Author

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 110. (Read 1276936 times)

sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 250
The Medici thing did help in pumping the XCP price a lot and I personally benefited from that pump. However, to be honest the final outcome seems not so good and the progress of counterparty itself was significantly slowed down by the digress of its two core devs. Hopefully, the return of core devs could help counterparty to secure its advantage of being the first usable BTC based 2.0 platform.

Que?

The final outcome is that Medici is still using XCP, and that new (!) devs were hired for Counterparty as soon as Overstock started Medici.

That Medici is also adding other platforms as well as XCP later somehow a negative thing? So increasing liquidity and connecting platforms with Counterparty is somehow the end of the world and a reason to sell? I was expecting it to pump the price even further, but after all, the markets are irrational!

If I told you that Example Exchange A is adding XCP to be tradeable with something else, like XCP or litecoin, would everyone also dump and cry?

Medici is using XCP primarily, adding support for other platforms, and the Counterparty dev team is coding and growing. That people are selling at the burn price makes me laugh, reminds me of Ronald Wayne, who sold 10% of Apple for $800... Keep selling guys, there's always someone with stronger hands at the other side.

P.S. If I had more BTC to spend at the moment, I'd join the bandwagon of being uncomfortable about the Medici situation too and post nervously... Because you gotta remember, crypto is a free for all... If someone convinces you to buy high and sell low, well. They win. Wink
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
The Medici thing did help in pumping the XCP price a lot and I personally benefited from that pump. However, to be honest the final outcome seems not so good and the progress of counterparty itself was significantly slowed down by the digress of its two core devs. Hopefully, the return of core devs could help counterparty to secure its advantage of being the first usable BTC based 2.0 platform.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
On Reddit I argued that the XCP price decline is nothing to worry about.
http://www.reddit.com/r/counterparty_xcp/comments/2xjm4w/a_low_xcp_price_is_not_that_bad/

Comments / feedback are welcome.

I've been buying more  Smiley Crazy some people are willing to sell below 0.004, probably many of them got in during the burn but BTC was also $500-600 back then. At these low price levels, the USD value of one XCP is close to what it was during the burn.
legendary
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io

Further info....

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/19401/developing-story-bitcoin-foundation-elections-shambles-candidates-call-restart/

In short, there wasn't any technical problem, but the way it was handled was clunky and required a lot of steps (not surprisingly since everybody voting would have had to register a BTC address from which they were voting), and apparently the guy who decided to go with the plan didn't consult with everybody first and some folks got a little pissy about some of the implementation details such as whose name was listed first in the voting.... ah, politics.  Furthermore, some people had valid concerns about the public's ability to see the results in real-time, which could discourage others from voting or otherwise affect the outcome.

The Election result are out at https://blog.bitcoinfoundation.org/election-results/

The irony here is that the "END" results were actually similar to the "rebooted" Blockchain Vote that was held earlier. Going by the results at https://blockscan.com/votecampaign/btcfoundation

Olivier Janssens - 63 Yes Votes

Jim Harper - 59 Yes Votes

Michael Perklin - 37 Yes Votes

Bruce Fenton - 45 Yes

Which basically means both Olivier Janssens and Jim Harper would have made the cut either way, with the first and second most number of votes.
member
Activity: 150
Merit: 29
Happy mother of 5 children
On Reddit I argued that the XCP price decline is nothing to worry about.
http://www.reddit.com/r/counterparty_xcp/comments/2xjm4w/a_low_xcp_price_is_not_that_bad/

Comments / feedback are welcome.
sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 250
Literally 0 of the problems with the election were caused by Counterparty, why would that affect the price?! I don't think I'll ever understand the markets...
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
This message was too old and has been purged
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Where's this "news" we've been talking about for months? That's probably the reason for the dump. I feel like dumping myself.


As far as my memory can prevail, Adam has been a man of his word. Even if Counterwallet is far from optimally operational, I believe that some day they will get there.

That's why I'm not dumping.
member
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
Where's this "news" we've been talking about for months? That's probably the reason for the dump. I feel like dumping myself.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114

Does this have to do with today's price crash? About 12-14%.

Somebody had to say something.
member
Activity: 150
Merit: 29
Happy mother of 5 children
More than 10,000 assets have been created to date. It's apparent that the wast majority of these have been taken by squatters.

I won't discuss whether squatting is good or bad, but it is a reality we have to deal with. Thankfully the DEX can at least make it convenient to buy and sell asset ownerships.

The owner of an asset should be able to place an offer for his asset, and anyone should be able to place a bid for any asset. If this were possible in Counterwallet I think we'd seen a boost in activity.

Imagine the attention prime assets such as GOLD or SILVER might get. Or every now and then someone would place a high bid on their own name, e.g. 100 XCP for PETER.

And whereas a DEX for regular trading seems to lose to centralized exchanges, I believe the DEX is ideal for buying and selling asset ownerships.
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
I know that you guys have implemented Ethereum but have you considered implementing AT (http://ciyam.org/at) which is actually running *live* already (on the Burst blockchain).

The world's first "decentralised lottery" and "crowdfunding app" has been achieved with this tech in the last couple of months.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
That's OK, I have faith you guys will get your s--- together pretty soon. I would buy even more but the price keeps sinking every time that happens.

It would be nice to get a working http://redeem.bitwatch.co/ or else get Counterwallet to work properly with that. Because it doesn't work right now, and its irritating and makes trading on Counterwallet rather unaffordable/impractical compared to your competitors.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500

Further info....

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/19401/developing-story-bitcoin-foundation-elections-shambles-candidates-call-restart/

In short, there wasn't any technical problem, but the way it was handled was clunky and required a lot of steps (not surprisingly since everybody voting would have had to register a BTC address from which they were voting), and apparently the guy who decided to go with the plan didn't consult with everybody first and some folks got a little pissy about some of the implementation details such as whose name was listed first in the voting.... ah, politics.  Furthermore, some people had valid concerns about the public's ability to see the results in real-time, which could discourage others from voting or otherwise affect the outcome.
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
Counterparty General Manager
New Update is live with the details about the upcoming election for Counterparty Foundation community seats http://counterparty.io/news/counterparty-update-feb-27/
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1002
Hello Counterparty Community, I recently had an epiphany (PICISI) about a crowdfunding cooperative involving 10 CC communities that could actually rival Kickstarter and Indiegogo ... well that truly idea died quickly when I realized that everyone loved the idea but only a hand full was willing to do the work.   Anyway, since PICISI impossible to do with only a few people, I'm hoping to do a massively scaled down version of PICISI so that we could get our feet wet in the crowdfunding space while building the brand, upgrading the site, and maturing relationships so that in 6 mos, when we reintroduce PICISI, it will be the site it was initially designed to be.  

At this point I want to raise funds to create the site, when I viewed this video: http://youtu.be/fr0sHxUQ-FQ?t=4m30s (from 4:30 to 5:52) it described how someone could raise funds using your resources.  I have some questions: how can we set the opening price?  how can we set a minimum value for the token?  can we have a private market where we only sell to those we select?  

The tokens will have actual value since they could be used to buy sponsorship opportunities at the site.

Are we able to reserve a token now for launch 6 months in the future?  Can we add more tokens (dilution) at a later date?  

Thanks for your help in this regard


Wow you asked the perfect question for an article which by coincidence just came out about 6 days ago with all the answers you need Wink

https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/crypto-for-change-how-to-create-your-first-token-and-distribute-it





The share distributor looks like a cool tool. Will test it out later.


Quote
Step 5. Distributing your tokens.

Now you have these sweet new tokens, you need a way to distribute them. One way is to send out tokens individually using Counterwallet, of course. If you're doing a mass distribution, you can can access the share distributor courtesy of the developers at Let's Talk Bitcoin!This tool lets you upload a CSV sheet with Counterparty addresses and the amount of your token you wish to distribute to each address and then does the job for you.

Unfortunately, the share distributor does not work on Testnet, so you will have to send out your testnet coins to other people on Testnet in the traditional way.

To access the share distributor, visit the dashboard section of your LTB account and click the “Share Distributor” option on in the lefthand menu under LTBcoin.

full member
Activity: 176
Merit: 100
Ain't no party like a Counterparty!
Hello Counterparty Community, I recently had an epiphany (PICISI) about a crowdfunding cooperative involving 10 CC communities that could actually rival Kickstarter and Indiegogo ... well that truly idea died quickly when I realized that everyone loved the idea but only a hand full was willing to do the work.   Anyway, since PICISI impossible to do with only a few people, I'm hoping to do a massively scaled down version of PICISI so that we could get our feet wet in the crowdfunding space while building the brand, upgrading the site, and maturing relationships so that in 6 mos, when we reintroduce PICISI, it will be the site it was initially designed to be.  

At this point I want to raise funds to create the site, when I viewed this video: http://youtu.be/fr0sHxUQ-FQ?t=4m30s (from 4:30 to 5:52) it described how someone could raise funds using your resources.  I have some questions: how can we set the opening price?  how can we set a minimum value for the token?  can we have a private market where we only sell to those we select?  

The tokens will have actual value since they could be used to buy sponsorship opportunities at the site.

Are we able to reserve a token now for launch 6 months in the future?  Can we add more tokens (dilution) at a later date?  

Thanks for your help in this regard


Wow you asked the perfect question for an article which by coincidence just came out about 6 days ago with all the answers you need Wink

https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/crypto-for-change-how-to-create-your-first-token-and-distribute-it
full member
Activity: 176
Merit: 100
Ain't no party like a Counterparty!
Instead of proclamations and simple bloviation on the future of the technology, in Counterparty fashion, we're operationally positioning things so that the base technology achieves (hopefully) indefinite sustainability...

This is exactly why I love you guys, this is why I pace myself with my collection of xcp and merely check in with your twitter page and this forum once a week or even once a month because I know that rather than talk about what you will do you guys always just DO things first and let the world talk about it. I can't wait to see what you all do next Wink
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
 Cry I guess it didn't work for some reason, as they are going to another platform (off-blockchain) for the voting......
Jump to: