Author

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 239. (Read 1276789 times)

sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
I actually had no real interest in investing in Swarm, I just did it as a test to see if I could at least buy some asset. Yes, if it were easier I would probably purchase more assets. I don't care that much about the exact rate. It is very hard to figure out how much I would normally be paying anyhow.

As an asset issuer, this would be a huge plus though, since it would make it much more simple for people to buy my asset. I would not even have to tell them the other more complicated ways of buying it.

- Eric

Thanks Eric. FYI, Swarm is using a vending machine based upon the code from Vennd (www.vennd.io).

Regards,

Jeremy.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
I actually had no real interest in investing in Swarm, I just did it as a test to see if I could at least buy some asset. Yes, if it were easier I would probably purchase more assets. I don't care that much about the exact rate. It is very hard to figure out how much I would normally be paying anyhow.

As an asset issuer, this would be a huge plus though, since it would make it much more simple for people to buy my asset. I would not even have to tell them the other more complicated ways of buying it.

- Eric
sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
I posted earlier about my troubles in counterwallet.co buying XCP and then an asset using BTC (I never ended up with any XCP or the asset), but I read an article today about
Swarm so I decided to try investing my counterwallet.co BTC balance in that instead because it sounded a lot easier. I just followed the instructions on the main page of swarmcorp.com, which said "Send BTC from your counterwallet to the SWARM address" (I could have instead sent XCP to a different address if I had any XCP). I left my wallet open (it was unclear if I could close it or not for this to work) and 2 hours later I came back to my computer and now have 2 SWARMPRE in my counterwallet.co wallet. It could not have been any easier. I am not sure how Swarm was able to do that, but all the Countercoin assets should be setup that way.

- Eric


Thanks for the feedback Eric. For your information, you don't need to leave Counterwallet open to receive SWARMPRE.

Question for you and other people who are interested in investing in XCP. If the same process was available to you, would you take that option? The price would be advertised on a web page, like a BTC ticker. However, purchasing through such a means may incur slightly worse rate (say 5%) for the convenience and ease of transaction. There are other options to purchase XCP: DEx, centralised exchanges and between users but this would be just another option available to people.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
I posted earlier about my troubles in counterwallet.co buying XCP and then an asset using BTC (I never ended up with any XCP or the asset), but I read an article today about
Swarm so I decided to try investing my counterwallet.co BTC balance in that instead because it sounded a lot easier. I just followed the instructions on the main page of swarmcorp.com, which said "Send BTC from your counterwallet to the SWARM address" (I could have instead sent XCP to a different address if I had any XCP). I left my wallet open (it was unclear if I could close it or not for this to work) and 2 hours later I came back to my computer and now have 2 SWARMPRE in my counterwallet.co wallet. It could not have been any easier. I am not sure how Swarm was able to do that, but all the Countercoin assets should be setup that way.

- Eric


 
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
It would help the fee issue if CP allows as many tx as possible to lump into one send.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 254
Editor-in-Chief of Let's Talk Bitcoin!
What do you think of setting up a new type of order using XCP that essentially lets anyone do a "kickstarter" style threshold-or-everyone-is-refunded asset sale order?

" I'm buying x TOKEN for y, but only once amount z is bought at the same time."

Those orders would accumulate and then excute all at once, as soon as the goal is reached. Optionally you could put a date your order expires, which is a personal "end of campaign" threshold for each person.

and it would only be possible with an XCP based instrument, so bitcoin would be out and XCP is suddenly the crowdfunding token because it can be escrowed

That would take all the trust off platforms like swarm and coinpowers, and be one of the first real uses of escrowing on the blockchain, and a damn good use for XCP - Bitcoin is the currency, and XCP is the crowdfunding/cryptofinance platform built on top.

Ok, so slight revision

the action is "I will buy A of B if C total amount of B is also purchased at the same time.  I was sent here by Z"

Z is a referrer payment address, it would get 1% or a user defined split of the tokens, which comes out of the crowdfunders side.  Basically 99% would be assigned to the sender and 1% would be assigned to the referrer, this would make it very worthwhile to run a site with a selection of campaigns that will attract investment.

So now the incentives say that an ideal crowdfunding site should have ALL the projects currently seeking funds who people will actually send money to, because they earn a little of
everyone they bring in

It is hugely expanded coverage for any but the largest crowdfunding campaign, and the cost is only 1%.  There is almost no infrastructure or financial or compliance cost because the

crowdfunding sites no longer do anything but showcase

and individuals even just on a blog can be a "Crowdfunding site" in this model

and it's (I believe) the first affiliate program built into a coin
-

Many of the problems of XCP use right now are caused by the chicken/egg of XCP being a much better currency to use (from a user experiance and cost standpoint), but few people having it and the standard way of acquiring it (for Bitcoin) is one of the clunkiest types of tx in the Counterparty system.

Soon you'll be able to open a counterwallet, send it some bitcoin, send some of the bitcoin to a Vending machine address which will send you back XCP at the days rate.  That is days or weeks away, hang tight.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin
PhantomPhreak - Yes, it seems like all those issues can be easily fixed with Counterparty. And yes, using BTC was part of the problem, but I only used BTC because I first tried to buy XCP (using BTC) at the market price and the order never completed, so after 3 hours I gave up and tried it using BTC instead.

