Author

Topic: [ANN][XEL] Elastic Project - The Decentralized Supercomputer - page 215. (Read 450523 times)

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
possible bcz ray kurzweil says that "singularity is near"

may be u can put a "button" in elastic core .. that button can explode computers all over the world. this is very important for security.

The Rise of Sentinel  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 500
elastic'll create a supercomputer...
 
Elastic Core software may upgrade itself. Elastic's supercomputer can create own AI. so it seems like "Terminator's Skynet", moreover Elastic's supercomputer is decentralized. Noone can stop it!

EK! ITS VERY DANGEROUS FOR HUMAN. PLEASE STOP PROGRAMMING

So you say we will reach singularity in 2016?  Grin

possible bcz ray kurzweil says that "singularity is near"

may be u can put a "button" in elastic core .. that button can explode computers all over the world. this is very important for security.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
elastic'll create a supercomputer...
 
Elastic Core software may upgrade itself. Elastic's supercomputer can create own AI. so it seems like "Terminator's Skynet", moreover Elastic's supercomputer is decentralized. Noone can stop it!

EK! ITS VERY DANGEROUS FOR HUMAN. PLEASE STOP PROGRAMMING

So you say we will reach singularity in 2016?  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 500
elastic'll create a supercomputer...
 
Elastic Core software may upgrade itself. Elastic's supercomputer can create own AI. so it seems like "Terminator's Skynet", moreover Elastic's supercomputer is decentralized. Noone can stop it!

EK! ITS VERY DANGEROUS FOR HUMAN. PLEASE STOP PROGRAMMING
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
I propose that we form a foundation (a brick and mortar aka. registered org).

And the foundation's main goal will be seeing the overall development and maintenance of the Elastic network as well as coordinating community members' efforts.

what do you guys think?
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Awesome to see this coming together like it is.
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
please correct my maths if i am wrong:

10 000 sat is 10 000 / 100 000 000 = 0.0001 btc

XEL market cap is then 0.0001 * 100 000 000 XEL  = 10 000 BTC = 7 500 000 usd right ?

that's still way cheaper than golem which does not have a working product yet.

Anyone has XEL to sell? Is there a thread for it already?
I would sell some for 10K satoshi each


That's cheap, XEL has more value.


At 10000 sat each now, if you sold you would make about x15 your original investment (roughly and depending on how soon you bought). So its definitely not cheap.

Still... I wouldn't sell either  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2165
Merit: 1002
Anyone has XEL to sell? Is there a thread for it already?
I would sell some for 10K satoshi each


That's cheap, XEL has more value.


At 10000 sat each now, if you sold you would make about x15 your original investment (roughly and depending on how soon you bought). So its definitely not cheap.

Still... I wouldn't sell either  Wink
hero member
Activity: 513
Merit: 500
Can we please sticky a link to the price speculation thread in the first post and just delete all price related posts here?
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
Damn, I really wish I bought some.
this project is so golden, i love it. Wish i bought more too  Roll Eyes but at least we bought some.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
Damn, I really wish I bought some.
sr. member
Activity: 464
Merit: 260

Where is the redeem instruction?I want try it.thx


Ps:I got notices, Blockchain download halted,no connection .

Is there any way to solved.

That is because the network is still on v0.5.0.  Right now you are just running a local server (that only you are on) which should be fine for testing the redeem logic.
sr. member
Activity: 243
Merit: 250
ImI
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Anyone has XEL to sell? Is there a thread for it already?
I would sell some for 10K satoshi each


That's cheap, XEL has more value.
hey bob! that's why they call me samaritan. I would start selling 10.000 XEL for 0.99 BTC. Just for you that 1% discount
Do you mean it's cheap or not?)
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 500
Anyone has XEL to sell? Is there a thread for it already?
I would sell some for 10K satoshi each


That's cheap, XEL has more value.
hey bob! that's why they call me samaritan. I would start selling 10.000 XEL for 0.99 BTC. Just for you that 1% discount
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Ben2016
Anyone has XEL to sell? Is there a thread for it already?
I would sell some for 10K satoshi each


That's cheap, XEL has more value.
first of all, I'm so happy to see you ( Bob Marley) are alive ! Next, I totally agree with you on the price. It is , I think, too early to put a price tag on this awesome project.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
Anyone has XEL to sell? Is there a thread for it already?
I would sell some for 10K satoshi each


That's cheap, XEL has more value.
sr. member
Activity: 464
Merit: 260
Hi EK,

I ran several tests on an earlier 0.6.0 version of core and it seems pretty stable.  I did notice that when the miner switched to a job that hadn't been mined in a while that usually the first couple of POW were rejected due to the difficulty, but overall, seems like a good improvement.

I've made several last minute fixes to the miner and uploaded the latest changes to my github.

Great, I will keep testing, and trying to fix that isue that you described.
Do you have some simple steps how I could reproduce that problem? What is "in a while"?

I am still working on the "retarget testcase". I promise that I will fix the "duplicate" message today, when more than 20 POWs are in the queue rejecting the subsequent ones.

The steps to reproduce the issue are:

  1) Create 2 jobs
  2a) My jobs were simple so I waited for the bounties of the job I was mining to get claimed, then the miner automatically switched to the second job.
  2b) You can also simulate this by canceling the first job.

The reason I can't be more specific about the occurrence was that I had other bugs I was working out, but I believe it may have something to do with how quickly you submit a POW after switching to the second job.  Either way, just redo the steps above a couple times and I'm sure you'll see it.
Jump to: