ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread - page 252.

jimmyoh

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

Quote from: yslyung on August 15, 2014, 10:59:06 PM

Quote from: contactlight on August 15, 2014, 10:57:25 PM

I just applied the firmware update on one of my miners and after the reboot something was wrong. It wouldn't start mining and the CPU load would be very high. I went ahead to reset the settings and rebooted. Now I can't access the device at all.

How is the physical hard reset done again?

pin hole next to lan port /led

Also, if you haven't done so already, make sure to uncheck the "save settings" on the firmware update page.
If don't your Miner Status page while remain blank.
That last FW update caused more problems than it fixed so went back to the older one.

yslyung

legendary

Activity: 1500

Merit: 1002

Mine Mine Mine

Quote from: contactlight on August 15, 2014, 10:57:25 PM

I just applied the firmware update on one of my miners and after the reboot something was wrong. It wouldn't start mining and the CPU load would be very high. I went ahead to reset the settings and rebooted. Now I can't access the device at all.

How is the physical hard reset done again?

pin hole next to lan port /led

contactlight

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

I just applied the firmware update on one of my miners and after the reboot something was wrong. It wouldn't start mining and the CPU load would be very high. I went ahead to reset the settings and rebooted. Now I can't access the device at all.

How is the physical hard reset done again?

visdude

legendary

Activity: 1081

Merit: 1001

Quote from: PatMan on August 15, 2014, 09:33:23 PM

Please keep your "pool" spam off the Bitmain thread - I & others don't want to scroll past quote upon quote about how good/shit it is while trying to find info about Bitmain products.

Thanks.

No, thank you! You beat me to it.

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Askit2 on August 15, 2014, 10:37:28 PM

Quote from: crazyates on August 15, 2014, 10:22:14 PM

Quote from: PatMan on August 15, 2014, 10:06:31 PM

I believe the setting is quite pool specific. I used to use --queue 1 but found I got a lower DOA rate & slightly better performance using --queue 0 with the cpu at ~80% - but I'm pointing mine at p2pool so maybe that's why? Load is currently: 1.58 1.62 1.40 @ 237.5

Thanks for the feedback. I'm pointing them at Slush, with Bitminter as a backup (failover).

Don't see how the CPU% is dependent on the OC, but I ran tests on 3 different clocks, with 3 different queue settings. The load was pretty high on all of them.

Everytime there is a new block the cpu has to make 4097, 129, 3, 2, or 1 work unit to send out immediately. There is always 1 with a queue of 0 you have 1 work unit prepped to send to the next chip needing work. with 4096 you have 4097 work units ready to go out. At the end of a block you still have 1 to 4097 work units ready to go. The cpu will have far less load spikes on a lower number. I started with 2 (three prepped in total) but noticed 1 (2 ready at all times) used a bit less cpu. I then moved to 1 and got just under 2 UNLESS I go to the Realtime Graphs tab. The big advantage to something slightly above 0 but less then maybe 16 is that if most of your hashing chips suddenly ran out of work there is enough work for half of them queued up. At least for one work unit each.

I really did prefer 2 ish but 0 seems to be less loaded and pool results aren't significantly different for me.

I understand how the queue works; I've been using cgminer since v 1.4 or something silly like that.

When I dropped down to queue=1, my hashrate dropped from ~480 to ~460. I'm running it with a queue of 16 for now, but my load is still 2+.

But to answer my original question: this sounds like something that other people are living with, and is normal?

visdude

legendary

Activity: 1081

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Omarko on August 15, 2014, 04:13:18 PM

Quote from: macgyver007 on August 15, 2014, 02:56:45 PM

Update....the latest firmware is a disaster on my miners...I don't like how the asic frequencies are only read from the rom (read only) for starters...the clock selections defaulting to 237.5 was the first sign, along with the other details I mentioned in the first post I made regarding this new firmware..back to 0721 for me and I don't get x's on stock like I do with the new firmware...all in all I think its a piece of junk and should be pulled from bitmain site...and what is the deal with the july 28 firmware...I had it on a few of my ants and now its gone due to the flash ~~"upgrade"~~ downgrade...I cant honestly see any benefit from having the latest August firmware...and for those who will say it helps with overclocking...if that is the help you need to overclock, please quit while you are ahead Roll Eyes

interesting observations and thanks for sharing. I just saw the firmware update on the site and downloaded but now hesitant to update.

Anyone out there that updated and had no issues?

As the saying goes, "don't fix it if it ain't broke".

