[ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 285.

Anotheranonlol

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 504

Quote from: JahPowerBit on May 03, 2014, 02:47:11 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

2. The need to have BTC dust in order to send XCP:

Again, I understand why this is required but it does impact usability, since you first need to send dust to the address before doing anything. This is just a suggestion and it would obviously need to be funded somehow, but is there some way of automatically sending dust to an address whenever it is needed? Perhaps if funds from the “fee required” were sent to a dev-controlled address as discussed above they could then be reallocated towards proving dust to addresses whenever it’s needed. Just throwing the idea out there so feel free to comment or criticize. I think it is only 0.0001086 BTC that’s required, so you could fund 100K transactions with less than 11 BTC. Seems like a decent price to me for enhanced usability and I would be happy to donate to something like that.

IMHO, It's the job of the wallet. It's sufficient to have a single address with a bit of BTC in the wallet. This can be a nice feature to add to the Counterwallet.

I thought this was already implemented, pretty damn smoothly too from what i experienced.

When I went to sweet privkeys from burn, I could simply paste a privkey of a wallet containing enough BTC dust, without having to send that BTC first to the wallet that contained XCP

Quote from: nxt123.cn on May 03, 2014, 11:26:42 PM

so,where's this wiki page

https://wiki.counterparty.co/w/Main_Page

nxt123.cn

member

Activity: 86

Merit: 10

so,where's this wiki page

JahPowerBit

sr. member

Activity: 335

Merit: 255

Counterparty Developer

Quote from: ?? on ??

2. The need to have BTC dust in order to send XCP:

Again, I understand why this is required but it does impact usability, since you first need to send dust to the address before doing anything. This is just a suggestion and it would obviously need to be funded somehow, but is there some way of automatically sending dust to an address whenever it is needed? Perhaps if funds from the “fee required” were sent to a dev-controlled address as discussed above they could then be reallocated towards proving dust to addresses whenever it’s needed. Just throwing the idea out there so feel free to comment or criticize. I think it is only 0.0001086 BTC that’s required, so you could fund 100K transactions with less than 11 BTC. Seems like a decent price to me for enhanced usability and I would be happy to donate to something like that.

IMHO, It's the job of the wallet. It's sufficient to have a single address with a bit of BTC in the wallet. This can be a nice feature to add to the Counterwallet.

td services

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

black swan hunter

Quote from: ?? on ??

2. The need to have BTC dust in order to send XCP:

Again, I understand why this is required but it does impact usability, since you first need to send dust to the address before doing anything. This is just a suggestion and it would obviously need to be funded somehow, but is there some way of automatically sending dust to an address whenever it is needed? Perhaps if funds from the “fee required” were sent to a dev-controlled address as discussed above they could then be reallocated towards proving dust to addresses whenever it’s needed. Just throwing the idea out there so feel free to comment or criticize. I think it is only 0.0001086 BTC that’s required, so you could fund 100K transactions with less than 11 BTC. Seems like a decent price to me for enhanced usability and I would be happy to donate to something like that.

Sounds like we need a dustbin to pull dust from as needed.

Matt Y

hero member

Activity: 647

Merit: 510

Counterpartying

Very interesting, thanks.

TheMightyX

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Vires in Numeris

Quote from: ?? on ??

I ran some numbers today on trading volume for XCP (excluding the DEX). I excluded the first few days of Poloniex (anything before the white hat) and got the following results. I used cryptocoincharts as my data source.

- Poloniex (USD): 175,399.60067
- Bter (USD): 166,197.287
- Bter (CNY): 59,930.5637
TOTAL: 401,527.45137

So since inception we have turned over ~ 15% of all XCP.

Thats a much more positive view than the current price would lead you to.

What this means is the majority of holders believe in the medium to long term value of this protocol.
That or its still just too damn difficult to sell your coins.

xnova

sr. member

Activity: 390

Merit: 254

Counterparty Developer

Counterwallet.co going down for about an hour for a necessary systems update.

Thanks for your patience. After beta ends, we shouldn't have largish service disruptions to the site like this (and, as JahPowerBit said, he are moving to more of a decentralized model based on Counterwallet becoming a locally installed Chrome app, or something similar).

