Well, I think the public will be interested in the answers to these questions:
1) Why did you hide the return of the coin's creator
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zerocurrency-9585982) Why the address for donations t1cDotxmVEJrniDjNqqjsCWq8mLMApV8vXC suddenly became "Developer Donation Wallet" although initially it was the address "On the development of the crypto currency," not a donation to the developers. And you made changes already after the donations were credited there (the editing date of the first post is enough to see, the moderators see it, we invite them). Today in personal correspondence, you said so, these are the coins of developers, and you will not spend them on development (correspondence will be provided on request to the moderator)
3) Exchange qiex.com, I also repeat here - this is a scam (you were repeated many times by users):
a) CERTIFICATE OF SECURITY HTTPS Tls 1.2 purchased at AMAZON !!!!!!!!! For 1 year!!!!!
b) The domain of qiex.com was registered in 2003. I explain once again, he was bought. Why introduce users to delusion?
c) Site with errors, translations squalor, functional curve.
d) Rick himself said that he tried to reach them, but who did not answer. BUT immediately in the correspondence he was told that now is not working time. THIS IS HONG KONG(Oh yeah, the domain is registered in the united states, but the phone is Chinese). He never sleeps)))) Online support means it works, but no phones. And even that did not bother you, Rick.
YOU motivated the listing there, that it is free. Do you care about your reputation? Rick actively promotes it (it would be better to have Zero advertised). Today Rick banned me for these words (in personal correspondence)
"State the fact. You're campaigning people to send funds to the Scam exchange.
Did you send anything there yourself?) No, of course"
I wrote them to him because Rick is actively promoting this exchange, despite all the warnings of users.
What is the reason? I do not know, to hide the fact that the creator appeared silly (such global changes in the network without it are impossible). Promote the questions of the community's opinion, ignore the obvious facts, exchange which does not deserve it. What is the reason for RICK? Do you have a personal interest?
P.S> sorry for mistakes, google translate
P.S> Rick, when Qiex will disappear with the money users, the community, what would you tell them? You've been warned many times. Or did you decide you were gonna say "Not my fault" excuse?!
I am one of the development team, and address your points per the below:
1) The coins creator has not returned to the project, and we still have no idea who this was, or even their whereabouts. This is community takeover 2.0 (since early April 2018), and the team in charge is open, transparent, and here for the long run;
2) There originally was one address, but as we are reliant on the donations from the community, we made three addresses so that the community can choose which address they want to donate to: one for the development of the project, one for exchange listings, and one for general donations.
Look the wallets up, there have only been additions to the wallets, and no withdrawals. The development team are volunteers, and we will in no way at all be touching the donations from the community for payment. I think that your confusion lies in the translation of developer fund (although the wallet is termed development fund).
3 a - d) QIEX is a brand new exchange that offered to list us for free, and they had a stringent process for listing. We have been working with the developers of QIEX in making this listing work. As always though, DO NOT leave your funds on any exchange, we would state this even if we were listed on Binance or any other Tier 1 exchange. THIS IS JUST COMMON SENSE.
As a note also, the dev team also did send some of their individual personally purchased ZER to the exchange to try out the interface and trading system.
In terms of your removal from Discord you were banned for constant FUD, blatantly bringing the project into disrepute in the Russian chat (yes, we can easily Google translate), and also constantly casting a negative view on the progress of the project up to and including 8 weeks since takeover and voicing these negative opinions in the chat.
When frustrated with the progress of the project, you directly approached the dev team to offer to 'buy sim cards to make numerous fake twitter accounts to increase Zero's awareness' in the Twitter-sphere. When we suggested that you keep your money, and that the project would organically grow with quality products and deliverables steadily released, you quit the Discord. You then came back after your own exile, and then purported to cast your negative views on the project once again.
In this second round return to Discord, you also accused us of not marketing the coin properly, and to use the funding that we had in the development fund to host Youtube bounties of the coin to the tune of 500 ZER and beyond. Imagine how the general community would feel if we had blown the current funds on Youtube promotions, instead of development towards a finite supply, block halving, and a developer fund. (Of which we have not touched yet, as we are aiming to avoid this as far as we can go).
If the developer community donations funding in said wallet still exists by the time that the developer fund is implemented in the upcoming fork, then we will REFUND THE DONATIONS TO THE RELEVANT WALLET ADDRESSES THAT SENT THEM. Not the best practice for a scam project I think many will agree.
By the way, the only funding that WILL be coming out of the 'development fund' community donation wallet is 40 ZER per month because the project is sponsoring the 2 x community pools that are offering a 0% pool fee to miners. This is to cover their operating costs.
Viktor, I don't know how much more transparent we can be, with weekly updates, a constant reminder of community donations still remaining in the relevant wallets, and a solid plan for the project.
None of this existed before, but it is still not good enough? Please take your negative views elsewhere while they exist, and if you want to extend an arm of assistance to the project in a legitimate way, then you are more than welcome back down the track.
We are sorry for the way you feel, but Zero is not a pump and dump project. We recognize that a lot of people may have invested into the project at ATH (which by the way, was 3 months before community takeover 2.0), but we are here for the long run, delivering a steady, organic, growth for the community, investors, and project.
If I haven't addressed all of your points above, please do let me know.
Thank you.
LMC
PS - for anyone's reference of the wallets name changing, and general transparent updates, please do refer to our Medium channel here to read up on our journey to date:
https://medium.com/@zerocurrencyWe have another update released tomorrow, so please also keep an eye out to remain updated.
Well, you yourself wanted to develop the topic with stupid excuses, we go further and on points) In every branch, every language topic).
1) The lie. Such global changes are not possible without the participation of the creator.
Another argument:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17905887Paragraph
Community:http://zero.financehttp://zero-currency.com/unconditional redirect to
https://zerocurrency.io/Last active zerocurrency
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zerocurrency-958598 April 22, 2018, 06:50:34 PM
Remind you the date of launch of the site?))))
There are a lot of these nuances. What did you decide to announce there on Monday, masternodes?) So you have already conducted the last update of the network (well, yes, without the creator
) under the masternodes.
Have you read your roadmap?) The "implementation of the dev fee" item. Bravo, again without a creator?!) I will especially focus on this point. And you asked the community for consent to this all? Discussed? But about this further, about the decision-making and what it was "community takeover" or else "takeover by a group of people".
2) You changed the destination of the address after people sent money to it. AFTER. Now about the correspondence with Rick. It was suggested that he categorically replied that these funds were for developers. Who decided this?) You?) Again, ok. Transparency and openness, as your motto says.
3) Warned?) About what?) Rick only wrote yesterday in the discord "Little volumes, let's add more" No warnings were the opposite, a daily, permanent copy of the advertisement of this exchange. Again your lie, little lie... Look and read how the story ended of SAFE COIN and EXVO.IO exchange. Until now, they are being brought up in connection with this exchange. And who decided to add there? You? You asked the community?) On the contrary, you have been repeatedly warned.
4) Now about me, here it was already an insult on your part, well, I will answer.
a) You talk about my inappropriate communication in Russian chat. Were there complaints from users?) Why only I was banned, I talked to someone?!I'm banned only ) Why was I banned after my words to Rick in private messages? Here are these:
State the fact. You're campaigning people to send funds to the Scam exchange.
Did you send anything there yourself?) No, of course You are a liar.Don't like criticism(a criticism that is justified)? Instead of bans objectionable it would be better to read what you write people and made the right conclusions.
b) Now about your attempt to compromise me.
1) What about the contest for bloggers youtube:
See the word EXAMPLE?) Send you what the word means FOR EXAMPLE?
And this correspondence with RICK was not about specific steps, but about the fact that Zero advertising should not only look like a copy-paste in Twitter and Discord. Advertising should be large-scale. Even on these two screenshots it is visible that these are examples, offers, but in any way not instructions to concrete actions. What we have? More lies on your part, this time about me. This can even be called an insult.
2) About Twitter accounts. You are again trying to distort the picture). Now you presented everything in such a way that I was trying to raise money for buying simcards and registering twitter accounts on them to add Zero's account
More silly performance I have not read. You lie again. What do you know about contextual advertising and promotion of Twitter accounts? But I sent Rick even a link to the service, where these accounts are entered and this service is already beginning to promote and add users, with the interests, in our case, cryptocurrency+contextual advertising in social networks. And that's a very big difference to your description. It turns out Rick you were misled or you are intentionally trying to slander me, whatever. But that's a lie again. And Yes, an insult.
I will summarize. Openness and transparency? It is not. False.
P.S. And for your insults LMC, I'll ask you the full