[ANN][XRB]Cryptocurrency's killer app: RaiBlocks micropayments - page 633.

axlroses

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: clemahieu on March 29, 2016, 11:39:47 AM

Quote from: cryptoboy.architect on March 29, 2016, 08:28:49 AM

LOL. This is what it feels like:

Don't get me wrong I like RAI. But I want more of it. Seeing as somehow 1M got distributed virtually overnight

Why not announce a clear method of distribution and stick to it? Like am I supposed to do it no more than once per hour? Per day? Per week?

Massive centralized server holding all the RAI and validating all the transactions... What could go wrong. Sorry, but... I want to give the devs more credit but something feels off here.

*sigh*

We can reevaluate the distribution method though I think I should lay out the different classes of people I've heard from.

1) Like the faucet because they don't have fast computers to mine or participate in BOINC.
2) Would want BOINC distribution because they don't want to click the faucet or pay
3) Want to pay for them because they don't want to set up a computing rig for BOINC or click the faucet

These are all mutually exclusive to an extent so no matter what we do, someone's going to be unhappy, maybe a bit of each.

windows wallet 32 bit? or web wallet? im not using 64 bit so i cant be a participant

clemahieu

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 122

Quote from: cryptoboy.architect on March 29, 2016, 08:28:49 AM

LOL. This is what it feels like:

Massive centralized server holding all the RAI and validating all the transactions... What could go wrong. Sorry, but... I want to give the devs more credit but something feels off here.

I can give a little insight on how the transaction clearing works now and how I hope it goes in the future.

Even though the faucet has a large balance, it has a representative account so it doesn't actually perform voting itself. This way we don't have two critical systems tied together.

Right now the wallet client is configured to pick from 8 preconfigured representatives in the config.json file. I have these representatives on different nodes around the world with different hosting providers to avoid a central point of failure during the ramp up.

In the future I envision people will set up their own representatives and move their vote off of the preconfigured ones, the faster this happens the more healthy and distributed the system will be.

wlemahieu

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: cryptoboy.architect on March 29, 2016, 08:28:49 AM

Don't get me wrong I like RAI. But I want more of it. Seeing as somehow 1M got distributed virtually overnight

Why not announce a clear method of distribution and stick to it? Like am I supposed to do it no more than once per hour? Per day? Per week?

Massive centralized server holding all the RAI and validating all the transactions... What could go wrong. Sorry, but... I want to give the devs more credit but something feels off here.

+3

From our count, yesterday we distributed about 150,000, not 1M. We'll be implementing a page soon which will display line-items by day of the distributed amount and percentage so this will always be readily available to see.

There IS a 1-minute limiter in place for obtaining free Rai.

If you are using Incognito (or if you just visited for the 1st time, or cleared your cookies) you must wait 1 minute after visiting the website to request free Rai. After that, it will allow you to request free Rai every minute. We'll also be implementing a timer that displays how long in seconds (right now, it's always less than 60 seconds) that you must wait to try again.

jibble

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Quote from: clemahieu on March 29, 2016, 11:39:47 AM

Quote from: cryptoboy.architect on March 29, 2016, 08:28:49 AM

LOL. This is what it feels like:

Don't get me wrong I like RAI. But I want more of it. Seeing as somehow 1M got distributed virtually overnight

Why not announce a clear method of distribution and stick to it? Like am I supposed to do it no more than once per hour? Per day? Per week?

Massive centralized server holding all the RAI and validating all the transactions... What could go wrong. Sorry, but... I want to give the devs more credit but something feels off here.

*sigh*

We can reevaluate the distribution method though I think I should lay out the different classes of people I've heard from.

1) Like the faucet because they don't have fast computers to mine or participate in BOINC.
2) Would want BOINC distribution because they don't want to click the faucet or pay
3) Want to pay for them because they don't want to set up a computing rig for BOINC or click the faucet

These are all mutually exclusive to an extent so no matter what we do, someone's going to be unhappy, maybe a bit of each.

This might just create another whole host of problems .

How many are distrributed between the different methods, someone mining BOINC didn't wanna use the faucet but now they have figured out that they dont get paid as much as simply clicking on a faucet, complaining of distributions to each group that has been created and how much each is getting in relation to effort or time placed

clemahieu

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 122

Quote from: cryptoboy.architect on March 29, 2016, 08:28:49 AM

LOL. This is what it feels like:

Don't get me wrong I like RAI. But I want more of it. Seeing as somehow 1M got distributed virtually overnight

Why not announce a clear method of distribution and stick to it? Like am I supposed to do it no more than once per hour? Per day? Per week?

Massive centralized server holding all the RAI and validating all the transactions... What could go wrong. Sorry, but... I want to give the devs more credit but something feels off here.

*sigh*

We can reevaluate the distribution method though I think I should lay out the different classes of people I've heard from.

1) Like the faucet because they don't have fast computers to mine or participate in BOINC.
2) Would want BOINC distribution because they don't want to click the faucet or pay
3) Want to pay for them because they don't want to set up a computing rig for BOINC or click the faucet

These are all mutually exclusive to an extent so no matter what we do, someone's going to be unhappy, maybe a bit of each.

jibble

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cryptoboy.architect on March 29, 2016, 08:28:49 AM

LOL. This is what it feels like:

Don't get me wrong I like RAI. But I want more of it. Seeing as somehow 1M got distributed virtually overnight

Why not announce a clear method of distribution and stick to it? Like am I supposed to do it no more than once per hour? Per day? Per week?

Massive centralized server holding all the RAI and validating all the transactions... What could go wrong. Sorry, but... I want to give the devs more credit but something feels off here.

*sigh*

It didn't jump by 1 million over night i haven't slept for 24 hours and have been periodically getting coins and buying them off several other people doing the same

There is a clear method of distribution and 99% of people don't have a problem easily using it. There is a problem for different reasons for a small % like most beta software

He has been actively developing the coin for 2 years straight.

He has been distributing coins since October of last year completely honestly and perfectly like clockwork. Focusing on working not trying to sell coins and over claim coins for himself, he could of easily gotten millions during October last year to February this year, when the faucet was giving much higher rewards and up until 1-2 weeks ago could be done at a rate of about 12 every minute , 12k a minute at its 1000/mrai per claim

He slowed the faucet down dramatically in the last week or so because it looked like someone had scripted a program to just claim automatically endlessly giving an unfair distribution

This is the most popular rai blocks has ever been, this is the moment the most people are currently claiming from the faucet than have ever been.

Whats makes you feel off?

cryptoboy.architect

hero member

Activity: 513

Merit: 500

LOL. This is what it feels like:

Don't get me wrong I like RAI. But I want more of it. Seeing as somehow 1M got distributed virtually overnight

Why not announce a clear method of distribution and stick to it? Like am I supposed to do it no more than once per hour? Per day? Per week?

Massive centralized server holding all the RAI and validating all the transactions... What could go wrong. Sorry, but... I want to give the devs more credit but something feels off here.

*sigh*

potatos55

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

Quote from: cryptoboy.architect on March 29, 2016, 07:35:59 AM

Yeah, sorry but this distribution model is not fair at all. I cleared cookies and still get the same error. And some people are obviously syphoning because there are now 8M distributed and I can't even get another 100.

What's not fair is the distribution?There are no problems with synchronization and the site works fine.Guys,don't forget to vote on https://c-cex.com/?id=vote

cryptoboy.architect

hero member

Activity: 513

Merit: 500

Yeah, sorry but this distribution model is not fair at all. I cleared cookies and still get the same error. And some people are obviously syphoning because there are now 8M distributed and I can't even get another 100.

cryptoboy.architect

hero member

Activity: 513

Merit: 500