitialized variable, and presumably some compiler difference caused this to not be a critical error on linux.

For those of you that think we don't want to restart to keep coins. Let me give you the lowdown. Between bitfreak and I, we have a total of 4 blocks. I'm pretty sure that in any kind of relaunch the results will be the same simply because we are pushing out the code and pushing go at the same time.

Don't waste your time to write these bullshits. Tell us how to get windows wallet work!

catia

full member

Activity: 288

Merit: 105

Quote from: prix on July 28, 2014, 01:09:15 AM

I got the error when click on "Inputs..." in "Coin Control Features" panel:

Coincontrol is not supported yet.

catia

full member

Activity: 288

Merit: 105

The windows chain is not viable. The difficulty adjustment had no effect, so all those coins were mined with minimum difficulty. Part of the problem is people thinking they lost some huge amount of coin when in fact those coins represent 1/1000 or less the work of coins done on the working chain.

So even if you have 200k XCN on that fork, it's probably not even a single blocks worth of work on the other chain. So moral of the story is that it's not practical to move the network to the windows chain and it's also not sane as the total work done in that chain is marginal at best. It seems to be a case of, well I lost mine, so everybody should lose theirs. One of these chains is correct, and the other is decidedly not. It sucks that you mined a weird chain, and I apologize for writing that code. But I am not the distributor of whatever justice you seek and am not going to tell people that the valid proof of works that they found don't count anymore because your miner was broke.

All of this was caused by a single uninitialized variable, and presumably some compiler difference caused this to not be a critical error on linux.

For those of you that think we don't want to restart to keep coins. Let me give you the lowdown. Between bitfreak and I, we have a total of 4 blocks. I'm pretty sure that in any kind of relaunch the results will be the same simply because we are pushing out the code and pushing go at the same time.

prix

hero member

Activity: 750

Merit: 511

Quote from: catia on July 28, 2014, 12:47:10 AM

Quote from: prix on July 28, 2014, 12:02:43 AM

I can't get a transaction from block 1 by the hash.
Can anybody check it?
What's wrong?

Couple things. It was printing the wrong txid, a what you really want to use it getrawtransaction txid 1
This is fixed in github and binaries are building.

Ok. Please, notify when the build will be available.

I got the error when click on "Inputs..." in "Coin Control Features" panel:

Code:

Assertion failed!
File: walletmodel.cpp, Line 554
Expression: 0

CrazyLeoW

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

XC

Quote from: bitfreak! on July 27, 2014, 11:59:31 PM

Ok we should have working Windows binaries now.

cryptonited-qt:
http://gpile.it/mbc/win64_cryptonite-qt_14072723.exe

cryptonited:
http://gpile.it/mbc/win64_cryptonited_14072723.exe

EDIT: you will probably need to delete the cryptonite folder inside of ~/AppData/Raoming/

Still cannot sync! Dev, Do I need to delete wallet.dat before launch the new wallet?

Vorksholk

legendary

Activity: 1713

Merit: 1029

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: provenceday on July 28, 2014, 12:20:11 AM

Quote from: bitfreak! on July 27, 2014, 11:59:31 PM

Ok we should have working Windows binaries now.

cryptonited-qt:
http://gpile.it/mbc/win64_cryptonite-qt_14072723.exe

cryptonited:
http://gpile.it/mbc/win64_cryptonited_14072723.exe

EDIT: you will probably need to delete the cryptonite folder inside of ~/AppData/Raoming/

main node Please?

+1

From IRC:

[22:32] <@catia> 37.187.229.12
[22:32] <@catia> 37.187.229.14
[22:32] <@catia> 5.9.84.228

watuba

full member

Activity: 211

Merit: 100

This is insane. It's nearing 500MHashes/sec. Is that normal 4 hours into a release? Is it just one giant player, or several big ones?

Vorksholk

legendary

Activity: 1713

Merit: 1029

For what it's worth, I'm a cloud miner who'd be fine with a chain reset, if it's really going to be a downfall of this coin. If you get enough interest, some of the other cloud miners might agree; it's about the long-term for the project. Just my $0.02, I'm happy to stay on the chain I mined on as well.

catia

full member

Activity: 288

Merit: 105

Quote from: prix on July 28, 2014, 12:02:43 AM

I can't get a transaction from block 1 by the hash.
Can anybody check it?
What's wrong?

Couple things. It was printing the wrong txid, a what you really want to use it getrawtransaction txid 1
This is fixed in github and binaries are building.

Code:

./cryptonited getblock 0000007200edbbd3f3500fb6444e5a85ef6f5a10cced726e8d6c8b0b198dd181
{
    "hash" : "0000007200edbbd3f3500fb6444e5a85ef6f5a10cced726e8d6c8b0b198dd181",
    "confirmations" : 814,
    "height" : 1,
    "version" : 1,
    "merkleroot" : "1e08f4eff42623867148e9e80f30345c5c856840535baf9eb6c44ac6c89c7700",
    "accountroot" : "afd20cfd51ecccaffdb1ff548c31de1c388d205e4b2ec58ed3a04a4a1b744c30",
    "time" : 1406509319,
    "nonce" : 16959575210240630596,
    "difficulty" : 1.00000000,
    "chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000200000",
    "previousblockhash" : "000009a460ccc429ac6e53c91c6ed2d96697884b8b656a903042faff8971c5aa",
    "nextblockhash" : "00000151f202d968d8fa074625cb1885d78dbcfcde75a3f0e76a613fcefcb929",
    "size" : 195,
    "tx" : [
        "001f14a48874608a21d1d5e22e7255b2078cbd80fc00ee13183dac30d3e6365a"
    ]
}

Code:

./cryptonited getrawtransaction 001f14a48874608a21d1d5e22e7255b2078cbd80fc00ee13183dac30d3e6365a 1
{
    "hex" : "010000000100000000000000000000000000000000000000000036e4023602000000010036e40236020000727769474f427b8ccc2a189780593529a34cbe27000100000000000000",
    "txid" : "001f14a48874608a21d1d5e22e7255b2078cbd80fc00ee13183dac30d3e6365a",
    "version" : 1,
    "lockheight" : 1,
    "msg" : "",
    "vin" : [
        {
            "coinbase" : true,
            "pubKey" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
            "address" : "CGTta3M4t3yXu8uRgkKvaWd2d8DQvDPnpL",
            "value" : "243.1000000000ep"
        }
    ],
    "vout" : [
        {
            "value" : "243.1000000000ep",
            "n" : 0,
            "pubKey" : "27be4ca32935598097182acc8c7b424f47697772",
            "address" : "CSu8ekNgv8Dwu5tDDgW4FeJMDLXYGFb4by"
        }
    ],
    "blockhash" : "0000007200edbbd3f3500fb6444e5a85ef6f5a10cced726e8d6c8b0b198dd181",
    "confirmations" : 816,
    "time" : 1406509319,
    "blocktime" : 1406509319
}

Topic: [ANN][XCN] Cryptonite | 1st mini-blockchain coin | M7 PoW | No Premine - page 180. (Read 578501 times)