Code:
// limit number of getslice from the same peer
Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), 2);
Just ban node for many getslice? Or there is fixed number of getslice() for full sync?
Topic: [ANN][XCN] Cryptonite - NEW Thread | 1st mini-blockchain coin | Bounties! - page 117. (Read 215666 times)
August 10, 2017, 06:44:52 AM
Do you think that it is clean?
Just ban node for many getslice? Or there is fixed number of getslice() for full sync?
Just ban node for many getslice? Or there is fixed number of getslice() for full sync?
August 10, 2017, 06:44:07 AM
Faucet are dry.. need some donation here.. 
I will send some coins from the fund, as soon as I have access to the machine with the wallet (network issues).
EDIT: meanwhile, if someone wants to send some coins, you are very welcome! This is the address: CVftwe8kKSnwM3ruTy6yRVypydtkQ1xvqU
August 10, 2017, 06:41:48 AM
Faucet are dry.. need some donation here..
August 10, 2017, 06:41:17 AM
Pushed some commits to github:
- Avoid possible sync loop
- Fixed transaction export
- Bump version
If you compiled your own wallet, especially if you run in server mode (i.e. allowing incoming connections), please update.
Great! Though I'm assuming that there will be no compiled Windows version, so neither us Windows users without the proper knowledge or btc38 can take advantage of the new commits. Unless, of course, someone compiles one. And it didn't seem especially easy, not even for a friend of mine which is a developer. Something about no proper and clear instructions, I don't know. Don't ask because I don't know.- Avoid possible sync loop
- Fixed transaction export
- Bump version
If you compiled your own wallet, especially if you run in server mode (i.e. allowing incoming connections), please update.
There are no differences compared to any other coin forked from bitcoin around the same time (beginning of 2014), as far as compilation is concerned (i.e. same dependancies).
I'm contacting bitfreak to ask for a windows build, he has a working windows compile environment.
August 10, 2017, 06:38:09 AM
Pushed some commits to github:
- Avoid possible sync loop
- Fixed transaction export
- Bump version
If you compiled your own wallet, especially if you run in server mode (i.e. allowing incoming connections), please update.
Great! Though I'm assuming that there will be no compiled Windows version, so neither us Windows users without the proper knowledge or btc38 can take advantage of the new commits. Unless, of course, someone compiles one. And it didn't seem especially easy, not even for a friend of mine which is an app developer (for Android mainly).- Avoid possible sync loop
- Fixed transaction export
- Bump version
If you compiled your own wallet, especially if you run in server mode (i.e. allowing incoming connections), please update.
Could a reason for the "bad nodes" that has been talked about be because of outdated Windows wallets?
August 10, 2017, 05:56:56 AM
Pushed some commits to github:
- Avoid possible sync loop
- Fixed transaction export
- Bump version
If you compiled your own wallet, especially if you run in server mode (i.e. allowing incoming connections), please update.
- Avoid possible sync loop
- Fixed transaction export
- Bump version
If you compiled your own wallet, especially if you run in server mode (i.e. allowing incoming connections), please update.
August 10, 2017, 05:13:40 AM
Don't forget that xcn is having constantly 1 million USD daily trade volume in the past months, and with peeks of more than 10 M$.
I don't understand how this can be called "lack of interest".
I don't understand how this can be called "lack of interest".
Think JasonSW meant that lack of mass-used exchanges and difficulties turn users off Cryptonite, it's not one of that coins you can just "hop into", mine and dump
Sounds like a good thing :-)
And it's exactly about those difficulties my current work is: bringing the fixes and not new features (yet); bring them having tested long enough to avoid any more issues or chain forks.
August 10, 2017, 04:35:44 AM
Don't forget that xcn is having constantly 1 million USD daily trade volume in the past months, and with peeks of more than 10 M$.
I don't understand how this can be called "lack of interest".
I don't understand how this can be called "lack of interest".
Think JasonSW meant that lack of mass-used exchanges and difficulties turn users off Cryptonite, it's not one of that coins you can just "hop into", mine and dump
And volume shows interest to coin, yes, at least on Chinese market.
August 10, 2017, 04:17:26 AM
Don't forget that xcn is having constantly 1 million USD daily trade volume in the past months, and with peeks of more than 10 M$.
I don't understand how this can be called "lack of interest".
