[ANN][XCN] Cryptonite | 1st mini-blockchain coin | M7 PoW | No Premine - page 62.

AizenSou

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

Quote from: darkota on September 30, 2014, 05:07:24 PM

Quote from: AizenSou on September 30, 2014, 01:17:28 PM

Quote from: bitfreak! on September 30, 2014, 12:39:51 PM

Quote from: bybitcoin on September 30, 2014, 08:40:06 AM

@bitfreak: is there any new update about the lightweight browser-based wallet?
I mean the full encrypted version..

Nah I wont get around to that for a while, got some other stuff I need to deal with first.

I just try to search #cryptonite @ twitter and to be honest I'm shocked with the result. No wonder one of the most innovative coins since Bitcoin is still very undervaluated now.
@bitfreak try it yourself Wink

No, it's lack of marketable things. Most bitcoin/crypto users to much dismay, don't understand the features this coin provides via mini blockchain. They understand simpler things like anonymity, tor, speed, or even something new to compliment the mini blockchain this coin already has etc.

+1 exactly. DRK is the leader in anon hype, so when XCN will lead to a new trend ?

darkota

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

Quote from: AizenSou on September 30, 2014, 01:17:28 PM

Quote from: bitfreak! on September 30, 2014, 12:39:51 PM

Quote from: bybitcoin on September 30, 2014, 08:40:06 AM

@bitfreak: is there any new update about the lightweight browser-based wallet?
I mean the full encrypted version..

Nah I wont get around to that for a while, got some other stuff I need to deal with first.

I just try to search #cryptonite @ twitter and to be honest I'm shocked with the result. No wonder one of the most innovative coins since Bitcoin is still very undervaluated now.
@bitfreak try it yourself Wink

No, it's lack of marketable things. Most bitcoin/crypto users to much dismay, don't understand the features this coin provides via mini blockchain. They understand simpler things like anonymity, tor, speed, or even something new to compliment the mini blockchain this coin already has etc.

AizenSou

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

Quote from: bitfreak! on September 30, 2014, 12:39:51 PM

Quote from: bybitcoin on September 30, 2014, 08:40:06 AM

@bitfreak: is there any new update about the lightweight browser-based wallet?
I mean the full encrypted version..

Nah I wont get around to that for a while, got some other stuff I need to deal with first.

I just try to search #cryptonite @ twitter and to be honest I'm shocked with the result. No wonder one of the most innovative coins since Bitcoin is still very undervaluated now.
@bitfreak try it yourself Wink

bitfreak!

legendary

Activity: 1536

Merit: 1000

electronic [r]evolution

Quote from: bybitcoin on September 30, 2014, 08:40:06 AM

@bitfreak: is there any new update about the lightweight browser-based wallet?
I mean the full encrypted version..

Nah I wont get around to that for a while, got some other stuff I need to deal with first.

catia

full member

Activity: 288

Merit: 105

Quote from: theprofileth on September 30, 2014, 04:02:37 AM

Has anyone considered a p2pool approach to decentralizing the mining? Because it would seem that the vast majority of people are mining on 1gh

p2pool is much harder on miniblockchain. Allowing the txset to be modified requires that nodes have a copy of the account trie in order to find the master hash corresponding to the txset. I suppose it could be done. Probably easiest way is to require the miner to be running the daemon and develop some rpc for processing hypothetical txset.

bybitcoin

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

@bitfreak: is there any new update about the lightweight browser-based wallet?
I mean the full encrypted version..

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1240

Quote from: theprofileth on September 30, 2014, 04:02:37 AM

Has anyone considered a p2pool approach to decentralizing the mining? Because it would seem that the vast majority of people are mining on 1gh

I doubt they'll move .. They don't even move yet with multiple pools available...

theprofileth

full member

Activity: 239

Merit: 100

Socialist Cryptocurrency Devote

Has anyone considered a p2pool approach to decentralizing the mining? Because it would seem that the vast majority of people are mining on 1gh

bitfreak!

legendary

Activity: 1536

Merit: 1000

electronic [r]evolution

Quote from: newbybtc on September 29, 2014, 09:38:50 PM

A basic question. When you back up a wallet you are only backing up addresses that have been used already, is that correct? In other words the wallet does not start out with any addresses and each time coins are received, if you generate a receiving address, you need to create a new backup?

I think the wallet starts with one address, obviously it has a zero balance, but the private key for that address will be backed up when you backup your wallet. You have to generate a new address each time you need a new receiving address, and in that case you should create a new backup. This applies to any cryptocurrency, because you need the private key for an address in order to spend from that address. You can re-use the same address over and over again, especially in the mini-blockchain scheme, since each address has a corresponding balance in the account tree. We actually discourage sending coins to an address which doesn't already exist in the account tree (aka an empty address) because it increases the size of the account tree.

go6ooo1212

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

quarkchain.io

Quote from: newbybtc on September 29, 2014, 09:38:50 PM

A basic question. When you back up a wallet you are only backing up addresses that have been used already, is that correct? In other words the wallet does not start out with any addresses and each time coins are received, if you generate a receiving address, you need to create a new backup?

Nope, if you create n number of addresses, they would bach up into your wallet.dat file

newbybtc

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

A basic question. When you back up a wallet you are only backing up addresses that have been used already, is that correct? In other words the wallet does not start out with any addresses and each time coins are received, if you generate a receiving address, you need to create a new backup?

psychofractor

full member

Activity: 137

Merit: 100

$Profile photo of psychofractor$

Quote from: CasualSam on September 29, 2014, 04:29:01 AM

Quote from: bathrobehero on September 28, 2014, 04:26:59 PM

Quote from: psychofractor on September 28, 2014, 05:10:58 AM

Quote from: psychofractor on September 26, 2014, 05:02:19 AM

Quote from: bathrobehero on September 26, 2014, 12:12:48 AM

Crashing started again for me. Now it crashes every few hours, more and more frequently. Only thing that solves it for a while is to completely resync which takes a looong time as it is only using 1 CPU core...

Same problem, can't sync at all, tried from scratch on two different computers.

Finally got the wallets back up and synced, but now this:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/g6xt3mkmc3r34dl/Clipboard01.png?dl=0

Closed the wallet, and it's up again, but a bit worried now...

UPDATE: Second error message after the first one. The wallet runs fine for an hour or two, then it crashes.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xl87oqwwp4acuhf/Clipboard02.png?dl=0

As someone who have been solomining this coin for several weeks now, the crashes got increasingly frequent to the point that the wallet is completely unreliable. With so many transactions and blocks while only using 1 thread (CPU core) to do all the work the wallet became one of the slowest to start and the amount of time it takes ro re-sync is just not even funny.

This is not a solution but have you tried running cryptonited until it syncs, and then kill it and run cryptonite-qt?

Wallet crashes when I close it... This is on my cold wallet computer, while it has been running stable on my hot wallet computer for two days now, fingers crossed...

CasualSam

member

Activity: 85

Merit: 11

Quote from: bathrobehero on September 28, 2014, 04:26:59 PM

Quote from: psychofractor on September 28, 2014, 05:10:58 AM

Quote from: psychofractor on September 26, 2014, 05:02:19 AM

Quote from: bathrobehero on September 26, 2014, 12:12:48 AM

Crashing started again for me. Now it crashes every few hours, more and more frequently. Only thing that solves it for a while is to completely resync which takes a looong time as it is only using 1 CPU core...

Same problem, can't sync at all, tried from scratch on two different computers.

Finally got the wallets back up and synced, but now this:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/g6xt3mkmc3r34dl/Clipboard01.png?dl=0

Closed the wallet, and it's up again, but a bit worried now...

UPDATE: Second error message after the first one. The wallet runs fine for an hour or two, then it crashes.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xl87oqwwp4acuhf/Clipboard02.png?dl=0

As someone who have been solomining this coin for several weeks now, the crashes got increasingly frequent to the point that the wallet is completely unreliable. With so many transactions and blocks while only using 1 thread (CPU core) to do all the work the wallet became one of the slowest to start and the amount of time it takes ro re-sync is just not even funny.

This is not a solution but have you tried running cryptonited until it syncs, and then kill it and run cryptonite-qt?

e.nexus

member

Activity: 96

Merit: 25

I do pretty much the same and it's never crashed, are you sure your ram isn't on the way out?

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Quote from: psychofractor on September 28, 2014, 05:10:58 AM

Quote from: psychofractor on September 26, 2014, 05:02:19 AM

Quote from: bathrobehero on September 26, 2014, 12:12:48 AM

Crashing started again for me. Now it crashes every few hours, more and more frequently. Only thing that solves it for a while is to completely resync which takes a looong time as it is only using 1 CPU core...

Same problem, can't sync at all, tried from scratch on two different computers.

Finally got the wallets back up and synced, but now this:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/g6xt3mkmc3r34dl/Clipboard01.png?dl=0

Closed the wallet, and it's up again, but a bit worried now...

UPDATE: Second error message after the first one. The wallet runs fine for an hour or two, then it crashes.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xl87oqwwp4acuhf/Clipboard02.png?dl=0

As someone who have been solomining this coin for several weeks now, the crashes got increasingly frequent to the point that the wallet is completely unreliable. With so many transactions and blocks while only using 1 thread (CPU core) to do all the work the wallet became one of the slowest to start and the amount of time it takes ro re-sync is just not even funny.

psychofractor

full member

Activity: 137

Merit: 100

$Profile photo of psychofractor$

Updated message on the wallet crash:

Finally got the wallets back up and synced, but now this:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/g6xt3mkmc3r34dl/Clipboard01.png?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xl87oqwwp4acuhf/Clipboard02.png?dl=0

The wallet runs fine for an hour or two, then it crashes.

darkota

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

Let's get this added to Cryptsy.

CasualSam

member

Activity: 85

Merit: 11

Quote from: bitfreak! on September 28, 2014, 04:29:19 AM

Quote from: CasualSam on September 28, 2014, 03:12:04 AM

Quote from: CasualSam on September 27, 2014, 07:50:07 AM

Possibly an official pool? Perhaps me/wolf0/xcn for 0.5%/0.5%/1%?

Bitfreak: Not interested in an official pool? I thought you might want some extra dev fund income for at least the short term. Would also probably be in the interest of any existing (non-1gh) pools to partner up with you.

Too many things to worry about with running a pool, it's not a simple undertaking if done properly, and I'd rather not have to concern myself constantly with the smooth operation of pool, I've already got enough things to worry about. It's best left to the people with experience in running pools imo.

Fair enough. I got a bit ahead of myself anyway. My implementation is full stratum so I had to modify the miners to support it. Not ideal for production as I don't have the expertise to get them building under windows. Anyway I'll hopefully be able to release the source late next week which might help other pools get established.

Edit: If there is any bounty for an open source pool I'll donate it towards an amd miner. Anyone else want to make a pledge?

lucazane

legendary

Activity: 1198

Merit: 1000