Askit2

hero member

Activity: 981

Merit: 500

DIV - Your "Virtual Life" Secured and Decentralize

Quote from: crazyates on August 15, 2014, 10:22:14 PM

Quote from: PatMan on August 15, 2014, 10:06:31 PM

I believe the setting is quite pool specific. I used to use --queue 1 but found I got a lower DOA rate & slightly better performance using --queue 0 with the cpu at ~80% - but I'm pointing mine at p2pool so maybe that's why? Load is currently: 1.58 1.62 1.40 @ 237.5

Thanks for the feedback. I'm pointing them at Slush, with Bitminter as a backup (failover).

Don't see how the CPU% is dependent on the OC, but I ran tests on 3 different clocks, with 3 different queue settings. The load was pretty high on all of them.

Everytime there is a new block the cpu has to make 4097, 129, 3, 2, or 1 work unit to send out immediately. There is always 1 with a queue of 0 you have 1 work unit prepped to send to the next chip needing work. with 4096 you have 4097 work units ready to go out. At the end of a block you still have 1 to 4097 work units ready to go. The cpu will have far less load spikes on a lower number. I started with 2 (three prepped in total) but noticed 1 (2 ready at all times) used a bit less cpu. I then moved to 1 and got just under 2 UNLESS I go to the Realtime Graphs tab. The big advantage to something slightly above 0 but less then maybe 16 is that if most of your hashing chips suddenly ran out of work there is enough work for half of them queued up. At least for one work unit each.

I really did prefer 2 ish but 0 seems to be less loaded and pool results aren't significantly different for me.

PlanetCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: aurel57 on August 15, 2014, 06:46:16 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on August 15, 2014, 06:40:55 PM

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 06:01:06 PM

Quote from: buy4crypto on August 15, 2014, 05:47:07 PM

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 05:44:28 PM

The point is, the "pool" is paying out more than it can ever take in on a PPS model so somethings up somewhere.

Trying to build a bitcoin affiliate network is what they are saying, also they claim the payout of bonus may last up until 5TH. This suggests they could end it sooner if they reach the goals for the pool.

If something is to good to be true it usually is. But on the other hand, if I had the resources, and could afford it, I would do the exact same thing to promote my own business, though perhaps not as aggresive as 12.5%

*Edit I am on the NY server, I only had a few minor disconnects, which may have to do with the fact the pool / company is in process of being built.

stratum+tcp://east2.bitcoindigger.com:3333

STILL dead ! I'll let test miner run for 10 minutes to see if it corrects but I doubt it.

Edit: Seems it was a worker issues _ instead of .

I am running 1 s-3 on it seems okay. I did the VA server as I may be closer to it then the NY one.

I am in the Midwest and run all 12 miners (9-S1's and 3-S3's) on the VA server.

My 2 S1's are on the VA server.
Did a ping to all of them and east1 (VA) had the lowest times (~80ms).
I'm in Minnesota.

Didn't read the previous post about not posting about pools in this thread.
Won't happen again.
Sorry.

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: PatMan on August 15, 2014, 10:06:31 PM

I believe the setting is quite pool specific. I used to use --queue 1 but found I got a lower DOA rate & slightly better performance using --queue 0 with the cpu at ~80% - but I'm pointing mine at p2pool so maybe that's why? Load is currently: 1.58 1.62 1.40 @ 237.5

Thanks for the feedback. I'm pointing them at Slush, with Bitminter as a backup (failover).

Don't see how the CPU% is dependent on the OC, but I ran tests on 3 different clocks, with 3 different queue settings. The load was pretty high on all of them.

PatMan

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Watch out for the "Neg-Rep-Dogie-Police".....

I believe the setting is quite pool specific. I used to use --queue 1 but found I got a lower DOA rate & slightly better performance using --queue 0 with the cpu at ~80% - but I'm pointing mine at p2pool so maybe that's why? Load is currently: 1.58 1.62 1.40 @ 237.5

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: PatMan on August 15, 2014, 09:33:23 PM

Please keep your "pool" spam off the Bitmain thread - I & others don't want to scroll past quote upon quote about how good/shit it is while trying to find info about Bitmain products.

Thanks.

This. This is why there are almost 270 pages, and I still have to post on the bottom to find the answer to the question that's probably been asked a dozen times over (yes, I have searched, but I can't find a final answer).

Cgminer is using 100% of the controller's CPU. The web GUI shows my load as between 2.5-3.5, and top shows cgminer as being maxed out. I went into /etc/init.d/cgminer, and changed the queue from 4096 to 128 and then to 1, and that helped a little, but not a lot (load is under 2 now, but top still shows cgminer as using 96% CPU). I'm also OC'd to 238mhz, and queue to 1 seems to be running a bit slower.

Any way to fix this?

PatMan

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Watch out for the "Neg-Rep-Dogie-Police".....

Please keep your "pool" spam off the Bitmain thread - I & others don't want to scroll past quote upon quote about how good/shit it is while trying to find info about Bitmain products.

Thanks.

sjc1490

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 06:01:06 PM

Quote from: buy4crypto on August 15, 2014, 05:47:07 PM

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 05:44:28 PM

The point is, the "pool" is paying out more than it can ever take in on a PPS model so somethings up somewhere.

Trying to build a bitcoin affiliate network is what they are saying, also they claim the payout of bonus may last up until 5TH. This suggests they could end it sooner if they reach the goals for the pool.

If something is to good to be true it usually is. But on the other hand, if I had the resources, and could afford it, I would do the exact same thing to promote my own business, though perhaps not as aggresive as 12.5%

*Edit I am on the NY server, I only had a few minor disconnects, which may have to do with the fact the pool / company is in process of being built.

stratum+tcp://east2.bitcoindigger.com:3333

STILL dead ! I'll let test miner run for 10 minutes to see if it corrects but I doubt it.

Edit: Seems it was a worker issues _ instead of .

Try east1.bitcoindigger.com I pinged it from TN and get 35ms returns. I might give it a shot.

Lowell904

member

Activity: 119

Merit: 10

Quote from: martijntje on August 15, 2014, 09:24:29 AM

Anyone have experience with an S3 where chain #1 gets much hotter? I have a 40 degree temperature on chain #1 while chain #2 is only 32 degrees. The whole thing is a lot slower than the other S3 I have.

Have already tried removing all the thermal paste from the chips and applying arctic MX-2, but that didn't change anything. Does it also help to change the paste on the inside? What else is there to try?

I had a similar problem. Mine were off by 4 to 5 degrees. I used the same paste as you, but went one step further and did one of the inside heatsinks, before I ran out paste. I have more on the way. The inside heatsinks have hundreds of thermal paste dots over the whole surface, so it was a challenge to try and spread the paste around.
The results were that the blades are now within 2 degrees of each other, but the unit still struggles to pull 440gh/s, drops over time, and can't be overclocked without lower hash rates and Xs and -s showing up.
After the paste gets here, I will redo the other blade and see if it helps at all.
On a side note, I have also installed heatsinks on the R47s and the little black chips above them, and it did not seem to help at all. At this point I'm a little nervous about them being in there.

aurel57

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1000

Quote from: philipma1957 on August 15, 2014, 06:40:55 PM

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 06:01:06 PM

Quote from: buy4crypto on August 15, 2014, 05:47:07 PM

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 05:44:28 PM

The point is, the "pool" is paying out more than it can ever take in on a PPS model so somethings up somewhere.

Trying to build a bitcoin affiliate network is what they are saying, also they claim the payout of bonus may last up until 5TH. This suggests they could end it sooner if they reach the goals for the pool.

If something is to good to be true it usually is. But on the other hand, if I had the resources, and could afford it, I would do the exact same thing to promote my own business, though perhaps not as aggresive as 12.5%

*Edit I am on the NY server, I only had a few minor disconnects, which may have to do with the fact the pool / company is in process of being built.

stratum+tcp://east2.bitcoindigger.com:3333

STILL dead ! I'll let test miner run for 10 minutes to see if it corrects but I doubt it.

Edit: Seems it was a worker issues _ instead of .

I am running 1 s-3 on it seems okay. I did the VA server as I may be closer to it then the NY one.

I am in the Midwest and run all 12 miners (9-S1's and 3-S3's) on the VA server.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 06:01:06 PM

Quote from: buy4crypto on August 15, 2014, 05:47:07 PM

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 05:44:28 PM

The point is, the "pool" is paying out more than it can ever take in on a PPS model so somethings up somewhere.

Trying to build a bitcoin affiliate network is what they are saying, also they claim the payout of bonus may last up until 5TH. This suggests they could end it sooner if they reach the goals for the pool.

If something is to good to be true it usually is. But on the other hand, if I had the resources, and could afford it, I would do the exact same thing to promote my own business, though perhaps not as aggresive as 12.5%

*Edit I am on the NY server, I only had a few minor disconnects, which may have to do with the fact the pool / company is in process of being built.

stratum+tcp://east2.bitcoindigger.com:3333

STILL dead ! I'll let test miner run for 10 minutes to see if it corrects but I doubt it.

Edit: Seems it was a worker issues _ instead of .

I am running 1 s-3 on it seems okay. I did the VA server as I may be closer to it then the NY one.

MoreBloodWine

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1001

Quote from: buy4crypto on August 15, 2014, 05:47:07 PM

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 05:44:28 PM

The point is, the "pool" is paying out more than it can ever take in on a PPS model so somethings up somewhere.

Trying to build a bitcoin affiliate network is what they are saying, also they claim the payout of bonus may last up until 5TH. This suggests they could end it sooner if they reach the goals for the pool.

If something is to good to be true it usually is. But on the other hand, if I had the resources, and could afford it, I would do the exact same thing to promote my own business, though perhaps not as aggresive as 12.5%

*Edit I am on the NY server, I only had a few minor disconnects, which may have to do with the fact the pool / company is in process of being built.

stratum+tcp://east2.bitcoindigger.com:3333

STILL dead ! I'll let test miner run for 10 minutes to see if it corrects but I doubt it.

Edit: Seems it was a worker issues _ instead of .

buy4crypto

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

freecrypto.top

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 05:44:28 PM

The point is, the "pool" is paying out more than it can ever take in on a PPS model so somethings up somewhere.

Trying to build a bitcoin affiliate network is what they are saying, also they claim the payout of bonus may last up until 5TH. This suggests they could end it sooner if they reach the goals for the pool.

If something is to good to be true it usually is. But on the other hand, if I had the resources, and could afford it, I would do the exact same thing to promote my own business, though perhaps not as aggresive as 12.5%

*Edit I am on the NY server, I only had a few minor disconnects, which may have to do with the fact the pool / company is in process of being built.

MoreBloodWine

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1001

The point is, the "pool" is paying out more than it can ever take in on a PPS model so somethings up somewhere.

Edit: FWIW, if it's such a good pool it wouldnt have two dead nodes lol

buy4crypto

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

freecrypto.top

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on August 15, 2014, 05:17:17 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: PlanetCrypto on August 15, 2014, 04:41:25 PM

Quote from: aurel57 on August 15, 2014, 02:38:54 PM

Quote from: JennaK on August 15, 2014, 02:30:44 PM

Quote from: kaltar on August 15, 2014, 02:25:37 PM

Quote from: jimmothy on August 15, 2014, 12:50:09 PM

Quote from: aurel57 on August 15, 2014, 12:47:57 PM

https://mining.bitcoinaffiliatenetwork.com/index.php

Quote

For a limited time this pool is currently open to the public mining community. There are no fees and a 12.5% bonus is paid out on all bitcoins mined.

Totally not a scam.

Yup not a scam at all, 12.5 % bonus AND there is also a tread that he says he`s giving away 1 free S3 every day for august. ya right.

Is it a scam or?

I mine there and the BTC payments have hit my wallet.

Edit: Paying PPS now with auto payouts. Also the bonus has been paid. My buddy has won 2 of the S3 miners and should take delivery this weekend or next week. Will see if they show.

Signed up.
Rolled 2 S1's to test.

FYI here is my payouts that have hit my wallet.
Last Hour   0.06612365   0.00039459   0.00000000   0.00000000   0.00000000   0.00000000
Last Day   0.09262321   0.00370703   0.00000000   0.00000000   0.00000000   0.00000000
Last Week   0.26180327   0.02117649   0.19296909   0.00000000   0.00000000   0.00030002
Last Month   0.43752334   0.04874878   0.33833177   0.00000000   0.00000000   0.00060002

I have pulled my miners a couple times and sometimes only ran half of them but am sold enough on this pool that I have all miners running there now. ( @ 2.5THs)

I'm sorry but I'm still crying foul here, your the only fanboy whos shown "proof" from the site. For the fun of it I took my 10Gh pi off BTC Guild and put it on both New York and VA, and guess what.... DEAD.

lol

And besides, you know why it's a scam because the pool pays out more than it ever takes in. Your just trying to get hash there to find a 25btc block and walk away happy with it all to your self.

You have every right to be skeptical. I have 5TH running and every payout has happened in past few days. If you read OP of mining thread he has a majority through his business of the hash here. Any blocks that are found, his teams hashing power can cover. Trust me, I was skeptical for weeks. But I have no reason to be anymore, I have seen proof myself. Which is why I was worried when they had a small hiccup in payments for 11 hours this morn. But it looks like the payout was in full, and the 1 hour payouts continue to come in with the estimated total time and time again.

Topic: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread - page 252. (Read 710164 times)