ANTMINER S7 is available at bitmaintech.com with 4.86TH/s, 0.25J/GH - page 328.

VirosaGITS

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1068

Quote from: vortexz on October 06, 2015, 08:32:46 AM

please,somebody send me a 100 $ S7 coupon to user id : vortexz

Thank you in advance !

The coupon need to be sent to your email registered to Bitmain. And you may be able to get one cheap at the market place. I wouldn't hold your breath for a free one until giveaways next weeks. But good luck nontheless.

vortexz

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1001

please,somebody send me a 100 $ S7 coupon to bitmain email id : [email protected]

Thank you in advance !

VirosaGITS

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1068

Quote from: fullzero on October 06, 2015, 08:08:10 AM

Unless YOU can buy a more efficient miner it doesn't matter what the self mining corps have.

We will see in 6 months; Cool

Of course it matters. Its actually the other way around. Its not what *you* pay that decide the profitability of Bitcoin, its what *most* of the network pay their gh/$/day upkeep that does.

Home miners is a minority and the profitability of S7 will go down regardless of if Bitmain release a S9 or not by then.

Difficulty is not going to stop going up because home miner are no longer getting competitive hardware available and the halving won't stop from dropping the profitability of all miners just because *you* can't get a more profitable miner.

fullzero

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1009

It doesn't matter what the self mining corps have. It only matters if YOU can buy a more efficient miner.

We will see in 6 months; Cool

VirosaGITS

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1068

Quote from: fullzero on October 06, 2015, 07:33:47 AM

Quote from: VirosaGITS on October 06, 2015, 05:01:29 AM

Quote from: Rabinovitch on October 06, 2015, 04:11:28 AM

Well, after all discussions here, are the S7 is good thing to enforce the mining farm with? Sure, their efficiency is good (and it's definetely the best available for upper-home level miner for now), but what about their reliability? Cool

I don't know, seem pretty hit and miss again. And the price is pretty hefty too. I think people that have acceptable electricity costs should stick with S5's and just let the S7 decrepit in price and prove itself first.

Unless your electricity cost is too high, then you could get a S7 but at that electricity cost i'm not even sure you can ROI the S7 before the halving with such electricity cost. At which point i doubt they will be worth more in 6 months than what a S5 is worth now.

An S5 is worth ~ $300 now. Your way off thinking an S7 will be worth $300 in 6 months.

I am? Then how much do you think a S7 will be worth with the halving? The S7 will suddenly less efficient then than the S5 is efficient now. So how am i way off? The S7 is not only very overpriced right now, it is also not that efficient. Competitors have 0.15 and 0.06 efficiency chips. I don't see the S7 being worth much at all then, just nope.

fullzero

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1009

Quote from: VirosaGITS on October 06, 2015, 05:01:29 AM

Quote from: Rabinovitch on October 06, 2015, 04:11:28 AM

Well, after all discussions here, are the S7 is good thing to enforce the mining farm with? Sure, their efficiency is good (and it's definetely the best available for upper-home level miner for now), but what about their reliability? Cool

I don't know, seem pretty hit and miss again. And the price is pretty hefty too. I think people that have acceptable electricity costs should stick with S5's and just let the S7 decrepit in price and prove itself first.

Unless your electricity cost is too high, then you could get a S7 but at that electricity cost i'm not even sure you can ROI the S7 before the halving with such electricity cost. At which point i doubt they will be worth more in 6 months than what a S5 is worth now.

An S5 is worth ~ $300 now. Your way off thinking an S7 will be worth $300 in 6 months.

vortexz

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1001

planning to buy 2x antminer S7, I already have 1 100$ coupon can somebody send me another coupon ?
my user id is vortexz

VirosaGITS

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1068

Quote from: Rabinovitch on October 06, 2015, 04:11:28 AM

Well, after all discussions here, are the S7 is good thing to enforce the mining farm with? Sure, their efficiency is good (and it's definetely the best available for upper-home level miner for now), but what about their reliability? Cool

I don't know, seem pretty hit and miss again. And the price is pretty hefty too. I think people that have acceptable electricity costs should stick with S5's and just let the S7 decrepit in price and prove itself first.

Unless your electricity cost is too high, then you could get a S7 but at that electricity cost i'm not even sure you can ROI the S7 before the halving with such electricity cost. At which point i doubt they will be worth more in 6 months than what a S5 is worth now.

beffje

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

Quote from: Rabinovitch on October 06, 2015, 04:11:28 AM

Well, after all discussions here, are the S7 is good thing to enforce the mining farm with? Sure, their efficiency is good (and it's definetely the best available for upper-home level miner for now), but what about their reliability? Cool

Still looking good....

Searing

copper member

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1465

Clueless!

Quote from: Rabinovitch on October 06, 2015, 04:11:28 AM

Well, after all discussions here, are the S7 is good thing to enforce the mining farm with? Sure, their efficiency is good (and it's definetely the best available for upper-home level miner for now), but what about their reliability? Cool

yeah what is the warranty? 90 days or so? Anyone have to send one back yet? How much was the RMA costs to China? etc etc

(don't have one ..not getting one ....just nosy)

But hey I could win the lottery and just want to get one..just saying at 13.5c kwh where I'm at ..its not happening Sad

Rabinovitch

legendary

Activity: 2030

Merit: 1076

BTCLife.global participant

Well, after all discussions here, are the S7 is good thing to enforce the mining farm with? Sure, their efficiency is good (and it's definetely the best available for upper-home level miner for now), but what about their reliability? Cool

SunnyIgor

sr. member

Activity: 353

Merit: 251

Quote from: notlist3d on October 05, 2015, 05:24:07 PM

Quote from: clgrissom3 on October 05, 2015, 05:19:16 PM

Quote from: notlist3d on October 05, 2015, 01:50:30 PM

Quote from: clgrissom3 on October 05, 2015, 12:47:30 PM

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 12:07:15 PM

Howdy folks.
Got ONE batch one in today, mailed on Sept 30.

Clocked at 575mhz
It is at batch TWO clock speed. Oy!

Plugged in, came right up , not much noisier than an s5. Has a fuller small vacuum cleaner sound.
Blows some heat, but not so much, ambient temp low right now.
One board connector was a bit stubborn to attach to but finally went on.
All chips good. No loose heatsinks.

I'll be posting observations.

What day was your order (payment) confirmed?

Also has anyone else from batch one got shipment during holiday? I assumed they would not have any shipping during it. But if this is true they may have shipped before holiday to meet before deadline of being late.

Anyone still waiting with nothing shipped and no tracking?

I'm still waiting with no shipping notice and no tracking. I ordered and got confirmation on Spetember 6th.

Wow very suprising on that. I was hoping with difficulty looking like it was not to slow considering China having holiday that the S7's were being delivered. I am pretty amazed on the month since payment.

I wonder if they will do coupons and how much they are worth. Will be interesting once they start working again.

I am still waiting, paid unshipped comfirmed, My bitmain acount create time 2015-09-02. bet I get a 4.6 model aswell! I hope they compensate with something more than just coupons....
Still BITMAIN is the best for home miners but they are slacking!

notlist3d

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: AriesIV10 on October 05, 2015, 05:42:21 PM

Quote from: Dr Charles on October 05, 2015, 07:38:18 AM

Quote from: Dyak80 on October 05, 2015, 07:09:19 AM

Hi, I paid 6.438 BTC for an order S7 ID:0012015100400017 but as a result of technical problems blockchain, he had long hung unconfirmed and confirmed when he was already gray, unpaid, expired. and did not change after the payment.
https://blockchain.info/ru/tx/480c85550868758969a11b154da57a9ffdd15f33b8ef45728903b94972c5292b

Send four letters in support bitmaintech, no answer.

Please correct.
My user ID: Dyak80

You most likely will not get a response until after the holiday. I would not worry though, with a record on the blockchain they can prove and verify receipt of your funds.

I just made an order and the same thing happened to me. Don't Worry, it has happened to me once before when ordering an S5. They will acknowledge your payment and your order will be put in the order that it was received. No Worries.

It is not a big deal, I have had it happen several times over my orders. I wish they moved it up to payments in 1.5 or 2 hours would make life easier for all.

But I do suggest emailing bitmain with all the information. That is quickest way to get it fixed. Keep in mind when they go to work from holiday they likely have backlog of emails so might be a day or two after.

AriesIV10

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1006

Mine for a Bit

Quote from: Dr Charles on October 05, 2015, 07:38:18 AM

Quote from: Dyak80 on October 05, 2015, 07:09:19 AM

Hi, I paid 6.438 BTC for an order S7 ID:0012015100400017 but as a result of technical problems blockchain, he had long hung unconfirmed and confirmed when he was already gray, unpaid, expired. and did not change after the payment.
https://blockchain.info/ru/tx/480c85550868758969a11b154da57a9ffdd15f33b8ef45728903b94972c5292b

Send four letters in support bitmaintech, no answer.

Please correct.
My user ID: Dyak80

You most likely will not get a response until after the holiday. I would not worry though, with a record on the blockchain they can prove and verify receipt of your funds.

I just made an order and the same thing happened to me. Don't Worry, it has happened to me once before when ordering an S5. They will acknowledge your payment and your order will be put in the order that it was received. No Worries.

notlist3d

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: clgrissom3 on October 05, 2015, 05:19:16 PM

Quote from: notlist3d on October 05, 2015, 01:50:30 PM

Quote from: clgrissom3 on October 05, 2015, 12:47:30 PM

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 12:07:15 PM

Howdy folks.
Got ONE batch one in today, mailed on Sept 30.

Clocked at 575mhz
It is at batch TWO clock speed. Oy!

Plugged in, came right up , not much noisier than an s5. Has a fuller small vacuum cleaner sound.
Blows some heat, but not so much, ambient temp low right now.
One board connector was a bit stubborn to attach to but finally went on.
All chips good. No loose heatsinks.

I'll be posting observations.

What day was your order (payment) confirmed?

Also has anyone else from batch one got shipment during holiday? I assumed they would not have any shipping during it. But if this is true they may have shipped before holiday to meet before deadline of being late.

Anyone still waiting with nothing shipped and no tracking?

I'm still waiting with no shipping notice and no tracking. I ordered and got confirmation on Spetember 6th.

Wow very suprising on that. I was hoping with difficulty looking like it was not to slow considering China having holiday that the S7's were being delivered. I am pretty amazed on the month since payment.

I wonder if they will do coupons and how much they are worth. Will be interesting once they start working again.

bsanders

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Just to post an update, my unit has been running for 10 days straight. Hashing at Eligius using 1,000w EVGA on two boards, and 650w EVGA on one board and controller. Just using stock speeds, have not tried overclocking.

https://i.imgur.com/gmm7NBr.jpg

clgrissom3

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1032

Carl, aka Sonny :)

Quote from: notlist3d on October 05, 2015, 01:50:30 PM

Quote from: clgrissom3 on October 05, 2015, 12:47:30 PM

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 12:07:15 PM

Howdy folks.
Got ONE batch one in today, mailed on Sept 30.

Clocked at 575mhz
It is at batch TWO clock speed. Oy!

Plugged in, came right up , not much noisier than an s5. Has a fuller small vacuum cleaner sound.
Blows some heat, but not so much, ambient temp low right now.
One board connector was a bit stubborn to attach to but finally went on.
All chips good. No loose heatsinks.

I'll be posting observations.

What day was your order (payment) confirmed?

Also has anyone else from batch one got shipment during holiday? I assumed they would not have any shipping during it. But if this is true they may have shipped before holiday to meet before deadline of being late.

Anyone still waiting with nothing shipped and no tracking?

I'm still waiting with no shipping notice and no tracking. I ordered and got confirmation on Spetember 6th.

wolfen

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 523

Quote from: VirosaGITS on October 05, 2015, 04:57:10 PM

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 04:54:54 PM

Quote from: VirosaGITS on October 05, 2015, 04:37:56 PM

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 04:34:12 PM

Quote from: RichBC on October 05, 2015, 04:20:13 PM

Quote from: VirosaGITS on October 05, 2015, 03:49:03 PM

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 03:47:00 PM

Do we know what the result is if you power the controller before the hash boards?
Do the hash boards not get detected?
Can you fix it with a soft reboot?

Yes you can fix it.
I've simply had the board not boot because it is not detected at boot.
I would probably avoid doing this as i'm unaware if there might be electrical issue related to this that would cause hardware damage.
Anyways, a soft reboot worked for me, but i didn't repeat the experience. Also a power cycling would definitively fix it if no damage was caused.

It's a great pity that we are having to guess why the instructions are to power up the Controller after the Hash boards. It would be much more useful if we were told what the problem(s) are if this is not done....

So to continue the guessing. In practice I suspect that most users are doing what they have always done and are powering up Controller & Hash Boards simultaneously, and are getting away with this?

There are then some reports of S7 that seem to have a lower Hash Rate & Higher HW errors either at switch on or after a power outage, that can be fixed by a Software Reboot, which could be interpreted as being the same as powering up the Hash Boards first, so perhaps this is the reason?

My latest best guess on the reason is nothing to do with the above problems but all to do with the fact that the controller now has a separate supply whereas in the past it was powered from the hash board and hence was powered simultaneously, with no risk that the Controller could be powered & the Hash Board not.

I think what Bitmain is guarding against is a situation where only the Controller is powered at the point that the Hash boards start taking power. The reason being that I suspect there is then a risk that the unpowered Hash Board attempts to take current from the Controller?

Unfortunately just another guess, but there you go.

Rich

This scenario happens with s5 controllers and hash boards also.
The s5 controller gets power from ONE hashboard so they would both go on at the same time.
The other hashboard however may not get powered at the same time.
I've had to soft reboot when the second hashboard chips don't show up live after a power on
or when nicehash does a pool switch and the hashrate goes to ZERO on the miner.
Sometimes it never comes back and locks up, other times one hashboard comes back and no amount of soft reboot
will fix it. At that point a power cycle is needed.

Glad I have the remote control PDU's so I can remotely power cycle instead of going the the PSU
and toggling the switch.

I'm not sure WHY but what do happen is that when a board is "powered" without a controller. Its not actually "on" its just connected to the energy supply. Then when the controller turn on, the blades all light up simultaneously.

I think there is probably not much risk to the hardware but its best to be cautious. Its probably just an issue of the controller sending a call to the boards and if its not already connected to an active power supply, it does not answer and thus is considered dead.

The last two hashboards I lost on s5's were the ones NOT connected to the controller.
At least it was easy to combine two hashboards from two half dead s5's and make a good one.
Also running an s5 with a bad hashboard connected will usually lock up after a bit for me but if you pull the hash cable off
the bad one it will run the other one by itself just fine.

Are you saying those two hashboard died because they were not powered at the same time as the controller? If they are all on the same PSU, they will all be powered at the same time, it does not matter afaik which board the controller is connected to.

But if you were powering the two boards on two different source, then that would be a pretty dread possibility that doing this can damage your hardware...

No not saying that, just an observation. Don't know the reason.

VirosaGITS

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1068

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 04:54:54 PM

Quote from: VirosaGITS on October 05, 2015, 04:37:56 PM

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 04:34:12 PM

Quote from: RichBC on October 05, 2015, 04:20:13 PM

Quote from: VirosaGITS on October 05, 2015, 03:49:03 PM

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 03:47:00 PM

Do we know what the result is if you power the controller before the hash boards?
Do the hash boards not get detected?
Can you fix it with a soft reboot?

Yes you can fix it.
I've simply had the board not boot because it is not detected at boot.
I would probably avoid doing this as i'm unaware if there might be electrical issue related to this that would cause hardware damage.
Anyways, a soft reboot worked for me, but i didn't repeat the experience. Also a power cycling would definitively fix it if no damage was caused.

It's a great pity that we are having to guess why the instructions are to power up the Controller after the Hash boards. It would be much more useful if we were told what the problem(s) are if this is not done....

So to continue the guessing. In practice I suspect that most users are doing what they have always done and are powering up Controller & Hash Boards simultaneously, and are getting away with this?

There are then some reports of S7 that seem to have a lower Hash Rate & Higher HW errors either at switch on or after a power outage, that can be fixed by a Software Reboot, which could be interpreted as being the same as powering up the Hash Boards first, so perhaps this is the reason?

My latest best guess on the reason is nothing to do with the above problems but all to do with the fact that the controller now has a separate supply whereas in the past it was powered from the hash board and hence was powered simultaneously, with no risk that the Controller could be powered & the Hash Board not.

I think what Bitmain is guarding against is a situation where only the Controller is powered at the point that the Hash boards start taking power. The reason being that I suspect there is then a risk that the unpowered Hash Board attempts to take current from the Controller?

Unfortunately just another guess, but there you go.

Rich

This scenario happens with s5 controllers and hash boards also.
The s5 controller gets power from ONE hashboard so they would both go on at the same time.
The other hashboard however may not get powered at the same time.
I've had to soft reboot when the second hashboard chips don't show up live after a power on
or when nicehash does a pool switch and the hashrate goes to ZERO on the miner.
Sometimes it never comes back and locks up, other times one hashboard comes back and no amount of soft reboot
will fix it. At that point a power cycle is needed.

Glad I have the remote control PDU's so I can remotely power cycle instead of going the the PSU
and toggling the switch.

I'm not sure WHY but what do happen is that when a board is "powered" without a controller. Its not actually "on" its just connected to the energy supply. Then when the controller turn on, the blades all light up simultaneously.

I think there is probably not much risk to the hardware but its best to be cautious. Its probably just an issue of the controller sending a call to the boards and if its not already connected to an active power supply, it does not answer and thus is considered dead.

The last two hashboards I lost on s5's were the ones NOT connected to the controller.
At least it was easy to combine two hashboards from two half dead s5's and make a good one.
Also running an s5 with a bad hashboard connected will usually lock up after a bit for me but if you pull the hash cable off
the bad one it will run the other one by itself just fine.

Are you saying those two hashboard died because they were not powered at the same time as the controller? If they are all on the same PSU, they will all be powered at the same time, it does not matter afaik which board the controller is connected to.

But if you were powering the two boards on two different source, then that would be a pretty dread possibility that doing this can damage your hardware...

wolfen

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 523

Quote from: VirosaGITS on October 05, 2015, 04:37:56 PM

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 04:34:12 PM

Quote from: RichBC on October 05, 2015, 04:20:13 PM

Quote from: VirosaGITS on October 05, 2015, 03:49:03 PM

Quote from: wolfen on October 05, 2015, 03:47:00 PM

Do we know what the result is if you power the controller before the hash boards?
Do the hash boards not get detected?
Can you fix it with a soft reboot?

Yes you can fix it.
I've simply had the board not boot because it is not detected at boot.
I would probably avoid doing this as i'm unaware if there might be electrical issue related to this that would cause hardware damage.
Anyways, a soft reboot worked for me, but i didn't repeat the experience. Also a power cycling would definitively fix it if no damage was caused.

It's a great pity that we are having to guess why the instructions are to power up the Controller after the Hash boards. It would be much more useful if we were told what the problem(s) are if this is not done....

So to continue the guessing. In practice I suspect that most users are doing what they have always done and are powering up Controller & Hash Boards simultaneously, and are getting away with this?

There are then some reports of S7 that seem to have a lower Hash Rate & Higher HW errors either at switch on or after a power outage, that can be fixed by a Software Reboot, which could be interpreted as being the same as powering up the Hash Boards first, so perhaps this is the reason?

My latest best guess on the reason is nothing to do with the above problems but all to do with the fact that the controller now has a separate supply whereas in the past it was powered from the hash board and hence was powered simultaneously, with no risk that the Controller could be powered & the Hash Board not.

I think what Bitmain is guarding against is a situation where only the Controller is powered at the point that the Hash boards start taking power. The reason being that I suspect there is then a risk that the unpowered Hash Board attempts to take current from the Controller?

Unfortunately just another guess, but there you go.

Rich

This scenario happens with s5 controllers and hash boards also.
The s5 controller gets power from ONE hashboard so they would both go on at the same time.
The other hashboard however may not get powered at the same time.
I've had to soft reboot when the second hashboard chips don't show up live after a power on
or when nicehash does a pool switch and the hashrate goes to ZERO on the miner.
Sometimes it never comes back and locks up, other times one hashboard comes back and no amount of soft reboot
will fix it. At that point a power cycle is needed.

Glad I have the remote control PDU's so I can remotely power cycle instead of going the the PSU
and toggling the switch.

I'm not sure WHY but what do happen is that when a board is "powered" without a controller. Its not actually "on" its just connected to the energy supply. Then when the controller turn on, the blades all light up simultaneously.

I think there is probably not much risk to the hardware but its best to be cautious. Its probably just an issue of the controller sending a call to the boards and if its not already connected to an active power supply, it does not answer and thus is considered dead.

The last two hashboards I lost on s5's were the ones NOT connected to the controller.
At least it was easy to combine two hashboards from two half dead s5's and make a good one.
Also running an s5 with a bad hashboard connected will usually lock up after a bit for me but if you pull the hash cable off
the bad one it will run the other one by itself just fine.

Topic: ANTMINER S7 is available at bitmaintech.com with 4.86TH/s, 0.25J/GH - page 328. (Read 527809 times)