EDIT: Server is back up. The market view was added to the View Prices page (this should become more useful once we have more trade volume).

EDIT2: Part of this update was the renaming of counterwalletd to counterblockd. I just restored the existing preferences and rebuilt...so your address names, etc. should properly show now. If you are not seeing funds/addresses that you had, email us at [email protected] (don't worry, you should still have the addresses and private keys, as it's a deterministic wallet, it's just a matter of getting them to show up).

TheMightyX

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Vires in Numeris

Quote from: JahPowerBit on May 02, 2014, 04:42:52 AM

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:23:49 AM

XCP needs more work! Come on devs! XCP needs to get easy to install and run. Stability with a one click Windows install with fantastic GUI should be the goal.

This is exactly our goal! And we have a good foundation to get there. Counterwallet can be used as soon as desktop..
The priority for now is to implement the missing Counterparty features in Counterwallet, we can then focus on the "packaging" and installation.

JahPowerBit is the man!

I know it's tough being patient but lets remember PhantomPhreak, Xnova and JahPowerBit are all VOLUNTEERS.
We can't expect something for nothing, but we can be thankful when we get it.

Chang Hum

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 502

Quote from: Janitor on May 02, 2014, 09:21:33 AM

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:14:42 AM

Why does XCP suck so hard?

/counterpartyd_build/dist/counterpartyd/counterpartyd.py", line 835, in
get_address = get_address(db, address=address)
TypeError: 'dict' object is not callable

I've obviously used counterpartyd_build which completely hijacks my Ubuntu box in order to build and install what should otherwise be a simple one package install. Booooo

http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

haha very good!

Janitor

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:14:42 AM

Why does XCP suck so hard?

/counterpartyd_build/dist/counterpartyd/counterpartyd.py", line 835, in
get_address = get_address(db, address=address)
TypeError: 'dict' object is not callable

I've obviously used counterpartyd_build which completely hijacks my Ubuntu box in order to build and install what should otherwise be a simple one package install. Booooo

http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

PhantomPhreak

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 300

Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:23:49 AM

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on May 02, 2014, 04:21:42 AM

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:20:37 AM

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on May 02, 2014, 04:18:42 AM

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:14:42 AM

Why does XCP suck so hard?

/counterpartyd_build/dist/counterpartyd/counterpartyd.py", line 835, in
get_address = get_address(db, address=address)
TypeError: 'dict' object is not callable

I've obviously used counterpartyd_build which completely hijacks my Ubuntu box in order to build and install what should otherwise be a simple one package install. Booooo

Do you still "Recommend XCP (based on innovation)"? Grin

I said "innovation" not "implementation" Grin

Believe in the core idea, but seems poorly implemented.

Touché!

XCP needs more work! Come on devs! XCP needs to get easy to install and run. Stability with a one click Windows install with fantastic GUI should be the goal.

I'm pretty sure that this bug was fixed. What command did you run that gave you that error, and what version of counterpartyd are you running?

JahPowerBit

sr. member

Activity: 335

Merit: 255

Counterparty Developer

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:23:49 AM

XCP needs more work! Come on devs! XCP needs to get easy to install and run. Stability with a one click Windows install with fantastic GUI should be the goal.

This is exactly our goal! And we have a good foundation to get there. Counterwallet can be used as soon as desktop..
The priority for now is to implement the missing Counterparty features in Counterwallet, we can then focus on the "packaging" and installation.

xibeijan

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1001

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on May 02, 2014, 04:21:42 AM

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:20:37 AM

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on May 02, 2014, 04:18:42 AM

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:14:42 AM

Why does XCP suck so hard?

/counterpartyd_build/dist/counterpartyd/counterpartyd.py", line 835, in
get_address = get_address(db, address=address)
TypeError: 'dict' object is not callable

I've obviously used counterpartyd_build which completely hijacks my Ubuntu box in order to build and install what should otherwise be a simple one package install. Booooo

Do you still "Recommend XCP (based on innovation)"? Grin

I said "innovation" not "implementation" Grin

Believe in the core idea, but seems poorly implemented.

Touché!

XCP needs more work! Come on devs! XCP needs to get easy to install and run. Stability with a one click Windows install with fantastic GUI should be the goal.

ShroomsKit_Disgrace

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:20:37 AM

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on May 02, 2014, 04:18:42 AM

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:14:42 AM

Why does XCP suck so hard?

/counterpartyd_build/dist/counterpartyd/counterpartyd.py", line 835, in
get_address = get_address(db, address=address)
TypeError: 'dict' object is not callable

I've obviously used counterpartyd_build which completely hijacks my Ubuntu box in order to build and install what should otherwise be a simple one package install. Booooo

Do you still "Recommend XCP (based on innovation)"? Grin

I said "innovation" not "implementation" Grin

Believe in the core idea, but seems poorly implemented.

Touché!

xibeijan

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1001

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on May 02, 2014, 04:18:42 AM

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:14:42 AM

Why does XCP suck so hard?

/counterpartyd_build/dist/counterpartyd/counterpartyd.py", line 835, in
get_address = get_address(db, address=address)
TypeError: 'dict' object is not callable

I've obviously used counterpartyd_build which completely hijacks my Ubuntu box in order to build and install what should otherwise be a simple one package install. Booooo

Do you still "Recommend XCP (based on innovation)"? Grin

I said "innovation" not "implementation" Grin

Believe in the core idea, but seems poorly implemented.

ShroomsKit_Disgrace

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!

Quote from: xibeijan on May 02, 2014, 04:14:42 AM

Why does XCP suck so hard?

/counterpartyd_build/dist/counterpartyd/counterpartyd.py", line 835, in
get_address = get_address(db, address=address)
TypeError: 'dict' object is not callable

I've obviously used counterpartyd_build which completely hijacks my Ubuntu box in order to build and install what should otherwise be a simple one package install. Booooo

Do you still "Recommend XCP (based on innovation)"? Grin

xibeijan

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1001

Why does XCP suck so hard?

/counterpartyd_build/dist/counterpartyd/counterpartyd.py", line 835, in
get_address = get_address(db, address=address)
TypeError: 'dict' object is not callable

I've obviously used counterpartyd_build which completely hijacks my Ubuntu box in order to build and install what should otherwise be a simple one package install. Booooo

td services

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

black swan hunter

Quote from: mishax1 on April 30, 2014, 12:21:33 PM

How's that for legal defense ?

.............../´¯/)
............,/¯../ /
.........../..../ /
...../´¯/'...'/´¯¯.`·¸
../'/.../..../.....:^.¨¯\
('(...´...´.... ¯_/'...'/
.\.................'...../
..'\'...\.......... _.·´
....\..............(
.?..\.............\

That's art. Had to save it for possible use in an email exchange I've been having with a party who has been described as a "Flaming Asshole"

Chang Hum

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 502

Quote from: prophetx on May 01, 2014, 08:58:32 AM

Quote from: Matt Y on April 30, 2014, 01:41:12 PM

Quote from: mishax1 on April 30, 2014, 06:28:58 AM

Hey.. do you remember XCP's IPO ? where only a small % of investors could actually use/move XCP with the super complex counetparyd installation allowing only the devs&freinds and other several people who could actually figure out how to sell them to dump them on the market making huge amounts of BTC for a high price, leaving the rest (most) investors watching how "their" recently bought XCP being sold at 1000% profit and not being able to do anything about it because they couldn't get the software to work.
Nobody's perfect.

It's not an IPO when no money is raised.

Matt you have to remember that more than 50% of the people on bitcointalk can't tell apples from oranges.

Including you.

prophetx

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1010

he who has the gold makes the rules

Quote from: Matt Y on April 30, 2014, 01:41:12 PM

Quote from: mishax1 on April 30, 2014, 06:28:58 AM

Hey.. do you remember XCP's IPO ? where only a small % of investors could actually use/move XCP with the super complex counetparyd installation allowing only the devs&freinds and other several people who could actually figure out how to sell them to dump them on the market making huge amounts of BTC for a high price, leaving the rest (most) investors watching how "their" recently bought XCP being sold at 1000% profit and not being able to do anything about it because they couldn't get the software to work.
Nobody's perfect.

It's not an IPO when no money is raised.

Matt you have to remember that more than 50% of the people on bitcointalk can't tell apples from oranges.

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 285. (Read 1276936 times)