 


This idea isn't going to work . CounterParty just introduced a BUTTload more complexity onto Bitcoin. People still don't even get what Bitcoin is let alone some confusing thing called Counterparty!   Plus, most of this is highly illegal. Just setting up a database for the SEC to go after ?  Good idea in general, but it will fail miserably.
sr. member
Activity: 335
Merit: 255
Counterparty Developer
(No fees for cancelled orders).

The only fees are miners fees for the cancel transaction.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
I shudder to think how much I have spend on btc transaction fees on failed sales of xcp for btc.  Order cancel themselves especially mysteriously or the btc holders are logged out so the do not pay...  Meh.

Yeah, I agree that this is a problem.  Pissing away satoshis on mysteriously failed orders doesn't feel good.  I realize that the amounts involved are small, but multiply by X and they get bigger.

They need to be more like the real exchanges in this area. (No fees for cancelled orders). Would encourage people to make more use of the CP exchange.
sr. member
Activity: 386
Merit: 250
One of the reasons that there is not a rush of outside developers creating Counterparty add-ons...

You may not see them yet, but this statement is very incorrect. 

That is good to hear.
hero member
Activity: 647
Merit: 510
Counterpartying
Additionally, my model has significantly lower startup costs than a comparable model that does not use Counterparty.
Could you please expand a little bit on that? What sort of costs Counterparty allow a startup to avoid?

My knowledge of what it takes to make a start up is weak.

Because Counterparty escrows funds and I never have access to them, I don't have to worry about creating user account capability, cold storage, two factor authentication, none of that. I just have to broadcast feeds and display that information on a website, and that is significantly less complex than running a sportsbook. This is part of the reason why a standard vig at an online sportsbook is 5-10% and on BetXCP the commission is a flat 0.5%.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 254
Editor-in-Chief of Let's Talk Bitcoin!
One of the reasons that there is not a rush of outside developers creating Counterparty add-ons...

You may not see them yet, but this statement is very incorrect. 
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
from what I understand, there is nothing stopping the issuer from diluting assets on counterparty by issuing more and more. unlike an alt-chain, where the distribution schedule is built into the distributed protocol.  very confusing. Is there any docs comparing and contrasting counterparty assets vs stand alone alt-coins?

An asset may be "locked", i.e., prevented from issuing any more units.  Everyone can see whether an asset is locked or not.  Of course people will be wary of assets that are unlocked.  In these cases, it will come down to a matter of trust in the asset issuer.  An asset such as LTBCOIN has good reasons for issuing more coins as they go along, and of course Adam Levine has a vested interest in avoiding any deviation from the issuance plan which he laid out in advance of the coin being created.
sr. member
Activity: 410
Merit: 250
Proof-of-Skill - protoblock.com
from what I understand, there is nothing stopping the issuer from diluting assets on counterparty by issuing more and more. unlike an alt-chain, where the distribution schedule is built into the distributed protocol.  very confusing. Is there any docs comparing and contrasting counterparty assets vs stand alone alt-coins?
sr. member
Activity: 386
Merit: 250
One of the reasons that there is not a rush of outside developers creating Counterparty add-ons is that the CP devs cannot offer bounties, like pre-mined coins can. They are not sitting on a stash themselves, and did not reserve such a horde for development. I think the lack of a pre-mine or IPO is a good thing, but at the moment it handicaps the development of an entire system around XCP. So how can this problem become a virtue?

One answer is Swarm. This is precisely the kind of situation that the kickstarter-like crowdfunding platform is made for. Unfortunately, Swarm won't be ready for awhile. Is it possible to create something shorter term that is custom-made for raising escrowed funds (to create bounties) that would encourage outside developers to create functionality for the Counterparty system? Could the CP devs do the escrow themselves, say, by creating an asset which anyone could buy? What if they created, say, asset CPGUI, with specific terms about what a GUI would require (code-wise), how the coders of the GUI would be paid, etc? How would buyers/holders of this asset get paid back?

Is any of this making sense, or are there logical/logistical problems with trying to fund development by issuing such an asset? Would the original CP devs welcome the work of outside developers?   
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
I shudder to think how much I have spend on btc transaction fees on failed sales of xcp for btc.  Order cancel themselves especially mysteriously or the btc holders are logged out so the do not pay...  Meh.

Yeah, I agree that this is a problem.  Pissing away satoshis on mysteriously failed orders doesn't feel good.  I realize that the amounts involved are small, but multiply by X and they get bigger.
legendary
Activity: 861
Merit: 1010
Additionally, my model has significantly lower startup costs than a comparable model that does not use Counterparty.
Could you please expand a little bit on that? What sort of costs Counterparty allow a startup to avoid?

My knowledge of what it takes to make a start up is weak.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
Please  yield to the community voice about a new front end. I am spending 2 hours a day trying to teach people about how to use the system and why it is so confusing. I have had 2 people just give up and say to hell with it, very discouraging  Embarrassed. Most people have no clue what counterparty is either so a little bit of PR might help to.
Thats sad to read, and will repeat itself again and again, until the recurring theme of confusion with use, is addressed.

@Devs. Genuine question.... when you first formulated your ideas with XCP, who were the type of people you saw happily clicking away on the finished platform?

Also, what Adam said about escrowing on the blockchain surely is a candidate for a 'killer app' scenario, if done right, and could represent a wide demographic of usage.  

legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
I shudder to think how much I have spend on btc transaction fees on failed sales of xcp for btc.  Order cancel themselves especially mysteriously or the btc holders are logged out so the do not pay...  Meh.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
sparta_cuss - nxtreporting.com is exactly what I was suggesting, thanks. They should build that directly into the NXT wallet.
Jump to: