Well, I have to chime in here as a merchant that made a special exception for YAC on my bitcoinmegamart.com . Don't you be throwing stones at CoinPayments.net, it was the YAC community that did not participate by supporting the merchants who provide a vehicle in which your coin can actually become a spendable currency. Is that not the point of cybercurrency? 99% percent of people in these forums are only out to do one thing, Pump and Dump. I didn't bribe YAC or ask YAC for one coin, I set up a special payment method Just for YAC. I posted announcements at the YAC forum and here to let members know that they have a spendable coin on something besides YAC promotional novelties. One would think that at least one YACr would have come by a dropped 5-10$ on something. Not one. Don't blame your communities apathy on folks trying to do good things for the cybercurrency community as a whole.
Perhaps that came across more hostile toward CoinPayments than intended. I love the concept of that site and what they have done. I said they probably would have added YAC back if I made the argument. I can't really blame them except they didn't set the rules on getting delisted ahead of time.
The good thing about paying in YAC is a perception of acceptance. With that said, I think getting on CoinPayments really wouldn't help the price--although it wouldn't hurt. Considering the marketcap and how dependent it is on bitcoin, I don't see why paying through the Cryptsy option or converting to bitcoin to pay is not just as good. It is just a question of what is cheaper in terms of fees. Because a vote costs bitcoin now, I definitely think that bitcoin is better spent elsewhere in support of YAC at this point.