I don't understand how this can be called "lack of interest".
August 10, 2017, 03:25:47 AM
ocminer not answer me. May be pallas can help - as I think my ip is banned by ocminer scripts. not web and stratum.
Coin is towards dead, less people interested to it. There aren't updates so far since takeover pretty much telling incapable of new dev except few fixes, and don't even want to try out the sync issue fixed or not.
Can't agree, can't disagree. Just look at Signatum. Coin success nowadays is all about hype created around that particular coin. We all come and join hypes, it's human nature, we like smooth design, style, it attracts our eyes, when everybody tells everywhere about bright future we don't want to miss a chance. You don't need to go far, just compare Cryptonite website and Signatum website. Which one would you choose?
But don't forget about technology.
Blockchain is technology, miniblockchain is technology, new hashing algo (actually not) is not a technological feature, marketplace is a great idea, but still nothing spare with technological innovation, we've seen it before.
Cryptonite needs that designer guys, PR-hypers, media coverage, add these people to the project - it'll be on bittrex in a month or two, that's how it rolls now.
Just my personal opinion.
August 09, 2017, 11:56:05 PM
ocminer not answer me. May be pallas can help - as I think my ip is banned by ocminer scripts. not web and stratum.
Coin is towards dead, less people interested to it. There aren't updates so far since takeover pretty much telling incapable of new dev except few fixes, and don't even want to try out the sync issue fixed or not.
August 09, 2017, 10:28:17 PM
ocminer not answer me. May be pallas can help - as I think my ip is banned by ocminer scripts. not web and stratum.
August 09, 2017, 05:07:49 PM
I've contacted to Novaexchange about my lost XCN, they do not see any transactions to the wallet, but Suprnova shows coins were transfered.
What should I do in this case?
What should I do in this case?
Use a third party source, like a block explorer, to show them the coins.
As pallas said, I provided to Nova support block info with my transaction. Coins appeared in wallet few hour later.
Now Nova refuses my sell orders - "Trades for XCN has been disabled, probably wallet issues. Check coininfo under balances."
Coininfo shows - all ok.
August 09, 2017, 03:34:55 PM
A bit optimised m7 kernels, this time it's pure Djm34 work + my tweaks (not palginmod)
+7% on maxwell+windows+x86...
edit: with oc, 970 13+ MH, 980ti 21+ MH
August 09, 2017, 03:12:36 PM
supernova web in down, but stratum work...it seems.
SNova works fine! Web and stratum
August 09, 2017, 02:56:09 PM
supernova web in down, but stratum work...it seems.
August 09, 2017, 01:37:41 PM
You should have asked beforehand, now it's in the wild ;-)
Will you publish the sources?
Will you publish the sources?
Not now, so removed
I have the same results between the 2 versions
You are faster with the x86 version on a windows 10 x64 install ?
You are faster with the x86 version on a windows 10 x64 install ?
x86 is faster, yes. Just make sure you have VC++ Runtime 2015 x86 installed (download one from Microsoft site).
indeed ! yes I can see it now yo'r right.
Anyway, I'll love to test the 'optimised' xcn miner ^^
But it's very expensive for the gain added
August 09, 2017, 01:13:13 PM
You should have asked beforehand, now it's in the wild ;-)
Will you publish the sources?
Will you publish the sources?
Not now, so removed
It's ok, you can keep it, I was just curious to see what tweaks you did. :-)
August 09, 2017, 01:03:18 PM
You should have asked beforehand, now it's in the wild ;-)
Will you publish the sources?
Will you publish the sources?
Not now, so removed
I have the same results between the 2 versions
You are faster with the x86 version on a windows 10 x64 install ?
You are faster with the x86 version on a windows 10 x64 install ?
x86 is faster, yes. Just make sure you have VC++ Runtime 2015 x86 installed (download one from Microsoft site).
August 09, 2017, 12:55:09 PM
A bit optimised m7 kernels, this time it's pure Djm34 work + my tweaks (not palginmod)
On my testrig:
1060 3G ~ 12+ MH
1080 ~ 18+
x86 is generally faster.
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_djm34.zip
On my testrig:
1060 3G ~ 12+ MH
1080 ~ 18+
x86 is generally faster.
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_djm34.zip
I have the same results between the 2 versions
You are faster with the x86 version on a windows 10 x64 install ?
Jump to: